US ‘I just want to find 11,780 votes’: In extraordinary hour-long call, Trump pressures Georgia secretary of state to recalculate the vote in his favor

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

President Trump urged fellow Republican Brad Raffensperger, the Georgia secretary of state, to “find” enough votes to overturn his defeat in an extraordinary one-hour phone call Saturday that election experts said raised legal questions.

The Washington Post obtained a recording of the conversation in which Trump alternately berated Raffensperger, tried to flatter him, begged him to act and threatened him with vague criminal consequences if the secretary of state refused to pursue his false claims, at one point warning that Raffensperger was taking “a big risk.”

Throughout the call, Raffensperger and his office’s general counsel rejected Trump’s assertions, explaining that the president is relying on debunked conspiracy theories and that President-elect Joe Biden’s 11,779-vote victory in Georgia was fair and accurate.

Trump dismissed their arguments.

“The people of Georgia are angry, the people in the country are angry,” he said. “And there’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.”

Raffensperger responded: “Well, Mr. President, the challenge that you have is, the data you have is wrong.”

At another point, Trump said: “So look. All I want to do is this. I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have. Because we won the state.”

The rambling and at times incoherent conversation offered a remarkable glimpse of how consumed and desperate the president remains about his loss, unwilling or unable to let the matter go and still believing he can reverse the results in enough battleground states to remain in office.

“There’s no way I lost Georgia,” Trump said, a phrase he repeated again and again on the call. “There’s no way. We won by hundreds of thousands of votes.”

Several of his allies were on the line as he spoke, including White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and conservative lawyer Cleta Mitchell, a prominent GOP attorney whose involvement with Trump’s efforts had not been previously known.

In a statement, Mitchell said Raffensperger’s office “has made many statements over the past two months that are simply not correct and everyone involved with the efforts on behalf of the President’s election challenge has said the same thing: show us your records on which you rely to make these statements that our numbers are wrong.”

The White House, the Trump campaign and Meadows did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Raffensperger’s office declined to comment.

On Sunday, Trump tweeted that he had spoken to Raffensperger, saying the secretary of state was “unwilling, or unable, to answer questions such as the ‘ballots under table’ scam, ballot destruction, out of state ‘voters’, dead voters, and more. He has no clue!”

Raffensperger responded with his own tweet: “Respectfully, President Trump: What you’re saying is not true.”

The pressure Trump put on Raffensperger is the latest example of his attempt to subvert the outcome of the Nov. 3 election through personal outreach to state Republican officials. He previously invited Michigan Republican state leaders to the White House, pressured Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp (R) in a call to try to replace that state’s electors and asked the speaker of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives to help reverse his loss in that state.

His call to Raffensperger came as scores of Republicans have pledged to challenge the electoral college’s vote for Biden when Congress convenes for a joint session on Wednesday. Republicans do not have the votes to successfully thwart Biden’s victory, but Trump has urged supporters to travel to Washington to protest the outcome, and state and federal officials are already bracing for clashes outside the Capitol.

During their conversation, Trump issued a vague threat to both Raffensperger and Ryan Germany, the secretary of state’s general counsel, suggesting that if they don’t find that thousands of ballots in Fulton County have been illegally destroyed to block investigators — an allegation for which there is no evidence — they would be subject to criminal liability.

“That’s a criminal offense,” he said. “And you can’t let that happen. That’s a big risk to you and to Ryan, your lawyer.”

Trump also told Raffensperger that failure to act by Tuesday would jeopardize the political fortunes of David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler, Georgia’s two Republican senators whose fate in that day’s runoff elections will determine control of the U.S. Senate.

Trump said he plans to talk about the fraud on Monday, when he is scheduled to lead an election eve rally in Dalton, Ga. — a message that could further muddle the efforts of Republicans to get their voters out.

“You have a big election coming up and because of what you’ve done to the president — you know, the people of Georgia know that this was a scam,” Trump said. “Because of what you’ve done to the president, a lot of people aren’t going out to vote, and a lot of Republicans are going to vote negative, because they hate what you did to the president. Okay? They hate it. And they’re going to vote. And you would be respected, really respected, if this can be straightened out before the election.”

