Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

As stated in their message, it was a mistake caused by the language barrier. These idiots couldn't be arsed to ask the broad herself or someone with the proper knowledge of the language, as it took them years to realize their goof.

It still boggles me how many Tumblrinas are in her fandom. The bitch is completely fucked in the head and constantly shits out stuff that revolves around murder, horrendous maiming and torture, sadism, sexual harassment/assault/rape, incest and other shite, which she often does to her characters with particularly no reason or reasonable context, other than to push the edge to the maximum and make shock content for the sake of it (it's also most likely, taht she is a fucked up fetishist, who projects her sick fantasies on her own work).

Maybe not for me to speak on the subject, if I like crap like Crossed, but it's too much and disturbs even me for all the wrong reasons.

P.S. What kind of a coward do you need to be, to block the whole country from accessing your work, because of crybabies who got offended over you using a flag with no ill intent?

For a very long time it was standard operating procedure for Japanese artists to IP block the entire USA. So... not very? They're just Xenophobic and don't want to bother with faggotry from foreign fujoshi.

Plus, Japan fucking HATES Korea.
 
Nice to see her blogs are also naming who's still standing with her at this point;

"This post was shared to me by the directors of the Racism and Anti-Racism Network (RAN) at the University of the Fraser Valley. " Based off their Twitter feed they were thrilled enough to have the lady join their network since it's the last post on their Twitter as of Feb 2, as far as I can tell after she did all of this nonsense. Way to go Fraser Valley.

If I was one of the directors of the University of the Fraser Valley. I GTFO of there to distance myself from that SOB.
 
Bokkuko is a tomboy trope. This is literally tumblr doing their shitty "tomboy? MUST BE A TRANNY!!!!!!!!" shit, again. Must be fun having to deal with those sociopaths.

Have they tried to cancel Okegom for transphobia? Maybe driven her off of social media yet?

Edit: Ah. The artist's name isn't Okegom, it's... Katei Shuujin. Or... DSP. Is the simulation fucking with us again?

And yeah, they tried to cancel her already once. Er, twice.



HOW DARE YOU EMBRACE JAPANESE CULTURE DON'T YOU KNOW THAT OFFENDS THE GLORIOUS CHINA-NUMBAONE AND KOREABOOS?!?! REPENT, YOU HONORARY WHITE PERSON, REPENT!

Edit:

Before we continue, I need to point out the characters Syakesan and Wadanohara, which caused a scandal because she posted "sexual assault" art of them.

View attachment 1919494View attachment 1919495

It's literally touhou tier chibi art and fucking spritework

View attachment 1919501View attachment 1919502View attachment 1919503

I swear to fucking god is there nothing Tumblr females won't fuck up with their shitty female-ness?
FEEEMALES, also I jack off to cartoons as an adult.

Can people here develop some self awareness for once? No one cares about this shit, I'm here to laugh at crazy feminists on Twitter who want to murder white men, not read about how much you hate women for ruining your kiddie cartoons.
 
Edit:

Before we continue, I need to point out the characters Syakesan and Wadanohara, which caused a scandal because she posted "sexual assault" art of them.

View attachment 1919494View attachment 1919495

It's literally touhou tier chibi art and fucking spritework

View attachment 1919501View attachment 1919502View attachment 1919503

I swear to fucking god is there nothing Tumblr females won't fuck up with their shitty female-ness?
There needs to be more context to this though. Sal actually did attempt to sexual assault her once and even succeeds in doing that and corrupting her in one of the endings of the game they made a debut in. Knowing DSP, it's not unlikely that request did involve sexual assault and people got pissed, since Wadanohara is one of the most adored characters of hers, but it's hypocritical to get pissy over this, when you remember what kind of shit DSP draws non-fucking-stop and thats lots of her fans drool all over characters who are absolute scum.

Speaking more about Funamusea/Okegom fandom, I heard about one situation, but it's all hearsay and I can't make a research, since there are some problems because of the language barrier and the lack of details. There was apparently a guy who experimented with the concept of making children-kind of OCs for some main characters, to toy with the material for silly fun. So, as it goes, two of those characters being clergyman-ish sons of Kcalb and Etihw, one of whom got an idea to secretly collect DNAs of Idate, Fukami and those sharks (all three), to create and research an enormous society, which he would place on enormous island and observe how they interact with each other. Then shite goes bonkers, island gets divided in three and each group hates each other to pieces.

Anyway, that's all a really partial and basic information, but my knowledge on this is limited to dwell much further into details, so let's move on. What's important is that a piece of the island populated by killer whales (Idate's biological offspring) is a fascist and speciesist dictatorship, which attacks smaller communities, takes slaves and commits other atrocities.

Really silly, but nothing outrageous.

