Furry Fandom and Drama General

The sad thing is that a lot of those fetishes are actually just cartoon tropes. If you actually look a the scenes that they claim that 'messed up them when they were children', the scenes themselves are completely mundane and ocile at best, absurd at worst. There is nothing 'hot' from being a living balloon.

Then again, when you find people having fetishes of cinder blocks o Ripto vomiting, I say tha they were messed up from the beginning.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: ScatmansWorld
It's not a police union, it's some mysterious 501(c)(3) that has existed since about 2017 and is run by some guy named Eddie Hutchison. Its address is

8710 BASH ST UNIT 501692
INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46250 USA

and its phone number is (302)469-1765.

In its first year of existence it had gross receipts of $103,171, but just by the next year, 2018, this had already risen to $2,294,166. By 2019, this rose to $3,147,874. This amount of money appears mostly to be spent, since between its cash on hand and debts, there is only $120,440 in net assets.

The organization claims, in a press release as well as in its Form 990:



I'm not sure what this actually entails but apparently getting into online spats with furfags is part of it.

It is apparently very upset with this Indianapolis Star article (https://archive.md/b3uXv).



More at the link.

Damn white people and their *shuffles deck*... living in rural areas
View attachment 1831693

Bonus monetary demand for being brown;
View attachment 1831696
This person is ALWAYS going off like this. It's a constant occurrence to see tweet walls of pure "whaaaa white ppl" when most of it isn't even an issue. A shame really because their art is very nice not gonna lie.

Like yeah I get it, we're treated like shit and what happened years ago was absolutely horrible and shouldn't be forgotten. But damn the whining over such non-issues like some white bitch living out in the woods, or someone who decides to put feathers in their sparkledogs hair is them just looking for things to complain about at this point.
 
The sad thing is that a lot of those fetishes are actually just cartoon tropes. If you actually look a the scenes that they claim that 'messed up them when they were children', the scenes themselves are completely mundane and ocile at best, absurd at worst. There is nothing 'hot' from being a living balloon.

Then again, when you find people having fetishes of cinder blocks o Ripto vomiting, I say tha they were messed up from the beginning.
The ones that really bake my noodle are the cardiophiles. You know those scenes in cartoons where a character has their heart jump out of their chest because they're so attracted/in love with someone?

Cardiophiles think that's hot as fuck. To the point they'll commission whole comics with characters fucking each other's hearts.

And here I am, wondering where did humanity go so wrong. I know this shit has always been there and it's only more obvious because of the internet (normally these weirdos would be jacking off alone at home instead of posting everything online) but are weird kinks just a result of our brains being too complex for their own good or something?
 
The ones that really bake my noodle are the cardiophiles. You know those scenes in cartoons where a character has their heart jump out of their chest because they're so attracted/in love with someone?

Cardiophiles think that's hot as fuck. To the point they'll commission whole comics with characters fucking each other's hearts.

And here I am, wondering where did humanity go so wrong. I know this shit has always been there and it's only more obvious because of the internet (normally these weirdos would be jacking off alone at home instead of posting everything online) but are weird kinks just a result of our brains being too complex for their own good or something?
I would have given you the Feels rating, but I did not wan to trigger the cardiophiles.
 
Miles vs. Twitter: Round 2
View attachment 1830392
(https://twitter.com/Miles_DF/status/1346498722696470530)

The responses are exactly what you would expect.
View attachment 1830398

I don't know why he caved in to them in the first place. He seems to have more than enough status to ride it out.
Hey, more power to him. Now we've got this gem of ideological furfag art.

jesus. mountains out of molehills. sure i'm not a trump fan either but it's such a minor thing.

Welcome to the world of bugmen. A horrible thing to be.

I'm not defending his ebegging or that shit, just native isn't brown, and natives have valid reasons to make that complaint.

ItS BiPoC NoW YoU BiGoT.
 
Last edited:
The sad thing is that a lot of those fetishes are actually just cartoon tropes. If you actually look a the scenes that they claim that 'messed up them when they were children', the scenes themselves are completely mundane and ocile at best, absurd at worst. There is nothing 'hot' from being a living balloon.

Then again, when you find people having fetishes of cinder blocks o Ripto vomiting, I say tha they were messed up from the beginning.
You do occasionally run into some really odd scenes. Like the floom scene from the 80's little pony flick or that tickle/inflation scene from the raggedy ann movie.

For the most part though yeah it's usually mundane stuff that's part and parcel for cartoons.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NoFeline
Did you even read before calling him brown? He's a native. I get where you're coming from with the "damn white people and their *shuffles deck*" memeing because it fucking fits a lot, but natives absolutely have the right for this kind of complaining. Land was stolen. That's objective truth.

I'm not defending his ebegging or that shit, just native isn't brown, and natives have valid reasons to make that complaint.
Don't come whining to me about "assimilation" and "losing connection to your homeland" when the Mourning Wars exist, you pretensious redskin fuck.
 