Trump’s conversation with Raffensperger put him in legally questionable territory, legal experts said. By exhorting the secretary of state to “find” votes and to deploy investigators who “want to find answers,” Trump appears to be encouraging him to doctor the election outcome in Georgia.

But experts said Trump’s clearer transgression is a moral one. Edward B. Foley, a law professor at Ohio State University, said that the legal questions are murky and would be subject to prosecutorial discretion. But he also emphasized that the call was “inappropriate and contemptible” and should prompt moral outrage.

“He was already tripping the emergency meter,” Foley said. “So we were at 12 on a scale of 1 to 10, and now we’re at 15.”

Throughout the call, Trump detailed an exhaustive list of disinformation and conspiracy theories to support his position. He claimed without evidence that he had won Georgia by at least a half-million votes. He floated a barrage of assertions that have been investigated and disproved: that thousands of dead people voted; that an Atlanta election worker scanned 18,000 forged ballots three times each and “100 percent” were for Biden; that thousands more voters living out of state came back to Georgia illegally just to vote in the election.

“So tell me, Brad, what are we going to do? We won the election, and it’s not fair to take it away from us like this,” Trump said. “And it’s going to be very costly in many ways. And I think you have to say that you’re going to reexamine it, and you can reexamine it, but reexamine it with people that want to find answers, not people who don’t want to find answers.”

Trump did most of the talking on the call. He was angry and impatient, calling Raffensperger a “child” and “either dishonest or incompetent” for not believing there was widespread ballot fraud in Atlanta — and twice calling himself a “schmuck” for endorsing Kemp, whom Trump holds in particular contempt for not embracing his claims of fraud.

“I can’t imagine he’s ever getting elected again, I’ll tell you that much right now,” he said.

He also took aim at Kemp’s 2018 opponent, Democrat Stacey Abrams, trying to shame Raffensperger with the idea that his refusal to embrace fraud has helped her and Democrats generally. “Stacey Abrams is laughing about you,” he said. “She’s going around saying, ‘These guys are dumber than a rock.’ What she’s done to this party is unbelievable, I tell you.”

The secretary of state repeatedly sought to push back, saying at one point, “Mr. President, the problem you have with social media, they — people can say anything.”

“Oh this isn’t social media,” Trump retorted. “This is Trump media. It’s not social media. It’s really not. It’s not social media. I don’t care about social media. I couldn’t care less.”

At another point, Trump claimed that votes were scanned three times: “Brad, why did they put the votes in three times? You know, they put ’em in three times.”


Raffensperger responded: “Mr. President, they did not. We did an audit of that and we proved conclusively that they were not scanned three times.”

Trump sounded at turns confused and meandering. At one point, he referred to Kemp as “George.” He tossed out several different figures for Biden’s margin of victory in Georgia and referred to the Senate runoff, which is Tuesday, as happening “tomorrow” and “Monday.”

His desperation was perhaps most pronounced during an exchange with Germany, Raffensperger’s general counsel, in which he openly begged for validation.

Trump: “Do you think it’s possible that they shredded ballots in Fulton County? ’Cause that’s what the rumor is. And also that Dominion took out machines. That Dominion is really moving fast to get rid of their, uh, machinery. Do you know anything about that? Because that’s illegal.”

Germany responded: “No, Dominion has not moved any machinery out of Fulton County.”

Trump: “But have they moved the inner parts of the machines and replaced them with other parts?”

Germany: “No.”

Trump: “Are you sure? Ryan?”

Germany: “I’m sure. I’m sure, Mr. President.”

It was clear from the call that Trump has surrounded himself with aides who have fed his false perceptions that the election was stolen. When he claimed that more than 5,000 ballots were cast in Georgia in the name of dead people, Raffensperger responded forcefully: “The actual number was two. Two. Two people that were dead that voted.”

But later, Meadows said, “I can promise you there are more than that.”

