Trainwreck Pamela Swain / DocHoliday1977 / MsPhoenix1969 / Observer1977 / danishlace2003 / Writer_thriller - Victim of grand #MeToo conspiracy, litigious wannabe starfucker, off her meds and online

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date

Which member of the Pamspiracy does Pam secretly want to fuck the most?


  • Total voters
    519
@Analog Devolved is Tony Robbins by admission.
c668e39a6077f9b80cad195e9cc0925c.jpg
Repetitive behavior

Harvey Weinstein- sex and death threats

Tony Robbins- sends his pictures
Just because I love motivational speakers and the mortal engines movie doesn't make me Tony Robbins.

You can take a screenshot without taking a picture of the screen.

Tony, did you get Donald Trump to tell judge stewart to shut down my lawsuit? And did you tell him to tell me "You have no idea who you're up against."?
I'm not Tony. Trump didn't talk to a judge. What does any of this have to do with the Red-Brown coalition and the mortal engines movie?
 
View attachment 1863453

Just because I love motivational speakers and the mortal engines movie doesn't make me Tony Robbins.

You can take a screenshot without taking a picture of the screen.


I'm not Tony. Trump didn't talk to a judge. What does any of this have to do with the Red-Brown coalition and the mortal engines movie?

Too late.
 
Swain v. Stewart et al Part 3: Tokyo Drift

Now we finally get into more interesting documents. I'm a big fan of this next order in particular, as it politely but pointedly calls out Spamela on her nonsense and idiocy.

1611280724221.png
1611280771813.png
1611280855867.png
1611280962605.png
1611281069060.png
1611281114212.png
1611281185553.png
1611281233272.png

1611281293353.png
1611281364419.png
1611281449877.png
1611281486265.png

Having received another generous chance to file a coherent complaint in accordance with the FRCP, Porky Pammy instead reiterated and remixed the exact same poorly edited delusional babble she'd submitted half a dozen times before, while simultaneously ignoring the fact the court had already told her they wouldn't move venue or file any criminal charges on her behalf. She also, out of absolute nowhere, attempted to add her poor sick mother to the complaint as an additional plaintiff without her mother's consent.

1611281568667.png
1611281614399.png
1611281780180.png
1611281832595.png
1611281933947.png
1611282138355.png
1611282299624.png
1611282389412.png

Since Spamela added yet more defendants (and tried to illegally add a plaintiff) to the 7th amended complaint filing, the court again directed her to file a coherent complaint that was valid under the FRCP.

1611282638936.png

So what does Porky Pammy do in her final amended complaint? Add even more defendants and continue to claim her mother is now part of a lawsuit she did not consent to participate in! Check out the list of school districts and businesses Spamela has been fired from as a result of her combo platter of insanity and incompetence, it's a hoot!

1611282790694.png
1611282829370.png
1611282994426.png
1611283036387.png
1611283091723.png
1611283295833.png
1611283396739.png

And now, the conclusion: Porky Pammy's frivolous lawsuit is finally thrown out after wasting 18 months worth of docket space and judge time. I posted the Report and Recommendations here before from another source, so here's just the final order and judgment dismissing the case.

1611283773699.png
1611283824051.png

Again, big thanks to @Useful_Mistake for their generosity in retrieving these documents from PACER! They also backed them up on Court Listener for convenience!

Here's the direct links to Part 1 and Part 2 for reference.

Taking a break from this for now, but I'll be back later to post the docs from Porky Pammy's current lolsuit, Swain v. Weinstien et al!
 
Then we're both idiots. And you posted your picture, yet again. Like you did before. You never change Tony.

This guy calls you Tony, not me.
View attachment 1863411
View attachment 1863425View attachment 1863433

@Analog Devolved is Tony Robbins by admission.

Repetitive behavior

Harvey Weinstein- sex and death threats

Tony Robbins- sends his pictures

Tony, did you get Donald Trump to tell judge stewart to shut down my lawsuit? And did you tell him to tell me "You have no idea who you're up against."?

