American Impeachment/25th Amendment Watch 2021 - If, at first, you don't convict, try, try again

What will happen to Donald Trump in the next two weeks?

  • The House of Representatives impeaches and the Senate convicts

    Votes: 23 8.6%
  • The House of Representatives impeaches and the Senate acquits

    Votes: 17 6.3%
  • The US Cabinet invokes the 25th amendment

    Votes: 11 4.1%
  • House of Representative and/or Senate censures the President

    Votes: 14 5.2%
  • President Trump resigns

    Votes: 11 4.1%
  • Trump continues as President until Jan. 20, with Biden becoming President afterwards

    Votes: 165 61.3%
  • Trump finds a way to continue being President after Jan. 20

    Votes: 28 10.4%

  • Total voters
    269
  • Poll closed .
I have never seen buyer's remorse to the level that most Biden voters have.
I mean, everyone told them what was going to happen, and shocker, it happened. They were just useful retards who didn't even bother but hated Trump. Turns out oopsie, neo-liberals aren't progressive and they have no problem fucking you over completely and putting a boot on your neck when you get spicy.
 
You have no idea how many times I have read that, like these retards think justice and laws started for slavery and there wasn't any law enforcement before.
I've argued with so many leftoids on social media who still buy into this myth, and when I show them factual articles about police forces, sheriffs, magistrates and such existing across the world since Biblical times, they just call me a bootlicker.
 
A thought crossed my mind. Since the senate gave the go-ahead in saying this latest impeachment is """"""""""constitutional,"""""""""" does that also open up past living presidents to get the same treatment? Of course, it'd be highly improbable to happen because the hologram's administration would do everything to make sure Obama, Dubya, Clinton, and even Carter remain untouchable until the days they die. But the precedent may or may not have been set by this farce, yeah?
 
I mean, everyone told them what was going to happen, and shocker, it happened. They were just useful retards who didn't even bother but hated Trump. Turns out oopsie, neo-liberals aren't progressive and they have no problem fucking you over completely and putting a boot on your neck when you get spicy.
I’m still ticked that the establishment got them to burn down their own cities...thus making them more dependant than they already were.
 
A thought crossed my mind. Since the senate gave the go-ahead in saying this latest impeachment is """"""""""constitutional,"""""""""" does that also open up past living presidents to get the same treatment? Of course, it'd be highly improbable to happen because the hologram's administration would do everything to make sure Obama, Dubya, Clinton, and even Carter remain untouchable until the days they die. But the precedent may or may not have been set by this farce, yeah?
That precedent is mainly being set to put the GOP in its fucking place as the loser wing of politics and to stop any upstarts from ever getting near the presidency again. Bush, Clinton, and Obama are all in the same club and won't be touched by this and you know it.
 
That precedent is mainly being set to put the GOP in its fucking place as the loser wing of politics and to stop any upstarts from ever getting near the presidency again. Bush, Clinton, and Obama are all in the same club and won't be touched by this and you know it.
Oh, it is abso-LUTE-LY wishful thinking on my part. Still... it seems like the sort of thing Trump could take advantage of if this whole thing ever gets to a phase of discovery. Let's see how the rest of this kangaroo court goes, first.
 
Were Democrats not paying attention when trump was saying the exact opposite of "commit violence" because pretty sure magatards got mad at him for not wanting a violent revolution.
Overall it just shows how slimey and Orwellian the democrats have become.
Constitutional rights only matter if our asses are on the burner! Orange glorf man doesn't get any !!!
 
Were Democrats not paying attention when trump was saying the exact opposite of "commit violence" because pretty sure magatards got mad at him for not wanting a violent revolution.
Overall it just shows how slimey and Orwellian the democrats have become.
Constitutional rights only matter if our asses are on the burner! Orange glorf man doesn't get any !!!
Trump says peacefully protest and clearly that means he wants violent insurrection.

Dems say go ahead and be violent and they’re clearly inspiring peaceful protests.

I think it’s smart to play to a public that is sick of the hypocrisy, I just wish they had gotten to the fucking point sooner.
 
pretty sure magatards got mad at him for not wanting a violent revolution.
Would have been good if either lolyer took the time to say that even Trump's ardent supporters got bored and left during his 1/6 speech because it was "disappointing," and "did not rile them up to stop the steal."