Another Trump lawyer on the call, Kurt Hilbert, accused Raffensperger’s office of refusing to turn over data to assess evidence of fraud, and also claimed awareness of at least 24,000 illegally cast ballots that would flip the result to Trump.

“It stands to reason that if the information is not forthcoming, there’s something to hide,” Hilbert said. “That’s the problem that we have.”

Reached by phone Sunday, Hilbert declined to comment.

In the end, Trump asked Germany to sit down with one of his attorneys to go over the allegations. Germany agreed.

Yet Trump also recognized that he was failing to persuade Raffensperger or Germany of anything, saying toward the end, “I know this phone call is going nowhere.”

But he continued to make his case in repetitive fashion, until finally, after roughly an hour, Raffensperger put an end to the conversation: “Thank you, President Trump, for your time.”

kubler-1024x806-1.jpg
 
boy sure would be nice to see official reports or something that shows that Trump lost GA fair and square. Or any state really.
Don’t worry guys, Georgia is doing a full audit, Raffesberger said he’ll have the results by December 24th.

Oops, I guess we’ll never know what happened in Fulton county. We’ll let you see Cobb county though.
 
ok so every single election ever was fraudulent?
non sequitor.
why is it so hard for you guys to prove your claims? the sec state says 2 dead people voted. not enough to change the result but enough to say this was a not a secure, free and fair election, certainly not to the standard used in the 2019 north carolina special election. haha.
 
non sequitor.
why is it so hard for you guys to prove your claims? the sec state says 2 dead people voted. not enough to change the result but enough to say this was a not a secure, free and fair election, certainly not to the standard used in the 2019 north carolina special election. haha.
It's spelled "non sequitur", which it isn't because it directly refers to your claims and how they would effect all of democracy since other elections aren't held to such scrunity. You have yet to prove any of your claims, you're still trying to make me prove a negative, when you haven't presented any evidence that the election was rigged.
I get you feel it was rigged, but facts over feelings, snowflake.
 
It's spelled "non sequitur", which it isn't because it directly refers to your claims and how they would effect all of democracy since other elections aren't held to such scrunity. You have yet to prove any of your claims, you're still trying to make me prove a negative, when you haven't presented any evidence that the election was rigged.
I get you feel it was rigged, but facts over feelings, snowflake.
True or false: PA violated their state election laws.
True or false: The PA Supreme Court decided they could supersede state law.
True or false: The US Supreme Court decided not to do its only job in this matter.
 
41:57 Trump asks about military and overseas citizens ballots going 100% biden. Sec state doesn't respond.

45:55 trump asks about the suitcases again, this time asking if the sec state looked at who those ballots went for (said to be 100% biden). Sec state deflects

48:10ish Sec State talks about the courts lol.

50:36 trump lady again asks for data and records and that she won't take sec state's word that everything fine. "all we know is what you tell us."
.
It's spelled "non sequitur", which it isn't because it directly refers to your claims and how they would effect all of democracy since other elections aren't held to such scrunity.

it's a non sequitor because i'm talking about specific allegations in a specific election. talking about elections in general and in vague terms is a non sequitor.
You have yet to prove any of your claims, you're still trying to make me prove a negative, when you haven't presented any evidence that the election was rigged.
I get you feel it was rigged, but facts over feelings, snowflake.
I'm trying to get you to prove that this was a clean election. there are procedures and safeguards that take place before an election so "this was a clean election" is something that needs to be proved. the way to prove the claim is to show the records from the procedures. i get that it's an impossible task because governments are hiding everything.

e: if you listen to the audio, it's apparent that the Sec State is not being transparent about his election, he's done a lot of talking and no releasing of data and records.

e2: we're still waiting for an official rebuttal to the antrim county audit of the voter machines. all we've got is "this audit is wrong" with zero explanations.
 
Last edited:
it's a non sequitor because i'm talking about specific allegations in a specific election. talking about elections in general and in vague terms is a non sequitor.

I'm trying to get you to prove that this was a clean election. there are procedures and safeguards that take place before an election so "this was a clean election" is the norm. the way to prove the claim is to show the records from the procedures. i get that it's an impossible task because governments are hiding everything.
No it's not, you used that to refer to my argument and the spelling doesn't change because of the context. You're just making up shit at this point dude cmon.

