Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger) 2: The Revenge

[autisticdragonkin]

The harm I've caused. You've certainly caused me no harm, unless I'll be shot by you tomorrow or something.

Us Kiwis are a supportive community who does not harm to anybody. We enter peoples lives when they are having problems and then give them a gentle hugbox that they can live in until they achieve recovery and bloom into the flower that they are inside. Isn't this right @Holden

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

@Holden confirmed for not even understanding himself.

No, I want confirmation you understand me. And I just got that you don't.

Ffs, entire book describes rape as a secondary mating strategy. I don't even know which part you want.

then give them a gentle hugbox that they can live in until they achieve recovery and bloom into the flower that they are inside

I know this is just sarcasm, but still - nobody doing that would deny the actual solutions like you do.

Ooops. I did misread you on the harm thing, Otaku. Sorry.

 

[autisticdragonkin]

I know this is just sarcasm, but still - nobody doing that would deny the actual solutions like you do.

how are we denying you solutions

 

[HickoryDickory]

They're coming around now.

What do you mean?

 

[deductionotaku]

The harm I've caused.

Supplied, even though this wasn't broached until you brought it up.

You've certainly caused me no harm, unless I'll be shot by you tomorrow or something.

Exactly as I stated, you delude yourself into not recognizing this truth everybody else can see. Some of them have even pointed it out for you, not including the one I supplied. Hell, you make it clear as day that many of us harm you when you refuse to quote or tag us, and sometimes even go further to block us. But here you are, ignoring anything that threatens to shatter your fantasy world.

 

[Owlflaps]

Political correctness, dumbass.

Lol. Maybe you fail at English. What does "testing" a friend have to do with political correctness? That was a non-sequitur.

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

You actually took a discussion on how straight people are unaffected by laws concerning gay people and spontaneously decided we were talking about gay people's feelings

Nope, it talks about straight people's feelings.

It mentions you supporting the right to rape 12 year old girls.

And, no, it doesn't mention it. It just basically says that everybody has this de facto right already in the West. Why? Because of things you support. Don't blame me for your own crimes, pal.

Lol. Maybe you fail at English. What does "testing" a friend have to do with political correctness?

It's a normal word for that. PC made it seem it is not, since PC hates all quality, and testing is often done to check this.

S
Hell, you make it clear as day that many of us harm you when you refuse to quote or tag us.

Look, this isn't even funny or even cooky anymore. It's just bizzare.

 

[Owlflaps]

It's a normal word for that. PC made it seem it is not, since PC hates all quality, and testing is often done to check this.

Confirmed: @Holden has no idea how to make friends.

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

But here you are, ignoring anything that threatens to shatter your fantasy world.

Posters with best and most respectful arguments weren't blocked but followed by me. Even idiots like Macie weren't blocked.

Those blocked were hopeless lunatics or people I have a problem with outside of the forum itself.

 

[Emiya Kiwitsugu]

No, I want confirmation you understand me. And I just got that you don't.

Ffs, entire book describes rape as a secondary mating strategy. I don't even know which part you want.

What part I want? No, it should be the part you want. I have no idea what the book may or may not say, you're the one who has supposedly read it. You're the one citing the book as your defense, it's up to you to show us the part that supports your argument. Were we to be discussing math as our argument, and I cited something from Newton's Principa as my defense, I'd have to explain what part of the books I'm referring to. I can't just say, "Oh, uh, all of it?" No, I'd have to point to wherein the information that supports my argument lies. Now, for your book that you mentioned, you said...

If they already took that into account with a decision to try and breed that way than the risks were acceptable. Thornhill and Palmer (2000) discuss this.

So, @Holden, why won't you site the section where they discuss the rapists having taken into account the possibility or their execution as punishment for the rape? It should be easy, after all, I'm sure you read the entire book...Right?

 

[HickoryDickory]

It's a normal word for that. PC made it seem it is not, since PC hates all quality, and testing is often done to check this.

Marijan, people are not electronics. One does not "test" people they consider (Or wish to consider) friends. All I can imagine is is you want to see who will and who won't be there beside you until you push it so far, that they just give up on you... Just so you can say "There! You see! Traitor!" when that is not the case at all...

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

What part I want? No, it should be the part you want. I have no idea what the book may or may not say, you're the one who has supposedly read it.

Yes, and it argues that rape is a secondary mating strategy that has some chance of success. Through, like, all of its chapters and pages. Just like Marx argues for communism on page 1,2,3.... Get it?

people are not electronics. One does not "test" people they consider (Or wish to consider) friends.

