March for Trump (1/6) - (1/5-1/6), 18 NAKED PROUD BOYS IN THE SHOWER AT RAM RANCH

Was this a terrorist incident?

  • Yes

    Votes: 514 24.4%
  • No

    Votes: 543 25.8%
  • There were bad people(terrorists) involved, but that shouldn't reflect on everybody else

    Votes: 260 12.4%
  • It was the state who created terror

    Votes: 788 37.4%

  • Total voters
    2,105
Pretty dissappointing America.
At least in riots in other countries when people storm a goverment building, rioters usually beat the shit out of politicians, you guys just went in there to take selfies and do dumb gags, and left when the cops asked nicely.
You will do jail time btw.

4/10
It's a start.
Besides, in other countries they don't have intricate underground tunnels to escape the peasantry on their government buildings. Not to my knowledge.
 
Last edited:
Laughing is the only thing they can do, tbh. Imagine a group of bumpkins forming up and doing what you should have done in an afternoon while you dallied around for 9 months. Some are often taught to laugh at their failures as a coping mechanism.
They're laughing because the bumpkins are losers, BLM and Antifa are going to be heroes. After this incident, BLM and Antifa are going to have a free card to kill anyone they want on the other side of the line. Anyone on the other side of the line is now an insurrectionist and terrorist. The media says so, Democratic leaders say so, all foreign governments say so and most of the GOP says so.
 
A manifesto from the DC devastator, @SIGSEGV
d067f3e7ac39499f8b6493d0ad0d6043.png
 
I don't see the Republican Party surviving this in its current form. The split between the Trumpists and the Romney/Rubio/Oh god please we just want to bomb Iran we'll do anything wing is just too strong at this point. The 2022 elections will see that entire centrist wing swept out of existence, or they'll flip to the Democrats. 2024 will be even more chaotic.
 
They better prepare their anuses because Trump is gonna sue. Because he's a public figure currently and the law states you can't censor a government figure from free speech.
They've been doing that for months, no? Politicians getting censored is nothing new.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Grumpy
View attachment 1834278
View attachment 1834279
I didn't look at TheDonald in a week or two but last I checked, it was definitely glowing. People probably did threaten to take hostages.
They opened the doors right up and they still fucked it up!

Praying for everyone in Silicon Valley tonight. Blackout rules. Keep your lights off.
 
They've been doing that for months, no? Politicians getting censored is nothing new.
They're theatening to deny service to Trump. Judges ruled that Trump couldn't block anyone from seeing his page. Nor could twitter block people from seeing Trump's tweets. A ban would be the final nail in the coffin.
 
Laughing is the only thing they can do, tbh. Imagine a group of bumpkins forming up and doing what you should have done in an afternoon while you dallied around for 9 months. Some are often taught to laugh at their failures as a coping mechanism.
These kind of takes amaze me. In what sense the summer of George was less profitable/useful than the Retard Pride parade today? I don´t think it is a good thing but I believe one side achieved/consolidated way more than the other... are Trumpster walking back to their trailers via BLM Plaza, btw?
 
Twitter is flexing that it has more de-facto power than the leader of the free world.
Does it though?
Zoomers are more into TikTok and Boomers can't even log in without assistance. Twitter is only relevant to autistic Millenials in first world nations.
Facebook has more users and influence worldwide. Whatsapp alone makes them more powerful.
 
It's amazing how a social media site can censor the president of an entire country (well he still is for a couple more weeks) nowadays.
The guy has his own site, he could make a live tv announcement any time he chooses, or call a whole press conference.

You're giving way more power to Twitter than it actually has.
Visit Another Website.
 
Wait, didn't some judge state that Trump (and other public officials) legally couldn't block people from their twitter accounts because it was considered public information? If this is real there's no way that Twitter can lock down an elected official's account because of that precedent. He's going to sue the shit out of them and use the settlement money to fund his next campaign.
 
Back