March for Trump (1/6) - (1/5-1/6), 18 NAKED PROUD BOYS IN THE SHOWER AT RAM RANCH

Was this a terrorist incident?

  • Yes

    Votes: 514 24.4%
  • No

    Votes: 543 25.8%
  • There were bad people(terrorists) involved, but that shouldn't reflect on everybody else

    Votes: 260 12.4%
  • It was the state who created terror

    Votes: 788 37.4%

  • Total voters
    2,105
No one says there's no fraud. There's 360 million people in the US, of course there's some bad actors. Hell, in PA alone, they arrested two guys who committed voting fraud for Trump. However, the amount that it occurs isn't enough to change the results. A few dozen people out of 150 million voters isn't going to do shit.

Trump and his cult are just seething that he lost, and so they're clinging onto the hope that the conman they worship is indeed as popular as their echo chamber said he was
Here is how I understand the argument from the people actually arguing in good faith

"you don't know how the complicated election process works, I don't know how the complicated election process works. The same people who have the power to change national election results have the power to avoid being fingered for it"

I'm not saying I agree but when your put in the position of defending our federal governments integrity..... well they have a proven history of screwing over the American people for what's politicly expedient
 
So basically someone tweeted some A&N tier shit and then maybe acted a little rowdy in public. Who the fuck cares? This isn't terrorism.

Thank you for saying this. I know you don't have much love for Trump, but it genuinely sickens me just how many people are trying to claim it was terrorism just because they hate the orange man.

In the absence of a single, universally-agreed definition of "terrorism," it is a matter of subjective determination as to whether these tweets they have been charged over should be described as acts of "domestic terrorism."

For me terrorism would be the combination of the following:

1) Extreme and orchestrated violence where it is almost certain that the public death of at least person is present.
2) A clear goal, demand or an affirmative statement that the terrorist(s) seek to achieve by either; a) to hold hostage and to ransom an individual or set of individuals or b) inflict a damage for which it is either implied or explicitly stated that further incidents can and will happen if said goal or demand is not met or said statement is not recognised.

Damn, defining this was a lot harder than I thought it would be when I started writing this. By my definition BLM riots were not terrorists as although criteria 1) could be satisfied (with an eye squint) criteria 2) is a loss and no "racial justice" is not a goal, demand or an affirmative statement. The capitol hill riots fail on 1) and 2).

For me, Entebbe would be the purest example of terrorism with acts like 9/11 and the Oklahoma city bombings being terrorism in the broader sense of the word.
 
Last edited:
For me terrorism would be the combination of the following:

1) Extreme and orchestrated violence where it is almost certain that the public death of at least person is present.
2) A clear goal, demand or an affirmative statement that the terrorist(s) seek to achieve by either; a) to hold hostage and to ransom an individual or set of individuals or b) inflict a damage for which it is either implied or explicitly stated that further incidents can and will happen if said goal or demand is not met or said statement is not recognised.

Damn, defining this was a lot harder than I thought it would be when I started writing this. By my definition BLM riots were terrorists as although criteria 1) could be satisfied (with an eye squint) criteria 2) is a loss and no "racial justice" is not a goal, demand or an affirmative statement. The capitol hill riots fail on 1) and 2).

For me, Entebbe would be the purest example of terrorism with acts like 9/11 and the Oklahoma city bombings being terrorism in the broader sense of the word.
I was modifying a quote from Snopes defending Susan Rosenberg being in possession of explosives, so you know.
 
Apparently he is impeached for the second time. Good luck Qanon.
No but you don't understand...when Pelosi came out and greeted the National Guard then gave them all coins, that pointed to a Q drop where coins are mentioned and therefore every military member is secretly waiting to spring the elaborate trap and nobody can stop what is coming
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Tismguide
The camp Auschwitz guy was arrested. The attack by the left and the media against him has been ridiculous, I keep seeing people calling him a nazi or white supremacist when his shirt is clearly a boomer saying crying about muh nazis and the authoritarian government or something.
Screenshot_20210113-164249_Chrome.jpgScreenshot_20210113-164421_Chrome.jpg
 
The camp Auschwitz guy was arrested. The attack by the left and the media against him has been ridiculous, I keep seeing people calling him a nazi or white supremacist when his shirt is clearly a boomer saying crying about muh nazis and the authoritarian government or something.
View attachment 1845718View attachment 1845719
I can't be the only one who thinks this guy looks like Alan Moore.
 

Attachments

  • alanmoore.jpg
    alanmoore.jpg
    94.1 KB · Views: 26
Another impeachment a week away from him stepping down anyways. What clown shoes nonsense is this. Well, can't say his presidency has been boring, that's for sure.
It's so that dems and media get the best of both worlds.

The media can continue on crying about trump for another year while ignoring any stupid shit Biden/dems do..

The dems also have ability now to pretend they can't pass any legislation(they were never going to pass anyways).
 
Back