Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

[TerribleIdeas™]

Black American lesbian writes a Twitter thread (can be found here too) about how wonderful it was to move to Indonesia with her girlfriend and gives tips and tricks to other Americans how to move abroad to other countries and skirt their COVID travel restrictions so they can live like royalty because of the value of the dollar on a third world country. And she's there illegally on an expired Tourist Visa, not paying taxes and used the thread to push her eBook too. Article about it here.

Indonesians tear her a new one for being a wealthy foreigner contributing to the gentrification and colonization of their country that already has massive poverty issues, and painting it as an exotic "Eat Pray Love" location when being LGBT in Indonesia is not accepted by the population at large (and is punished by flogging in parts of it).

Americans then accuse the Indonesians of being racist because the woman they are criticizing is black and say they would keep quiet if it was white people doing it. (Obligatory rich race baiter tweet.)

Indonesians shoot back and tell the Americans to shove their race card and "blacks can't be racist and gentrifiers" explanation up their butts and to hold other black people accountable for the shit they would jump at the throat if it was a white person doing.



I'm surprised she got the pushback she did, but what I'm not surprised by is how the arguments defending her reek of the first world western mentality that encompasses the whole Social Justice movement. The people defending her are saying a very privileged black woman who moved to Indonesia to live like a queen illegally is more oppressed than Indonesians facing poverty and can't be criticized because racism. Never mind her rent, which she called cheap, is around four times the minimum wage in Indonesia.

It's still a bit surreal when the Social Justice movement finds out people they claim to fight for disagree with them, because those people invariably get attacked for not sharing the westernized point of view on the matter and thrown under the bus for the "more oppressed" groups. Funny how the "lived experiences" of the Indonesians complaining don't matter now that they are criticizing an American black woman.

Interesting that gentrification of this kind is bringing in enough money that it might improve the wages of those that do business with LaQueefa Lesbiana, but at the same time could creates a fear of cultural degradation, in the eyes of many of the same people that might potentially enjoy the financial benefits.

 

[Dave.]

Don't forget that low-margin small businesses don't have the assets and capital to operate with even thinner margins caused by a hike in labour costs.

When the minimum wage went up in my neck of the woods, it had absolutely no impact on the wage of skilled tradespeople in the area, but it definitely had an impact on the prices at the chain supermarkets, the walmarts, and the other places you buy all your basic groceries and household goods.

The biggest irony is the majority of small businesses in my part of the U.S are run by minorities from Mexico. So these oppressed minorities they're claiming to help are going to get fucked even harder because they can't compete and they'll never find jobs in fast food because they're going to innovate with automated ordering software.

You remember when I said these twitter tards just want what they want and if that means a road paved with corpses, so be it? They just want to have their cake and eat it too while the lower classes foot the bill.

 

[Ashen One]

Interesting that gentrification of this kind is bringing in enough money that it might improve the wages of those that do business with LaQueefa Lesbiana, but at the same time could creates a fear of cultural degradation, in the eyes of many of the same people that might potentially enjoy the financial benefits.

Gentrification is an interesting subject where there is no clear cut right or wrong, both points of view are valid. I don't fault people for moving somewhere they can have a better quality of life, and at the same time I see why the people who already live there would be incensed about someone moving in, potentially pricing them out and changing things just because they're richer.

What seems to have made people much angrier at her is that she hasn't immigrated there legally and is by all means only taking advantage of the country without contributing much to it. She's living there on an expired Tourism Visa as the government tends to turn a blind eye to those, working online for dollars (so her economic power is much stronger than the natives') and not paying any taxes as she doesn't legally live there. And her thread was encouraging others to do the same, including skirting Indonesia's COVID travel restrictions.

Had she been living there legally and doing everything right, the gentrification debate would still be happening just much less heated than it is at the moment. And Indonesian Immigration launched a probe into her after this story exploded.

 

[Malagor the dank omen]

Gentrification is an interesting subject where there is no clear cut right or wrong, both points of view are valid. I don't fault people for moving somewhere they can have a better quality of life, and at the same time I see why the people who already live there would be incensed about someone moving in, potentially pricing them out and changing things just because they're richer.

What seems to have made people much angrier at her is that she hasn't immigrated there legally and is by all means only taking advantage of the country without contributing much to it. She's living there on an expired Tourism Visa as the government tends to turn a blind eye to those, working online for dollars (so her economic power is much stronger than the natives') and not paying any taxes as she doesn't legally live there. And her thread was encouraging others to do the same, including skirting Indonesia's COVID travel restrictions.

Had she been living there legally and doing everything right, the gentrification debate would still be happening just much less heated than it is at the moment. And Indonesian Immigration launched a probe into her after this story exploded.

>digital nomad
What the fuck is this crap? Is this a new term to refer to retards that move to other countries to take advantage of the system to live like royalty?

