Insurrection 2021

[RomanesEuntDomus]

Saying you won't hear a case on the outcome of the Presidential Election, due to "standing" isn't politically a good look. If I was SCOTUS and wanted to nip this in the bud I'd take the case on hear all the evidence and if it wasn't up to scratch tell them to fuck off. You want at least to give the impression you have some transparency of Democracy.

It's a state bringing a case to the Supreme Court. It's a historical moment. Saying you won't even hear the case due to "standing" is like saying "just fuck off, they can do whatever, fuck laws". When SCOTUS says "fuck laws" where are we headed?

Trump rattled his sabre and REEEd about his awesome, unbeatable evidence, when he was asked to come forward with it, his lawyers went full Lionel Hutz-tier incompetence going "Uh... hearsay is technically a type of evidence, right?" He had such a weak fucking case that hearing it in court would have had no merrit. If he has evidence strong enough to warrant a meritious hearing in court, he needs to put that forward -at least to some degree- to get a hearing. Going "I have amazing evidence, in fact, the greatest evidence, you can ask anybody- last week I was talking to Guiliani and he said 'boy, that's some great evidence' and I said 'yeah' and y'know, y'know... that's how this works, I know how this works, we have great evidence. So please hear us in court. We'll bring the evidence then. Pinky Swear!" won't help. If he had such amazing evidence for his mind-blowing accusations is anyone's guess. I bet Q-tards claim that he needed to keep it secret, cause otherwise the Deeps State would have been able to do something nasty. Basically, the Q-tard version of the emperor's new clothes. "That's some amazing evidence that only the enlightened such as us can see!" only when someone goes "There is no evidence", the Q-tards piss themselves crying and accusing the other party of being a traitor Antifa paid by Soros or something instead of coming to terms with their own gullibility.

This whole thing has the most retarded line of thought behind it anyway it might as well go:
"Hurr. Dear supreme court, allow me to present my case: The Moonkaiser stole the election with the hollow-earth reptiloids after using Santa's global communist logistics network, an angel told me in my dreams!"
"Durr. The supreme court refuses to hear me out on this, if it was as stupid as they said, they could allow me to make my case in court propperly and throw me out - if it was as easy to dismiss as they claim! But since they didn't allow me to go to court, this means they have something to hide and I am correct and this is a conspiracy!"


It's a shittily build frivolous case supported with poor evidence being cockblocked from wasting the judge's time just to humor a bunch of boomer Donaldrones.
The fact that Trump couldn't win over enough judges to hear him out isn't proof that the game is rigged against him, but rather that his case was that fucking bad. Deal with it.

Instead, people specifically mentioned that they couldn't handle the stickers

Just a hunch, but to me, this reeks of newfags and refugees from /pol/ or whatever, who simply can't deal with being in a subforum that hasn't become an echochamber for their retarded doompost bullshit faggotry and who get their knickers in a knot when they see someone gave them the trashcan or tophat. And given some of the reactions, the idea that these faggots follow an election for the first or maybe second time around holds more and more ground.

 

[Maradontia]

FTFY

Here's the real map.

https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1338650030576689152/photo/1

 

[Taco]

Here's the real map.

https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1338650030576689152/photo/1

This is the real map without all the (((fraud)))

 

[your fricky]

F-fraud...? Huh?
Oh, human...

 

[alreadyhome]

Well, yes, if all you're doing is political theater, led by the AG of Texas, who wants to be the Governor of Texas or maybe a Senator from Texas, it's going to be hard to file a case with any basis in law.

Trump has taken in $200 mill from gullible boomers- probably over $300 mill at this point. If he was serious about overturning the results of the election, why hasn't he hired on actual Supreme Court guns on his staff, guys like Paul Clement, rather than Giuliani- who is a politician not a lawyer- and some ho he saw on Fox News? Real Supreme Court specialists were there for Bush v. Gore, they aren't now. He isn't short of money.. his only problem is that credible lawyers don't want to embarrass themselves by filing joke cases.

He went with Guiliani because the relatively higher chance of not being betrayed was worth more than higher skilled but potentially disloyal or tentative representation.

Saying you won't hear a case on the outcome of the Presidential Election, due to "standing" isn't politically a good look. If I was SCOTUS and wanted to nip this in the bud I'd take the case on hear all the evidence and if it wasn't up to scratch tell them to fuck off. You want at least to give the impression you have some transparency of Democracy.

Baris and Barnes said it was the equivalent of a parent not caring about their child.

I don't know, bud. Why don't you know what an American five-year old could be expected to know about American law or elections?

Most five year olds don't know much about law or elections...perhaps your future children will be elite brains like yourself.

 

[⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛]

He went with Guiliani because the relatively higher chance of not being betrayed was worth more than higher skilled but potentially disloyal or tentative representation.

How's that 'fall back on NY cronyism' strategy working out for Trump so far? 0-40 I believe?