Black people aren't indigenous to America. Native Americans have East Asian and Ancient North Eurasian (ANE alleles also caused blond hair!) genetics in their DNA. There are no known humans that originated from America.
 
Last edited:
There are no known humans that originated from America.

Umm what? Tribes of humans have existed in the Americas since the late paleolithic after the first bands of hunter-gatherers arrived from Asia across a land bridge that is now at the bottom of the ocean. I think it's pretty fair to say that some groups of humans "originated" here, in the same way other groups originated on the other continents. Unless you insist on going way far back in evolution, in which case, technically there are no known modern humans that originated from anywhere other than Africa.

Of course, for the purposes of organizing modern society, none of this is relevant except for in the context of studying archaeology. The people who put so much emphasis on who is "native" just want "Blood and Soil, but it's woke because whitey is the bad guy this time".
 
Umm what? Tribes of humans have existed in the Americas since the late paleolithic after the first bands of hunter-gatherers arrived from Asia across a land bridge that is now at the bottom of the ocean. I think it's pretty fair to say that some groups of humans "originated" here, in the same way other groups originated on the other continents. Unless you insist on going way far back in evolution, in which case, technically there are no known modern humans that originated from anywhere other than Africa.

Of course, for the purposes of organizing modern society, none of this is relevant except for in the context of studying archaeology. The people who put so much emphasis on who is "native" just want "Blood and Soil, but it's woke because whitey is the bad guy this time".
It doesn't matter either way, since the natives were quite proficient at taking over each other's land and territory.

This bullshit some people spout about "the natives had no concept of land ownership" is just that: bullshit. Yeah, the land may not have officially belonged to anyone specifically, but your stuff was still your stuff, and the tribe was going to defend their territory being encroached upon as viciously as an European, and they had enough trouble with people attacking and invading one another they actually created their own local confederacies. That meant they were politically sophisticated, for sure (humans tend to be), but it also spoke volumes as to the situation they were in: one would expect peoples who are always coexisting peacefully to not require peace treaties.

This all boils down to Noble Savage arguments.
 
Umm what? Tribes of humans have existed in the Americas since the late paleolithic after the first bands of hunter-gatherers arrived from Asia across a land bridge that is now at the bottom of the ocean. I think it's pretty fair to say that some groups of humans "originated" here, in the same way other groups originated on the other continents. Unless you insist on going way far back in evolution, in which case, technically there are no known modern humans that originated from anywhere other than Africa.

Of course, for the purposes of organizing modern society, none of this is relevant except for in the context of studying archaeology. The people who put so much emphasis on who is "native" just want "Blood and Soil, but it's woke because whitey is the bad guy this time".
They had to migrate from other lands. Hence why I said there are no known humans that originated from America. We all come from Africa. Anyway, you arriving there first doesn't mean other people aren't allowed to contest and fight for your land (at least, back then). Discovery does not mean keepsie forever. If you're not prepared enough, you'll be conquered. I don't understand why people demonize only the European settlers back then. Native Americans happily accepted black slaves into their lives and would happily fight other tribes over territory. Hell, tribes raped other tribes' women. They're not special--they're human, just like everyone else. Why is it so much more wrong that one race came over and demolished another race when if you look at it without color, it's yet another conquering? Is it only more OK if it's black-on-black or Amerind-on-Amerind killing? It seems like these people like segregation on all levels, including homicide.
 
Last edited:
The sad thing is that a lot of those fetishes are actually just cartoon tropes. If you actually look a the scenes that they claim that 'messed up them when they were children', the scenes themselves are completely mundane and ocile at best, absurd at worst. There is nothing 'hot' from being a living balloon.

Then again, when you find people having fetishes of cinder blocks o Ripto vomiting, I say tha they were messed up from the beginning.
Ripto vomic chick is still at it and has her own OC's now instead of Ripto. It goes a lot deeper than the art and there's a lot of weird stalking an underage ex and other stuff behind I seen up close years back. She seems to have calmed down a bit at least now, thank fuck, but yeah, I'm surprised not many folk realized the shit that was going on back then. She was just a minor note left on LadyAlts ED page for the most part. I suspect a big part of her not getting more attention drawn to her antics is her constant deleting/disabling her page every few days.

Most fetishes seem to come from the most mundane things, so I'm not surprised about the cartoon stuff. I've seen some folk who obsessess over specifically 'toony' things like those weird bumps that grow out a characters head when they get hit, 'dizzy' stuff with the birds and stars and crossed eyes, things like that.
 
The ones that really bake my noodle are the cardiophiles. You know those scenes in cartoons where a character has their heart jump out of their chest because they're so attracted/in love with someone?

Cardiophiles think that's hot as fuck. To the point they'll commission whole comics with characters fucking each other's hearts.

