March for Trump (1/6) - (1/5-1/6), 18 NAKED PROUD BOYS IN THE SHOWER AT RAM RANCH

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Was this a terrorist incident?

  • Yes

    Votes: 514 24.4%
  • No

    Votes: 543 25.8%
  • There were bad people(terrorists) involved, but that shouldn't reflect on everybody else

    Votes: 260 12.4%
  • It was the state who created terror

    Votes: 788 37.4%

  • Total voters
    2,105
You shouldn't accuse others of not reading when you ain't read what hearsay is.

First person testimony of the incident in question is not hearsay. Are you seriously suggesting that eye-witness testimony is non-admissible? So hypothetically if someone shoots you in the face with a ropey wad of AIDS-ridden cum and I see it happen, then my eyewitness testimony is moot? Good to know.
 
You are so narrow minded as to think that the powerful minority, that you are sucking up too, hand-waving this away is going to end well for the country. If you are so certain the election wasn't rigged then why is everyone so very strongly against a quick and simple independent audit? Why are you being so seriously autistic about this? You should relax a little, maybe read some testimony, have a cup of hot chocolate.
Even if there was an audit (states have done audits, btw, like GA, and found nothing), you retards would not accept it anyway. You refuse to believe Trump won because you never leave your echo chambers and think Trump is this nationally beloved figure and there's just no way he could lose.

I still suspect some fishy stuff went down, but I gotta admit the lawsuits were an embarrassing trainwreck for the most part.
Trump has lawyers who did nothing but look for evidence of it. They even had hotlines for it and cash rewards. The best they could come up with was the lawsuits that happened. If there was fraud, it'd have come out by now.
 
You are so narrow minded as to think that the powerful minority, that you are sucking up too, hand-waving this away is going to end well for the country. If you are so certain the election wasn't rigged then why is everyone so very strongly against a quick and simple independent audit? Why are you being so seriously autistic about this? You should relax a little, maybe read some testimony, have a cup of hot chocolate.
Pretty sure he's just trolling you, Simp. Chill out.

Also whoever asked about Trump and why he thinks this march represents good optics, I have two words for you: fuck optics.

 
In the end, it doesn't matter what a few shitposters think it matters what those in power say and the GOP has already declared a win for Biden

Oh I know, and I fully expect they will successfully steal the election, they will face no consequence for it. Biden will be sworn in, and the GOP will actively help. I am preparing for the GOP collapse and removal. They won this battle, but the prize they've won isn't going to be desirable.
 
Hahaha, lolno that's never happening, the sides will only become more divisive until they start clashing in bloodier ways. We're very likely to start seeing the Troubles in America very soon.
You're probably right and it fucking sucks because it's all so unnecessary if only people weren't such idiots and assholes.
 
First person testimony of the incident in question is not hearsay. Are you seriously suggesting that eye-witness testimony is non-admissible? So hypothetically if someone shoots you in the face with a ropey wad of AIDS-ridden cum and I see it happen, then my eyewitness testimony is moot? Good to know.
https://www.rulesofevidence.org/article-viii/rule-801/ said:
(c) Hearsay. “Hearsay” means a statement that:


(1) the declarant does not make while testifying at the current trial or hearing; and


(2) a party offers in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted in the statement.

Getting a sworn affidavit when your case has literally not been accepted is hearsay, yes. You are testifying out of court by default.
Testifying at a committee is also, surprise susprise, not a court.

But yeah, I dunno. Federal Rules of Evidence, or you, who's correct?
 
Oh I know, and I fully expect they will successfully steal the election, they will face no consequence for it. Biden will be sworn in, and the GOP will actively help. I am preparing for the GOP collapse and removal. They won this battle, but the prize they've won isn't going to be desirable.
Dude the election wasn't stolen. Half the voters voted Biden, half the voters voted Trump. A few more in the right places voted for Biden, so he won the Electoral College. It's the same thing that happened when Trump beat Hillary. You can moan and complain about media bias and unfair framing, but straight-up fraud in the electoral process isn't what made the election swing toward Biden.

Was there fraud? Yes. Should it be investigated? Yes. Did the small amount of fraud that exists in every election cause Trump to lose? No.

It's alright, dude. Your guy has a huge movement behind him now and the old GOP is faltering. (and so are the Democrats for that matter) It's not the end of the world, just the end of the election.
 
Even if there was an audit (states have done audits, btw, like GA, and found nothing), you retards would not accept it anyway. You refuse to believe Trump won because you never leave your echo chambers and think Trump is this nationally beloved figure and there's just no way he could lose.

They didn't audit anything, the recounted the faulty ballots with the same machines.

