Trainwreck Pamela Swain / DocHoliday1977 / MsPhoenix1969 / Observer1977 / danishlace2003 / Writer_thriller - Victim of grand #MeToo conspiracy, litigious wannabe starfucker, off her meds and online

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date

Which member of the Pamspiracy does Pam secretly want to fuck the most?


  • Total voters
    519
Don't worry Pam you will never see me naked.

This is how you spent your birthday. Sperging about celebrities and chimping out at random internet trolls.

On my birthday I went out for a nice dry ages kobe beef ribeye, ordered it rare plus and had a big bowl of miso soup and a platter of bluefin tuna sashimi and a variety of nigri and roe.

Stay mad Pam.
More random nonsense.


Did you invite Kimberly? Or was there enough room for her and your ego?


Would this "official testimony" have been revealed to you by an email from say "Avikander@yahoo.com" or the like? Or did the voice in your head tell you? Because either way it sounds like you got nothing.

And no, not Fassbender.



Yep, just a random internet crazy lady.



Translation: I didn't think that far.



We'll get hugs and kisses and warm chocolate cookies.



You think that because you're delusional.



Well, if we're talking imaginary stalkers, everyone you've ever named as one of your stalkers. It's a fairly long list, turns out.



Oh, your theory of mind is deteriorating again, I see.


Alan Dershowitz. The mind is not a theory. Its apart of the id as Freud calls it.

Name the list.

Oh it has nothing to do with an email. And you've got nothing.
 
Alan Dershowitz.

Not him.

The mind is not a theory. Its apart of the id as Freud calls it.

"Theory of Mind" Pam.
This

Name the list.

Weinstein, Robbins, Dershowitz, Clinton, Butler, Fassbender, Vikander, McAvoy, Trump, Grannon, Kimberly, Pierre, I can go on for ages with all the names of people you erroneously believe are stalking you.

Oh it has nothing to do with an email. And you've got nothing.

I never claimed to have anything. But you have, and yet you refuse to show it. Hence, calling your bluff.
 
The mind is not a theory. Its apart of the id as Freud calls it.
If I may interrupt.
There are philosophical schools claiming that everything is not real. For example solipsism claims that, simplifying, the only thing in the world is a singular mind and everything else is a figment of its imagination. Or simulation theory claiming that everything is created by a powerful quantum computer and we're just a part of a running program.
And old Freud... In freudian psychoanalysis ID is the part of the mind where our unconscious urges and desires reside. Opposite of ID is Super Ego responsible for, generally speaking, social norms, ethics and\or morality. ID and Super Ego are, of course, in constant conflict because they usually want exactly opposite things. Here comes Ego - consciousness - a mediator trying to resolve the conflict in more or less productive way.
 
Weinstein, Robbins, Dershowitz, Clinton, Butler, Fassbender, Vikander, McAvoy, Trump, Grannon, Kimberly, Pierre,

Not Weinstein. Robbins, Dershowitz, Fassbender, Vikander, Trump, Kimberly or Pierre (who)

I had a crush on McAvoy so sue me.
Grannon yes.
What? No Sam Vaknin!?!?

I'm not reading a link to theory of mind. Just not gonna do it. I don't want to get this started.
If I may interrupt.
There are philosophical schools claiming that everything is not real. For example solipsism claims that, simplifying, the only thing in the world is a singular mind and everything else is a figment of its imagination. Or simulation theory claiming that everything is created by a powerful quantum computer and we're just a part of a running program.
And old Freud... In freudian psychoanalysis ID is the part of the mind where our unconscious urges and desires reside. Opposite of ID is Super Ego responsible for, generally speaking, social norms, ethics and\or morality. ID and Super Ego are, of course, in constant conflict because they usually want exactly opposite things. Here comes Ego - consciousness - a mediator trying to resolve the conflict in more or less productive way.


But someone wants to get this started.


Existence isn't the matrix. Humans are individual Id personalities just like that old codger Freud postulated. However, our bodies are organic avatars that we are plugged into to interact with reality through our senses. Case in point, sex. Would you have had an orgasm without your mind or without your sexual organs? Does a coma patient have an orgasm? Spirit, id, body are all needed to create an orgasm. Don't believe me. Jack off to porn for a few long hours. Your mind disconnects and there is no orgasm anymore. Your id didnt attach to the fake action.