Too late.
You can tell @Viridian is successfully getting under her skin because Piggy Pammy is oinking and squealing like crazy.
 
You can tell @Viridian is successfully getting under her skin because Piggy Pammy is oinking and squealing like crazy.
Fassbender why are you so mad?

Swain v. Stewart et al Part 3: Tokyo Drift

Now we finally get into more interesting documents. I'm a big fan of this next order in particular, as it politely but pointedly calls out Spamela on her nonsense and idiocy.


Having received another generous chance to file a coherent complaint in accordance with the FRCP, Porky Pammy instead reiterated and remixed the exact same poorly edited delusional babble she'd submitted half a dozen times before, while simultaneously ignoring the fact the court had already told her they wouldn't move venue or file any criminal charges on her behalf. She also, out of absolute nowhere, attempted to add her poor sick mother to the complaint as an additional plaintiff without her mother's consent.


Since Spamela added yet more defendants (and tried to illegally add a plaintiff) to the 7th amended complaint filing, the court again directed her to file a coherent complaint that was valid under the FRCP.


So what does Porky Pammy do in her final amended complaint? Add even more defendants and continue to claim her mother is now part of a lawsuit she did not consent to participate in! Check out the list of school districts and businesses Spamela has been fired from as a result of her combo platter of insanity and incompetence, it's a hoot!


And now, the conclusion: Porky Pammy's frivolous lawsuit is finally thrown out after wasting 18 months worth of docket space and judge time. I posted the Report and Recommendations here before from another source, so here's just the final order and judgment dismissing the case.


Again, big thanks to @Useful_Mistake for their generosity in retrieving these documents from PACER! They also backed them up on Court Listener for convenience!

Here's the direct links to Part 1 and Part 2 for reference.

Taking a break from this for now, but I'll be back later to post the docs from Porky Pammy's current lolsuit, Swain v. Weinstien et al!


Yall are mad, tonight.
 

I agree, you have many issues.

I'm studying to be a psychologist and I e taken all this with a grain of salt cause, quite frankly. Ya'll ate idiots.

For breakfast. Oh, you meant are. Just another example of that flawless intellect at work, Pam.

Butttttt. I'm going to start responding truth fully and compassionately cause I think you all are in emotional psychological jeopardy.

Hillary, you had an emotional breakdown almost 2 months ago. Why are you helping Harvey? He needs to provide restitution for his harassment and crimes. You helping him is insane and you'll not in a place to handle it.

Tony, wow, you can't harass someone and then try to harass them into liking you. And dear, you act like a lolcow yourself.

Gerry, don't do other people's stupid shit. You're not an asshole. Your mother raised your ass right. Tell the truth.

The trolling needs to stop. The Russian emails need to stop. The arrogance really needs to stop. Harvey got himself into trouble. If you all want to follow down his road, be my guest. But you're making fools of yourselves.

None of these people are in this thread. You are sending advice to your own delusions.

I'm not entertaining the idea of a "group".

On the contrary, you're insisting on one.

You do realize you make ridiculous gotcha posts, right? I can talk to whomever I want. Calm down.

How are those gotcha posts?

Yes, we did cover this.

No, the story doesn't change

AND

You are trying to use 2 to 3 accounts posting to convolute the responses in an act of desperation.

You've given at least three distinct versions of the story, and no, everyone here is posting under just their own account.

Thanks to the generosity of @Useful_Mistake, we can all enjoy reading Porky Pammy's lawsuit filings! I'm going to break this up into multiple posts to make it easier to read and digest.

First up, filings from Swain v. Stewart et al, filed on January 11, 2019:






More to come!

Oh, these are gold. Both "hit site for hackers" and "the court finds these claims less than credible"

*munches popcorn*

You all are way behind.

Well, yeah, none of us are parties to the case and even if we were you never served anyone. This is the first we're seeing your slapdash and slapstick case.