That's this correctness I was talking about.

 

[autisticdragonkin]

It's a normal word for that. PC made it seem it is not, since PC hates all quality, and testing is often done to check this.

Look at it this way: If you lived in your dream fascist state then you would be in an extermination camp right now. Political correctness is the only thing keeping you alive.

 

[Emiya Kiwitsugu]

Yes, and it argues that rape is a secondary mating strategy that has some chance of success. Through, like, all of its chapters and pages. Just like Marx argues for communism on page 1,2,3.... Get it?

You argued very specifically that the part you were referencing claims that the rapist would've been aware of the potential retribution for their crime, and have taken that possible retribution into account before committing the rape. Here, I'll even put your quote in as an image so it's harder for you to ignore it.

Now, why don't you reference that part?

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

Look at it this way: If you lived in your dream fascist state

And now I decide to look away and mock you.

 

[deductionotaku]

Nope, it talks about straight people's feelings.

It did, until you decided to twist it and spontaneously talk about gay people's feelings.

And, no, it doesn't mention it. It just basically says that everybody has this de facto right already in the West.

Not even close to what you said. Keep moving that goal post.

Why? Because of things you support. Don't blame me for your own crimes, pal.

I'm still waiting for you to provide any evidence I support any such thing.

Look, this isn't even funny or even cooky anymore. It's just bizzare.

Avoiding the issue, as usual.

Posters with best and most respectful arguments weren't blocked but followed by me.

You've got that backwards. Those with the best and most respectful ones are the only ones you've blocked. Anyone who challenges you and proves once and for all that they can school you invariably winds up blocked. The only ones you don't are those who don't challenge (Horse), those who mostly poke fun at you instead of digging in and thus aren't a serious threat (Owlflaps), or those who can convince you they're not a serious threat even though they actually are and have begun to obsess over (4Macie).

Those blocked were hopeless lunatics or people I have a problem with outside of the forum itself.

You've only labeled them lunatics because they disagreed with you and chased your points down until you exhausted all of your places to run.

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

You argued very specifically that the part you were referencing claims that the rapist would've been aware of the potential retribution for their crime, and have taken that possible retribution into account before committing the rape. Here, I'll even put your quote in as an image so it's harder for you to ignore it.



Now, why don't you reference that part?

The entire books claims this. It's claim was that rape was/is a secondary mating strategy. Just briefly from the Wikipedia article, They argue that the capacity for rape is either an adaptation, or, a byproduct of adaptative traits such as sexual desire and aggressiveness that have evolved for reasons that have no direct connection with the benefits or costs of rape.

It did, until you decided to twist it and spontaneously talk about gay people's feelings.

No, I didn't. All the time I talked about feelings of straight people who had the legal institute they had for thousands of years expanded and thus taken from exclusively them. I haven't mentioned a single word about feelings of gay people. I mentioned some guy was castrated and called him poor for that, but that has nothing to do with feelings of gay people but with an insane Roman emperor.

Stop bullshitting me. I told you I won't put up with it.

 

[HickoryDickory]

That's this correctness I was talking about.

I figured you would edit my post to ignore the part that hurts. That's the only way you are able to protect yourself and your delusionary ideals from reality. (None of which would work in the real world. It would all end in the same way as in any past society, by evolution or revolution)

If you weren't so paranoid and uptight, you'd be a lot happier.

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

Not even close to what you said. Keep moving that goal post.

It did say that. How did it say I said men should have the right to do that? Analyse the post and tell me.

I figured you would edit my post to ignore the part that hurts.

It didn't hurt me cause I didn't read it. Your first sentence here as well is enough to make my brain hurt already.

 

[Emiya Kiwitsugu]

The entire books claims this. It's claim was that rape was/is a secondary mating strategy.

You claimed specifically that they would've accounted for retribution against their crimes when making the call to rape someone. Not that it was simply a mating strategy.

Just briefly from the Wikipedia article

Ladies and gentlemen, here's the only thing about the book he ever read: The Wikipedia article. Admit it, @Holden, you never read the damn book, you saw it mentioned somewhere, skimmed over the Wikipedia article, and that was it. You didn't even read the article on the psychological effects that occur during rape, like hell you read an entire 250-page book on biology and anthropology.

Just admit it, you're only embarrassing yourself more than usual when you attempt to skirt this.