March for Trump (1/6) - (1/5-1/6), 18 NAKED PROUD BOYS IN THE SHOWER AT RAM RANCH

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.

Was this a terrorist incident?

  • Yes

    Votes: 514 24.4%
  • No

    Votes: 543 25.8%
  • There were bad people(terrorists) involved, but that shouldn't reflect on everybody else

    Votes: 260 12.4%
  • It was the state who created terror

    Votes: 788 37.4%

  • Total voters
    2,105
Every single hot take I've seen from normies who were barely aware of this when it was happening until like the next day has been basically this
20210113_080748.jpg

Apparently the last 7 months didn't
happen
Screen-Shot-2020-06-01-at-8.32.45-AM.png

PRC_153216112.jpg

3000.jpg
merlin_173048241_e8f406ac-62dd-44bc-92f0-ffe68709be21-articleLarge.jpg

YQD4BET4GFC3VGV4LHWV6QPCPQ.png

GettyImages_1219989083t.jpg
I've heard people say lefties don't care at all that boomers or whatever stormed the capitol but about the police response and use of force between the two types of protests was unfair.
Bro redditors would really throw the ones they love to the damn Gestapo just cause of political beliefs and disagreement. It's interesting though to see in little over year time span of people being hypocritical and doing what they preached not to do just to get at another they hate. That's hate son.
Remember these types of people still believe boomer qtards and drumpers are the REAL nazis/fascists despite having no swaying power politically nor socially but acab and fuck the system(when it's convenient and socially acceptable then it's all about that snitch shit) right?
It's only considered terrorism when it's the lives of politicians at stake, you the average citizen don't matter.
 

Attachments

  • PRC_153216112.jpg
    PRC_153216112.jpg
    141.5 KB · Views: 21
I'd value your opinion more if you were, since I'm a weeb. Alas, you're using some assmad Hamtaro(?) shit.
Dude, it's Ebichu, it's like an NSFW spoof of Hamtaro. Check it out, it's a riot. no pun intended.
something scary there commie? The van instills the fear of God into any antifa
This might be hard for you to fathom, but just cause I am calling Qtards spergs doesn't mean I side with Antifa. What are you, 12?

There's no reason to continue playing by rules that are blatantly lopsided. Why is the Right always obligated to be noble suckers?
I wholeheartedly agree. Which is why I want to see both sides get their punishment. If people just start to ignore the law, you end up with bloodshed on the streets by angry mobs and I would assume that's not what people in general want, therefore the legal system has to become active.

Unfortunately the left will bitch about how all cops and people in the legal system are nazis and only punish the left, while the right will bitch about the cops and people in the legal system are establishment commie thugs and only punish the right. Look at this Capitol thing, how many retards on the left claim this was a cakewalk for the right wing during the riots, ignoring videos of people getting beaten up by the police of hit in the face by rubber bullets.

Also, saying that you want the equivalent of a person who slaps another treated the same as one who beats a person down with a baseball bat doesn't make sense.
Another nice fallacy: Strawmanning. Point out where I said I want them to receive the same punishment. I want both sides to face the legel repercussions of their actions, if you don't understand the difference, that's not my problem.

It just means you want to sit on the fence and be considered a good person.
So, advocating for the application of the law in equal measure is fence sitting? Are you for fucking real?
It means he wants to downplay the BLM riots in comparison to the capitol incident.
Nope. Try again.
 
Last edited:
Nope. Try again.

Ok let me put this another way. Were you calling for a crackdown on domestic "terrorists" when Steve Scalise got shot? I'm sure you don't condone it and will say that you want equal application of the law, but it's patently obvious that you are not measuring the left and right equally, which is why posters are pointing it out.

The left has done political violence to a far greater extent and for far longer and no massive crackdown was instigated. Was Trump wrong to not add politicians like AOC to a no fly list or are the democrats wrong for thinking that doing it to Hawley and Cruz is fair game. I firmly believe the latter.
 
I don't know. There were suggestions by some (without evidence that I know of) that Trump would start his own media brand after all this. And Lord knows that recent events and the behaviour of Big Tech have given him plenty of ammunition to do so. I think that's partly what things like deplatforming Twitter and banning him from Facebook are all about. There have been so many responses of "if you don't like it build your own platform" that they're worried he might take them up on it. It may also be part of why they're so keen to humiliate him by removing him from office early (like that wont backfire).

We'll see.

Separately, I'm seeing a marked increase in the speed to which people are now embracing accelerationism.
The only thing Trump will be doing in the next couple of years is filing for Chapter 11 and trying to avoid prison. There's going to be no redemption arc for him.

If he hadn't acted like a teenage girl when the election was stolen he could have leveraged the justified outrage to protect himself and launch a comeback.

Instead he went and played golf and tweeted out nonsense while taking his dumps.

There was no opp-sec during the election. There was no ground game to gather intelligence. There was no coherent media campaign.

And he capped it off with an, admittedly hilarious, sperg out followed by an immediate collapse into the greatest cuck out in recorded history.
 
