Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

Whoa there lads, where to start?

First of all, I didn't make it onto your exhibit list? Rude.

Second, the actual exhibits are fucking retarded.

One is an email basically saying "I'm an admin lol we doxed you and we'll dox your kids too" but with no way to tie it in with any concrete members. A toddler could have written it. It's not even an email from Josh, who she is suing.

Another is a videogame meme used by Deadpool, with no threatening statements.

Another is a user saying Melinda would sue the user "For threatening to kill her," but never outright threatening her.

Then the multi-tiered sperging motions, each one sounding like a cut and paste job of the last. The amount of times she's said "No name on the service doesn't invalidate it" is akin to a child chanting something to make it true.

The only new thing she tries (And fails) to do is claim that the farms are funding Josh's lawyer. She has no concrete dollar value on compensation he has received, and I would guess that the amount is drastically lower than what he's paid on this case.

The rest is Melinda just nitpicking over dates. Basically saying "Yeah, well IF I had gotten this thing, then things would have been better SO GIVE ME THE THING I WANT! I WANT IT SOOOOOO BAD!"
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Miel67, Botchy Galoop, Viridian and 5 others
PomegranateKing said:
Whoa there lads, where to start?

First of all, I didn't make it onto your exhibit list? Rude.

Second, the actual exhibits are fucking retarded.

One is an email basically saying "I'm an admin lol we doxed you and we'll dox your kids too" but with no way to tie it in with any concrete members. A toddler could have written it. It's not even an email from Josh, who she is suing.

Another is a videogame meme used by Deadpool, with no threatening statements.

Another is a user saying Melinda would sue the user "For threatening to kill her," but never outright threatening her.

Then the multi-tiered sperging motions, each one sounding like a cut and paste job of the last. The amount of times she's said "No name on the service doesn't invalidate it" is akin to a child chanting something to make it true.

The only new thing she tries (And fails) to do is claim that the farms are funding Josh's lawyer. She has no concrete dollar value on compensation he has received, and I would guess that the amount is drastically lower than what he's paid on this case.

The rest is Melinda just nitpicking over dates. Basically saying "Yeah, well IF I had gotten this thing, then things would have been better SO GIVE ME THE THING I WANT! I WANT IT SOOOOOO BAD!"
Click to expand...
Dont forget that it was a videogame meme with no threatening statements, that she acknowledged wasn't actually a threat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Miel67 and Useful_Mistake
@SIGSEGV
sig_quote.png

sig_exibit.png

@Deadpool You should be scared EXHIBIT C John Doe 1
deadpool_quote.png

bender_lol.png


She also wants the court to force Null to handover IP's. There are so many grammatical errors in that submission that it's hard to fathom just how she can be so bad with a modern text editor. You're a special kind of stupid Melinda.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Optimistic
  • Lunacy
Reactions: AmateurComedicTaxidermist, Botchy Galoop, Orange Rhymer and 4 others
PomegranateKing said:
The only new thing she tries (And fails) to do is claim that the farms are funding Josh's lawyer. She has no concrete dollar value on compensation he has received, and I would guess that the amount is drastically lower than what he's paid on this case.
Click to expand...
And that's actually not relevant. How Josh pays his lawyer, or indeed if he pays him at all, is between Josh and his lawyer. It is none of the court's, or Melinda's, concern.

It's rich though that she's complaining about her adversary getting his legal fees paid when she's not paying any legal fees!
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: AmateurComedicTaxidermist, Botchy Galoop, ConSluttant and 2 others
I reread every thing, and I needed to rename the files so that they made sense to me. Otherwise they all look very similar. No less than 6 of the filings are Melinda screeching like a monkey for the user info that she thinks Josh has. The judge ruled to give Josh more time before he has to produce anything. Mel has reacted by screeching at Josh's lawyer, and the judge that she wants this info NOW NOW NOW!! Pretty sure she knows that this case is about to get tossed, just like all the other ones.
She includes the strangest things in her filings, like the above mentioned Josh's supposedly crowdfunding here for lawyer fees. Or claiming that Josh's lawyer is attempting to show her in a " bad light" umm, duhh, that's his job. Making statements about a video that pissed off new Zealand, the suicide of Julie terryberry, and the behaviors of user's unrelated to Josh are doing what exactly? Attempting to show him in a glowing one? In any case, not really relevant, but ok. Whatever.
The more she runs her mouth, the more she fucks up.
While Christmas day may be the only court holiday, the fact that she doesn't understand that having consideration for the judge and courthouse staff might help her case is very typical, of her. Bitch.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Miel67, Botchy Galoop, Kosher Salt and 5 others
LoverofPi said:
What, you can't convert between them in your head?




Oof, my sympathies. Is it a dry or a wet heat?
Click to expand...
Dry heat. Very dry, at least last summer. This summer it's relatively wet. Last summer was a nightmare.
talk talk talk said:
CourtListener seems to be down right now, so I don't know if RECAP got all of Smelly's new filings. Here they are from PACER.
Click to expand...
Why does she need null to tell her when people sign up to kiwi farms? It's publicly available when you click on their profile.

