Trainwreck Pamela Swain / DocHoliday1977 / MsPhoenix1969 / Observer1977 / danishlace2003 / Writer_thriller - Victim of grand #MeToo conspiracy, litigious wannabe starfucker, off her meds and online

[Useful_Mistake]

@Useful_Mistake
@Whale Spotter

Are you two accounts identifying yourselves as lawyers for these defendants.

You do realise that whatever my answer is Supreme Court caselaw would not allow you to use it(in court), right?

 

[Whale Spotter]

@Useful_Mistake
@Whale Spotter

Are you two accounts identifying yourselves as lawyers for these defendants.

No, Pam, I am only going by what I read on this thread and I am not in law or in the US at all. I have told you this multiple times.
I will take this as you telling me that you have not shown proof to anyone because you have no proof.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

No, Pam, I am only going by what I read on this thread and I am not in law or in the US at all. I have told you this multiple times.
I will take this as you telling me that you have not shown proof to anyone because you have no proof.

Of course she hasn't. The fact that she keeps pissing the court off with her shotgun pleadings does not help her one bit.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

You do realise that whatever my answer is Supreme Court caselaw would not allow you to use it(in court), right?

Ok. I think you're confused.

No, Pam, I am only going by what I read on this thread and I am not in law or in the US at all. I have told you this multiple times.
I will take this as you telling me that you have not shown proof to anyone because you have no proof.

*shrugs*

Of course she hasn't. The fact that she keeps pissing the court off with her shotgun pleadings does not help her one bit.

Lol at shotgun.

 

[Whale Spotter]

Of course she hasn't. The fact that she keeps pissing the court off with her shotgun pleadings does not help her one bit.

I don't know anything about US laws but there must be a point when a judge looks at this insanity and says: "ok, that's it" and throws the case out. As hilarious as this is for us, it is a huge waste of court's time.

Ok. I think you're confused.

No Pam, so far, the only confused one here is: you.

*shrugs*

No argument, gotcha.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Ok. I think you're confused.

Nope. I have shown you that SCOTUS case multiple times. The fact that you can't find a counterargument is entirely your own problem.

Lol at shotgun

If you knew even a bit of law, you'd know that's a legal term.
And just a reminder:

This is nothing more than a shotgun pleading and as such (considering it is not your first one), the Gerogia appeals court in BUSH et al. v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON et al. has ruled it should be dismissed. Furthermore WEILAND v. PALM BEACH COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE has ruled that such fillings are forbidden.

Tldr: Your case should be dismissed.

I don't know anything about US laws but there must be a point when a judge looks at this insanity and says: "ok, that's it" and throws the case out. As hilarious as this is for us, it is a huge waste of court's time.

I covered that in my opinion of her docs. The Magistrate Judge also recommended the trial judge to dismiss it. One of the reasons was indeed that the filings pissed him off and was just a waste of everyone's time.

 

[Analog Devolved]

I have requested to put a gag order on my case.
Happy chatting!

What case? Nutcase.

Um, I don't have to show shit to you on a cracker jack website.
Isn't this ironic from the lady who had her government server hacked?

She's not Hillary.

Ok. I think you're confused.



*shrugs*



Lol at shotgun.

Honestly surprised you didn't post *munches popcorn* or more screenshots from your buddy Bryan See.

The Red-Brown coalition wishes you a happy valentines day.

 

[Whale Spotter]

I covered that in my opinion of her docs. The Magistrate Judge also recommended the trial judge to dismiss it. One of the reasons was indeed that the filings pissed him off and was just a waste of everyone's time.

Ah sorry I must have missed it.
I did see that she mentioned that Donald Trump and Donald Trump Jr. (for some reason) have a lot of influence on the judge, that was a high IQ move.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

What case? Nutcase.

I believe she is referring to her Swain v. Weinstien lawsuit

Ah sorry I must have missed it.

Ah, no problem.

I did see that she mentioned that Donald Trump and Donald Trump Jr. (for some reason) have a lot of influence on the judge, that was a high IQ move.

I prefer her allegation that Tony is Null and controls not only us but even national security issues. Biden is apperantly Null's puppet

 

[DocHoliday1977]

I believe she is referring to her Swain v. Weinstien lawsuit

Ah, no problem.

