Trainwreck Pamela Swain / DocHoliday1977 / MsPhoenix1969 / Observer1977 / danishlace2003 / Writer_thriller - Victim of grand #MeToo conspiracy, litigious wannabe starfucker, off her meds and online

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date

Which member of the Pamspiracy does Pam secretly want to fuck the most?


  • Total voters
    519
Joining the tard group brigade?
I most certainly wasn't trying to antagonize you. The phrase just brought this song to my mind. I like it and for some reason I really love the music video - probably something with color saturation and the floral patterns on the walls.
So I thought I'd share. Don't you like it?
 
Joining the tard group brigade?
You are the brigadier general in charge of that brigade Pam.

I most certainly wasn't trying to antagonize you. The phrase just brought this song to my mind. I like it and for some reason I really love the music video - probably something with color saturation and the floral patterns on the walls.
So I thought I'd share. Don't you like it?
You're talking to a woman who has been assblasted at the internet for seven years because she got a spam email and a fake account friended her on Facebook.

Hey Harvey.
Why do you want Harvey to be here so bad? Did mommy and daddy not love you enough as a child?

Pam's mad. Time for one word responses. The nightly pacing and screaming at pictures of Tony pasted to her wall has begun.

Tony Robbins will never fall in love with you Pam. Your lonely, childless, husband-free life is all you have to look forward to. You should probably apply for tardbux now since you'll never have a job again and it will pay your property tax bill in the future.

.

War of the Alans.
*shrugs
No Alan's Pam. Just you, your delusions and internet trolls laughing at you.

"Meds are my maker" -Bryan See
 
You're talking to a woman who has been assblasted at the internet for seven years because she got a spam email and a fake account friended her on Facebook.
I'm mostly aware of the story. Still, she doesn't grift, she doesn't groom minors, she's not some crazy political activist - all of which warrant trolling and ridicule - so I'm trying to have a polite conversation with her :)
 
I'm mostly aware of the story. Still, she doesn't grift, she doesn't groom minors, she's not some crazy political activist - all of which warrant trolling and ridicule - so I'm trying to have a polite conversation with her :)

Legitimately, best of luck. She will probably decide you're someone in her delusions before too long and become hostile. Though depending on who she decides you are and her mood she might be flirtatious. There's always that chance with Pam.
 
Legitimately, best of luck. She will probably decide you're someone in her delusions before too long and become hostile. Though depending on who she decides you are and her mood she might be flirtatious. There's always that chance with Pam.
We actually managed to have a nice conversation about psychology and a little philosophy a few pages back and Pamela's reasoning and conclusions were rather sound.
 
We actually managed to have a nice conversation about psychology and a little philosophy a few pages back and Pamela's reasoning and conclusions were rather sound.

If Pam could divest herself of her maladies I'm sure she'd be a lovely conversationalist. She's not a moron, but she is suffering from severe mental disorders. If you brush up against them at all, you run the risk of her brain incorporating you into them. I'm just saying be prepared for that eventuality.
 
I'm mostly aware of the story. Still, she doesn't grift, she doesn't groom minors, she's not some crazy political activist - all of which warrant trolling and ridicule - so I'm trying to have a polite conversation with her :)
You might get on her good side but the vast majority of people just become another part of her grand conspiracy theory. Have you looked at the threads where she has tried suing the forum?

We actually managed to have a nice conversation about psychology and a little philosophy a few pages back and Pamela's reasoning and conclusions were rather sound.
You might catch her in a moment of lucidity once in a blue moon but don't expect her to indulge in any real conversation.

Legitimately, best of luck. She will probably decide you're someone in her delusions before too long and become hostile. Though depending on who she decides you are and her mood she might be flirtatious. There's always that chance with Pam.
Pretty much this. It's honestly not a matter of IF but when she decides you're Dr. Phil.

If Pam could divest herself of her maladies I'm sure she'd be a lovely conversationalist. She's not a moron, but she is suffering from severe mental disorders. If you brush up against them at all, you run the risk of her brain incorporating you into them. I'm just saying be prepared for that eventuality.
Yeah, no one thinks Pam is evil but she has serious issues. She will never accept reality and you'll have to come to terms that she is a crazy person on the internet.

"Is my meds my maker?" -Bryan See
 
If Pam could divest herself of her maladies I'm sure she'd be a lovely conversationalist. She's not a moron, but she is suffering from severe mental disorders. If you brush up against them at all, you run the risk of her brain incorporating you into them. I'm just saying be prepared for that eventuality.
You might catch her in a moment of lucidity once in a blue moon but don't expect her to indulge in any real conversation.
I actually read first couple pages and last couple pages of the thread and skimmed through the rest before writing. We had a short convo about books and movies and a little more in-depth convo about Freud, behaviorism and some philosophical concepts of reality and based on those I'm sure she doesn't have intellectual deficit and indeed can engage in an interesting conversation. Both of our convos happened during usual thread exchange so I don't think she was in a different mindset.
Gives me similar vibes to:
(again, nothing related to anybody present, just a piece of music I like)
 
Back