Michael Fassbender, you are coming across desperate. Tell us all why?

I plan to edit and update later cause the story of harassment continues, doesn't it Fassbender? Things have unfolded the most dramatic manner as of lare.

@Illuminati Order Official
I know you're not Fassbender. He's just poking around cause of issues.


Fassbender is not here. You are speaking to a delusion again.

Did distort my judgements through the department of defense, Donny Trump Jr

Dept of Defense would not be involved in this and Donald Trump Jr definitely isn't.

Swain v. Stewart et al Part 2: Electric Boogaloo

Spamela was told by the judge to submit an amended complaint, so she does! And then sends in another one... and another one... and another one... and ANOTHER one...

Note that most of these are extremely redundant. I'm including them for completeness, and to demonstrate just how much the schizocow likes to spam the court system with repetitive filings. For the most part Porky Pammy tacked on whatever new sperging she wanted to add to the end of the document in each iteration. That's where the more interesting bits tend to be.






Part 3 coming soon!

You put a defendant in, you take a defendant out, you do the hokey pokey and you waste a judge's time, that's what it's all about!

@Analog Devolved is Tony Robbins by admission.

Posting a picture of him is not admission, Pamela. Otherwise anyone could post a picture of you and "admit" to being you.

Swain v. Stewart et al Part 3: Tokyo Drift

Now we finally get into more interesting documents. I'm a big fan of this next order in particular, as it politely but pointedly calls out Spamela on her nonsense and idiocy.


Having received another generous chance to file a coherent complaint in accordance with the FRCP, Porky Pammy instead reiterated and remixed the exact same poorly edited delusional babble she'd submitted half a dozen times before, while simultaneously ignoring the fact the court had already told her they wouldn't move venue or file any criminal charges on her behalf. She also, out of absolute nowhere, attempted to add her poor sick mother to the complaint as an additional plaintiff without her mother's consent.


Since Spamela added yet more defendants (and tried to illegally add a plaintiff) to the 7th amended complaint filing, the court again directed her to file a coherent complaint that was valid under the FRCP.


So what does Porky Pammy do in her final amended complaint? Add even more defendants and continue to claim her mother is now part of a lawsuit she did not consent to participate in! Check out the list of school districts and businesses Spamela has been fired from as a result of her combo platter of insanity and incompetence, it's a hoot!


And now, the conclusion: Porky Pammy's frivolous lawsuit is finally thrown out after wasting 18 months worth of docket space and judge time. I posted the Report and Recommendations here before from another source, so here's just the final order and judgment dismissing the case.


Again, big thanks to @Useful_Mistake for their generosity in retrieving these documents from PACER! They also backed them up on Court Listener for convenience!

Here's the direct links to Part 1 and Part 2 for reference.

Taking a break from this for now, but I'll be back later to post the docs from Porky Pammy's current lolsuit, Swain v. Weinstien et al!

There's just so much bullshit in here and the court's responses are just golden.

Stay mad, Pam.
 
Last edited:
I agree, you have many issues.



For breakfast. Oh, you meant are. Just another example of that flawless intellect at work, Pam.



None of these people are in this thread. You are sending advice to your own delusions.



On the contrary, you're insisting on one.



How are those gotcha posts?



You've given at least three distinct versions of the story, and no, everyone here is posting under just their own account.



Oh, these are gold. Both "hit site for hackers" and "the court finds these claims less than credible"



Well, yeah, none of us are parties to the case and even if we were you never served anyone. This is the first we're seeing your slapdash and slapstick case.









Dept of Defense would not be involved in this and Donald Trump Jr definitely isn't.



You put a defendant in, you take a defendant out, you do the hokey pokey and you waste a judge's time, that's what it's all about!



Posting a picture of him is not admission, Pamela. Otherwise anyone could post a picture of you and "admit" to being you.



There's just so much bullshit in here and the court's responses are just golden.

Stay mad, Pam.