And employment? Lol

And she is hard-strung that she thinks nulls address was that place in florida. She doesn't listen.

Edit: she thinks null travelled only for a holiday? Lol. And no one us whining not to do this over Christmas (IDK if null even is religious), if anything these filings are an early christmas gift

And LOL she thinks a pic of a video game character is threatening? Lol @Alex Krycek
 
Last edited:
Maybe at some point I will do a thorough dissection of Smelly's arguments, but I just want to hit on one thing that's been bugging me and I did like five minutes of research and since she shouldn't be filing any more on the issue, pointing this out here won't help her.

Smelly loves a quote she cites to a case called Wade v. Alamanace C'nty Dept. of Soc. Servs. Wade is a case out of North Carolina decided this summer brought by some Smelly-like lolcow suing a bunch of county agencies for the termination of her parental rights. It doesn't appear to be collected in Federal Supplement (Third), but you can read the order here: https://casetext.com/case/wade-v-alamance-cnty-dept-of-soc-servs-1

Marsha Wade, just like Smelly, fucked up service. The District Court dismisses her insane claims for various reasons relating to personal and subject matter jurisdiction. Wade lost, just like Smelly will lose.

What Smelly keeps quoting from Wade is this:

​
"When there is actual notice, every technical violation of the rule or failure of strict compliance may not invalidate the service of process" (emphasis added) (Wade v. Alamance Caunty Department Of Social Services, Dist. Court, MD North Carolina 2020 citing Armco, Inc. v. Penrod-Stauffer Bldg. Sys., Inc., 733 F.2d 1087, 1089 (4th Cir. 1984)​
​

The portion in qutotation marks is a direct quote from the Fourth Circuit case of Armco. If Smelly was doing actual research rather than cutting and pasting bits of things she found on the internet, she would have cited directly to Armco, which is binding precedent, rather than to Wade, which is just another district court case.

But! Let's take a look at Armco. The sentence quoted by the Wade court and Smelly is only part of a paragraph. The entire paragraph is:

The defendant, of course, had notice that an action had been commenced by the filing of a complaint. When the process gives the defendant actual notice of the pendency of the action, the rules, in general, are entitled to a liberal construction. When there is actual notice, every technical violation of the rule or failure of strict compliance may not invalidate the service of process. But the rules are there to be followed, and plain requirements for the means of effecting service of process may not be ignored. This is particularly so when the means employed engenders the kind of confusion which the defendant's officers reasonably experienced here, leaving them without clear notice of the necessity to respond.​

Armco, Inc. v. Penrod-Staufer Bldg. Sys., 733 F.2d 1087, 1089 (4th Cir. 1984).

Smelly only quotes the sentence in italics. She does not quote (and likely has not read) the immediately following sentence in bold, which sets forth the rule. The Armco court, in fact, held service was not effective and reversed the district court's refusal to grant relief from the default.

(Free link to Armco for the curious: https://casetext.com/case/armco-inc-v-penrod-stauffer-bldg-systems)
 
  • Informative
  • Winner
  • DRINK!
Reactions: TurboNAS, Botchy Galoop, ConSluttant and 6 others
Ask Jeeves said:
She also wants the court to force Null to handover IP's. There are so many grammatical errors in that submission that it's hard to fathom just how she can be so bad with a modern text editor. You're a special kind of stupid Melinda.
Click to expand...
So she still thinks the IP's are going to help her, despite being told multiple times by members replying here that most, if not all of us using VPN's and/or TOR completely invalidates any and all IP data she might get. My current circuit is in fucking Switzerland.

Time to sue the Swiss!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt, ConSluttant, Ask Jeeves and 2 others
redcent said:
Dry heat. Very dry, at least last summer. This summer it's relatively wet. Last summer was a nightmare.

Why does she need null to tell her when people sign up to kiwi farms? It's publicly available when you click on their profile.

And employment? Lol

And she is hard-strung that she thinks nulls address was that place in florida. She doesn't listen.
Click to expand...

Lol at her getting from Null actual dates of birth and city/state/country. Even the IPs really. If her findings were that John Does have IPs in Nicaragua, Portugal and Morocco, wtf is she gonna do anyway?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ken Jennings, Shaka Brah, redcent and 1 other person
fnaarf said:
You should send this to Null's lawyer if you haven't already.
Click to expand...
I posted it in the dedicated lawsuit thread, and tagged Null. I figure if it's relevant he'll pass it on to his lawyer. I also posted it here in case the lawyer is reading this thread. I'd also send him a PM but I don't want to annoy Null or his lawyer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ken Jennings, Useful_Mistake and super thug
Pork Fried Rice said:
You will only be spared if you become her sex slave. She's got to be going through the nympho version of withdrawal since Marshmellow hasn't put his pinto bean in her lately, and Deadpool keeps cruelly rejecting her.
Click to expand...
Now she's claiming she's still with Manlet Castersen and is lying to us for reasons connected to some "investigation" she's doing. Either she's so desperate for a win she's claiming that she's still fucking an abusive rapist, or she's still fucking an abusive rapist. It's funny because both of those choices makes her look like the utter loser that she is.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Ken Jennings, Botchy Galoop, Kosher Salt and 7 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back