You're suffering a narcissistic injury to your patriarchal world order
Citacion, please.
THIS IS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NOT CHINA. Go read the First Amendment.
THIS IS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WHERE PEOPLE ARE FREE TO HOLD RELIGIOUS BELIEFS WIT
Oh, boy, you are just repeating your old talking points.
THE PRACTICE OF RELIGION is protected too, you're an idiot.
You know nothing about the concept of a State Actor and you clearly don't understand the First Amendment. You're a bunch of international stalkers trying to attack the American Constitution
The First Amendment reads:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"
You are a moron with a memory of a goldfish. Back in October I debunked every single of your First Amendment points. You can see my posts
here, and
here. In those posts, I used SCOTUS rullings to show just how limited the First Amendment is.
Suppose, for a moment, that 1st is as absolute as you think, why do Muslim murderers get arrested in USA? Their religion encourages murder of non-believers. Why satanists are arrested? Their(they have many different sects, but most embrace sacrifices in Lucifer's name) religion encourages murder. Shouldn't 1st make them immune? No, because no one is retarded enough to think that 1st gives a murder immunity, and SCOTUS, on many occations, has limited the first amendment.
If the 1st was as absolute as you think, why couldn't Epstein make up a pedo-loving religion(or just proclaim himself a muslim) and why did he get arrested? Seems like, according to you, he had a easy way to misuse the law.
You can't even get The Creator's name right, you think you're fit to judge me?
Everyone is fit to judge you.
You're a bunch of foreigners trying to attack the US Constitution.
Citacion, please. Also, it's weird how us alleged "foreigners" know the constitution better than you, an American.
Is she actually mentally capable?
She can barely read, and thinks everyone hates her for being a woman, so, I'm gonna say no.
Practice is restricted only when it interferes with another person's constitutional rights to life, liberty and property. Or animal rights.
"It's absolute"
"Okay, it's limited"
Lol, nice.
You don't have a First Amendment right. You're aren't the press.
Did this retard just say that the first only applies to the press? That's even more shocking, considering how often she uses the 1st to justify neglecting her children
WRONG. Kiwi Farms community is just as guilty for Defamation and Cyber Stalking.
No. We don't fit § 18.2-152.7:1, and we don't lie about you either. If we are wrong about something, very likely we had a good faith reason to believe that(and that protects us under the 1st)(st. amant v. thompson)
No, it's not protected. Accusing someone of a felony publicly is Defamation per se.
We all have Good Faith as defined by St. Amant v. Thompson as to why you are a child abuser, comming from the facts you yourself have stated.