Cultcow Marjan Šiklić / Marijan Ciklic / GovernmentsGetGirlfriends / ThatIncelBlogger / CAAMIB - Third Edition: Fear and Loathing of Vagina

Maybe the fact that I am trying to save intelligent young men from destruction they are sure to endure if they think they can form "relationships" with insane animals like modern Western women? That I am trying to protect them from being jailed and having all their money taken away, and the latter part is if they are not single forever?

Holden I literally asked you in the last thread to name a single case of a man being so much as being prosecuted, not even convicted, over your insane belief that men are imprisoned for not raping women, and you couldn't name a single case then. So I'll ask again, name a single instance.
 
Maybe the fact that I am trying to save intelligent young men from destruction they are sure to endure if they think they can form "relationships" with insane animals like modern Western women? That I am trying to protect them from being jailed and having all their money taken away, and the latter part is if they are not single forever?

You hate consent, you hate any form of civilized behavior. This they have to know.

The backslash is, as seen by what Horse is now bragging about (she's the first person here to really trick me, but oh well), great, but it can't change reality. It only confirms it.
This doesn't show you have a good in you, Holden.

So, are you going to ever answer WHY you want to fuck a 12 year old? And can you explain how having 12 year olds (6th-7th graders) have children promotes a sane society? Or, better yet, how is a 25+ year old man wanting to impregnate a 12 year old helping society at all?

What else should 12 year olds be allowed to do if they can have children?
Drive? Smoke? Vote? Have a job? Have a loan for a house?
 
@Humanoid Email Address - He's not going to name anything because there is no such thing. He knows it. He has admitted that he merely enjoys pissing people off. He has spent many years in a quest to convince the world that in Zagreb, or some shithole suburb thereof, lurks the world's biggest asshole. After two threads and the beginning of another, it seems as though we are convinced.

As I just told him in PM, it makes men look like assholes by association. One of the few actually correct things I told him (e.g. my alias for the burner Skype I used was "Rosie Redbike," allegedly referring to a red bike I had in childhood; it was in fact blue) is that my fiancé aka Mr. Horse was nearly killed by his first wife. Mr. Horse did not turn bitter, did not start raping people, did not shit up Reddit and every other forum in the universe with made-up words like "incel" and "CoAlpha." He is sweet and gentle, and liked by everyone who meets him. Mr. Horse is not, in other words, the sort of guy who would -- in the middle of getting FOUR SOLID HOURS of attention in his lonely life -- turn around and, without provocation, call his interviewer "scum." Mr. Horse does not advocate imprisoning one's girlfriend in a cage, nor pimping her out to "cash in on her sluttiness." Mr. Horse had a shitty experience... and moved past it to grow and become stronger. It's funny how people are capable of that, isn't it? So (the person widely known as) Marijan Skugor Siklic does nothing to present men as rational. It's a good thing most men aren't him.

Because really. Man wants reputation as massive dickhole, man gets reputation as massive dickhole, man is surprised. Like, seriously? And we're supposed to believe that he has the mental power to track down The Fatal One or his other girlfriend he couldn't score with, and rape one or the other? That is his master plan for 2015 (which is half over), as well as doxing somebody named [REDACTED]. He seemed to expect I would know who that was; I didn't at all. Okay, you want us to be convinced that you are bent on destroying the "foolish whim" of female consent, and we believed you. And you have the infinite gall to be shocked by that. Some people's kids.

Also, he doesn't have a dog.
 
Last edited:
@Humanoid Email Address - He's not going to name anything because there is no such thing. He knows it.
Umm, do you want me to cite what we talked about in PM? I told you plainly that these men get accused of rape and are convicted of rape. So how is it even possible that anybody would know that they were initially accused because they weren't rapists? Nobody's gonna say this. I told you this several weeks ago.

And, yes, the things I say are the things I believe in.

did not shit up Reddit and every other forum in the universe with made-up words
All words are made up. Somebody who claims to be in your profession should know that. Seems you're lying about that as well.
 
Mr. Horse does not advocate imprisoning one's girlfriend in a cage, nor pimping her out to "cash in on her sluttiness." Mr. Horse had a shitty experience... and moved past it to grow and become stronger. I
Does Mr. Horse even exist though? Why would I believe you, seeing how you lied to me?

The reality is that NO ONE will EVER care for you.
Nor will they about anybody else. Animals don't feel much empathy and reproduce like animals.
 
Trolling by lunatics like you isn't that.

See? Denial. That or you're really so oblivious.

You get cut off after the first nonsensical thing you say, which is almost always after your first sentence.

Which is why you always respond and wind up running away from a duel with me?

Umm, do you want me to cite what we talked about in PM? I told you plainly that these men get accused of rape and are convicted of rape. So how is it even possible that anybody would know that they were initially accused because they weren't rapists? Nobody's gonna say this. I told you this several weeks ago.