Ok Hillary

My autocorrect has a mind of it's own. I guess we're not buddies anymore.

Why are you here, Hillary.
 
Ok Hillary

Not Hillary

My autocorrect has a mind of it's own. I guess we're not buddies anymore.

If you would learn to spell, you wouldn't have that problem.

Why are you here, Hillary.

As I am not Hillary, I cannot answer this question.

Much like the "How did Weinstein become aware that you exist" there is no answer to your question because it asks for something that does not exist.
 
Not Hillary



If you would learn to spell, you wouldn't have that problem.



As I am not Hillary, I cannot answer this question.

Much like the "How did Weinstein become aware that you exist" there is no answer to your question because it asks for something that does not exist.

I told you. Get your nurse to find it and reread it o you. Yeah, you're Dershoshitz.

You deliberately ignore responses and it just shows how fast and severe your mind has declined.

It means that Tony has continued to harass me since 2017.

And I didn't say he was Tony. This person did.
20210121_113809.jpg

You cursed son of a bitch.

I don't have to explain what's going on in a group of cursed idiots heads who harass me. I don't know goes through sick men and women's heads who are clear perverts.

I'm not having sex for a career and I'm not putting up with 4 more years of government lawlessness sexual harassment.

Past the point of no return. People. Blood oath curse.
 
I told you. Get your nurse to find it and reread it o you.

You have not, in fact, told me that. You have given multiple accounts which contradict each other and none of which actually contain the suppose point of first contact.

Yeah, you're Dershoshitz.

Even more incorrect than the first time you accused me of that. Amazing how simple things like objective truth never get in the way of your delusional accusations.

You deliberately ignore responses and it just shows how fast and severe your mind has declined.

That you of all people are trying to call anyone out on deliberately ignoring responses is laughable. You get huffy and give one word replies whenever you see an argument you can't refute.

It means that Tony has continued to harass me since 2017.

And I didn't say he was Tony. This person did.
View attachment 1863745

Okay, this is not in response to anything I said, and nothing shown here by you or anyone else "means" Tony Robbins has harassed you for three years.
The person in your email is even less an authority on the identity of various farmers than you are Pam, and that's saying something.

You cursed son of a bitch.

I don't have to explain what's going on in a group of cursed idiots heads who harass me. I don't know goes through sick men and women's heads who are clear perverts.

I'm not having sex for a career

Good. No one wants you to have that. We want you to seek therapy. I will repeat that in bold Literally no one wants you to have sex for a career. At most we want you to seek therapy and medication for your untreated delusions and disorders.

and I'm not putting up with 4 more years of government lawlessness sexual harassment.

You haven't put up with any years of that. No one in the government is sexually harassing you.

Past the point of no return. People. Blood oath curse.

Pam, I sincerely hope you look back on these threads some day and realize just how unhinged you sound right now, because you will have recovered from whatever malady afflicts you.

Blood oath curses are not a thing, you cannot command god to do your bidding, you have no power over the weather, and I'm sure I am forgetting at least half a dozen power fantasies you have desired in your rage.
 
You have not, in fact, told me that. You have given multiple accounts which contradict each other and none of which actually contain the suppose point of first contact.



Even more incorrect than the first time you accused me of that. Amazing how simple things like objective truth never get in the way of your delusional accusations.






Okay, this is not in response to anything I said, and nothing shown here by you or anyone else "means" Tony Robbins has harassed you for three years.
The person in your email is even less an authority on the identity of various farmers than you are Pam, and that's saying something.



Good. No one wants you to have that. We want you to seek therapy. I will repeat that in bold Literally no one wants you to have sex for a career. At most we want you to seek therapy and medication for your untreated delusions and disorders.



You haven't put up with any years of that. No one in the government is sexually harassing you.



Pam, I sincerely hope you look back on these threads some day and realize just how unhinged you sound right now, because you will have recovered from whatever malady afflicts you.