What happened is that the poor lad had a mistake of bringing it up in one of DSP's fan communities, making some snowflakes upset over that killer whale island part, due to racist and fascist themes. So, the bloke gets condemned from talking about his funny fanfic any further, he tries to argue and gets kicked out.

He then visits another community and brings it up there, only to get silenced again.

Seems like it's fine to be obsessive over evil characters, who do godawful shite like sadistic brutality and rape, but having racist and fascist characters, whose actions you aren't even endorsing, makes you bad and problematic.
 
Last edited:
Indianapolis Museum of Art Apologizes for Insensitive Job Posting

The museum wrote that it was seeking a director who would work to maintain its “core, white art audience,” in addition to attracting a more diverse one.


The Indianapolis Museum of Art’s chief executive, Charles L. Venable, apologized for a job description: “If we were writing this again, with all the feedback we’ve gotten, we wouldn’t write it that way.”

The Indianapolis Museum of Art’s chief executive, Charles L. Venable, apologized for a job description: “If we were writing this again, with all the feedback we’ve gotten, we wouldn’t write it that way.”

Sarah Bahr
By Sarah Bahr
Published Feb. 13, 2021
Updated Feb. 14, 2021, 1:27 a.m. ET

INDIANAPOLIS — The Indianapolis Museum of Art at Newfields has edited and apologized for an employment listing that said it was seeking a director who would work not only to attract a more diverse audience but to maintain its “traditional, core, white art audience.”

The museum’s director and chief executive, Charles L. Venable, said in an interview on Saturday that the decision to use “white” had been intentional and explained that it had been intended to indicate that the museum would not abandon its existing audience as part of its efforts toward greater diversity, equity and inclusion.

“I deeply regret that the choice of language clearly has not worked out to mirror our overall intention of building our core art audience by welcoming more people in the door,” he said. “We were trying to be transparent about the fact that anybody who is going to apply for this job really needs to be committed to D.E.I. efforts in all parts of the museum.”

The museum subsequently revised the position description linked in the listing, which now reads “traditional core art audience.”

Venable said it was unfortunate that what he called the museum’s “core commitment to inclusion” had been overshadowed by the word choice.

Refer someone to The Times.
They’ll enjoy our special rate of $1 a week.
“This is a six-page job description, not a single bullet point,” he said. “We talk a lot about our commitment to diversity in all kinds of ways, from the collections to programming to hiring.”

But, he added, “I can certainly say that if we were writing this again, with all the feedback we’ve gotten, we wouldn’t write it that way.”

Malina Simone Jeffers and Alan Bacon, the guest curators for the museum’s upcoming “DRIP: Indy’s #BlackLivesMatter Street Mural” exhibition, scheduled to open in April, said in a statement on Saturday night that they had decided they could not remain as guest curators.

“Our exhibition cannot be produced in this context and this environment,” said Simone Jeffers and Bacon, the co-founders of GANGGANG, a local art incubator working to elevate artists of color. “We have asked Newfields to revisit this exhibition to include an apology to all artists involved, the opportunity for the 18 visual artists to show their other, personal works with appropriate compensation, and an intentional strategy from Newfields to display more works from more Black artists in perpetuity.”


The incident comes at a time when the museum’s workplace culture and support for artwork created by nonwhite artists have been under fire — and amid a national reckoning at institutions over how to reform work environments that have in the past excluded artists and employees of color.

Kelli Morgan, who was recruited in 2018 to diversify the museum’s galleries, resigned in July, calling the museum’s culture “toxic” and “discriminatory” in a letter she sent to Venable, as well as to board members, artists and the local news media.

Morgan, who had served as the museum’s associate curator of American art, criticized the museum for its lack of training efforts to address racism and implicit bias, a “racist rant” by a board member that had left her in tears, and an Instagram post that included a Black artist’s work in a racial justice statement without consulting him after the museum failed to substantially support an exhibit he had created.

Venable said at the time that he regretted Morgan’s decision and that the museum had been taking steps to become more diverse, but that it would take time.

Morgan, who is now working as an independent curator and consultant in Atlanta, said in an interview on Saturday that she was disappointed that, despite the fact that the museum had begun training its leaders in diversity, equity and inclusion, it had still included the language in the job description.

“Clearly there’s no investment or attention being paid to what’s being learned or communicated in the training,” she said. “Because if there were, there’s no way a job posting would’ve been written like that, let alone for a museum director.”

Venable said the description had been posted in January, when the museum began its search to fill the director position. Under the museum’s new leadership structure, Venable will serve as the president of Newfields, the museum’s 152-acre campus, and a second person will direct the Indianapolis Museum of Art.

Venable, who has led the museum since 2012, has been criticized for catering to a popular audience with programming like an artist-designed miniature golf course at the expense of investing in traditional art experiences. He also instituted an $18 admission charge at the formerly free institution in 2015.

Though museums have recently taken measures to diversify their collections and programming in the wake of George Floyd’s death in police custody and the Black Lives Matter movement, Morgan said a critical understanding of and commitment to diversity at the nation’s arts institutions remained a long way off.