I still think Sam's in love with me. How dare you?
 
Wait a minute. Are you carrying Tony Robbins' baby?
Pam, I'm not pregnant with any celebrity's baby. Why are you so obsessed with that? From reading the very first introductory post of this thread it shows that you've been talking about celebrities and their pregnancies or someone being pregnant with a celebrity's baby consistently. Is that just some fantasy you had that you can't get out of your delusions now? No one here is pregnant with a celebrity's child. Go see a psychologist.
 
Weinstein, Robbins, Dershowitz, Clinton, Butler, Fassbender, Vikander, McAvoy, Trump, Grannon, Kimberly, Pierre,

Not Weinstein. Robbins, Dershowitz, Fassbender, Vikander, Trump, Kimberly or Pierre (who)

I had a crush on McAvoy so sue me.
Grannon yes.
What? No Sam Vaknin!?!?

All the names I listed are all the names of people you have fraudulently alleged to be stalking you or aiding a conspiracy to stalk you. I never said it was exhaustive.

I'm not reading a link to theory of mind. Just not gonna do it. I don't want to get this started.

So you actively refuse to educate yourself on the concept of theory of mind?

And you wonder why you're flunking psychology courses.

But someone wants to get this started.


Existence isn't the matrix. Humans are individual Id personalities just like that old codger Freud postulated. However, our bodies are organic avatars that we are plugged into to interact with reality through our senses. Case in point, sex. Would you have had an orgasm without your mind or without your sexual organs? Does a coma patient have an orgasm? Spirit, id, body are all needed to create an orgasm. Don't believe me. Jack off to porn for a few long hours. Your mind disconnects and there is no orgasm anymore. Your id didnt attach to the fake action.

So you think we are minds connected to but not intrinsic of bodies? Somehow that does not surprise me given everything.

Pam, I'm not pregnant with any celebrity's baby. Why are you so obsessed with that? From reading the very first introductory post of this thread it shows that you've been talking about celebrities and their pregnancies or someone being pregnant with a celebrity's baby consistently. Is that just some fantasy you had that you can't get out of your delusions now? No one here is pregnant with a celebrity's child. Go see a psychologist.

I suspect Pam might obsess over pregnancies due to the death of her father and the realization that she represents the end of her family line should she fail to procreate, which is the state she currently finds herself in.
 
All the names I listed are all the names of people you have fraudulently alleged to be stalking you or aiding a conspiracy to stalk you. I never said it was exhaustive.



So you actively refuse to educate yourself on the concept of theory of mind?

And you wonder why you're flunking psychology courses.



So you think we are minds connected to but not intrinsic of bodies? Somehow that does not surprise me given everything.



I suspect Pam might obsess over pregnancies due to the death of her father and the realization that she represents the end of her family line should she fail to procreate, which is the state she currently finds herself in.

Nope. I don't feel you have the capacity for academic thought. I will never talk to you about anything.

"And you wonder why you're flunking psychology courses." Lie. Alan. Lie.

Pam, I'm not pregnant with any celebrity's baby. Why are you so obsessed with that? From reading the very first introductory post of this thread it shows that you've been talking about celebrities and their pregnancies or someone being pregnant with a celebrity's baby consistently. Is that just some fantasy you had that you can't get out of your delusions now? No one here is pregnant with a celebrity's child. Go see a psychologist.

No. I was mocking you.

I wish Sam were here....sigh!
 
Nope. I don't feel you have the capacity for academic thought. I will never talk to you about anything.

You're just mad I'm smarter than you are and refuse to play into your bullshit.

"And you wonder why you're flunking psychology courses." Lie. Alan. Lie.

Oh, so you're not flunking them like you complained about in your lolsuit?
 
Existence isn't the matrix.
Most probably not but trying to disprove solipsism or simulation theory is an interesting thought experiment.

