Insurrection 2021

[Gorillad Cheese]

Wouldn't the courts want to mend the schism created by this election to help mend things? As far as I can see ignoring the cases and dismissing things is only confirming in some peoples minds that the election was stolen. Wouldn't you even want to attempt some sort of healing for both sides? As far as I can see you are only confirming the peoples biases by ignoring the case.

Basically you are saying I want lunatic Trumpers shooting up the place. Is that what they want?

The Supreme Court does not get involved in political disputes. That doctrine is decades, if not centuries, old.

And you're acting like a Supreme Court decision would mean jack shit to Trump fans. The Supreme Court would inevitably rule against Trump, and the Trump fans would just declare that the Supreme Court is owned by the global elite Democrats, which they are already doing.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

Wouldn't the courts want to mend the schism created by this election to help mend things? As far as I can see ignoring the cases and dismissing things is only confirming in some peoples minds that the election was stolen. Wouldn't you even want to attempt some sort of healing for both sides? As far as I can see you are only confirming the peoples biases by ignoring the case.

Basically you are saying I want lunatic Trumpers shooting up the place. Is that what they want?

To anyone with a functioning brain, dismissing the lawsuits would be evidence that the lawsuits were retardedly bad.

However, you retards just cannot fathom the idea that your Dear Leader isn't as much of a genius and isn't as popular as your hugboxes lead you to believe. If you stepped outside of /pol/ every now and then, you'd see a lot of people hate him. Yes, Biden sucks, but Trump is a lot more hated

 

[WhimsicalTrolli]

Looks like Antifa isn't happy Hawley is going to contest the certification.

View attachment 1831272

View attachment 1831278

It's like my fears of right wingers being attacked was not a crackpot conspiracy.

 

[Grandpa Simpson]

The Supreme Court does not get involved in political disputes. That doctrine is decades, if not centuries, old.

 

[WhimsicalTrolli]

Dems are sweeping, what a shame Mitch should've gave us them 2000 stimulus checks.

Remember 3 isn't a 1.

 

[KimCoppolaAficionado]

According to this https://www.peoplespunditdaily.com/elections/live-results-georgia-senate-runoff-regular-election/ and this https://www.peoplespunditdaily.com/elections/live-results-georgia-senate-runoff-special-election/ the Dems have a strong early lead but only 8% of the vote has been counted so far. Seems a little early to be calling the election just yet.

Says the man who has spent the past two months arguing the elections are fixed
If Trump's election was fixed to get rid of Trump and give the Dems/Deep State unlimited power, then why wouldn't this one be fixed too? Especially since you've been saying that failing to #StoptheSteal would mean that no R would ever win any political position again.

 

[Rich Evans Apologist]

The Supreme Court does not get involved in political disputes. That doctrine is decades, if not centuries, old.

And you're acting like a Supreme Court decision would mean jack shit to Trump fans. The Supreme Court would inevitably rule against Trump, and the Trump fans would just declare that the Supreme Court is owned by the global elite Democrats, which they are already doing.

Jesus 2.0 said they were actually blackmailed by global elite democrats with child pornography execution snuff (but also the blackmail lost its potency) so who do I trust more, a guy with a funny monkey as his avatar or a guy who is definitely not committing blasphemy of the highest order

View attachment 1831518

SCOTUS was asked to specifically interpret safe harbor clauses and their applicability to running a vote recount by the safe harbor date.

What, exactly, was Texas Vs The World asking the SCOTUS to interpret?
Further, why would they intentionally suspend the most basic requirement of a lawsuit: standing?

 

[Gorillad Cheese]

View attachment 1831518

Do you have any idea how controversial that case was? The Supreme Court does not want to do that again, especially with public trust in the Supreme Court as an institution extremely low among both parties.

 

[WhimsicalTrolli]

Do you have any idea how controversial that case was? The Supreme Court does not want to do that again, especially with public trust in the Supreme Court as an institution extremely low among both parties.

But who caused that extremely low trust?

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

Early vote totals are showing the Democrat candidates with a decent lead, but early voting was leaning more Democrat.

So when the Democrat's leads evaporate, instead of tardraging about "STOPPING THE COUNT" like Trump and his retard cult, we will just accept it because we understand how elections work.