I prefer her allegation that Tony is Null and controls not only us but even national security issues. Biden is apperantly Null's puppet

So Joe Biden is Tony's puppet?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

So Joe Biden is Tony's puppet?

That's what you alleged in your latest complaint, yes.
Personally, I think you are just delusional

 

[DocHoliday1977]

So is Tony Robbins speaking to Joe Biden directly to get his sexual harassment case thrown out?

Thanks for letting me know.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

So is Tony Robbins speaking to Joe Biden directly to get his sexual harassment case thrown out?

That is what you alleged in your suit.

Thanks for letting me know.

The fact that you forgot you alleged this in your suit shows all we need to know

 

[Whale Spotter]

I prefer her allegation that Tony is Null and controls not only us but even national security issues. Biden is apperantly Null's puppet

LOL poor Jersh, he is always being accused by some lunatic of something.
Incredible that he controls Biden and has to live in some Eastern European country.

So is Tony Robbins speaking to Joe Biden directly to get his sexual harassment case thrown out?

Pam, you said that, Useful told you that you were delusional (he is right).
You still can't read.

The fact that you forgot you alleged this in your suit shows all we need to know

Hard to keep her stories straight.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Incredible that he controls Biden and has to live in some Eastern European country.

It's simple. Josh is controlled by Putin, and since Josh controls Biden, Putin wants to keep Josh close.

Hard to keep her stories straight.

When one makes up some new bullshit everyday, I can imagine

 

[Whale Spotter]

It's simple. Josh is controlled by Putin, and since Josh controls Biden, Putin wants to keep Josh close.

Ah yes, that makes perfect sense.

When one makes up some new bullshit everyday, I can imagine

I bet she is writing an amendment right now adding Putin, Josh and Biden as defendants.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

That is what you alleged in your suit.

The fact that you forgot you alleged this in your suit shows all we need to know

?????????

It's simple. Josh is controlled by Putin, and since Josh controls Biden, Putin wants to keep Josh close.

When one makes up some new bullshit everyday, I can imagine

Woah woah woah.

Josh? Not Tony? Backtracking much?
You really think the owner of kiwifarms controls Biden, president of the United States?

This is why we need a gag order.

 

[Whale Spotter]

Woah woah woah.

Josh? Not Tony? Backtracking much?
You really think the owner of kiwifarms controls Biden, president of the United States?

This is why we need a gag order.

What is he backtracking? He repeated the retarded allegations you put in your lolsuit.
Also, Pam, I told you many times, sarcasm and jokes are a thing.

Daily reminder:
Tony is not here
Tony doesn't know you exist
Tony is not connected to Kiwifarms
Josh is the owner of Kiwifarms
Tony and Josh are not the same person
Josh does not control Biden

You will never get a gag order because you are insane

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Ah yes, that makes perfect sense.

I bet she is writing an amendment right now adding Putin, Josh and Biden as defendants.

She has Josh in there already under Tony's name. But, yeah, she probably is.

?????????

Which part of that was hard to understand?

Josh? Not Tony? Backtracking much?

I'm not backtracking.

You really think the owner of kiwifarms controls Biden, president of the United States?

No. I'm not a moron. But you alleged that in your suit, so I am laughing at it.

This is why we need a gag order.

Plaintiff admits she wants gag order for no other reason than to stifle speech. Courts hate that, Pam. And like I said, SCOTUS has made the gag orders be rarely granted. So did the Georgia courts.

Gag orders may be "constitutionally permissible in exceptional circumstances", but they are "presumptively unconstitutional" WXIA–TV et al. v. STATE of Georgia et al., Georgia Supreme Court. I assert that this request will be denied.

In regards to the Gag orders SCOTUS cases like Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539 (1976) say more or less the same thing. The case says "Any [gag order] comes to this Court with a 'heavy presumption' against its constitutional validity" among other things.

You will never get a gag order because you are insane

That and because they are unconstitutional in almost all cases.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

From a psychological research point of view, people who are used to being in power and have it taken away from them tend to have mental breakdowns ranging from the emotional attachment their personality had to being in power and having power over people.

The people who've posted on this thread exhibit these tendencies.

For the depths of nonsense these posters have descended, these posters have suffered with hidden personality disorders and mental disorder ailments for years. And instead of confronting these issues, they've been surrounded by people seeking their own gain and stature by enabling them. Now, there seems to be cognitive deficiencies due to prolonged disregard of said mental and personality disorders.