Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger) 2: The Revenge

Status
Not open for further replies.
Whelp we're probably going to reach the end of this thread in an hour or so. What now?

We rip apart @Holden's arguments when he tries to argue one of his dumb points, and make fun of him when he says something unintentionally silly. Like when he reveals his sexual attraction to unicorns, dolphins and skunks.

Edit: Just as the sun shall rise each day, so will Holdin shitpost eternally.
 
We rip apart @Holden's arguments
Like you do, with constantly making strawman after strawman I have to point out?

I like @Holden's attempts to justify his strawmanning of Fareal's post by strawmanning mine.
How did I strawman Fareal? If you don't want to be seen as diagnosing online don't mention actual diseases. You're an idiot going "She mentioned you have this and that but didn't diagnose you!"

How did I strawman you?
 
Can someone else ask him how many arguments he's won, considering he's said he never lost any?
 
But that's the issue, though - I am not.

You are somebody who's been laughed at my me hundreds of times for your delusional posts. Your posts make no sense, and I've been replying to you saying that over and over. If you tell me I'm not in tune with reality it's like somebody locked up in max security ward is telling me that.

Cause, you know, how come nobody irl is saying this? Here's what your reply will be - a lie that I don't communicate with anybody there, which is something you can't know and the only way to be consistent and deny it is to deny all I ever said, not the things you don't like.

That's what you are, Macie. A nut.

You'd want your own son jailed for not hurting women, ffs.
Everyone IRL is saying what I've been saying. You are the only one not saying it (well you and other loveshy). While I may have been laughed at by you 100 times, you've been laughed at by hundreds of people thousands of times.

The opinions of someone like you doesn't matter to me. You're not well. We all know this.

And while I might be a nut, at least I can pleasure a woman, something you can never do. and really, who wants to be normal anyway. That's so boring.
 
I wonder if he knows one of the Golden Rules of the Internet... "if you have to put it in bold, large text, all caps, or any combination of those you aren't telling the truth."
 
  • Like
Reactions: cromit
Can someone please clear his blocklist and set his css to something where he can't find it or something

Also
  • Give him embarrassing wordfilters so that he accidentally pastes them back to his blog.
  • set a timer that backspaces his post field once every 5 seconds
  • change his font to comic sans
  • change his css into something visually painful to look at for 20 hours straight
  • add some nutcracker prince midi
  • activate the worst advertisements on the internet
  • \
throttling him made him do strangely hilarious shit I'm sure any of this will make him flip out and even though he's like kiwis house lulz on tap I wouldn't mind a seasonal change of flavor
 
How did I strawman Fareal? If you don't want to be seen as diagnosing online don't mention actual diseases. You're an idiot going "She mentioned you have this and that but didn't diagnose you!"

How did I strawman you?

Do you even know what a strawman is?

Also, @flossman wants to know how many arguments here you claim to have won.
 
How did I strawman Fareal? If you don't want to be seen as diagnosing online don't mention actual diseases. You're an idiot going "She mentioned you have this and that but didn't diagnose you!"

How did I strawman you?

Holden said:
Humanoid Email Address said:
Holden, you should know that simply saying, "Well people did x before and society didn't collapse so it's a good thing," isn't a very particularly good argument.
I agree. So good that it is not mine but your strawman.

Here, since the meth has unfortunately damage your brain in addition to teeth, I'll put it in an easy to understand format.

-On the topic of gay marriage, you had argued that because society had survived with the tradition that only straight marriage be allowed for centuries, it would be dumb to alter a system that was working well.

-I countered that your appeal to nothing but tradition was poor, because under similar traditions influenced by religion, it was procedure to burn heretics at the stake. As an atheist, you would be executed under these traditions.

-You counter by saying that you agree, and that you agree because it was my strawman and not your's.