 

[Gorillad Cheese]

But who caused that extremely low trust?

I don't see how that's relevant.

 

[Affluent Reptilian]

Wouldn't the courts want to mend the schism created by this election to help mend things? As far as I can see ignoring the cases and dismissing things is only confirming in some peoples minds that the election was stolen. Wouldn't you even want to attempt some sort of healing for both sides? As far as I can see you are only confirming the peoples biases by ignoring the case.

Basically you are saying I want lunatic Trumpers shooting up the place. Is that what they want?

No, they want to avoid it altogether. The decision that best exemplifies this is the Wisconsin Supreme Court decision, which you can read here: https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315395
Read the dissenting opinions - beginning at [61] - which are quite correct in their refutation of the majority's excuse for not hearing the suit. Note this lawsuit didn't allege fraud as such, but procedural violations of voting laws.

 

[Yotsubaaa]

It's like my fears of right wingers being attacked was not a crackpot conspiracy.

Except that the guy embellished the whole thing, and there's literally video recordings of it proving that it never happened the way he said it did.

https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/police-protesters-outside-sen-josh-hawley-s-home-were-peaceful/article_f5adb15c-171b-542d-85ce-236579716c2d.html

https://archive.vn/45Ask

 

[Grandpa Simpson]

If Trump's election was fixed to get rid of Trump and give the Dems/Deep State unlimited power, then why wouldn't this one be fixed too? Especially since you've been saying that failing to #StoptheSteal would mean that no R would ever win any political position again.

See you think this is a D vs R thing. Most people who support Trump don't care about that, they already know those people have worked their way up from the various political and department positions over the last few decades. They are more interested in if someone who came in from the outside of the political establishment is going to get their day in court. And it looks like they won't.

 

[Gorillad Cheese]

Except that the guy embellished the whole thing, and there's literally video recordings of it proving that it never happened the way he said it did.

https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/police-protesters-outside-sen-josh-hawley-s-home-were-peaceful/article_f5adb15c-171b-542d-85ce-236579716c2d.html

https://archive.vn/45Ask

Is this like when Rand Paul claimed he was assaulted and then the video showed that it was just people yelling at him and no one touched him?

 

[Meat Target]

just people yelling at him and no one touched him?

Because there were cops between him and them. Don't be coy.

 

[Gorillad Cheese]

See you think this is a D vs R thing. Most people who support Trump don't care about that, they already know those people have worked their way up from the various political and department positions over the last few decades. They are more interested in if someone who came in from the outside of the political establishment is going to get their day in court. And it looks like they won't.

You seem to be under the impression that there is an entitlement to a Supreme Court case. Trump got his day in court about 60 times, the fact that he never made it to the Supreme Court is no more of an injustice than all those death row inmates whose certiorari petitions get denied.

Because there were cops between him and them. Don't be coy.

I'm sorry, was he assaulted or not? Because if he wasn't, then that makes him a liar.

 

[Meat Target]

The Supreme Court does not get involved in political disputes.

Except that's their entire reason for existing. If their job isn't to settle whether or not a law is constitutional, then why the fuck do we even have them?

I'm sorry, was he assaulted or not? Because if he wasn't, then that makes him a liar.

"I tried to kill you, but someone intervened, therefore I did not attack you".

Unless you're referring to the time he was hospitalized when his neighbor broke in? An incident that Democrats not only don't condemn, but outright celebrate? Imagine if Republicans praised Jared Loughner.

 

[HTTP Error 404]

Imagine being such a faggot that you are celebrating the idea that Iran might try and have Interpol arrest the President of the United States at the start of his second term because he killed some raghead terrorist sandnigger.

 

[WhimsicalTrolli]

I don't see how that's relevant.

How is it not relevant?

Except that the guy embellished the whole thing, and there's literally video recordings of it proving that it never happened the way he said it did.

https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/police-protesters-outside-sen-josh-hawley-s-home-were-peaceful/article_f5adb15c-171b-542d-85ce-236579716c2d.html

https://archive.vn/45Ask

Article is survey locked. But at least it was peaceful, anytime its a right winger protesting at someones home its terrorism. But nice seeing fact checkers in record speeds.