Humans are individual Id personalities just like that old codger Freud postulated.
In freudian model (which in itself is a theory) ID is Eros and Thanatos. Eros is the urge to engage in sexual activities, Thanatos is our urge for destruction and\or self-destruction. It's the "reptilian mind", kill or be killed, do whatever you want now and don't think about what happens later. ID is the voice that tells you to punch your interlocutor during an argument or make a step forward when standing at the edge of a cliff. Opposing ID is Super Ego. It's your social norms and morality shaped by society (so people growing up in disfunctional parts of society can have different norms imprinted into their Super Ego). It's the voice that tells you to resolve a conflict with words and not fists or turn away from the cliff. ID and Super Ego are pretty much little devil and little angel standing at your shoulders. You, concious thought process, the Ego, is between them and needs to resolve the conflict between those two guys at war with each other.
Imagine this hypothetical situation: you see someone you really hate walking in front of you on an empty street. And now:
Your ID tells you: Hit him in the head, kick him in the balls and run.
Your Super Ego tells you: Walk past him, assaulting another person is wrong.
It's up to you (Ego) to resolve this conflict. If you let ID win - Super Ego will be displeased and strike back with guilt and remorse. If you let Super Ego win - ID will be mad and attack you with frustration over missed opportunity.
This conflict can be resolved in many ways - better (like sublimation: turning unacceptable urge into acceptable behavior - for example art: walking past that person and writing an artistic description of the assault you planned to give ID his adrenaline kicks) or worse (like distortion: misrepresenting the event - for example assaulting the person and telling Super Ego that it was more like a strong but playful pat in the back).
Anyway, that's old perv Freud :)

However, our bodies are organic avatars that we are plugged into to interact with reality through our senses. Case in point, sex. Would you have had an orgasm without your mind or without your sexual organs? Does a coma patient have an orgasm? Spirit, id, body are all needed to create an orgasm.
This sounds more like Carl Young and his "collective unconscious" (basically: we're all individuals but we're connected on some plane of existence which can be accessed for example in dreams).
I'm not sure one can experience orgasm while in coma but I'm (and every other guy who ever was in his teens) can confirm you can experience orgasm and ejaculation while sleeping :)
Don't believe me. Jack off to porn for a few long hours. Your mind disconnects
and there is no orgasm anymore. Your id didnt attach to the fake action.
I wish I was this durable :) Don't even want to imagine the pain of a few hours long erection.
 
You're just mad I'm smarter than you are and refuse to play into your bullshit.



Oh, so you're not flunking them like you complained about in your lolsuit?

20210123_003055.jpg
 
Most probably not but trying to disprove solipsism or simulation theory is an interesting thought experiment.

In freudian model (which in itself is a theory) ID is Eros and Thanatos. Eros is the urge to engage in sexual activities, Thanatos is our urge for destruction and\or self-destruction. It's the "reptilian mind", kill or be killed, do whatever you want now and don't think about what happens later. ID is the voice that tells you to punch your interlocutor during an argument or make a step forward when standing at the edge of a cliff. Opposing ID is Super Ego. It's your social norms and morality shaped by society (so people growing up in disfunctional parts of society can have different norms imprinted into their Super Ego). It's the voice that tells you to resolve a conflict with words and not fists or turn away from the cliff. ID and Super Ego are pretty much little devil and little angel standing at your shoulders. You, concious thought process, the Ego, is between them and needs to resolve the conflict between those two guys at war with each other.
Imagine this hypothetical situation: you see someone you really hate walking in front of you on an empty street. And now:
Your ID tells you: Hit him in the head, kick him in the balls and run.
Your Super Ego tells you: Walk past him, assaulting another person is wrong.
It's up to you (Ego) to resolve this conflict. If you let ID win - Super Ego will be displeased and strike back with guilt and remorse. If you let Super Ego win - ID will be mad and attack you with frustration over missed opportunity.
This conflict can be resolved in many ways - better (like sublimation: turning unacceptable urge into acceptable behavior - for example art: walking past that person and writing an artistic description of the assault you planned to give ID his adrenaline kicks) or worse (like distortion: misrepresenting the event - for example assaulting the person and telling Super Ego that it was more like a strong but playful pat in the back).
Anyway, that's old perv Freud :)


This sounds more like Carl Young and his "collective unconscious" (basically: we're all individuals but we're connected on some plane of existence which can be accessed for example in dreams).
I'm not sure one can experience orgasm while in coma but I'm (and every other guy who ever was in his teens) can confirm you can experience orgasm and ejaculation while sleeping :)

I wish I was this durable :) Don't even want to imagine the pain of a few hours long erection.

