Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds
- Thread starter trannyfucker
- Start date
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Also "gender dysphoria" isn't supposedly a disease any more. It's completely healthy. So why should insurance pay for completely optional surgery? Which is it?
Is it a mental illness so severe that it requires "life-saving" surgery or people will commit suicide? If so, they're severely mentally ill and shouldn't be allowed to own guns and should probably be institutionalized for their own good. Or is it completely normal? And if that, then why should it be treated at all?
Completely unsurprisingly, the answer always changes, and the answer is always whatever will get more gibs for the troon.
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2016
We should move to giver services to gender dysphoric fetuses treatment. Like abortions in utero and retroactively.Happy News Trannies Age no longer a Restrictiction in CA
Commissioner Lara takes proactive step to ensure transgender youth have access to gender-affirming medical care for gender dysphoria
News: 2020 Press Release
For Release: December 30, 2020
Media Calls Only: 916-492-3566
Email Inquiries: cdipress@insurance.ca.gov
Commissioner Lara takes proactive step to ensure transgender youth have access to gender-affirming medical care for gender dysphoria
Department of Insurance finds applying strict age limits in health insurance for gender transition surgery impermissible under California law
LOS ANGELES, Calif. — Today, Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara directed the Department of Insurance to issue a General Counsel Opinion Letter clarifying that under existing California law, health insurance companies may not deny coverage for male chest reconstruction surgery for female-to-male patients undergoing gender-affirming care for gender dysphoria based solely on a patient’s age.
“For far too long, individuals diagnosed with gender dysphoria have had to battle a host of challenges to get access to gender-affirming care in order to be their true selves,” said Commissioner Lara. “Social stigma, misconceptions about gender dysphoria and its treatment, and outdated medical criteria create barriers to necessary medical care that can lead to tragic results for individuals with gender dysphoria, especially for our transgender youth.”
California law already provides protections meant to reduce these barriers to gender-affirming care for gender dysphoria. However, due to complaints from young Californians and their parents, some health insurance companies may still use coverage criteria and processes that wrongfully deny coverage, and place the burden on consumers to pursue their legal rights to transgender health services through time-consuming appeals and independent medical reviews. To be proactive, health insurance companies should evaluate their coverage criteria for gender dysphoria treatment and eliminate any noncompliant practices to avoid needlessly delaying and interfering with medical care recommended by a patient’s doctor.
The Department’s General Counsel Opinion Letter, issued pursuant to Insurance Code section 12921.9, was prepared in response to an inquiry from San Diego’s TransFamily Support Services regarding several denials of coverage for male chest surgery for patients under 18 years old who are transitioning from female to male. The Department determined that denying coverage for mastectomy and reconstruction of a male chest based solely on age is impermissible under state laws requiring coverage of reconstructive surgery. Health insurance companies must consider a patient’s specific clinical situation in determining medical necessity.
“TransFamily Support Services is proud to partner with the California Department of Insurance to remove the age barrier for gender-affirming care,” said Kathie Moehlig, Executive Director at TransFamily Support Services. “This barrier was discriminatory and detrimental to the lives of trans youth. To have to navigate the overwhelming barriers to health care should not be a part of their experience. Transgender youth already face so many challenges from unsupportive families, bullying at school, social stigmas, and even violence.”
Additionally, imposing strict age limits on coverage of male chest reconstruction surgery when it is requested to treat gender dysphoria but not other medical conditions, such as breast cancer or trauma, constitutes discrimination in health coverage based on age, sex, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, and health conditions in violation of state and federal law.
"Today the State of California has put insurance companies on notice that they cannot deny access to medically-necessary care based on outdated rules that are not supported by evidence or scientific consensus,” said Dr. Ward Carpenter, Co-Director of Health Services at the Los Angeles LGBT Center. “In so doing, the state not only expands access to health care but also takes an important step in saving the lives of transgender and non-binary (TGNB) adolescents struggling with gender dysphoria, depression and suicidal thoughts. Decisions about an adolescent’s health must be left to the patient, their families and their care providers, not to insurance companies."