I truly hope 3rd world countries sort out their inmigration systems so people like this can't get there and take advantage of the system. Those countries are already taking a serious hit as things stand, they probably don't need entitled morons going there so they can feel like royalty among the destitute. I truly hope she gets punished for this.

 

[Ashen One]

>digital nomad
What the fuck is this crap? Is this a new term to refer to retards that move to other countries to take advantage of the system to live like royalty?

People who can work online from anywhere, so they don't have the need to live on a fixed location and can usually move from place to place without it impacting their work. It just happens that people who can work online from anywhere are also people who can go live in the good areas of poorer countries due to their higher economic power so there is a big overlap between the two groups.

 

[Wulfpack Legend]

Not even on MLK’s birthday

 

[The Last Boyscout]

>digital nomad
What the fuck is this crap? Is this a new term to refer to retards that move to other countries to take advantage of the system to live like royalty?

I was gonna say the first thing that comes to my mind is the term 'nomad trash' from Mad Max looting and pillaging wherever they go without contributing anything, but then I remembered the gayboi bikers with assless chaps are way cooler than these losers.

 

[Emperor Julian]

Not even on MLK’s birthday
View attachment 1855317

She is of coarse the moral authority on dr kings legacy so must be listened to.

 

[Ledian]

A little late but I find the ignorance with Ireland despicable. The native Irish had been oppressed and enslaved, physically or economically, since the age of the Vikings (which predates the more well known African Slave Trade by 400 to 500 years). They absolutely, in a game of oppression poker, have a bigger hand when it comes to being an oppressed race. Hell, the English tried to use the Great Famine to "better" the Irish or thought it was God finally punishing them for their sins. They were ready to have the Irish die en masse.

Not even on MLK’s birthday
View attachment 1855317

I'm totally sure MLK Jr. would be okay with people being unable to do things equally again like saying his own name.

 

[NoReturn]

The native Irish had been oppressed and enslaved, physically or economically, since the age of the Vikings (which predates the more well known African Slave Trade by 400 to 500 years).

 

[Plague Spectrum]

Not even on MLK’s birthday
View attachment 1855317

"Our aim must never be to defeat or humiliate the white man, but to win his friendship and understanding. We must come to see that the end we seek is a society at peace with itself, a society that can live with its conscience. And that will be a day not of the white man, not of the black man. That will be the day of man as man." -MLK

I've always found it so interesting that around this time of year, these kinds of people are the ones trying to control who can and cannot talk about someone who's teachings would likely denounce the modern ideals of "fuck while people", "woke segregation" thing going on right now, as if his teachings are only gospel when it's convenient to their agenda. I dunno. Just something I've noticed and always found interesting.

 

[Ledian]

"Our aim must never be to defeat or humiliate the white man, but to win his friendship and understanding. We must come to see that the end we seek is a society at peace with itself, a society that can live with its conscience. And that will be a day not of the white man, not of the black man. That will be the day of man as man." -MLK

I've always found it so interesting that around this time of year, these kinds of people are the ones trying to control who can and cannot talk about someone who's teachings would likely denounce the modern ideals of "fuck while people", "woke segregation" thing going on right now, as if his teachings are only gospel when it's convenient to their agenda. I dunno. Just something I've noticed and always found interesting.

It really feels like the only reason they give him any respect, fake as it is, and don't just toss him aside is because he was the face of the Civil Rights Movement. His ideals don't mesh with modern "woke" ideals and they refuse to live up to them, which really says a lot about what they think about him, his sayings, and his teachings. Of course, when it comes time, they give a token visual appeal of respect as if to act like they give a shit about him.

 

[AnOminous]

View attachment 1854634

I'm fine with all these things.

 

[Inventor of the Telephone]

She is of coarse the moral authority on dr kings legacy so must be listened to.

Already Kamala's vapid family chimping out. Lovely.

 

[Dracula's Spirit Animal]

Or maybe there are those of us who understand that an increased minimum wage doesn't mean "you get more money." All it's really doing is shifting the "zero" baseline for goods and services. Sure, in the short term, you'll be making more money (or at least appear to be), but in the long-term, stores are going to increase their prices to account for the increased wages and cost to produce goods. So really, all you've accomplished is devaluing the American dollar even more as you masturbated your ego over how "empathetic" you are to those living on minimum wage.

Yeah, the whole thing is stupid.

What would happen in reality:

1. Minimum wage rises
2. Shortly thereafter, prices of goods increase, cancelling the gains provided by the rise in minimum wage
3. Small independent businesses (more likely to be owned by precious POC darlings than the major corporations) go under
4. Rental prices go up
5. Inflation
6. With largely only large corporations left, they seek to automate at an accelerated pace, making more people unemployed
EDIT: I forgot a step: 6B. In the process of automation, capital and assets are dumped into 3rd world and totalitarian shitholes who provide the solutions using slave labour, increasing domestic debt
7. Rich huwite men, who make up the majority of investors and manager class, get even richer, while middle and lower class people get poorer, all the while having less consumer freedom.