Well, I part ways with Freud in the Eros and Thanatos parts. He tries to animalize humans ie the reptilian brain. Humans do have repetitive survival patterns but we do have agency over those patterns as a higher organic being than dogs. I never understood why pavlov's dog experiments or any kind of animal behavior could be applied to human behavioral patterns.
Humans can interrupt behaviors. Rehabs prove this everyday.

It's about the personhood. You're walking down the street and you see a person you hate, your Id remembers the personal injury and wants retaliation but the super ego reminds you that the ramifications of retaliation are greater than the momentary satisfaction of punching the shit out the bottomfeeder. It's behavior interruptus. It's determined by the self training the super ego has over the ID to protect the ID. The feelings of injury are just feelings.

I do believe in subconscious connection. I also believe that is subject to super ego influence.
And this could explain teen boys troubling wet dreams dealing with new subconscious sexual narratives that engage the sexual mind in sleep and the lack of experiential usage and control leads to the expected outcome. The mind/Id/soul is very strong.

Well, yes, I am. I can properly spell and correcttly conjugate verbs, among other things.



Okay, so you committed perjury in your lolsuit, WRT interference with your studies AND to filing IFP.

And that's assuming those are your course records we're seeing.

You either deliberately refuse to look up correct information or you live in a disturbed world of perpetual lies.

I'm not sure one can experience orgasm while in coma but I'm (and every other guy who ever was in his teens) can confirm you can experience orgasm and ejaculation while sleeping :)

I always think of kill bill, where Beatrice was attacked while in a coma and woke up. She seemed to remember the attacks in her subconscious mind but felt nothing in her body.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, I part ways with Freud in the Eros and Thanatos parts. He tries to animalize humans ie the reptilian brain. Humans do have repetitive survival patterns but we do have agency over those patterns as a higher organic being than dogs. I never understood why pavlov's dog experiments or any kind of animal behavior could be applied to human behavioral patterns.
Humans can interrupt behaviors. Rehabs prove this everyday.

You say this, but you are trapped in a cycle of stimulus response you play out on the regular. More fequently than daily, in fact.

It's about the personhood. You're walking down the street and you see a person you hate, your Id remembers the personal injury and wants retaliation but the super ego reminds you that the ramifications of retaliation are greater than the momentary satisfaction of punching the shit out the bottomfeeder. It's behavior interruptus. It's determined by the self training the super ego has over the ID to protect the ID. The feelings of injury are just feelings.

Yet again this is hilarious coming from you and your seemingly nonexistent impulse control.

I do believe in subconscious connection. I also believe that is subject to super ego influence.
And this could explain teen boys troubling wet dreams dealing with new subconscious sexual narratives that engage the sexual mind in sleep and the lack of experiential usage and control leads to the expected outcome. The mind/Id/soul is very strong.

Mind, Sould, and Id are not interchangeable terms.

You either deliberately refuse to look up correct information or you live in a disturbed world of perpetual lies.

That would be you, Pam. You've refused to look at correct information when it's been handed to you on a silver platter and you exist in a world of delusions.
 
You say this, but you are trapped in a cycle of stimulus response you play out on the regular. More fequently than daily, in fact.



Yet again this is hilarious coming from you and your seemingly nonexistent impulse control.

I do believe in subconscious connection. I also believe that is subject to super ego influence.
And this could explain teen boys troubling wet dreams dealing with new subconscious sexual narratives that engage the sexual mind in sleep and the lack of experiential usage and control leads to the expected outcome. The mind/Id/soul is very strong.



That would be you, Pam. You've refused to look at correct information when it's been handed to you on a silver platter and you exist in a world of delusions.
[/QUOTE]


Nope
 
Back