The World Professional Association for Transgender Health, an international professional association that provides evidence-based standards of care for transgender people, states that male chest reconstruction surgery to treat gender dysphoria could be carried out in individuals under 18 “depending on an adolescent’s specific clinical situation and goals for gender identity expression.” The use of rigid age criteria in determining medical necessity, and thus insurance coverage, for female-to-male chest reconstruction surgery does not allow consideration of each individual’s unique clinical situation, contrary to the generally accepted standards of care for transgender health and the requirements of state and federal law.
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
View attachment 1826611
...............................................................................................................................................
View attachment 1826613
View attachment 1826617
View attachment 1826620
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2014
This is exactly what I said in another thread yesterday: normal is now defined in terms of the pathological.
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2019
The goalposts are on a conveyor belt.
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2020
The troon cult is spreading in Japan 
No. of people changing registered gender rising at record pace in Japan
Also note the disabled comments under the article. The troon lobby has infiltrated JapanToday too.
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2020
Fuck it, at least Nippon makes sure the troons sterilize themselves before giving them any true and honest ground. And that they don't have underage children they can force their lunacy on. Stay strong Japan-san
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2020
Lol that's cute. "Contender of the World 2020 championship". Brazil is such a shitty region they only get to send one team to worlds and the rest of us basically consider that round a by. But yeah, diversity!
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
Considering all the trap faggotry and vacation tours of Thailand the Japanese enjoy... why is anyone surprised?The troon cult is spreading in Japan
No. of people changing registered gender rising at record pace in Japan
Also note the disabled comments under the article. The troon lobby has infiltrated JapanToday too.
Secret Asshole
Expert in things that never, ever happened
Forum Staff
⚡ Thunderdomer ⚡
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2017
There's absolutely no evidence that SRS decreases the suicide rate and rates of depression, anxiety and other symptoms of dysphoria.
In fact, SRS, until very recently, was considered a last resort for people who couldn't resolve their dysphoria any other way. The fact that this has no age limit is a fucking disgrace, but its California.
Forcing insurance companies to adopt a (VERY) expensive surgical technique as necessary (when its fucking not) is going to fuck over normal people using insurance because they will factor this into their premiums. Or they'll start restricting the most expensive surgeons and have them out of network and only let the parents have back alley Mexicans for their body mutilation.
Also for women to tolerate breasts being classified as abnormal is fucking lol. Troons are literally taking away be every aspect. There are going to be so many fucking terfs (mostly without the f).
queue-anon
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2019
Also, how many minor girls get breast cancer? It's unusual enough to see breast cancer in a woman under 30.
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2016
The saga of Angela and Rick. Mandatory training I have to take for a dogshit McJob. On my own time.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2016
Dont, under any circumstance assume a genderfuck is capable of interacting like normal person.
Do expect them to be to emotional fragile to correct you if you're titling them wrong .
But most importantly Do. Not. make friendly small talk with a genderfuck like you want to get to know them, capisce?
Instead remind them how much they dont pass by singling them out and ask about their "pronouns".
Lol
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2014
Angela is a sperg and woe betides any dude who have sex with her.
As for the question, the correct answer is: avoid "David" at all costs. Treat her as if she were transparent. Don't talk to her unless absolutely necessary and then as briefly as possible, because anything you spoke to her might be used against you.
Comrade Autogynephilia
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2019
Now imagine if they'd made that with the roles reversed, the black woman sceptical of the tranny shit and the white guy simping for it, which is probably far more likely for how irl this to go down.
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2016
So just to get this clear:
* Not asking for pronouns can be anti-trans discrimination because even inadvertent "misgendering" is wrong
* Asking for pronouns can be anti-trans discrimination because you are possibly singling out someone for being trans
* Being trans is super important and needs to be respected
* Asking someone any questions related to being trans is a serious violation of privacy
I know this is real because my work had a similar training and may even have used the same actors, but it's literally impossible to follow all these rules at the same time. If this is what it takes to keep tranny employees content I'm just not going to hire them.
EDIT:
All the background you need: I work for a large company with protections for troons in our official policies and a strong attitude of "we don't fire people". This story takes place over maybe one and a half to two years.
A few years ago, another group at my company got a new manager. She was ex-military (Navy) and it showed in her demeanor-blunt and abrasive, demanding, and very hard working. Unfortunately for her, one of the people she now had to supervise was none of these things; he was lazy, inept, and basically had all his reports ghostwritten by other people but hadn't fucked up bad enough to get fired. The guy was like forty but nobody could actually figure out what he did all day.
