Here we go. Biden considering bringing Troops back to Iraq.

The zombie couldn't have the courtesy to wait a month before throwing our troops back into that quagmire?

He's only been "president" for a day and already I despise his administration and puppet masters.
hey, at least you waited a day before you decide you hate his guts

thats a longer time than the amount of hatred trump got before he even took office
 
hey, at least you waited a day before you decide you hate his guts

thats a longer time than the amount of hatred trump got before he even took office
You're mistaken, I already hated his guts after the way he "conveniently" won the election.

I just naively thought he'd gradually undo all the progress made by Trump instead of going all in immediately.
 
Armstrong-profile-shot-0.png


PACs, arms manufactures... job creators jack! all those workers spending money, paying taxes. trust me, a little war can work wonders for the economy!
 
Nice try with the false equivalency faggot.
There’s a difference between bombing the hell out of ISIS and getting out, which is what Trump did, and your faggotry.
Why else do you think Mattis and the other Neo-cons bailed?
Zoomer libertarians man.
"Soleimani was ISIS"
Hahaha you fucking retard, he was battling ISIS. Your guy killed the guy actually fighting ISIS.
This is why nobody takes americans serious on foreign policy :story:
Perhaps some of us are comfortable with drone striking a few sand niggers in a far away place but draw the line at putting flesh and blood on the line in a country that is mostly hostile to us.
Then why was Trump doing both lmaooooooo
 
I find this interesting. If you look up XAR as a stock ticker, it’s a fund based on defense contractors - basically the more we spend on war / the military, the better it does. Check out its price around November of 2015 and November of 2020. I’m phone posting so I can’t get a good screenshot, sorry.

The spoiler is it went up something like 20% from the end of October 2020 to the end of November 2020. No idea why that would be! But I’m buying some shares.
 
Moving more troops and resources back into Iraq, means it is a lot easier to then deploy them to a nearby country...

Are those Syrian rebels starting to be reequipped and rising up again? How long until another really vague incident with a ship blamed on Iran?
 
View attachment 1862571

I think these clowns are exempt from combat. So..

There was also something posted on twitter today about the UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS establishing new "guidelines" for how jarheads are allowed to behave, and it included something to the effect of "if you're outed as being at a "right-wing gathering, you'll be subject to the UCMJ", although I didn't catch how (or if) they were defining "right-wing gatherings." Fucked if I can find it now, though.
 
There was also something posted on twitter today about the UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS establishing new "guidelines" for how jarheads are allowed to behave, and it included something to the effect of "if you're outed as being at a "right-wing gathering, you'll be subject to the UCMJ", although I didn't catch how (or if) they were defining "right-wing gatherings." Fucked if I can find it now, though.
I think there's some long-standing regulation that while you're in the service, you're not allowed to shit-talk POTUS or use your uniform as a bully pulpit (since POTUS is Commander in Chief, and the military is supposed to be apolitical).
 
I think there's some long-standing regulation that while you're in the service, you're not allowed to shit-talk POTUS or use your uniform as a bully pulpit (since POTUS is Commander in Chief, and the military is supposed to be apolitical).

What I read specified that it didn't matter if you were in uniform, on leave, or anything, if you were reported as being at "a right-wing event", that was sufficient grounds to begin proceedings under the UCMJ. I'm pretty sure they can't tell you what you're allowed to do in your spare time, as long as it's not a breach of your oaths, criminal, of injurious to your duty and commitment.
 
There should be voting reform and you have to state a valid reason why you are voting for each candidate instead of "AnYoNe BuT TrUmP" or have the policies listed on the ballot with a summary of their political career. The dems going to try lowering the voting age to 16 you might as well test those voters.
 
I think there's some long-standing regulation that while you're in the service, you're not allowed to shit-talk POTUS or use your uniform as a bully pulpit (since POTUS is Commander in Chief, and the military is supposed to be apolitical).
As long as it doesn't involve using rank or influence to push political beliefs. Pretty sure being at a riot at the capital falls on the right side of stupid under any circumstances.