To be honest, I'm not sure what the hell you were even trying to strawman in my argument, other than that you claimed I made a strawman argument. You didn't reference it yourself, and it seems you're not even aware what you accused of being a strawman now that you're asking me about what you yourself said was a strawman. You were the one who appealed to tradition, and accused my pointing out that your appeal to tradition could similarly have you killed, was somehow a strawman argument? I was literally just going off the same logic of the appeal you made, nothing more. And of course, you then accuse me of having made a strawman argument, despite the fact I couldn't possibly have done so there. The fact you added in false information to attack me is, in of itself, a strawman.

Are you happy now?
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Rin
Also, @flossman wants to know how many arguments here you claim to have won.
All that weren't about some fact I didn't initially know and was proven incorrect by actual evidence in a correct context. An example of an argument I lost would be one I had on Skype with Lalala. I claimed she doesn't like the fact of me having a kid because I'm not a monster who seduces. She managed to show me pretty well that, as somebody studying for a teacher and somebody who really cares for children, she actually cared that the kid had two parents. I realized my mistake and admitted she had been correct.

-On the topic of gay marriage, you had argued that because society had survived with the tradition that only straight marriage be allowed for centuries, it would be dumb to alter a system that was working well.
No, I didn't.

Another strawman. A sane forum would put one for your avatar.

My claim, so far as expressed there, was about values of an institution and emotions of straight people. It said nothing about survival of societies. I didn't even say that the system is working well. It sometimes does, sometimes doesn't. Right now it doesn't and many countries which don't have gay marriage are also wrecks, due to feminism.

See how stupid you are?

Argue against my actual points, not strawmen.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
After reading the threory @Fareal had about @Holden I decided to go take a nap for a while. I wake up to find this:

BUT WHAT FOR?

Even if I had all those diseases it would only increase my chances with insane Western sluts who hate all rationality and health. That's the main point. If you're too stupid to understand she was diagnosing fine, but this is the crux issue.

A mentally healthy man is a criminal to Western sluts.

Yes, there is a lot wrong with them to diagnose anybody online.

As for help, I repeat the question

BUT WHAT FOR?

Even if I had all those diseases it would only increase my chances with insane Western sluts who hate all rationality and health. That's the main point. If you're too stupid to understand she was diagnosing fine, but this is the crux issue.

A mentally healthy man is a criminal to Western sluts.

Sympathy for @Holden going.... Going..... Gone..... That didn't take long. Also, all these pages I wasn't part of and I still didn't miss anything.


Jealous of what? He doesn't have a girlfriend. His "girlfriend" is everybody's to fuck.

No. No no no. That is my wife. Swingers, remember? Though it is only when I give permission that she is everybody's to fuck. Get it right @Holden because you are giving the wrong insults to the wrong people now.


@Cowlick writes erotica, right? Maybe we could chip in some money and commission the fic from him.

Wouldn't work, @Cowlick is a horrible writer. I mean, just look at his grammar and sentence structure back in his own thread. Completely unreadable at times. Your money would be wasted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rin and Trombonista
All that weren't about some fact I didn't initially know and was proven incorrect by actual evidence in a correct context. An example of an argument I lost would be one I had on Skype with Lalala. I claimed she doesn't like the fact of me having a kid because I'm not a monster who seduces. She managed to show me pretty well that, as somebody studying for a teacher and somebody who really cares for children, she actually cared that the kid had two parents. I realized my mistake and admitted she had been correct.
1) That's on Skype, not here.

2) She just said she cared that "the kid had 2 parents", not really saying she didn't like you having a kid.

Try again.
 
1) That's on Skype, not here.

2) She just said she cared that "the kid had 2 parents", not really saying she didn't like you having a kid.
1) In that case I can't really remember. Maybe some tiny argument on some info. If anybody can find some, please show it.
2) strawman. The point was that her reason wasn't that of most Western women - that I'm not a seducer or a killer. Most modern Western women vomit at the idea that a man who isn't a monster is a father. That's why they usually kill the babies the father would like to take care of.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: cromit and Rin
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back