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

Can you retards stop big-text posting? People are going to read your posts without it and it just comes off as "THIS IS SUPER IMPORTANT OMGZORZ" when it's nothing. It's like some people were just made aware fonts come in all sizes or something.

I don't understand how, but people who dislike Trump are STILL fucking mad because MAGAs and people who they perceive as such are not shutting up like they want them to. People aren't going to stop talking about this for years, what the fuck do you expect? "Oh Biden won! Welp that's that!"?
You still hear people say Bush stole the election from Gore and that's not going to stop until those retards die. Stop expecting people to shut up over it just because that's what you think makes sense.

This low video quality + the people involved reminds me that this is the proper way to use deepfakes to spread whatever BS someone wants. It'd naturally be called fake but any controversial leak would be (see: Hunter Biden)
I don't doubt this one, though I wonder who would leak it and I don't really see what's controversial about this except for him saying blacks need to be ready to work with hispanics. Blacks aren't going to take over America ever based on population trends so this is exceptionally retarded and misguided imo. Oh and racist but that's pretty standard.

Us anti-Trump folks aren't mad. We're laughing our asses off at the Trumper's cope and salt. It's fucking hilarious how badly they're taking this, especially after all the shit they talked the past 4 years (particularly how they made fun of the Hillary fans for how badly they took 2016).

And the video was released, in full, last weekend I think. I haven't watched it, but it's obvious he's not saying "doomed" but he's saying "due", as in the country is due to have work done to help ease racial tensions. You'd think Kiwi Farmers, of all people, would be aware of how easy it is to take clips and make them appear worse than they are, but the past month and a half has shown that's not the case.

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

https://twitter.com/ChuckCallesto/status/1341519068596199425
https://archive.vn/0pvpW

https://www.citizenfreepress.com/br...s-the-presidents-use-of-the-insurrection-act/

Citizen Free Press incorrectly reported the following story for (45 minutes) earlier this evening. We made the mistake of relying on a tweet from a congressional candidate. The Insurrection Act amendment was actually part of H.R. 6395, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2021.

https://escobar.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=393
https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/2020/07/20/house-section/article/H3114-2

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

https://twitter.com/ChuckCallesto/status/1341519068596199425
https://archive.vn/0pvpW
View attachment 1805703

This means something!

 

[Kknd]

The insurrection act is not a coup cause as it's checked by the judicial branch. If Trump calls it over the election the courts would shut it down. Insurrection act then is out of the picture so if the "generals supported it" that would just be a military coup, which is definitively Q-boomer fiction.

There's a nice Andrew Jackson quote that is relevant.

"The Supreme Court has made its decision, now let them enforce it."

There is also this:

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/316115-trump-hangs-portrait-of-andrew-jackson-in-oval-office

Do you not understand that if half the population and the president believe the system is broken it comes down to naked force. There are no checks and balances then. Luckily there are still about four ways this can be resolved without the insurrection act or even a counter coup.

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

Do you not understand that if half the population and the president believe the system is broken it comes down to naked force. There are no checks and balances then. Luckily there are still about four ways this can be resolved without the insurrection act or even a counter coup.

I do think we should avoid inflammatory rhetoric like 'counter-coup' and instead use something more neutral like 'The President used the Insurrection Act to prevent violations of the equal protection clause and Article II Clause 2 in states and to ensure that every legal vote was counted'.

Clearly in this case the rule of law and liberty would be enhanced whereas a coup implies some sort of break to the constitutional order like that which you'd get by rigging elections to put a Manchurian candidate into office.

Comparisons to Andrew Jackson seem a bit off too. Andrews Jackson was a genocidal racist, tyrant, murderer, and Democrat. Trump is a friend of all True Americans and if he were to invoke the Insurrection Act it would be out of love and the Christmas spirit.

 

[Sped Xing]

I cannot believe you faggots won't admit Biden won and pay me my two dollars. That's only 30 minutes worth of work at your jobs.

And nobody cares that you almost joined the Marine Corps.

Comparisons to Andrew Jackson seem a bit off too. Andrews Jackson was a genocidal racist, tyrant, murderer, and Democrat. Trump is a friend of all True Americans and if he were to invoke the Insurrection Act it would be out of love and the Christmas spirit.

Andrew Jackson I'd vote for.

 

[Kknd]

I do think we should avoid inflammatory rhetoric like 'counter-coup' and instead using something more neutral like 'The President used the Insurrection Act to prevent violations of the equal protection clause and Article II Clause 2 in states and to ensure that every legal vote was counted'.

Clearly in this case the rule of law and liberty would be enhanced whereas a coup implies some sort of break to the constitutional order like that which you'd get by rigging elections to put a Manchurian candidate into office.

Comparisons to Andrew Jackson seem a bit off two. Andrews Jackson was a genocidal racist and Democrat. Trump is a friend of all True Americans.