The exact same problem would happen with UBI as the first step in the above.

Both ideas ultimately hurt the poor, "minorities", and working middle class owners, all the while enriching huge conglomerates and multi-nationals.

They both are ultimately a "fuck the poor, fuck the workers, fuck the middle class, fuck the small business owners, and fuck anyone of any color who wants to scramble out of poverty". More Ayn Rand than Karl Marx.

 

[Oh Long Johnson]

Yeah, the whole thing is stupid.

What would happen in reality:

1. Minimum wage rises
2. Shortly thereafter, prices of goods increase, cancelling the gains provided by the rise in minimum wage
3. Small independent businesses (more likely to be owned by precious POC darlings than the major corporations) go under
4. Rental prices go up
5. Inflation
6. With largely only large corporations left, they seek to automate at an accelerated pace, making more people unemployed
EDIT: I forgot a step: 6B. In the process of automation, capital and assets are dumped into 3rd world and totalitarian shitholes who provide the solutions using slave labour, increasing domestic debt
7. Rich huwite men, who make up the majority of investors and manager class, get even richer, while middle and lower class people get poorer, all the while having less consumer freedom.

The exact same problem would happen with UBI as the first step in the above.

Both ideas ultimately hurt the poor, "minorities", and working middle class owners, all the while enriching huge conglomerates and multi-nationals.

They both are ultimately a "fuck the poor, fuck the workers, fuck the middle class, fuck the small business owners, and fuck anyone of any color who wants to scramble out of poverty". More Ayn Rand than Karl Marx.

Do the reverse, if this logic is ironclad.

The key to reducing housing prices, the price of goods (I'm assuming everything here, given your specificity), slowing inflation and increasing the success of small businesses owned by niggers is to lower the national minimum wage.

Nivrana, by the conservatives' leading economic minds.

 

[Jonah Hill poster]

View attachment 1854634

This subliminal advertisement is trying to boost hope in forcing more women into Congress, while out right replacing white people with.... more women?

 

[HTTP Error 404]

Do the reverse, if this logic is ironclad.

The key to reducing housing prices, the price of goods (I'm assuming everything here, given your specificity), slowing inflation and increasing the success of small businesses owned by niggers is to lower the national minimum wage.

Nivrana, by the conservatives' leading economic minds.

Yes, allowing workers to negotiate a fair wage with their employer without government interference would indeed be in line with conservative thinking. Is this surprising?

 

[Dracula's Spirit Animal]

Do the reverse, if this logic is ironclad.

The key to reducing housing prices, the price of goods (I'm assuming everything here, given your specificity), slowing inflation and increasing the success of small businesses owned by niggers is to lower the national minimum wage.

Nivrana, by the conservatives' leading economic minds.

That was kind of silly. Of course not EVERYTHING would work that way. I thought the subject would have been made obvious in its specificity to mean "goods available to minimum wage earners".

Ad yes, removing an artificial labour restriction WOULD improve the buying power of wages. We already have the tiger by the tail, though, so removing those restrictions doesn't seem feasible. The transition would be too chaotic, so we are stuck here, however, raising that number ultimately would lead to more poverty and consildation of corporate power.

I'm all for strong workers rights laws, but the wage they chose to accept for their labour should not be among those rights. Forcing that onerous labour restriction destroys the working class and only benefits the ultra-wealthy in the long run.

 

[Oh Long Johnson]

That was kind of silly. Of course not EVERYTHING would work that way. I thought the subject would have been made obvious in its specificity to mean "goods available to minimum wage earners".

Ad yes, removing an artificial labour restriction WOULD improve the buying power of wages. We already have the tiger by the tail, though, so removing those restrictions doesn't seem feasible. The transition would be too chaotic, so we are stuck here, however, raising that number ultimately would lead to more poverty and consildation of corporate power.

I'm all for strong workers rights laws, but the wage they chose to accept for their labour should not be among those rights. Forcing that onerous labour restriction destroys the working class and only benefits the ultra-wealthy in the long run.

My point is that changing the value of one input isn't going to result in that laundry list, or the US dollar turning into Zimbabwe bucks. The US economy is gigantic. Giving the banks $500B back in '08 didn't change the median salary of people working for banks or the cost of services they offer or even the price for a family office at Goldman's.

but the wage they chose to accept for their labour should not be among those rights

I obviously disagree. Look at the chart below. Wage stagnation is reality. It very well may be that men are too retarded to negotiate their own salary, but I cannot believe that side of the equation is solely to blame. The only reason why women aren't flatlined is due to the ERA.