Even better would be them adding to the argument that some of those populist-leaning idiots felt that "he threw them under the bus," or that some of the far-gone Qtards think that he's the real Establishment-Swamp traitor now because he didn't have a plan that they put their trust in. Do I even have to mention the "LAW AND ORDER" spamming?
 
Not only is it buyers remorse, but they insist that they absolutely positively are not having it. They will still vote for this guy or his replacement 4 years down the line.

The modern African American is mentally and politically more of a slave than he was when he was in chains. When blacks were in chains, they knew they were slaves and tried to get off of it if they could. Here they are mentally stuck on the plantation and want to stay on it.

The last year gave me more than enough of a wake up call for that. The election only more so with some of them running the counters. Most niggers are worthless niggers who are perfectly content to stay as niggers and no amount of help from anyone is ever going to lift them out of niggerdom until an entire generation of their own children decide to stop being niggers, give every single one of their fat, race-grifter reverends and activists the bird, and get the fuck out of their buckets. I want nothing to do with any of them until.
 
Since the senate gave the go-ahead in saying this latest impeachment is """"""""""constitutional,"""""""""" does that also open up past living presidents to get the same treatment?
The only reason this has been able to go forward is that he was impeached (ie, charges brought) while still president. Charges cannot be brought up against non-sitting presidents unless you really try to snap the process in half.

This is a part of why Leahy's reasoning doesn't really make any sense - it's okay to do this because Trump was charged as president, but overseeing those charges we're not going to behave as if he's president.
 
You have no idea how many times I have read that, like these retards think justice and laws started for slavery and there wasn't any law enforcement before.
But if they really think that, doesn't that also imply that before black people came over as slaves, whites were so peaceful that they didn't even need police officers?
 
I'm a little surprised Twitter isn't more involved in all this. Anything impeachment doesn't show up higher than 10th on trending, and there's two woke tags ahead of it. Half of the trends beating impeachment have less than 8k tweets.

1612923345293.png
 
I'm a little surprised Twitter isn't more involved in all this. Anything impeachment doesn't show up higher than 10th on trending, and there's two woke tags ahead of it. Half of the trends beating impeachment have less than 8k tweets.

View attachment 1908940
Because even they know he won’t get convicted. They just don’t have the votes, it’s just grifters trying to milk hype and otherwise let them avoid doing anything important.
 
Because even they know he won’t get convicted. They just don’t have the votes, it’s just grifters trying to milk hype and otherwise let them avoid doing anything important.
Isn't that why they're trying to eliminate the fillibuster and make it a simple majority, thus making a potential conviction easier if Trump won reelection?
 
Eliminating the filibuster has nothing to do with impeachment trial votes, it’s written into the constitution to be 2/3 majority.

They likely will eliminate the filibuster in a year or two even though 2 dems said they wouldn't because that’s just how they work when in power.

Cassidy’s defense for voting against Trump is that the defense lawyers didn’t present a clear case when we all know it doesn’t fucking matter anyway and the fucking dems literally introduced into evidence a doctored, edited clip of Trumps rally speech where they cut out the peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard line.
 
Isn't that why they're trying to eliminate the fillibuster and make it a simple majority, thus making a potential conviction easier if Trump won reelection?
Filibuster isn’t going away. DC and Puerto Rico statehood, along with packing the Supreme Court, are also off the table. Trump’s trial and COVID relief are basically all they can somehow manage to legislate unilaterally on, given that it’s Joe’s turn to have President Random Judge overturn EOs they don’t like.

They need to milk the hype, to keep everyone’s attention off of them.
 
Filibuster isn’t going away. DC and Puerto Rico statehood, along with packing the Supreme Court, are also off the table. Trump’s trial and COVID relief are basically all they can somehow manage to legislate unilaterally on, given that it’s Joe’s turn to have President Random Judge overturn EOs they don’t like.

They need to milk the hype, to keep everyone’s attention off of them.
COVID relief's going to be the bare minimum and as late as possible, don't forget it.
 
Back