March for Trump (1/6) - (1/5-1/6), 18 NAKED PROUD BOYS IN THE SHOWER AT RAM RANCH

Was this a terrorist incident?

  • Yes

    Votes: 514 24.4%
  • No

    Votes: 543 25.8%
  • There were bad people(terrorists) involved, but that shouldn't reflect on everybody else

    Votes: 260 12.4%
  • It was the state who created terror

    Votes: 788 37.4%

  • Total voters
    2,105
Faggots on twitter say armed forces use those as "bragging rights" higher up the official who gives it to you the more prestige yada yada

Any vets in here can back that up?

From my eyes it looks like she tossed them all one of these
View attachment 1845643
and got a photo-op out of it
chuck-e-challenge-coin.jpg


I had to.
 
Impeach the orange man before his term up for your hurt ego... WHAT could possibly go wrong. Alright boys, we have a significant amount of RINO's ready to impeach the orange man like retards, so get ready for mass scale IRL glow posting because the skies are about to turn reddish green. May Allah have no mercy on Nancy's child eating soul.
 
It doesn't. Being a psychopathic ass doesn't rate against being a psychopathic ass. No one is in the right doing anything like that. Why does it always have to be, "Well at least it wasn't ..." with some folks? Assholery is assholery, plain and simple.
Some people mysteriously only complain when the Dreaded Alt-Right does Thing, but are conveniently silent (EDIT: or not as vociferous in their anger) when other people do it. That is why it is important to implicitly ask where others were back then. This is not difficult.
 
Last edited:
Impeach the orange man before his term up for your hurt ego... WHAT could possibly go wrong. Alright boys, we have a significant amount of RINO's ready to impeach the orange man like retards, so get ready for mass scale IRL glow posting because the skies are about to turn reddish green. May Allah have no mercy on Nancy's child eating soul.
Maybe we'll get a reenactment of 1812 again
 
Some people mysteriously only complain when the Dreaded Alt-Right does Thing, but are conveniently silent when other people do it. That is why it is important to implicitly ask where others were back then. This is not difficult.
It's not difficult, but it is a bit pointless. My Pap used to say that anyone who cares about the state of your tomatoes is having a shit growing season.
 
Theres a lot of suspect shit going on with Baked Alaska, somehow he's able to avoid being charged for any of this well at the same time having the FBI use his footage for their posters.
View attachment 1845568
View attachment 1845567


So you record yourself breaking the law and then the FBI uses that same footage well missing you. Seems legit bro.
"You can see 'em when you're driving..."
 
It's not difficult, but it is a bit pointless. My Pap used to say that anyone who cares about the state of your tomatoes is having a shit growing season.
Cute anecdote. I fully await with bated breath for you to make this exact same argument when someone here complains about the right totally doing X too after someone points out the left does it.

I know you won't, because what you're doing is cheerleading while trying to pretend at being impartial.

Even without that, your point is nonsense. Politics is an inherently social activity that justifiably requires one to evaluate where someone else stands, so it is perfectly valid to question someone's motives for doing or saying something.
 
so he can never hold political office again.

Article I Section 3 clauses 6 & 7

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: The Cum Consumer
Good to know that the joke about the next president getting impeached every week might come true
Only takes a bare 50% in the hizzouse. Get all the progs to impeach Biden, get all the blue dogs to impeach Harris after he steps down later, and then... idk, win the house somehow in 2022 and immediately impeach harris again for her laugh, bang. Anything's possible

Article I Section 3 clauses 6 & 7

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.
I don't know if you were just citing that they have that power or not, but I underlined the relevant portion. Impeachment can achieve one of two judgments, the latter of which is barring from office.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Mr. Bung
Back