March for Trump (1/6) - (1/5-1/6), 18 NAKED PROUD BOYS IN THE SHOWER AT RAM RANCH

[FaramirG]

Apparently there's a clause in the 14th Amendment that bans anyone who joins or "provides comfort" to an insurrection from ever holding public office again, and all Congress needs to make it happen is a simple majority. Wonder if they'll use it on Trump, would be a simple way to knock him out of the '24 election if he literally isn't legally allowed to run.

 

[Rich Evans Apologist]

I have some questions for whoever, in this thread.

1. Is it that you don’t believe anyone involved in this went there planning to take hostages and execute various people starting with Pence, or that you do, and you think they believed their actions, in which you would never participate and do not approve of in any way, would’ve been theoretically justified in Minecraft?
2. To me, 90% of these people illustrated that thing Grampas ask when their dog comes back from chasing the garbage truck: What do you think you’d do with it if you caught it? Other than the 10% or so who may have had an actual plan (and came prepared with restraints and constructed the gallows etc) which will no doubt be investigated, what do you think they thought was going to happen next? To them? Your basic Rick and Karen in that crowd. What did they think happens next after you storm the US Capitol?

That‘s what I keep wondering. I just can’t figure how you take these actions and think you’re going home to live your life, and I can’t figure how they thought they’d actually overturn the election that day, and I can’t figure how they thought maybe Trump would protect them? Did they think the government would see no difference between rioters burning down Portland and rioters constructing a gallows and storming the US Capitol while the VP and the entire order of succession was inside? Because even if you think morally it’s the same or worse to burn Portland, did they really think the goddamn feds would agree?

People who never paid attention to political elections or to the nation's history are, surprise surprise, also prone to never having paid attention to its laws or blossoming security state. There's no doubt that some frenzy overtook the people that rushed into the building, but it doesn't explain the sheer look of surprise on these peoples' face when their selfies in the capitol building started being used to find and arrest them.

The defense at the moment has been that no-one was armed, which continues to ignore that concealed carry is a thing and that even just one guy carrying in a group of 100+ does indeed give you the option to do executions - nevermind that you can also pretty easily just club someone to death with a flagpole. They unironically believe that if they plead "innocence" with arguments like this, they'll get left off. Turns out someone you can giddily convince to jump off of a cliff isn't exactly the brightest.

 

[wtfNeedSignUp]

I wonder what would have happened if the cops in the capital had just started unloading rounds on the protestors, ending it with several people dead. Would that had massively enflamed the protests, or had the media memoryhole the entire event?

 

[Arm Pit Cream]

lol

 

[Cope or Rope]

When leftists claim the police were going easy, just send em this.
View attachment 1842510

That's been debunked by independent fact checkers lmao

 

[DumbDude42]

EU/Merkel taking issue with censorship is the most surprising to me tbh. I expected them to celebrate the bravery and strength of such a difficult move against hate

it's pure virtue signaling

most EU countries (germany in particular) already have censorship and anti hate speech rules applied by de facto government oversight, which is pretty much the exact thing that the left has been wanting for america too since many years ago.
them acting all high and mighty is purely a PR move primarily directed at their own people to play off common anti american sentiment for popular support.

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

Fun fact, impeaching Donald Trump wouldn't do anything to his future prospects:

Fact check: No, impeachment itself would not ban Trump from a 2024 run

A viral tweet claims that impeaching President Donald Trump for a second time would mean he would lose the ability to run for president in 2024.

www.cnn.com

All the people who've been insistent that he couldn't run again in 2024 if he were impeached are retards. MFW CCN has to correct you on this and doesn't just openly agree with a misconception for go-along-get-along reasons.

 

[Rich Evans Apologist]

Fun fact, impeaching Donald Trump wouldn't do anything to his future prospects:

Fact check: No, impeachment itself would not ban Trump from a 2024 run

A viral tweet claims that impeaching President Donald Trump for a second time would mean he would lose the ability to run for president in 2024.

www.cnn.com

All the people who've been insistent that he couldn't run again in 2024 if he were impeached are retards. MFW CCN has to correct you on this and doesn't just openly agree with a misconception for go-along-get-along reasons.

Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.

Mind, as the CNN text itself says, he has to be convicted by the senate for this to occur. Yes, a second house impeachment alone doesn't do anything.

 

[DumbDude42]

Taking siege on the capital would not only be stupid, but a waste of time. If the past 3 years has proven anything, it has proven that these Big Tech monopolies have privatized free speech, and that they have become more powerful than the federal government ( at least in terms of how much control they have over our private lives).

Spoiler: If I were playing Minecraft, this is what i would do

Wouldn't it make more sense if they overtook Google HQ and/or sabotage one of their server farms? I mean, they'd probably have less of a chance of getting ventilated on the spot, and more likely to get their desired outcome. Again, can't stress this enough: in Minecraft.

the people who did the capitol spergout were not the kind of calm and collected insurrectionist that would come to a conclusion like you laid out. they are hysteric lunatics and attention whores, more interested in broadcasting their faces to their boomer friends on the internet and livestreaming themselves inside the building than in actually causing serious damage or disruption to their political enemies.

in objective terms, yes, blowing up a google datacenter or two would have much more real impact than autistically screeching "STOP THE STEAL" in d.c. but these people are not serious people, they are loud mouthed amateurs who really can't (and don't want to) do anything more serious than yell and screech for attention in a public way

 

[Elbe]

Are we still trusting THE PLAN? Because, I'll be honest, I'm having a few doubts right now.

 

[Arm Pit Cream]

Wake up, Joe!

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

lol
View attachment 1842594View attachment 1842595

Why did you censor the images?

 

[Slap47]

It's not just snitching. How much do you have to hate yourself and your relatives to report them for such a unreasonable thing. It's kinda sad.

This is the future.

 

[Elbe]

Wait....panic over! We're back on track.

 

[A Cat in a Minefield]

View attachment 1842646

This is the future.

I'm not sure if the answer in this post is ironic, but if it isn't it is funny how dumb it is

 

[Endu]

Are we still trusting THE PLAN? Because, I'll be honest, I'm having a few doubts right now.

Keep believing, fellow groyper! This is just a feint to give Trump's enemies false hope! He will sweep the election once all the court cases are finished being heard!

 

[FaramirG]

I wonder what would have happened if the cops in the capital had just started unloading rounds on the protestors, ending it with several people dead. Would that had massively enflamed the protests, or had the media memoryhole the entire event?

Idk, there's enough of a mindless bootlicker element to that crowd that they would probably try to rationalize it as the cops doing the right thing. "Back the Blue" and all that. I think it's part of why there hasn't been more of a backlash for that Air Force girl who got shot.

 

[FAQnews Correspondent]

View attachment 1842646

This is the future.

It's getting to the point where you cannot associate yourself with people of certain political persuasions.

 

[RomanesEuntDomus]

The defense at the moment has been that no-one was armed, which continues to ignore that concealed carry is a thing and that even just one guy carrying in a group of 100+ does indeed give you the option to do executions - nevermind that you can also pretty easily just club someone to death with a flagpole. They unironically believe that if they plead "innocence" with arguments like this, they'll get left off. Turns out someone you can giddily convince to jump off of a cliff isn't exactly the brightest.

Also: Not carrying a gun ≠ being unarmed. Knives, clubs, fire extinguishers used to spray people in the face (that can also be used to bash someone's head in). There were plents of weapons, but no visible guns.
It's a bit silly, but Buffalo Bill was carrying a spear... not like I think he planned to shank Pence in the face with it, but you never know. A bladed weapon is nothing to take lightly in close quarters and such a situation. Doesn't have to be Buffalo Bill that uses it, some tard might yank it out of his hands and use it to kill someone else.

It was an armed mob by any definition of the word. Might as well say BLM was unarmed, cause they didn't have TOW missiles on standby.

 

[FaramirG]

No there isn't wtf are you even talking about, you can actually read the Constitution you know, you don't just need to make shit up.

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/amendment-14/section-3/

"No Person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability."