*I have been informed that is person is using Twitter shit favoritism to get around Twitter bull. Not a troon. Sry for wrong info*
Now the person he's arguing with is or claims to be a troon. View attachment 1893101
I don't know how one can be AFAB, NB and a transwoman at the same time. This person is interesting because while they claim to be trans, they are decidedly anti-trans. As in they think men in dresses in a women's bathroom are men in dresses in a women's bathroom.View attachment 1893114
This exchange peeked my curiosity because it seems ridiculous that anyone could think a Male-centered society would allow troons. I mean if a group of men are coming up with and actually carrying out the "final solution" to the "woman question". Why would they allow undeniable sex fetishes who wantt to be "poor helpless women"? If anything, they would gas the troons before they ever got around to the actual women.
Do you guys think that after the Olympics, there's going to be a red hot debate about the troon thing in sports? I don't know how many troons are going to participate, but still. Can't imagine that Biden's executive orders can stand unchallenged in a post-Olympics enviroment.
Listen cis lesbians! A trans womans girldick is totally not the sameas these ugly icky cis penises! You have to believe this because ur limp dicked r/Al overlords always tell the truth.
I try to keep my tumblr about sports and the NFL, free of tranny bs, but somehow it gets in anyway. i figure they must be posting about themselves constantly.
You know what we should normalize? Men with chests that aren’t flat. Men that have periods. Men that have high-pitched voices. Men with round faces. Men with curves and hips and men with uteri. Men that can’t grow facial or body hair. Men that can and do get pregnant. Men that have all of these traits. Men that don’t “pass as men.”
Something I see a lot to ‘prove’ that trans men are men is the classic argument of “look this trans guy is buff and has a beard and a deep voice and you can’t even see his top surgery scars, you can’t tell he’s trans” and while the argument may be well-intended, it throws us trans men that can’t pass under the bus. It implies that you’re only a valid trans man if you’ve done xyz, if you take testosterone, have top and/or bottom surgery, if you bind or pack, or are in the process of doing these things. And while many of us (myself included) want these things, notall of us have the money, the time, the resources or the support to medically transition and look like the “perfectly valid trans man.” And not all of us want to pass.
Some men are perfectly okay with not having a flat chest or a deep voice or facial hair. Some men are okay with wearing bras and not binding. Some men don’t mind having periods or having a vagina, and they don’t feel like they need a dick to be a man because they know they are already men. And you know what? That doesn’t make them any less trans, and that doesn’t invalidate the struggles trans guys like me face for wanting these things. Trans men are men regardless of where we are in our transition. You don’t need to take testosterone or have any surgery or kind of medical transition to be a trans guy. All you need to be a man is to identify as one. It’s that simple. So instead of expecting us to be the most masculine cis-passing trans bros ever in order to respect our pronouns, normalize trans bodies at every stage of our journeys. See us for who we really are and not for how you think we should look like. Because being trans has no single look, we aren’t a monolith and we are a diverse and vibrant community with lots of different bodies.
The thing that strikes me the most is the complete disconnect between the trans community and well, just about anything else really.
As a very boring, vanilla hetero I don't wish to speak for others but I think the letters need re-arranging. Straights, Lesbians, Gays and Bi's all seem pretty much a piece,
I know a lot of people went through a lot of shit to get us here and respect for that but in 2021 its pretty homogeneous.
The vast majority of people in these groups are rational, grown-up folks who just happen to like fucking a certain group of like minded individuals. They're mostly hard working, law abiding sensible types trying to make the best of a shitty world without pissing everybody else off. Plenty of difference of opinion and approach certainly but other than that it's one pant leg at a time. Even the regular kinks are spread evenly across the board.
Then you've got troons. Irrational, demanding, narcissistic, very often just hateful fucking losers who WANT TO DO EXACTLY WHAT THEY WANT ALL THE TIME BUT EVERYBODY ELSE BETTER GET IN LINE.
Not all of them obviously but christ it's a pretty fair proportion.
The point of my ramble is that these days it should really be SLGB and then over there - - - - - - - - - > the T's. That would be a more relatable ordering.
This just reads like she is trying to convince mostly herself of the superiority of girl dick. Like when you are about to do something and you know deep down is a horrible idea you'll regret but can't go back now.
Lol, I've been thinking that too. He has that weird vibe about him, a mini version of his mummy. He would probably pass alright though, he is quite a beautiful looking man.
Listen cis lesbians! A trans womans girldick is totally not the sameas these ugly icky cis penises! You have to believe this because ur limp dicked r/Al overlords always tell the truth.
Welcome to Troontown. A while back I found a forum om Saidit who advocates for just that thing. It's called LGB Drop the T ...one word though. https://www.saidit.net/s/LGBDropTheT
I'm straight but I love to read these gay guys and lesbians ranting about the insanity of trans people. They want nothing to do with them, and they rightly believe that troons make them look bad.
TRA arguments are always so hilarious, what does it matter what firefighters are called? Do you choose having a uterus and menstruation? Is the argument that the word "woman" is biased and sexist? How is "people with uteruses healthcare" more accessible than "women's healthcare"?