March for Trump (1/6) - (1/5-1/6), 18 NAKED PROUD BOYS IN THE SHOWER AT RAM RANCH

Was this a terrorist incident?

  • Yes

    Votes: 514 24.4%
  • No

    Votes: 543 25.8%
  • There were bad people(terrorists) involved, but that shouldn't reflect on everybody else

    Votes: 260 12.4%
  • It was the state who created terror

    Votes: 788 37.4%

  • Total voters
    2,105
The smart play here by Biden and the Democrats would be to take a page from Lincoln and appeal to the better Angel's. Biden Pardononing the MAGA chuds who went Rabble rabble at the Capital would be a huge gesture that would be pretty hard to top and start his Presidency off on the right foot. You know, about bridging the divide.

Sadly I know this wont happen. The far left wants blood and now that Trump is on the out the Media needs a new enemy to fear monger about for ratings. We had for an entire year a tidlewave of "fiery but mostly peaceful protests" that the Democrats not only actively encouraged through the media but even used their political power where available to protect and accelerate. More then 30 people were killed and tens of billions of dollars lost to property destruction. Property destruction I still see not repaired to this day in my home town. It holds not a candle to what happened at the Capital and the injured shrieking from the Media comes across as nothing less then hypocritical rantings from a power structure that long ago lost any semblance of respect.

I do not like the course of history our political leadership has chosen and I see a marked unwillingness to change it. It is not an Abberation that thousands of people went to DC and decided storming Congress was a Good Idea. This is indicative a very very serious issue because for every person in that crowd there were at least 100 other people watching it happen and applauding. This is massively dangerous and there seems to be zero awareness among the political class of just how dangerous this is. The First American Civil War did not break out spontaneously. There was a steady escalation. Random acts of violence and outrages that compounded over a period of 20 years. Two senators beating the shit out of each other on the floor of the Senate. Bleeding Kansas, John Browns Raid on Harpers Ferry. All incidents that in there individuality were minor. But were symptomatic of a larger problem boiling under the surface.

And in today's hyper partisan media environment, the incentive is to turn up the heat, not turn it off. God save the Republic.

But the right has the ability to stop them in their tracks within a year. Starve them, starve the corps and tech giants that are the real source of their power.

Let's do it if we even have an ounce of will.
 
Americans walking into the Capitol building in 2034 to proclaim the United Afro-Latinx American Empire like
View attachment 1838168
Spanish Racial Lesson.jpg
 
🚨🚨Don't do this🚨🚨------------->
USA Today is requesting help from the American public to identify protesters who were in the Capitol at DC. Some people are doing what's called "OPERATION: HYDE TODAY"
This operation is nice and simple:
Step 1: Turn on your VPN and be sure to use a burner google account.
Step 2: Fill out the form, choose a random photo number and answer the "name" section with any variation of "Samuel Whitcomb Hyde."
Step 3: Click "yes" under the "may we follow up with you" tab.
Step 4: Provide them a fake name and number. Have fun with it, use the national suicide prevention hotline if you like.

Here is the article link: Here is the specific form link: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf1wqki1tRZsxiPAz1aamzMyq7XuIm0Z1MDnaxxWI4M3esRew/viewform
View attachment 1838118

Now I'm not advocating for people doing this at all, but I think people should have the knowledge that evil trump supporters are doing this wretched plot. And I don't think using the same name over and over is that great of a method cause they do eventually catch on, so a variety of names would be better in all likelihood, but thats just my critique.
Sam Hyde is going to be made immortal isn't he
 
Yeah not even close to the mark. Shit on Trump for completely failing but the one thing Trump always had was his beliefs and his "gut" which he's been remarkably consistent about through the years.

He got booed loudly at the Republican debate for speaking out against the Iraq war and Bush. He's been nursing his populism for decades but nobody in power wanted what he did so he made some trade deals and peace deals and built a few hundred miles of wall but nothing much else got done.
He got booed loudly by establishment lobbyists. The American people were broadly on his side regarding the Iraq War (a war which Trump himself voiced support for back when it was popular to do so). Nothing about Trump's beliefs has been consistent over the years. If you think they have, you haven't been paying attention at all over the past 20 years.
 
Why is it whenever I look at someone who is posting something completely skitzoshit like this, they inevitably registered in 2020 and have done nothing but ever post in A&H threads

Kill yourself, fuck off back to /pol/ where you belong.
Something that has honestly and truly blown my mind about this place is how people on a website that isn't even a decade old will pull out the "newfag" card so readily during arguments. If this is your first real stint on a website, you may or may not be an old fag here, but you are doubtlessly a newfag on the internet. This isn't even touching on the fact that you're simultaneously bitching about someone migrating from cuckchan, while also using terminology popularized by cuckchan.
What the fuck is bunkerchan, who the fuck are you people, why would you register for this site in december 2020, you've been copeposting for an entire month.

Seek help.
>Doesn't know what bunkerchan is despite it being created by hotwheels
>Calls people newfags

...
 
So I know that the doxing double standard has been around for a long time, but I'm genuinely surprised no one has gone out of their way to report these violations of Twitter TOS, not in the hopes that they act on it and more to gather evidence of discriminatory corporate behavior.