Blood oath curses are not a thing, you cannot command god to do your bidding, you have no power over the weather, and I'm sure I am forgetting at least half a dozen power fantasies you have desired in your rage.


Ok.

I wrote a goddamned book about it. Broken up responses on site full of dipshits isnt a courtroom or an appropriate venue for legal questioning, and if you think it is, you need your goddamned head checked.

As far as I sound, how I sound to you isn't going to help you in the near future.

Don't contradict me again. Go read my Harvey weinstein book for details and then shut your ass up with the questions.

I suggest you @LoverofPi start wanting to change the topic cause this rude exchange is unwanted. And I will by whatever means necessary spiritually from here on to remove my harassers. I will not tolerate this anymore
I suggest you start talking recipes and other benign normal conversations or I'll pray and ask God to send thousands demons to everyone of you to scramble your brains like eggs.
 
Taking a break from this for now, but I'll be back later to post the docs from Porky Pammy's current lolsuit, Swain v. Weinstien et al!
The docs without the great commentary from @Viridian

image-000001.png
image-000002.png
image-000003.png
image-000004.png
image-000005.png
image-000006.png
image-000007.png

image-000001.png
image-000002.png
image-000003.png
image-000004.png
image-000005.png
image-000006.png
image-000007.png
image-000008.png

image-000001.png


image-000002.png
image-000003.png
image-000004.png
image-000005.png

image-000001.png

image-000002.png
image-000003.png
image-000004.png
image-000005.png
image-000006.png
image-000007.png
image-000008.png
image-000009.png
image-000010.png
image-000011.png
image-000012.png

image-000001.png

image-000002.png
image-000003.png
image-000004.png
image-000005.png
image-000006.png

image-000001.png

image-000002.png
image-000003.png
image-000004.png
image-000005.png
image-000006.png
image-000007.png
 

Attachments

Starting tomorrow. I expect the creeps that harass me to disappear. I expect this thread to go away. I expect gainful employment with no Tony Robbins and his railings of a Red Brown coalition. And I expect to never know that any Trump or Trump whores exist.

And I expect respect. If you numbnuts can do this, I'll stay in my corner of the world and you can stay in yours with no problems. I expect fair lawful judicial rulings and no special favors to faggots. Follow the law that exists. If you can't, no one will follow the law for you. You reap what you sow and yes, you all are on the wrong side.

Do you understand me? Dont make me have to repeat myself.
 
Starting tomorrow. I expect the creeps that harass me to disappear. I expect this thread to go away. I expect gainful employment with no Tony Robbins and his railings of a Red Brown coalition. And I expect to never know that any Trump or Trump whores exist.

And I expect respect
Fuck off. We do what we want.
Follow the law that exists. You all are on the wrong side.
We do follow the law, naturally. And, perhaps you will find surprise in this. but all we do here is fine and dandy as per law.
Do you understand me? Dont make me have to repeat myself.
No.
I'll pray and ask God to send thousands demons to everyone of you to scramble your brains like eggs.
This makes no sense unless you are a satanist(are you?), and even then, why would Lucifer obey you at all?
 
Fuck off. We do what we want.

We do follow the law, naturally. And, perhaps you will find surprise in this. but all we do here is fine and dandy as per law.

No.

This makes no sense unless you are a satanist(are you?), and even then, why would Lucifer obey you at all?

I'm not a satanist. Jackass.

Bitch. You don't do what you want with me. And you are about to find out.

Ok we'll see. We'll see about you and your law.


Lucifer? Ask him the next time you try to hex my ass.

I was all...Lucifer?

Literally who????
 
Bitch. You don't do what you want with me. And you are about to find out.
You gonna sue me as well? Please do.
Ok we'll see. We'll see about you and your law.
Have you ever won a lawsuit?
Ask him the next time you try to hex my ass.
lol
I was all...Lucifer?

Literally who????
>talks about God and Demons
>Guys, who is Lucifer?
Lol, amazing
 
Back