As you can imagine, this caused a ton of friction and she had no problem making that known - she could not fire him but she could call him a lazy idiot to his face. Needless to say, he did not take kindly to this and "came out" as trans. Suddenly if she yelled at him for not doing his job that could easily get turned into a discrimination complaint with HR. So not only did she cut him a ton of slack on the whole "ineptitude" thing but she respected his pronouns and instructed everybody else in her group to do the same. So far, so bad and she was obviously frustrated with the situation.
As it turns out this was not what the troon wanted at all - from what we can tell he was fishing for a discrimination suit because the manager had called him out initially and he figured the payout would be much greater than his regular salary. So he escalated things - dressed ridiculously, spent all his time putting up trans pride flags in his cube and volunteering with the employee diversity group, again with the obvious but unspoken threat that there'd be an HR complaint against anybody who objected. The manager held her ground too and gradually delegated all his responsibilities to other people - her way of minimizing the damage without risking a lolsuit. I don't think he ever figured out what she was doing but eventually he got tired of waiting for her to actually do anything he could complain about and just stormed into her office threatening to make a formal hostile workplace complaint. She called his bluff, he stormed out, that's the last anybody heard of him.
So yeah, trannies are not good workers and if you really stop to think about it many of their threats are seriously impotent.
A few years ago, another group at my company got a new manager. She was ex-military (Navy) and it showed in her demeanor-blunt and abrasive, demanding, and very hard working. Unfortunately for her, one of the people she now had to supervise was none of these things; he was lazy, inept, and basically had all his reports ghostwritten by other people but hadn't fucked up bad enough to get fired. The guy was like forty but nobody could actually figure out what he did all day.
As you can imagine, this caused a ton of friction and she had no problem making that known - she could not fire him but she could call him a lazy idiot to his face. Needless to say, he did not take kindly to this and "came out" as trans. Suddenly if she yelled at him for not doing his job that could easily get turned into a discrimination complaint with HR. So not only did she cut him a ton of slack on the whole "ineptitude" thing but she respected his pronouns and instructed everybody else in her group to do the same. So far, so bad and she was obviously frustrated with the situation.
As it turns out this was not what the troon wanted at all - from what we can tell he was fishing for a discrimination suit because the manager had called him out initially and he figured the payout would be much greater than his regular salary. So he escalated things - dressed ridiculously, spent all his time putting up trans pride flags in his cube and volunteering with the employee diversity group, again with the obvious but unspoken threat that there'd be an HR complaint against anybody who objected. The manager held her ground too and gradually delegated all his responsibilities to other people - her way of minimizing the damage without risking a lolsuit. I don't think he ever figured out what she was doing but eventually he got tired of waiting for her to actually do anything he could complain about and just stormed into her office threatening to make a formal hostile workplace complaint. She called his bluff, he stormed out, that's the last anybody heard of him.
So yeah, trannies are not good workers and if you really stop to think about it many of their threats are seriously impotent.
EDIT X2: Removed some stuff that accidentally got duplicated.
Last edited:
Comrade Autogynephilia
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2019
Someone should give it this treatment
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2020
So, essentially the Corporal Klinger Gambit cranked up to 11 and retooled for a business environment.
Edit: And just like with Klinger, this strategy didn't work.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
I've been saying this for years. Anime, Drag and Instagram thots have been at the core of the troon cult. You'll see it everywhere you go when you tread through the murky waters of troonland.
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2019
As @Positron and @twattycake said, 'C' is not the right answer. Asking for pronouns can be deeply invalidating for a trans person, because you could send the message that they don't pass, triggering their insecurity about their looks and their identity (read from an article written by a male troon, who was traumatized by people asking his pronouns: "I'm in a dress and makeup, don't you see I'm a true and honest woman?")
Seriously, where the fuck did they take this material from? Stonewall UK?
Edit: typos
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2020
"Hey do you think it would be cool to ask the trans coworker I get along with about certain aspects of being trans so I can educate myself on it?"
"No you shouldn't do that."
"Oh, okay, cool."
"But you should educate yourself on trans stuff."
????
This is actually retarded.