March for Trump (1/6) - (1/5-1/6), 18 NAKED PROUD BOYS IN THE SHOWER AT RAM RANCH

Was this a terrorist incident?

  • Yes

    Votes: 514 24.4%
  • No

    Votes: 543 25.8%
  • There were bad people(terrorists) involved, but that shouldn't reflect on everybody else

    Votes: 260 12.4%
  • It was the state who created terror

    Votes: 788 37.4%

  • Total voters
    2,105
I don't think he was deliberately stomping on the flag, it seems he was just trying to buck it behind him so he won't trip on it.
All I want from this is that the rich men learn that maybe polarizing politics on the internet autism zone is not okay.

It's hard to kind of digest what happened in 2020 and today. I don't have political radicals around me, and I don't feel as if they are that way either. Most of the time we talk about our hobbies, families and what not. I live in a 1/2 and 1/2 state of liberals and conservatives. I want to know if there's kiwis that are experiencing the same thing as me or if I'm just out-of-touch.
And I don't think that all government officials are nefarious as they're being presented. Maybe some like Nancy, but there's hundreds of others out there that are normal people. And they don't get the spotlight because they aren't controversial (which is a good thing because they won't make decisions out of dopamine fuel). I have less confidence in this statement because I'm just a village idiot, but all I wanna say is that I hope ppl don't get hurt too much (:_(
I think most people are in a similar camp as you. The hyper-plugged-in tend to try to get others around them plugged in, and if those others don't, then they usually eschew them. Where I'm at has a lot of radicals around, but I don't get along with them because I don't really care to purposefully drench myself in an indoctrination chamber. I think that there will be a huge chunk of pro-trump people that are turned off by the shit that happened today, but they're not going to be that vocal about it and they'll just quietly change. The massive conspiracy shit has egged on a lot of people to new heights, but it has also turned off a lot of people. Run a new election tomorrow and the results might surprise you.

I stick my head into this shit because it's a good time, but I also have a (covid-impaired) functional normal life to turn to outside of laughing at speds and hurling blocks of text. That's a necessary grounding and distance that a lot of people seem to lack online, but have in spades in reality. Part of the reason I enjoy laughing at self-serious speds so much is to deal with the fact that this isn't a great place to be in, and a bunch of people hyping themselves up in an extreme echo chamber are actively trying risk inflicting extreme suffering and pain on the rest of the population... because they don't want to admit that they might be wrong.
 
Again, there is no way this is an isolated incident. Shit's about to get really real.
it's a bad idea to broadcast your formations before battle, announce the weaknesses you expect to take advantage of, and weaken your morale.

worse we saw many of those magapeeds were not willing to die. were they willing to make a statement? sure. and that'll do something, but not much more.
 
Because nobody should be violently burning and killing shit to get their way, regardless of what "side" youre on. That's how they do things in shit hole third world countries.
I don't disagree with you. That's all nice usually.

However, why should the right hold back when the left was allowed to burn, loot and destroy over a hoodrat only to get praise and strength as a group.

Why should the right keep playing by the rules of civility when it doesn't get you anything but called a nazi and chased out from your job?
 
I'm not very informed but why is everyone condemning the people that raid the capitol when the BLM cucks that burned buildings for not good reason got promoted as good people?
Every single website is painting those protesters as evil fascists but are they even doing any real damage? the only dead so far is a woman that got executed by the police and some people are straight up happy about it because she is "evil bad Nazi woman".


Surely there is some inequality here right? why is every website and news outlet left-sided?
my side is good your side is bad. Whenever my people do something I defend them, when the other side does something I attack them.
Its a winning strategy and the left been making nothing but progress for decades using it.
 
This guy is insanely lucky a cop/agent did not mistaken this device as some sort of IED, Who the fuck enters the biggest government building in the country wearing something like this?

213213231213.PNG
 
1) More wars. War with China over Taiwan's sovereignty, war with the Middle East over oil, maybe war with Russia if they get too aggressive with Ukraine.

2) The collapse of the middle class. Obviously the middle class has been shrinking since the Great Recession but I think we will see it completely vanish in the next few years.

3) More Covid. This isn't Biden's fault but Covid isn't magically going away any time soon. I doubt the vaccines will change anything either. I think lockdowns, social distancing, masks and working from home will just be reality from now on.
EL OH EL
Taiwan is fucked.
 