I do think you should avoid getting high on your own farts. You're not half as clever or informed as you think you are. You can't even parse simple english.

No, literally counter coup as in I have the military, the food and the production capacity. As opposed to the insurrection act or whatever legal avenues exist.

 

[JaneThough]

Disgusting? Let me give you some advice, if I may.

STOP USING RUSSIAN EMAIL ADDRESSES FOR AMERICAN BASED SOCIAL MEDIA SITES.

I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'RE MENTALLY DEFICIENT OR IF YOU ROAD THE SHORT BUS IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, BUT STOP DOING IT. IF YOU'RE CONNECTED TO THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH OR ANY BRANCH OF US GOVERNMENT, STOP USING RUSSIAN EMAILS TO HACK AND STALK US SOCIAL MEDIA AND GOVERNMENT SITES.

Spamming sites with Russian emails aren't going to change the election outcomes. I'm sorry. Find another cause to get behind like save the whales.

This is our KRAKEN, Trumptards!

 

[Aidan]

Us anti-Trump folks aren't mad. We're laughing our asses off at the Trumper's cope and salt. It's fucking hilarious how badly they're taking this, especially after all the shit they talked the past 4 years (particularly how they made fun of the Hillary fans for how badly they took 2016).

And the video was released, in full, last weekend I think. I haven't watched it, but it's obvious he's not saying "doomed" but he's saying "due", as in the country is due to have work done to help ease racial tensions. You'd think Kiwi Farmers, of all people, would be aware of how easy it is to take clips and make them appear worse than they are, but the past month and a half has shown that's not the case.

I see more "Y R U MAD" than I do actual people being mad around here. Plenty of crazies but I don't know if I'd call what I see in the wild "salt" since it's mostly bernie-tier "he can still win!" and the usual Q-tier conspiracies circulated by bored boomers.
I don't care what anyone wants to call it, but I don't know any glorious salt mines and I don't see any Trump outrage compilations floating around. Considering current events and general ideology, I expect them not to post videos to social media bitching about the election being stolen and instead buy guns, ammo, tubs of dubious contents for consumption, etc.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

There's a nice Andrew Jackson quote that is relevant.

"The Supreme Court has made its decision, now let them enforce it."

There is also this:

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/316115-trump-hangs-portrait-of-andrew-jackson-in-oval-office

Do you not understand that if half the population and the president believe the system is broken it comes down to naked force. There are no checks and balances then. Luckily there are still about four ways this can be resolved without the insurrection act or even a counter coup.

Trump can throw his temper tantrum all he wants, but on January 20th, the secret service will throw him out of the white house

 

[KimCoppolaAficionado]

I do think you should avoid getting high on your own farts. You're not half as clever or informed as you think you are. You can't even parse simple english.

No, literally counter coup as in I have the military, the food and the production capacity. As opposed to the insurrection act or whatever legal avenues exist.

So masks off, Trump just declares himself President-for-Life? Because if you think Trump of all people will be a Cincinnatus and go back to Mar-a-Lago after your perceived crisis is over, you have the reasoning abilities of a gerbil. Of course, that's all assuming the military will fall in lock-step with an extrajudicial coup when the current Pentagon staff hate his guts, but sure, let's assume the grunts and boots will all decide to shatter the chain of command.

 

[XYZpdq]

https://twitter.com/ChuckCallesto/status/1341519068596199425
https://archive.vn/0pvpW
View attachment 1805703


https://www.citizenfreepress.com/br...s-the-presidents-use-of-the-insurrection-act/

Thanks for the specific gov links. So is this the gajillion dollars to gender programs in Pakistan / six hundred bucks to Joe Six-pack omnibus or something else?

 

[DocHoliday1977]

The military doesn't love him as much as he thinks.

 

[DeadFish]

I do think we should avoid inflammatory rhetoric like 'counter-coup' and instead use something more neutral like 'The President used the Insurrection Act to prevent violations of the equal protection clause and Article II Clause 2 in states and to ensure that every legal vote was counted'.

Clearly in this case the rule of law and liberty would be enhanced whereas a coup implies some sort of break to the constitutional order like that which you'd get by rigging elections to put a Manchurian candidate into office.

Comparisons to Andrew Jackson seem a bit off too. Andrews Jackson was a genocidal racist, tyrant, murderer, and Democrat. Trump is a friend of all True Americans and if he were to invoke the Insurrection Act it would be out of love and the Christmas spirit.

I said it before and Ill say again.
The only way any faction can stop the other faction is via violence or causing a 1990s Russian style collapse. The establishment wants to crush populist. The populists want violence cause they realize the establishment wants them dead or enslaved.

There isnt any other solution.
To talk further about said solution on these forums is to at bare minimum get your dog shot and very worst waking up in Guantánamo bay.