I guess the moral is that according to the powers that be, doxing is wrong, but doxxing is totally kosher.
Do you mean this story publishing his address, or that the reporters got his address from the material that featured him?

Platforms with a bent (or a bent among the users who generate data which they train their recognition patterns and low-level audit employees on) will always probably have a skew, but there's a good question in here about whether these companies should have a duty to protect everyone's information about their identity unless they themselves explicitly post it. A lot of television won't let you use the faces of people that you record on a show, for example. Yet some of these tweets are getting millions on millions of views of the face and name.
Sadly I know this wont happen.
It's possible, but not probable. If he does do this, he won't pardon every single one, but still. Him dropping as much as he has from the progressive platform and barely even acknowledging BLM suggests that the far-left has functionally been rendered fangless in the house & senate similar to how the tea party/freedom caucus got neutered.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Kknd
In Rome tonight, more than a thousand activists from Casapound and other nationalist movements paid homage to Franco, Francesco and Stefano, young activists assassinated on January 7, 1978.
Per tutti i camerati caduti, presente!
 
Why is it whenever I look at someone who is posting something completely skitzoshit like this, they inevitably registered in 2020 and have done nothing but ever post in A&H threads

Kill yourself, fuck off back to /pol/ where you belong.
Lol calm down there champ, you might pull something while you're posturing that hard.
 
That's a good sign you should take action and actively fight tooth and nail against the degenerate bullshit they are spewing from the pulpit. I'm lucky to be in a pretty orthodox Catholic parish, but I would do anything and everything to get a priest that says something contrary to the Faith censured or laicized. The problems with a lot of "conservatives" is that they cower at the first sign of adversity especially in matters of faith and morals, when there have been thousands of fucking saints that have been canonized for their heroic martyrdoms (like those of all the Apostles except St. John, Justin Martyr, Ignatius of Antioch, the Japanese Martyrs, Thomas More,etc). They don't push back at all because they're no different from your average leftist hedonist except them might slightly dislike the things the leftists like. Learn to hate evil and learn to love what is good most importantly. Then you can actually preserve it instead of letting it fester like a pus wound. A virtuous man dies only but once but a thousand times a day.
The Pope is pozzed. You lose.
 
How would you know? You don't believe in them in the first place so there's no point convincing you.

You do realize that the Mass is a sacrifice in Catholic (and Orthodox (albeit under the he name of Divine Liturgy)) theology right? As in, by recreating the Last Supper, we believe Jesus Christ becomes present in the bread and wine and makes it his Body and Blood, which he sacrificed for us on Calvary. If you took 10 seconds to look this up on Wikipedia this would be readily apparent. It just shows your lack of interest in learning anything that makes a religion a religion, namely ritual. A religion without any rituals is just a philosophy, so that's why I'm recommending you some.

I don't really care for Liebniz or really any Enlightenment philosopher. Frankly, I only like the various Ancient virtue ethicist schools of philosophy (Aristotelianism, (Neo)Platonism, Stoicism), Scholasticism, the Phenomenological School of Germany (specifically Heidegger and Husserl and their students Edith Stein and Hannah Arendt) and a few English Analytic philosophers like G.E.M. Anscombe, Roger Scruton, Alasdair MacIntyre and Michael Dummett (my user-namesake). I feel like they have a better conception of reality than most Enlightenment philosophers ever did, as evidenced by the fact that institutions based on Enlightenment principles are currently crumbling before our eyes at record pace.

The second you start applauding Frankfurt School fuckery, is the second I automatically discount everything you have to say.
 
Politico, January 6th:



1610087897858.png


Also Politico, January 7th:



1610087919191.png


Pretty sure I have whiplash.
 
Vote third party. It's better than not voting at all, since it will give a tangible number to how many people they pissed off, rather than thinking people are just "less energized".
Fuck 3rd party. Remember when the Libertarian Candidate called and white people to be actively anti-racist? They're just as treacherous. Just write in Harambe on all ballots forevermore.
 
Fuck 3rd party. Remember when the Libertarian Candidate called and white people to be actively anti-racist? They're just as treacherous. Just write in Harambe on all ballots forevermore.
Speaking as a libertarian, the Libertarian Party is a fucking joke and should be ridiculed by everyone.

View attachment 1838178I used to think that my life was a tragedy, but now I realize, it’s a comedy.
Oh God. 7 months of ignoring non-stop leftist riots later and the shitlibs are going to start screeching that Joker finally made straight white men violent.
 
Do you mean this story publishing his address, or that the reporters got his address from the material that featured him?

Platforms with a bent (or a bent among the users who generate data which they train their recognition patterns and low-level audit employees on) will always probably have a skew, but there's a good question in here about whether these companies should have a duty to protect everyone's information about their identity unless they themselves explicitly post it. A lot of television won't let you use the faces of people that you record on a show, for example. Yet some of these tweets are getting millions on millions of views of the face and name.
I mean the direct violation of their stated policy of not allowing theirs users to post the personal information of individuals for purposes of harassment or intimidation.
 
Back