Trainwreck Pamela Swain / DocHoliday1977 / MsPhoenix1969 / Observer1977 / danishlace2003 / Writer_thriller - Victim of grand #MeToo conspiracy, litigious wannabe starfucker, off her meds and online

[Useful_Mistake]

You all realize ya'll don't have to have a thread on me or even engage me at all, do you?

You don't have to do anything fun, yet everyone chooses to do something fun they enjoy. We don't have to mock you. We choose to do so.

This section of kiwifarms is designated for women you all want to engage in sexual favors

Literally not, and you could not convince a single person of this.

So again why even have a thread or post here?

To mock retards like you.

Oh and here's the insult for learning to read again.

I really don't see any improvement in your ability to read.
Please, do learn to read.

Such anger and hostility.

Just advice.

 

[Whale Spotter]

They exist, but they are very difficult to get someone committed to one.

Ah thanks.

I've had an extremely productive day today.

Yall want to lock me up in an insane asylum...lol but all you can do is post on kiwifarms.

I just think that the asylum saga would be hilarious, Pam. But it makes no difference to me whether you are or aren't.
Your stupidity doesn't affect anyone except for your poor mother and the courts that have to put up your lolsuits.

 

[Viridian]

You all realize ya'll don't have to have a thread on me or even engage me at all, do you? If I upset you so much.

I don't understand. This section of kiwifarms is designated for women you all want to engage in sexual favors. And I refuse to do so which is my right.

So again why even have a thread or post here?

You're being a retard and a liar again, Spamela.

Oh and here's the insult for learning to read again.

Such anger and hostility.

The only one upset here is you, Piggy Pammy. You can't gaslight us about our own feelings. Your transparent attempts to pull a "NO U" by irrationally projecting your own emotions and failings onto us only gives us another reason to keep laughing at you.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

You don't have to do anything fun, yet everyone chooses to do something fun they enjoy. We don't have to mock you. We choose to do so.

Literally not, and you could not convince a single person of this.

To mock retards like you.

I really don't see any improvement in your ability to read.
Please, do learn to read.

Just advice.

Such anger and lack of character. You are stunted in 3rd grade.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Such anger and lack of character. You are stunted in 3rd grade.

it's telling that the only way you can try to counteract my arguments is by attacking my perceived character.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

it's telling that the only way you can try to counteract my arguments is by attacking my perceived character.

You don't think your behavior is based and immature and indicative of your lack of character?

 

[Viridian]

You don't think your behavior is based and immature and indicative of your lack of character?

You're the one who keeps threatening to murder innocent people (who don't know you exist) on this thread. That speaks to your lack of maturity and character, not ours.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

You don't think your behavior is based and immature and indicative of your lack of character?

Of course not. I am quite happy with my character in its entirety.

 

[Whale Spotter]

I don't understand. This section of kiwifarms is designated for women you all want to engage in sexual favors. And I refuse to do so which is my right.

Disgusting Pam, no one wants to engage with you. Keep your sexual fantasies to yourself.

Oh and here's the insult for learning to read again.

Such anger and hostility.

That was not an insult, I have told you before that you lack the ability to read and comprehend (especially when sarcasm is involved)

You don't think your behavior is based and immature and indicative of your lack of character?

@Useful_Mistake seems based for sure, but that's not an insult, Pam, think about it again.

Also, the replies were mostly correcting your legally ignorant arguments, you make ridiculous accusations and expect a decent answer? You are very confused, this isn't Twitter.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Also, the replies were mostly correcting your legally ignorant arguments, you make ridiculous accusations and expect a decent answer?

Well, tbf, I try to keep the insults to a minimum when I reply to a legal arguments.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Disgusting Pam, no one wants to engage with you. Keep your sexual fantasies to yourself.




That was not an insult, I have told you before that you lack the ability to read and comprehend (especially when sarcasm is involved)



@Useful_Mistake seems based for sure, but that's not an insult, Pam, think about it again.

Also, the replies were mostly correcting your legally ignorant arguments, you make ridiculous accusations and expect a decent answer? You are very confused, this isn't Twitter.

I didn't make any legal arguments on here. That other post was a mistake.

Did you just tell me that kiwifarms is a decent place for legal discussion?

Well, tbf, I try to keep the insults to a minimum when I reply to a legal arguments.