“Newfields is a very visible, very bad symptom of a much larger cancer,” she added. “Until the museum world is Black and white and red and purple, and until we deal collectively with the responsibility for discrimination, things like this will continue to happen.”

Sarah Bahr is a reporter on the Culture desk and a member of the 2020-2021 New York Times fellowship class. @smbah
 
Why is it a bad thing if a Fandom or hobby is mostly white? Rap fans are mostly black, fans of Mexican soap operas are mostly Latino, are those deeply problematic too? Secondly no matter how much money is poured into inclusivity campaigns black inner city dwellers are not going to listen to Bach.
 
FEEEMALES, also I jack off to cartoons as an adult.

Can people here develop some self awareness for once? No one cares about this shit, I'm here to laugh at crazy feminists on Twitter who want to murder white men, not read about how much you hate women for ruining your kiddie cartoons.
Except that those 'crazy feminists' take great glee in ruining everything that people have loved over the last forty years. Because they want to remake it in their image, and deny it to the people they think 'oppressed' them.
 
Except that those 'crazy feminists' take great glee in ruining everything that people have loved over the last forty years. Because they want to remake it in their image, and deny it to the people they think 'oppressed' them.

Yea I don't really understand the people who think sjws are just a right wing conspiracy. They're not Hitler but it's impossible to deny they have made society considerably worse in the past two decades.
 
Yea I don't really understand the people who think sjws are just a right wing conspiracy. They're not Hitler but it's impossible to deny they have made society considerably worse in the past two decades.
It's more that the typical stereotype of the blue haired feminist isn't always necessarily the responsible party. A lot of what people complain about is the result of racial grievance activism dating back to radical groups in the 1960s civil rights era and corporations attempting to pander to progressives to try to avoid the left turning on them at the polls. It's a lot bigger than Tumblr and a lot of the comments in this thread get genuinely sexist making sweeping statements about all women rather than focusing on the political and corporate forces which want this to happen. The BLM rioting and pandering would still have happened in a world where Tumblr didn't exist and no one used hair dye.

Basically if anyone who isn't a biologist, medical professional, or in the military or police starts talking about "females" as a term for women I assume they're a smelly virgin, rightly or wrongly. It's hard to describe just how weird it would sound if someone started casually talking like that in real life. I think the same way about feminists who whine about "white males". Those people must have pretty unsatisfying lives.
 
Last edited:
Court packing won't happen without removing the filibuster (which hasn't happened) and Supreme Court rulings are not based on public opinion (though the judges themselves can be biased). Citizens United and corporate personhood was massively unpopular but it's never been overturned. The Christian baker case has never been overturned either despite the left being furious. Nor has the death penalty been ruled unconstitutional since the 1970s.

I'm also actually not aware of Congress trying to pass a hate speech bill. It's basically accepted as settled case law by most members of Congress, Democrats included. The Democrats' strategy is not to pass laws against the first amendment, but to rely on friendly social media corporations like Twitter to direct the narrative in their favour.
I agree for the most part, that the threats to pack the Supreme Court are just threats and pandering to the Dem base. However, these threats can be effective, which is what happened to the Supreme Court under FDR. FDR threatened to pack the courts after they overturned the Tennessee Valley Authority, and even though there was a major bipartisan backlash, SCOTUS pretty much stopped overturning cases brought against his policies. For example, Wickard v. Filburn, where they ruled that the Commerce clause allowed Congress to regulate pretty much anything if it had the possibility to affect interstate commerce. That is what worries me about these court-packing threats and I hope SCOTUS retains enough of its independence.
 
I agree for the most part, that the threats to pack the Supreme Court are just threats and pandering to the Dem base. However, these threats can be effective, which is what happened to the Supreme Court under FDR. FDR threatened to pack the courts after they overturned the Tennessee Valley Authority, and even though there was a major bipartisan backlash, SCOTUS pretty much stopped overturning cases brought against his policies. For example, Wickard v. Filburn, where they ruled that the Commerce clause allowed Congress to regulate pretty much anything if it had the possibility to affect interstate commerce. That is what worries me about these court-packing threats and I hope SCOTUS retains enough of its independence.
Difference is that back then in the 1930s Democrats absolutely dominated the Senate by a filibuster-proof supermajority of over 60 seats so they could pass pretty much whatever they wanted. Now the Senate is balanced on a knife-edge so it's a lot less dominant.

Whenever people complain about left wing domination of institutions now, it's far less overpowering than it was in FDR's time. He ran for office 4 times in a row and had his VP serve 2 terms after him for a total of 20 years of Democratic leadership. No party since has come close. Closest was Reagan+Bush Sr at the height of the power of the evangelical right in the 1980s before Clinton and Perot finished them in 1992.
 
Back