The establishment elite don't want us dead, thats what I think people are missing out of all this.
They don't want us dead because thats one less serf. One less taxpayer. One less consumer.
One less body to use and abuse.
They want us compliant and stupid, and if we can't be that then they want us gagged and muzzled. They want us smeared and removed from public life. They want us unable to speak and convey thought because ideas are so very dangerous.
The future totalitarian state will not be one of gulags and death camps. Do not picture a boot stamping on a human face when you try to imagine tomorrow.
Picture a man without a voice, desperate to scream.
Rating you optimistic because elites have been happy to let the opioid epidemic slowly rise, and force small businesses to ultimately collapse with little to no compensation; Ultimately leading to increased deaths of despair. They might not actively want most people dead so far, but they certainly seem to be fine with encouraging the conditions to passively... "thin the herd" if you know what I mean.
 
In equal measure: Ie treating both sides with the same scrutiny. As opposed to a lopsided approach that favours one side based on political affiliation.
Did you really need this to be cleared up for you?
Yeah that's weird because as much as you claim you are it's obvious you're not. You're sperging out that someone stole a podium and sat at a cunt's desk while doing the "What BLM did was bad, BUT..."

You also still act like the list thing started after the riot when Dems literally wanted a list started the week after the election.
 
I want to stop using Apple products so bad but Android/Google sucks shit worse. There's shit like this and then Apple is also going hard into globohomo politics e.g. their last keynote where it was nothing but black people and no whiteys. I wish you could just make your own phone with parts from Newegg like with a PC.
Get a flip phone, retard.
 
I'm sure you don't condone it and will say that you want equal application of the law, but it's patently obvious that you are not measuring the left and right equally, which is why posters are pointing it out.
So, just to get this straight: When I say that I want the law to apply to everyone equally, that is me not measuring the left and right equally, but rather me somehow supporting the left... and this is the case after I have made numerous remarks on the last few pages alone, that the Capitol riot was in no way comparable in scope to what BLM did?

Well okay then.
What do I need to do to measure them equally exactly? I'd like to hear that.

You're sperging out that someone stole a podium and sat at a cunt's desk while doing the "What BLM did was bad, BUT..."
Feel free to post a quote of me doing anything remotely like that, please.
 
You also still act like the list thing started after the riot when Dems literally wanted a list started the week after the election.
This is important to remember. The Dems didn't just now start calling for gulags for Trumpies. They've been waiting for 4 years to avenge Princess Pantsuit.

When Obama was elected, the dumb bitter clingers were supposed to have been put in their place once and for all. Trump winning in '16 disproved that.

It all comes down to the Democrats' wounded pride. They'd rather brand half the country as Russians and terrorists before admitting, nay, even considering, the idea that they're capable of wrongdoing.

Their message is clear: "we are your betters! How DARE you defy us!"
 
Last edited:
Look I am gonna give some advice to any idiot who thinks showing up for any protest at state capitol buildings especially if you are cock waiving a gun lawfully. Now is not the time, Any other time this is fine but now is definitely not the time. Trump caved in, Q bullshit is bullshit and the dems and house are just waiting for a fucking reason as if the January 6th Riot was not reason enough. If you want to have your rights get fucked then show up. If you do not want them to be fucked as hard as they will be stay home. Do you want to lose a finger or your entire hand?
 
Ok let me put this another way. Were you calling for a crackdown on domestic "terrorists" when Steve Scalise got shot? I'm sure you don't condone it and will say that you want equal application of the law, but it's patently obvious that you are not measuring the left and right equally, which is why posters are pointing it out.

The left has done political violence to a far greater extent and for far longer and no massive crackdown was instigated. Was Trump wrong to not add politicians like AOC to a no fly list or are the democrats wrong for thinking that doing it to Hawley and Cruz is fair game. I firmly believe the latter.
comparing a lone wolf to an organized group which clearly traded tips, organized, and planned an event and calling them synonymous is about as retarded as suggesting that screaming and trying to vandalize a federal courthouse is synonymous to breaking into the nation's capitol.
Yeah that's weird because as much as you claim you are it's obvious you're not. You're sperging out that someone stole a podium and sat at a cunt's desk while doing the "What BLM did was bad, BUT..."

You also still act like the list thing started after the riot when Dems literally wanted a list started the week after the election.
Yeah, breaching the nation's capitol is definitely not an international disgrace which thoroughly damages the US's reputation and definitely not a crime punished far higher than looting and arson in every country in the world or anything. I mean, go on, find me a country that treats them as equivalent.
 
Well okay then.
What do I need to do to measure them equally exactly? I'd like to hear that.

Like I said in my previous post, a congressman was shot in 2017. Now we can (should) both agree that was worse than what the capitol hill rioters did. So therefore in equal treatment land the governments response should have been greater for the second instance than the first.

Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley have both been put on no fly lists because they are tangentially related to the rioters in DC. I think this a gross overreaction along with a bunch of other shit they are going to try and ram through as a response. Trump shouldn't be impeached over this (and probably won't be convicted anyway) but if the dems had their way, he would.

In contrast when Scalise was shot they only punished the man responsible. I think this was the correct response and all I ask is for you to confirm whether the Dems are overreacting or whether the Trump administration should have cracked down on all Bernie Bros and tangentially related dem congressman like Barbara Waters?