Lol You keep your responses to a minimum on here?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I didn't make any legal arguments on here.

You did actually. At one point you did nothing but screenshot blog about stalking and harassing law. You even cited federal law and doj a few times. Is your memory that bad?

That other post was a mistake.

Looking at how bad it was, clearly.

Did you just tell me that kiwifarms is a decent place for legal discussion?

As decent as any place.

Lol You keep your responses to a minimum on here?

How are you this bad at reading? Literally even a child would have done better. What I said, and if need be I can dumb it down for you, was that when I involve myself in legal arguments ("when I reply to a legal arguments."), I try to keep insults to a minimum ("I try to keep the insults to a minimum").

The fact that you are this bad at reading is nothing less than proof of failure of the educational system

 

[DocHoliday1977]

You did actually. At one point you did nothing but screenshot blog about stalking and harassing law. You even cited federal law and doj a few times. Is your memory that bad?

Looking at how bad it was, clearly.

As decent as any place.

How are you this bad at reading? Literally even a child would have done better. What I said, and if need be I can dumb it down for you, was that when I involve myself in legal arguments ("when I reply to a legal arguments."), I try to keep insults to a minimum ("I try to keep the insults to a minimum").

The fact that you are this bad at reading is nothing less than proof of failure of the educational system

Triggered, Alan? Are you insulting my intelligence, Alan?

Oh I have posted a few things, but I've realized that you are so deranged in your percieved intellectual over confidence, that nothing I say will win against you when you're on full blown lying mode. You blather and totally change gears at a whim in hopes to win at any cost. You'll break laws, hack devices, stalk, harass, slander at all costs to "win" in your wee little mind.

I'll let you contradict yourself since you kick your own assvery well.

 

[Kurple Pecleon]

you are so deranged in your percieved intellectual over confidence, that nothing I say will win against you when you're on full blown lying mode. You blather and totally change gears at a whim in hopes to win at any cost.

I'll let you contradict yourself since you kick your own assvery well.

I see you're now right in the middle of the projection phase. I forgot what was next, was it the monosyllables, *munches popcorn" & "smh"?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Triggered, Alan?

Not Alan, and no.

Are you insulting my intelligence, Alan?

Not Alan. Yes, I am alleging that you seem incapable of basic reading, are delusional, and probably autistic/retarded in some way.

Oh I have posted a few things, but I've realized that you are so deranged in your percieved intellectual over confidence, that nothing I say will win against you when you're on full blown lying mode.

Post even a single lie I have ever told to you in legal arguments or outside it. You can't.

You blather and totally change gears at a whim in hopes to win at any cost.

Nope. So far I have been consistent. Again, feel free to prove me othervise.

You'll break laws, hack devices, stalk, harass, slander at all costs to "win" in your wee little mind.

I have never done that, and if I thought you had any money on you I'd sue you for what is clearly defamation per se as per Eidson v. Berry, 415 S.E.2d 16, 17 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992), SMITH et al. v. STEWART, Lucas v. Cranshaw, 289 Ga. App. 510, 659 S.E.2d 612 (2008 ),

I'll let you contradict yourself since you kick your own assvery well.

Post even a single contradiction to myself I have made.

 

[LoverofPi]

I've had an extremely productive day today.

Doubtful, but I'll bite, what made it productive?

Yall want to lock me up in an insane asylum...lol but all you can do is post on kiwifarms.

We do not want you locked up, Pam. We were discussing primarily why you were not.

You all realize ya'll don't have to have a thread on me or even engage me at all, do you? If I upset you so much.

You don't upset us. Are you so emotionally broken that you honestly think that how you feel about us is how we feel about you?

That has surprising explanatory power, come to think of it.

I don't understand. This section of kiwifarms is designated for women you all want to engage in sexual favors. And I refuse to do so which is my right.

This is not what the subforum is for at all. No one wants to engage in sexual favors with you. That, I suspect, is part of your problem.

So again why even have a thread or post here?

Because you are our dancing monkey dancing for our amusement. Duh.

Oh and here's the insult for learning to read again.

It's not an insult. You are honestly bad at understanding what you read.

Such anger and lack of character. You are stunted in 3rd grade.

Projection

I didn't make any legal arguments on here. That other post was a mistake.