Also happy to see @Arm Pit Cream flying high and true. Godspeed.
 
What I read specified that it didn't matter if you were in uniform, on leave, or anything, if you were reported as being at "a right-wing event", that was sufficient grounds to begin proceedings under the UCMJ. I'm pretty sure they can't tell you what you're allowed to do in your spare time, as long as it's not a breach of your oaths, criminal, of injurious to your duty and commitment.
If true, they'd be antagonizing a lot of Enlisted:
Screenshot_20210121-181858_DuckDuckGo.jpg

....which supports my hypothesis that libs have embraced their own brand of accelerationism: beas hateable as possible, to bait the Right into lashing out.
 
How long before things get ugly? It’s very easy to talk about plans for revolution on the internet. And everyone talks about getting into fights against evil for their greater good...until they’re in one.
Depends who shoots who first. Im betting the government.

I have no idea whats going on in DC but it looks like a staging area. Like d day or green zone in iraq.
We already have videos of us marshals deputizing the troops.

That ought to send chills down your spine.

Im guessing theyre building a force to enact mass arrest.

Whats the legality of that?

As for baiting the right?
Thats why you use humor.

Like gluing a whale sized dildo with bidens face carved into it as the head to the hi way.

The main goal for any counter government forces is to distract, disrupt and deny. Doesnt have to be a milita doing a check point. Pranks works just as good for this purpose. Balls of steel skit series annoying devil blocking off a bridge with dog turds is a great example of distract, disrupt and deny. For it gathers attention, it disrupts the ability to use the bridge (which causes problems with local economy) and serves as area denial.

Pranks play another role if done right. The media will not report any thing if its super embrassing. If it makes them look like an idiot then its not going be used as a propaganda piece to terrorize the un woke.

Humor can be used to defeat the propaganda machine. What would hapen If someone did stop military movement with a major prank thats super embrassing ? The media wont report on it

You can use their refusal to report it to delegitimize them. To get people take them less seriously. See? See? There was a major event and they didnt report on it or lied about it? See where this is going?


Also as many people have noted there is a severe distrust between the politicos and the troops. That can be exploited. Along with the paranoia the politicos have for anyone not of their clique.

Focus on these things and youd be able to get away with alot.
 
Last edited:
What I read specified that it didn't matter if you were in uniform, on leave, or anything, if you were reported as being at "a right-wing event", that was sufficient grounds to begin proceedings under the UCMJ. I'm pretty sure they can't tell you what you're allowed to do in your spare time, as long as it's not a breach of your oaths, criminal, of injurious to your duty and commitment.
Most of the frontline fighters tend to be overwhelming white, male, straight, and Republican. If the Biden administration tried to do an ideological purge, all the branches of the military would probably tell him to get fucked. The military has been losing recruits every year, to the point that now they have to rely on PMCs to help them with operations. If they let go of thousands of experienced fighters, then the military would have to reinstitute the draft to be able to maintain its operations, or basically contract the PMCs those soldiers would join. I don't care if you work those Democrat ballots 24/7 for the next four years, that's fucking Democrat suicide in 2024.
 
Last edited:
If true, they'd be antagonizing a lot of Enlisted:
View attachment 1863073
....which supports my hypothesis that libs have embraced accelerationism to bait the Right into lashing out.
There's also a big difference in showing up to events in civvies on your private time or showing up in Class As and hanging yourself on a cross. There also was that one communist West Point cadet wearing a Che shirt that got kicked for being a sperg.

Uniformed services are apolitical, even if politics are at the forefront of culture.
 
If they let go of thousands of experienced fighters, then the military would have to reinstitute the draft to be able to maintain its operations,
Silverlining would be the ANTIFAs and dangerhairs get some crushing reality lessons. I'm against the draft, but there's a spot in my heart where I would enjoy watching them be punished for their hubris. Also, hard times make strong people, so hopefully the ones who live will get some character.

They might also learn when you're supposed to use a tourniquet.
 
Back