I just want an answer to that question.
 
It’s so bizarre to see Republicans who’ve been backing Trump for years now all of a sudden turn on the guy on a dime. I can’t tell if they just wanna distance themselves from him now because his reputation is just that bad at this point or if they always saw the guy as a useful idiot that they were gonna throw to the wolves when it was convenient for them anyways.
I still support Donald Trump. Ike was President when I was born, so have seen many Presidents. Trump has his failings, but far as I'm concerned he's the best President since Reagan. Have never doubted President Trump's desire to put America and the American people first. The Dems stole the election from him. Once he steps down from office there will be NO leadership in Washington, just office-holders.

If anyone has noticed, ever since congress got cucked last week, all they seem to be doing is acting like a bunch of little bitches. Can't think of anything they've done to meet the needs of the people. All they are worried about is punishing the peons who had the audacity to enter their holy sepulchre. Hate to say it, but a person really needs to step back and wonder if democracy has simply failed in the USA. The vast majority of senators and congresspeople are re-elected, time after time. They apparently end up believing they are the people's masters instead of their servants. And some of those elected to congress are idiots, such as the clown who was worried about Guam tipping over, or AOC, etc. Even worse, there are plenty who milk their time in office for the maximum financial gain possible, for themselves, their relatives, and their friends. Haven't we all seen too much of that? Remember, Donald Trump accepted no salary as President, donated it throughout his term.

It's been said that the first 535 names in a phone book could govern the country better than the present office-holders in congress. Am quite sure of that. I could see all formerly-elected positions being filled by lottery, with basic age/background qualifications. You'd serve one term, period. Selections staggered for continuity. President and Vice President would be chosen by lottery, at different times, from those who'd previously served as Senators/Representatives. You don't need to be a genius to be a great public servant. Just have common sense and be willing to listen. Problem is now, too many office-holders, at all levels, once elected, no longer care about those who elected them. See that in the city I live in. Not voting any more except for bond issues and initiatives. Otherwise, my vote is meaningless.

1610553269252.png



1610553389538.png



Here's a story about a Congresswoman who's told Harvard to fuck off after they canceled her from a board where she'd been serving for many years. Looks like she has some guts.

Harvard removes GOP Rep. Elise Stefanik from advisory board as part of purge. Here’s her response.​

January 12, 2021 | Jon Dougherty | Print Articl



New York Republican Rep. Elise Stefanik was removed from a politics advisory board at Harvard University over claims of voting irregularities in the 2020 presidential election.

“Over the past several days, Mark Gearan and I have spent a good deal of time considering the role at the Institute of Politics of our colleague Congresswoman Elise Stefanik, whom I have included in this message,” Dean Douglas Elmendorf wrote to the Senior Advisory Committee of the Institute of Politics at Harvard Kennedy School, which Gearan heads.



“Mark and I have read public materials, listened to students and alumni, and consulted with colleagues at Harvard on this important matter,” Elmendorf continued,

“Following this consideration, I spoke with Elise and asked her to step aside from the Senior Advisory Committee. My request was not about political parties, political ideology, or her choice of candidate for president,” he wrote.
“Rather, in my assessment, Elise has made public assertions about voter fraud in November’s presidential election that have no basis in evidence, and she has made public statements about court actions related to the election that are incorrect,” wrote Elmendorf. “Moreover, these assertions and statements do not reflect policy disagreements but bear on the foundations of the electoral process through which this country’s leaders are chosen.

“I made this request to Elise mindful of her important contributions to the crucial mission of the Institute of Politics over a long period, beginning with her role as a student leader (she was in the class of 2006) and continuing to her mentoring students and strengthening the IOP’s programming in many ways. I know that we are grateful for her long and committed service,” he noted further.
“In my conversation with Elise, she declined to step aside, and I told her that I would therefore remove her from the IOP’s Senior Advisory Committee at this time,” Elmendorf said.

Last week, Stefanik joined scores of other House Republicans in objecting to slates of electors from states where officials altered voting rules and procedures ahead of the Nov. 3 General Election. Stefanik and others have said they believe those changes were unconstitutional because they were not made by state legislatures and appeared to violate existing state election laws.
Nevertheless, her objection led more than 750 Harvard students and alumni to petition for her removal from the board.

In response, the New York Republican blasted the decision, saying that the board now consists “only of Joe Biden voters.”
“As a conservative Republican, it is a rite of passage and badge of honor to join the long line of leaders who have been boycotted, protested, and canceled by colleges and universities across America,” Stefanik said in a statement.
“The decision by Harvard’s administration to cower and cave to the woke Left will continue to erode diversity of thought, public discourse, and ultimately the student experience,” she continued. “The Ivory Tower’s march toward a monoculture of like-minded, intolerant liberal views demonstrates the sneering disdain for everyday Americans and will instill a culture of fear for students who will understand that a conservative viewpoint will not be tolerated.”
“I relish the opportunity to stand up for freedom of speech and freedom of thought on college campuses across America,” she added. “Congratulations Harvard, the entire Board of the Institute of Politics now consists only of Joe Biden voters — how reflective of America.”




 
Last edited:
Back