Yes you're trying to get me to prove a negative when you won't answer my questions. You're unironically implying every single secretary of state, state government and attorney general was somehow working in coordination to steal this election from Trump and falsify the vote. You haven't presented any evidence of your claims of how this election was dirty, you're implying it is and trying to get me to prove a negative. The default position is to assume a vote is legitimate until proof is shown otherwise.
 
You don't want to go down that rabbit hole.


this was four years ago. it has the same issues with absentee voting we're seeing in 2020 (page 3). if it happens in a tiny district, it's likely to happen all over.

No it's not, you used that to refer to my argument and the spelling doesn't change because of the context. You're just making up shit at this point dude cmon.

Yes you're trying to get me to prove a negative when you won't answer my questions. You're unironically implying every single secretary of state, state government and attorney general was somehow working in coordination to steal this election from Trump and falsify the vote. You haven't presented any evidence of your claims of how this election was dirty, you're implying it is and trying to get me to prove a negative. The default position is to assume a vote is legitimate until proof is shown otherwise.


we've gone over it in the main thread. states didn't follow their own constitution and election laws regarding absentee and vote by mail, In ga's case ballots were pulled out from a table after pollsters kicked everyone out (we have the video of this happening - the explanation refuting this is hearsay with no proof given), non residents voted (as alleged in GA with zero evidence given to dispute).
 
Last edited:
You're unironically implying every single secretary of state, state government and attorney general was somehow working in coordination to steal this election from Trump and falsify the vote
Career politicians are dedicated to Swampism uber Alles. It doesn't even necessarily require coordination; it's just jobbers protecting their meal tickets.
 
41:57 Trump asks about military and overseas citizens ballots going 100% biden. Sec state doesn't respond.

45:55 trump asks about the suitcases again, this time asking if the sec state looked at who those ballots went for (said to be 100% biden). Sec state deflects

48:10ish Sec State talks about the courts lol.

50:36 trump lady again asks for data and records and that she won't take sec state's word that everything fine. "all we know is what you tell us."
.

Hillary already said this was going to happen that "things are going to drag out, and we'll win if we don't give an inch"

Which I guess means dismissing most cases due to being too early, too late, or no standing. The establishment has made their decision, sorry.
 
I wish that I could say that I was surprised that there are speds here actually defending lolcow president's latest meltdown. I really do.
Trump is the Chris Chan of presidents and this site has a lot of /pol/tards who are not only right-wing extremists but also typically have crippling autism. It's a perfect combo
 
Hillary already said this was going to happen that "things are going to drag out, and we'll win if we don't give an inch"

Which I guess means dismissing most cases due to being too early, too late, or no standing. The establishment has made their decision, sorry.
You do not get to uproot the entire legal apparatus of the nation you live in because you really, really want to. If that was the case, the BLM protestors would have had Whitey in chains by November.
 
So much sadness. So many tears.
Trump is the Chris Chan of presidents and this site has a lot of /pol/tards who are not only right-wing extremists but also typically have crippling autism. It's a perfect combo

it's hilarious to watch these retards reeeee about nonexistent election fraud while defending an actual, documented, recorded attempt at election fraud.
 
If georgia was lost fair and square the GA government could release information proving so. They could certainly audit and release documents regarding Atlanta where a lot of allegations arise from. and not other winky dink counties.

Ctrl+F for ruby freeman doesn't find anything in the wapo article.
Remember how I said you'd never be satisfied? You got a signature audit of 15k votes (10% of the total), of which 2 were impermissible (and rectified). Google Cobb county - it's a suburb of Atlanta. Nevertheless, Raffy has promised to press on with a statewide audit.

Nevertheless, the results of both the Cobb audit and the statewide audit will never be enough for you, and you will always look the other way, religiously worshiping the strongman.
I'm not a libertarian. The legislature has been fucking with the executive all four years of this presidency and it's disgusting. The executive should fight back with everything they have.
Fucking lol, are you new to US politics? The legislature has been abdicating powers and privileges to the executive for over 30 years while they sit on their ass. The US system is based on checks and balances, which would be why the executive has a fucking veto.

Man if you want an unchecked executive, Belarus is looking cool this time of year - just DO NOT WEAR GREEN
True or false: PA violated their state election laws.
True or false: The PA Supreme Court decided they could supersede state law.
True or false: The US Supreme Court decided not to do its only job in this matter.

Does the ban on civvies owning/purchasing RPGs violate the second amendment? By some readings, but not by the reading that the SCOTUS decided on.
The PA SC did not supersede state law. It -interpreted- the wording of state law as giving the blessing to both mail-in ballots and to the three-day "grace" period.

The legislature has the ability to override the court's reading by passing a bill to amend the wording of the original bill so as to be more clear. They (and any concerned Pennsylvanians) also had the ability to legally challenge the ruling on the grounds that it violated either the PA or the US constitution. You would always have standing to allege this, though you would still need to cite the specific laws and so-forth.

Instead they alleged future fraud, for which it is impossible to have standing, and did fuckall otherwise despite the course of years to challenge the initial reading and months to challenge the extension. They waited until after the election to allege on constitutional grounds, which triggers laches because it is at that point a clearly political move to disenfranchise people who voted by mail with no explanation for why they did not press prior to the election on the proper avenues.

SCOTUS properly threw shade on both that idiot Kelly and the Texas clowncar suit, regardless of how many people with a fourth-grade understanding of government whined.
 
Hillary already said this was going to happen that "things are going to drag out, and we'll win if we don't give an inch"

Which I guess means dismissing most cases due to being too early, too late, or no standing. The establishment has made their decision, sorry.
too bad the antitrump crowd cant point to a lawsuit that was dismissed on the evidence and not procedure.
 
I would appreciate a full, unadulterated transcript, which is all that WaPo needed to provide, instead of giving a selective play-by-play with unnecessary commentary (necessary commentary being the provision of context to better understand what's being said instead of, say, speculations of an interlocutor's state of mind) as well as audio that would take a minimum of its duration to listen through even though the information could be gleaned in less time through writing.

At this point, I'm largely beyond voter fraud as an issue in Georgia, let alone anywhere else. I was up all night looking at states' vote counting slow into crawls counting their ballots as well as completion percentages jumping from 91% to 85% or somesuch. Philly, in particular, stopped counting at midnight but starts it up again at 3-4 AM. The red flags are there, though any allegation or evidence-- valid or otherwise-- is barely examined and vetted because the cases more often than not get dismissed due to technicalities such as standing or laches as opposed to the merits of those evidences.

Agreeing with @Secret Asshole, the big issue is that the GOP have crap ground game and are incapable or unwilling to do so much as support their own (and I'm not talking about Trump-- I'm talking about their rank-and-file), much less do the legwork to either set up a favorable stage for themselves or at minimum ensure electoral fairness if that's actually what they want. If the state of Georgia isn't okay with ballot harvesting, why the hell would they keep a loophole that allowed Stacey Abrams to do exactly that, and why wouldn't they fix it when it became clear what was happening? Why would it escape them that election officials that went around to notify voters that their ballots needed to be cured were being instructed to discern political allegiance and pull away from Republicans? Why are we hearing so much about GOP challengers being forced out or manipulated out of the way without the weight of the party station backing them up? Why did COVID become a good excuse for not allowing challengers to actually examine a ballot when they could have did what Wisconsin did and set up plexiglass barriers or even plexiglass enclosures? Did you see how badly the Arizona GOP was performing earlier in all of this, in the courts?

The grievances go on and on because the GOP is largely slow, lazy, apathetic, and dim. If they didn't want to deal with the fallout of electoral fraud or even something that only strongly resembled it, then the time to make that happen was before the elections-- hell, right after the primaries, when the rumbling of future issues started. It's why you can put more faith in Ohio's results, or (especially!) Florida's results.
 
Last edited:
Back