And here I am, wondering where did humanity go so wrong. I know this shit has always been there and it's only more obvious because of the internet (normally these weirdos would be jacking off alone at home instead of posting everything online) but are weird kinks just a result of our brains being too complex for their own good or something?
Humanity went wrong by being TOO prosperous. Consider Maslow's hierarchy of needs. When you live on a small farm in simple times where failing to feed yourself means certain starvation, a human has no time to worry about degenerate artwork or 'self-actualization'. When all lower needs of that hierarchy are fulfilled endlessly, people latch onto weird shit to fill that void in purpose.

Humanity was always fucked up, but prosperity allowed human's darkest urges to bubble to the surface.
 
This person is ALWAYS going off like this. It's a constant occurrence to see tweet walls of pure "whaaaa white ppl" when most of it isn't even an issue. A shame really because their art is very nice not gonna lie.

Like yeah I get it, we're treated like shit and what happened years ago was absolutely horrible and shouldn't be forgotten. But damn the whining over such non-issues like some white bitch living out in the woods, or someone who decides to put feathers in their sparkledogs hair is them just looking for things to complain about at this point.
I agree. I personally find their art cool enough to the point I considered ordering a print, but seriously this dude's attitude is nastier than a hotel room after a diaperfur room party.

The sad thing is that a lot of those fetishes are actually just cartoon tropes. If you actually look a the scenes that they claim that 'messed up them when they were children', the scenes themselves are completely mundane and ocile at best, absurd at worst. There is nothing 'hot' from being a living balloon.

Then again, when you find people having fetishes of cinder blocks o Ripto vomiting, I say tha they were messed up from the beginning.
With zoomers and late millenials I'd argue they may make an actual point. I remember being a wee lad with no internet restrictions and discovering inflation furry porn at the ripe age of eight. Then again I didn't turn into a furry inflation coomer, so who knows.
 
Humanity went wrong by being TOO prosperous. Consider Maslow's hierarchy of needs. When you live on a small farm in simple times where failing to feed yourself means certain starvation, a human has no time to worry about degenerate artwork or 'self-actualization'. When all lower needs of that hierarchy are fulfilled endlessly, people latch onto weird shit to fill that void in purpose.

Humanity was always fucked up, but prosperity allowed human's darkest urges to bubble to the surface.
nigga what the fuck, you think farmers fucking their animals is some new kind of degeneracy? Or is that less degenerate than weird cartoon animal people fucking to you? You're right that humans are a goddamn weird bag of fucked up but you think prosperity of all things enabled it in particular when this shit has been going on for millennia and simply happened to be less well documented.
 
I don't know, man. I would argue that the weebs are a much larger fandom than furries but even though randomly finding hentai is a bit of a meme, you can actually avoid most of it if you avoid the -boorus and whatnot, as opposed to furry places where you will find NSFW and SFW content hosted side by side.

The anime/manga fandom is an actual fandom. The people there are mostly fans of complete creative works, with characters, plots and resolutions, and while there are OCs and fan characters they aren't required and they aren't immediately assumed to be your avatar. The furry fandom isn't so clear cut. Yes, there's a sizable "fan" element to the furry fandom (that is, people who are in it because they're fans of a specific piece of work), Zootopia-fans-turned-furry being the most recent crop, but you can see the difference very clearly in one of the big rites of passage for a new furfag: they're all encouraged to create a fursona.

I think I've said this before, actually. Furries aren't a fandom. They're a lifestyle based on aesthetics. While some are in it because they enjoy stories featuring anthropomorphic characters, most are in it just because it appeals to their tastes/kinks. Since they don't have anything to actually base their interests on (there are no fandom-wide stories and/or characters to make fanart/fanfic of), they just turn inwards for inspiration. And what do they have inside? A lot of social awkwardness and pent-up sexual frustration, which gets overcompensated with their "in-character" behavior being obnoxiously "social" (even though they don't know how to be social) and 300% horny on main. You see it all the time with people who start out looking like normies, joking about how they're making a fursona but they would never get into certain fetishes... and then one or two years later they're neck-deep in nipplevore.

Shit, I need more coffee. I don't know how to finish this.
Interestingly a lot of the fetishes (particularly the extreme ones) you find in the furry fandom came from older hentai tropes (tentacles, shitting dick nipples, etc). The furry fandom has a lot of crossover with weebs. I think furry fetishes usually fall into two camps, the ones that came from hentai and the ones that came from weird Looney Tunes gags (like being flattened or cardiophilia).
 
Interestingly a lot of the fetishes (particularly the extreme ones) you find in the furry fandom came from older hentai tropes (tentacles, shitting dick nipples, etc). The furry fandom has a lot of crossover with weebs. I think furry fetishes usually fall into two camps, the ones that came from hentai and the ones that came from weird Looney Tunes gags (like being flattened or cardiophilia).
I'm sorry, Shitting WHAT-
 
Back