You've made plenty of admittedly half assed legal arguments, Pam.

Did you just tell me that kiwifarms is a decent place for legal discussion?

It is, but no, he did not.

Lol You keep your responses to a minimum on here?

Literally not what he said. You are amazingly bad at reading.

Triggered, Alan? Are you insulting my intelligence, Alan?

Alan isn't here, Pam. And I see you're mirroring verbal tics now. Wondered when you'd start adopting that.

Oh I have posted a few things, but I've realized that you are so deranged in your percieved intellectual over confidence, that nothing I say will win against you when you're on full blown lying mode. You blather and totally change gears at a whim in hopes to win at any cost. You'll break laws, hack devices, stalk, harass, slander at all costs to "win" in your wee little mind.

I'll let you contradict yourself since you kick your own assvery well.

It's like Pam's so broken that the closest she can get to self awareness is to accuse someone else of every dumb thing she's constantly doing. Fascinating, in a trainwreck sort of way.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

I see you're now right in the middle of the projection phase. I forgot what was next, was it the monosyllables, *munches popcorn" & "smh"?

Geez at the anger.

Not Alan, and no.

Not Alan. Yes, I am alleging that you seem incapable of basic reading, are delusional, and probably autistic/retarded in some way.

Post even a single lie I have ever told to you in legal arguments or outside it. You can't.

Nope. So far I have been consistent. Again, feel free to prove me othervise.

I have never done that, and if I thought you had any money on you I'd sue you for what is clearly defamation per se as per Eidson v. Berry, 415 S.E.2d 16, 17 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992), SMITH et al. v. STEWART, Lucas v. Cranshaw, 289 Ga. App. 510, 659 S.E.2d 612 (2008 ),

Post even a single contradiction to myself I have made.

I see you are still mad. I can't gather everything from those bloated overly long posts that you thought was making look distinguished and intellectually academic.

Consist on wrong action and criminal intent.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I see you are still mad. I can't gather everything from those bloated overly long posts that you thought was making look distinguished and intellectually academic.

Consist on wrong action and criminal intent

In other words, you accused me of things that you could not prove.
FYI, amant v. thompson, 390 u.s. 727 (1968 ) does not define that as good faith and would hold it defamatory.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

In other words, you accused me of things that you could not prove.
FYI, amant v. thompson, 390 u.s. 727 (1968 ) does not define that as good faith and would hold it defamatory.

So you, under deposition, will say, "I never posted on the kiwifarms pamela swain thread with the intent to mock, deride, intimidate, or harass?"

Rudy Guiliani?
Alan Dershowitz?

Then you have no problems giving a deposition under oath.

Doubtful, but I'll bite, what made it productive?



We do not want you locked up, Pam. We were discussing primarily why you were not.



You don't upset us. Are you so emotionally broken that you honestly think that how you feel about us is how we feel about you?

That has surprising explanatory power, come to think of it.



This is not what the subforum is for at all. No one wants to engage in sexual favors with you. That, I suspect, is part of your problem.

So again why even have a thread or post here?

Because you are our dancing monkey dancing for our amusement. Duh.



It's not an insult. You are honestly bad at understanding what you read.



Projection



You've made plenty of admittedly half assed legal arguments, Pam.



It is, but no, he did not.



Literally not what he said. You are amazingly bad at reading.



Alan isn't here, Pam. And I see you're mirroring verbal tics now. Wondered when you'd start adopting that.



It's like Pam's so broken that the closest she can get to self awareness is to accuse someone else of every dumb thing she's constantly doing. Fascinating, in a trainwreck sort of way.

Ok Tony, under oath, you have never posted here or harassed, Intimidated, mocked, and continued to harass on a hate thread on kiwifarms?

Who else posted on the thread? Donny Tump Jr? Hillary Clinton? Harvey Weinstein?

You posted your pictures. You were on here in some way, shape and form.

Because you are our dancing monkey dancing for our amusement. Duh.

How humiliating and degrading, Tony.

Did Donald Trump jr send this unrequested text or was it another person from this site?


Was all this just jokes and lulz?


Hm?


What?

 

[Geralt of Rivia]

Yall want to lock me up in an insane asylum...

Nah, not really interested in having you locked up personally. We're all a bit crazy, some of us just don't post about it to a greater effect than others do.