It's tough to confirm that "female criminals are less common", because women are charged less often; you can't track it as a crime, if no charges were filed. It's like feminists claiming "men commit more domestic violence!", when what actually happens is:
- feminists created the Duluth Model, which insists that men commit 99.999999% of domestic violence
- the Duluth Model is incorporated into legislation, and impacts how police handle domestic violence calls
- when operating from a "Duluth-Model-informed position", men are always the vast majority of those arrested for DV
- men getting arrested more (regardless of charges) permits feminists to claim "men commit more domestic violence"
- feminists get more funding and legislation to push their self-fulfilling prophecy
- any reference to actual data is dismissed as "self-reporting", "non-scientific", "problematic", etc., because arrest statistics clearly show that more men are arrested for domestic violence
- don't pay any attention to the obviously biased protocols, goy
If women consistently don't get arrested or charged for committing the same crimes that men consistently get arrested or charged for, there's no way to claim that "there's fewer female criminals", because the relevant stats won't reflect any kind of factual information.