He very easily could have lost, but if he did lose, then why all the weird cloak and dagger shit? Why is it every single media corporation, social media outlet, and paid celebrity shill all have the exact same talking points? Why is only one side being labelled as "under dispute" when there are two sides of the dispute. The very nature of the dispute should lead to flags being used on both sides when discussing the election.

Yet, they are not.

You can pick the side of globo-homo and corporate fuedelism all you like, just don't expect me to be anywhere near you when it collapses under it's own weight and hubris.

Dude the election wasn't stolen. Half the voters voted Biden, half the voters voted Trump. A few more in the right places voted for Biden, so he won the Electoral College. It's the same thing that happened when Trump beat Hillary. You can moan and complain about media bias and unfair framing, but straight-up fraud in the electoral process isn't what made the election swing toward Biden.

Was there fraud? Yes. Should it be investigated? Yes. Did the small amount of fraud that exists in every election cause Trump to lose? No.

It's alright, dude. Your guy has a huge movement behind him now and the old GOP is faltering. (and so are the Democrats for that matter) It's not the end of the world, just the end of the election.

The GOP is going to collapse, and it should. These fudds have been wearing the corpse of the middle class like a cheap-suit for too long.

I should clarify Trump is a zionist shill with very few redeeming qualities, he's only my guy as far as he was an entertaining sledge hammer to the face of the media, the establishment and the "liberal left"

My contention is the election was stolen, it was done in broad-daylight and was so brazenly done it's unfathomable for you to even believe it.
 
I think he can do it. Dont ask me for the odds, but If anybody can it would be him.
But how? It would be hilarious if it happened, but I can't think of a way it could happen at this point.

Trump has lawyers who did nothing but look for evidence of it. They even had hotlines for it and cash rewards. The best they could come up with was the lawsuits that happened. If there was fraud, it'd have come out by now.
I guess I just don't see what the incentive for playing fair is when the stakes are so high, I don't see why American elections couldn't be rigged when America has played a role rigging the elections of various other nations and I don't see why so many US agencies would be compromised by a massive hack during an election year if it wasn't meant to impact the elections somehow.

I also doubt the competence of Trump's lawyers considering he thought hiring Sidney Powell was a good idea, lol. But it's all just speculation on my part-- it's true that no ironclad proof of large scale fraud has surfaced, as far as I know.
 
Trump has lawyers who did nothing but look for evidence of it. They even had hotlines for it and cash rewards. The best they could come up with was the lawsuits that happened. If there was fraud, it'd have come out by now.
The highlight for me was when Rudy Giuliani burst out laughing at his own witness because her testimony was so ridiculous. She essentially argued that because she can't tell Asians apart, it's impossible to tell whether or not the election was legitimate. Her exact words were "I think all Chinese look alike, so if some Chou shows up, how are you supposed to tell?" LOL.
 
There's gonna be streetfights when antifa shows up. Some stabbings may occur and fireworks will be thrown, but there will be maybe one or two casualties at most. That's how these things usually go.

The Proud Boys have decided that the cops are enemies, but I doubt most Trumpers feel incentivized to say screw the law and start a real riot.
Backing the blue was the most retarded thing the right ever did. Just like backing draconian plandemic restrictions and a ravenous gyre of a surveillance state to "fuck the chuds" will end up being the dumbest thing the left ever did. Cops are shit, cops are the enemy, fuck cops and laugh when cops die. That is all.
 
I'm kinda surprised that this thread has been up for this long and even got a front page mention. I thought the crack down on politisperging was going to be way harder tbh.

The worst of the doomposters had all the spine of a cattail reed and booked it once people made fun of them, and gradually other doomposters have been mysteriously vanishing or far, far less active and vehement in their wailing now that people aren't respecting how serious and important their thoughts are on the internet, which I wonder if nool hasn't noticed.

With the people fedposting and turning literally every topic outside of the containment boards into political whining, there really isn't a need to crack down hard on the shit. But that's more my take as a sped.

No not really, I don't want anyone putting any stock in Trump or MAGA. I want people putting stock in the collapse of the corporate media and their many heads.
You gonna get back to me on whether your definition or the federal rules of evidence definition is correct?

I mean, if you just want to act like a moody teenager and say that "the globohomo rome shall fall," woooow, deep. Turns out that the US can survive not being the unipolar hegemon - but lazy fuckers without skills might run into some trouble there, an insecurity which has bubbled up in no small number of ways.


The highlight for me was when Rudy Giuliani burst out laughing at his own witness because her testimony was so ridiculous. She essentially argued that because she can't tell Asians apart, it's impossible to tell whether or not the election was legitimate. Her exact words were "I think all Chinese look alike, so if some Chou shows up, how are you supposed to tell?" LOL.
Look, she was testifying to a committee, so it's true alright? Wwyd if some Chou shows up at the club and slaps her ballot on your gf's ass?
 
Back