And, yes, the things I say are the things I believe in.

So...conspiracy theory.

Also, how do you distinguish the not-rapists from the incel rapists?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Emiya Kiwitsugu
Mr. Horse does not advocate imprisoning one's girlfriend in a cage, nor pimping her out to "cash in on her sluttiness."
So, the alternative is - what? To have her destroy you, like any Western tart would? Not cashing in on her slutiness - why? You idiots always attack me for not wanting to work, but cashing in on having a slut as a "gf" is wrong?

See? Denial.
What I said. It's the first sentence, usually.
 
does nothing to present men as rational.
I never said all men are rational.

It's a good thing most men aren't him.
Good for sluts right now, bad for sluts any everybody in the future.
Because really. Man wants reputation as massive dickhole, man gets reputation as massive dickhole, man is surprised. Like, seriously?
My goals with you weren't that you represent anything that isn't my ideas.


And we're supposed to believe that he has the mental power to track down The Fatal One or his other girlfriend he couldn't score with, and rape one or the other?
Mental power? And you think I haven't learned something about them?
Some people's kids.
As are the millions of women you want raped en masse and who should then father childless kids ! As are the men you want destroyed because you will sell them lies on some "consent" and "relationships", concepts that are long gone !

Oh Horse...

No, just you.
Oh, yeah, like I am the only one who got burnt by believing lies on some "consent" and "relationships" !
 
Last edited:
I dunno. I suppose I could take Mr. Horse's picture to prove he exists, but that seems a bit unfair seeing as he's asleep and naked. You might be threatened, or god knows, aroused. Also, you already got four hours on Skype typing angrily about how rape was the only way, but how you're also just like a broken-down 90-year-old man, but how you are the greatest uncaught rapist in all of Croatia, blah blah et cetera. So I think that's just a bit too much effort. So sorry, old chap.

I also love how you're acting like the interview and/or wiki edits were some massive favor to the Farms or me. You ordered me to put up your changes, like I was some kind of servant. You frothed at the mouth until you got the chance to explain your views. Guess who has two thumbs and is not your personal clerk-typist? This gal! Your truncated version of the wiki also serves no one's goals but your own. And this is something I "got"? Please.

My point is that you are astonishingly easy to manipulate with simple Jedi mind tricks, like allowing you to pick your own alias, despite wanting us to think that you are simultaneously "a dangerous man and a criminal," as you put it, and someone whose views should be taken seriously, despite how utterly, atrociously barking mad they are. You were never, ever going to change your views, so don't even pretend otherwise. You were never going to be convinced that Western women were anything other than what you think. You were never going to read some source we produced and suddenly have a revelation and change your ways. Don't even try to imply that this would be the case. You just want listeners. Okay, you got listened to. You should be dancing with joy for that alone.

How many people have you tried to badger into making those wiki edits? It doesn't even matter, really, because you are still talking about an article on a wiki about lunatics. That's like having the best haircut at the insane asylum. You're still in the asylum.
 
Your truncated version of the wiki also serves no one's goals but your own.
The point was never to shorten anything. The point is that it had been written by a lunatic who can't differentiate between my second gf and the schizo slut. The point is that he doesn't even know what The Awakening is. Which is among the slightest of his 500 mistakes. The point was to fix the mistakes. Also, typing? You were just supposed to check what I wrote and c/p it.

you are simultaneously "a dangerous man and a criminal," as you put it, and someone whose views should be taken seriously, despite how utterly, atrociously barking mad they are.
Yet nobody ever said why they're mad with actual arguments. Also, does it matter? Truth is the truth, and I never wanted to obscure any of my actual views.

You were never, ever going to change your views, so don't even pretend otherwise. You were never going to be convinced that Western women were anything other than what you think. You were never going to read some source we produced and suddenly have a revelation and change your ways. Don't even try to imply that this would be the case. You just want listeners.
Of course I am not going to change them. The reason for this is that they are... um, correct and based on facts? Did I ever try to say I will change them?

Okay, you got listened to. You should be dancing with joy for that alone.
Except that I wasn't listened to.

It doesn't even matter, really, because you are still talking about an article on a wiki about lunatics. That's like having the best haircut at the insane asylum. You're still in the asylum.
Which was never the point. I said what the point was many times. It was never to say state something I am not.
 
Of course I am not going to change them. The reason for this is that they are... um, correct and based on facts? Did I ever try to say I will change them?

Can you honestly find a single fact or source to support literally any argument you've made?

Please, do, it's always funny to look at the crazy sources people here cite for their dumb views.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Positron and Rin
And, ffs, if your argument had been the whole time that "we don't need to change anything cause the views are crazy in any case" then what is there to be said about those like you, who advocate decapitation of women, as long as done by their sacred groups like blacks?

Can you honestly find a single fact or source to support literally any argument you've made?
I did so back in December. And every month after. Go away, child.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back