230 is safe at least for a while. Trumps autistic tantrums made sure of that
Did you miss the part where some democrats are already blaming social media for all of this?

Section 230 isn't safe. Lotta Dems want to "reform it" too so they can attempt to control social media directly through government regulation.

It's the only real way they can ensure that, literally, only their viewpoints are allowed to be seen and spoken about. It's about control.
 
You are going to get one eventually because there is only so long ine party can turn things to shit before it swings back.

Keep an eye out for 4-8 years from now.
Nah, they'll never let a man that honest in again. That he was the most honest voice in DC by a long shot is sad, but there it is. Nothing but wholly fake and gay from now on. Sure it'll swing back, back to an Obama or Biden or Nimrata or Crenshaw tier faggot.

I'll miss having a president willing to treat the media like they deserve. He was too nice to them, really. He should have gitmo'd the whole lot and replaced them with fawning racist blondes.
 
Because nobody should be violently burning and killing shit to get their way, regardless of what "side" youre on. That's how they do things in shit hole third world countries.
What should we do then? Vote them out™️? Protest? Start a hashtag? Boycott? Write angry letters to them?

Sorry, sugarnips, but we've done that, and it has gained us dick-all. These ivory tower fucknuts need to be reminded that they have power because we allow it, and they will relinquish that power when we demand it. They need to be reminded that, as our elected representatives, they are little more than slaves of We the People.
robert-a-heinlein-quote-anyone-who-clings-to-the-historically-untrue-a.jpg
 
You're right. Let me do the proper posting.
That Lindsey Graham! Such a snake. I hope he gets caterwauled unpleasantly in minecraft.
Really, I don't think that Trump is hurt that bad by this; actually, I think he'll come out in the end stronger than ever.
The GOPe is done for, put them in the ground. We'll keep fighting for our country and they can't stop us.
This random woman didn't deserve to die, alexa play despacito

This is a forums board. When you post about your political side of the aisle, your persuasion, people might recognize it and bring it up later.

Woodrow Wilson 2.0 is a reference to the Progressive Party AKA Bull Moose party splitting the vote. Tell me, do you think that Trump will quietly leave politics and his bloc will gladly hop and skip to join hands with the republicans? Or that the GOP that just fucking disowned him harder than any politician has been disowned in our lifetimes, will bend over and spread for his base?
Or do you think it'll look like the 1912 election, where Wilson, an awful and unlikable candidate, wins with just 41% of the vote vs 27 for Roosevelt and 23 for Taft because it's split down the middle?

Oh, yeah, that's really unlikely, doompilled. I'm reading tea leaves here.
By the way, whatever happened to UKIP, Yogurt Wilders, FN, the Swedish Democrats, AfD, and Kevin Bacon after 2016?
'Your political persuasion'

My political persuasion is I hate both parties. I was a southern Democrat until this year, and I only voted for Trump because I thought he was slightly better than the pedo zombie. I don't care about the closeted guy from North (?) Carolina, and I don't even know what GOPe stands for. I have even said that the woman played stupid games and won a stupid prize, but it sucks for her kids.

So what is your 'persuasion?' From your posts here and elsewhere, I am guessing either a standard republican or, worse, a deluded lolbertarian? Like I give two fucks about either. If the GOP dies because of Trump being a sperg, I would actually be ecstatic. I would love both modern parties to die, but I don't think we're that lucky.

So now we're clear on politics, what the fuck does any of this have to do with me telling you to calm your tits?
 
You really think Biden and his handlers will go to war with their benefactors?
this is going full schizo, but imagine for a moment you control the nation you're at war with.

if he's really stuck to china, and they have spies in his cabinet, his presidency would be a great time to attack.
 
Did you miss the part where some democrats are already blaming social media for all of this?

Section 230 isn't safe. Lotta Dems want to "reform it" too so they can attempt to control social media directly through government regulation.

It's the only real way they can ensure that, literally, only their viewpoints are allowed to be seen and spoken about. It's about control.
Calling it now.

Dems and Big Tech will reach a comprise. The dems won't put through reform section 230 as long as Big Tech censors right wing media more with an occasional left extremist to appear apolitical. The internet is safe!
 
Back