Trainwreck Pamela Swain / DocHoliday1977 / MsPhoenix1969 / Observer1977 / danishlace2003 / Writer_thriller - Victim of grand #MeToo conspiracy, litigious wannabe starfucker, off her meds and online

[LoverofPi]

Are you President Joe Biden to say this or are you a member of the department of justice to be saying this?



I'll request it.

@LoverofPi
I'm not talking local county or state, weirdo. They are too corrupt themselves.

Seeing as how Donny Trump Jr and Donny Trump can just call the county sherriff and DA and cover their asses. I bypassed those avenues of justice to seek relief

And that will wind up with your case dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, among other reasons, but won't get criminal charges filed.

I can answer that! She did, in fact, completely make it up. It's an excerpt from the rape fantasy "memoir" she self-published about Harvey Weinstein and her obsession with him back in 2019. I know this because I saw it posted on her Tumblr when I did that deep dive a bit ago.

View attachment 1921495View attachment 1921496

This "scene" supposedly happened during Piggy's attempt to get a restraining order against Weinstein in 2018. That case also never went to trial and was thrown out before a single hearing happened, as far as I know. So not only did she make the phrase up, but she's now trying to attribute it to a completely different case than she did originally!

I would love to read the full version of Pam's fanfiction, but I am staunchly opposed to giving cows money.

You've established tonight that you've- - aided and abetted stalkers
- used government agencies to stalk me for them.
- contacted local sherriff and judges to corrupt the rule of law.
- repeatedly violated my privacy.
- and then tried to get me to give credit to your father for settling this.

Also,
- was viciously apart to a hate website that mined my data.
- hacked my phone and accounts.
- gaslighted me repeatedly.
- had people follow me around.
- had local officials corrupt rulings to harm me.

We have done literally none of that. If anything we've tried to stop you gaslighting yourself.

@LoverofPi
Are you Jay Stewart?

I am not Jay Stewart.

Yall better get rid of this turd. I won't settle until this account is gone.




Ok, have it your way.

I just know what's being filed next week on both suits.



I know it's you Tony. I dont respect you at all as a man or as a business man or as an asshole guru. I'm not sleeping with you. I'm not joining your clown car of bullshit.

I'll see this through with criminal charges.

Pam, settle what? None of us are named as defendants, your suit will be thrown out for the joke it is, you have no bargaining power.

This literally shows me nothing bar that you reported some pic on facebook for "harassment".

Oh, this would be the "fake nudes" of Pam that she insists were fakes of her that someone sent to a younger relative of hers. The details seem to change with every one of Pam's retellings, but my bet on the real version is

Pam accidentally sent her nudes to the wrong person
Said wrong person was an underaged relative
Said relative told her Mom
Said Mom rightfully raised a stink about what Pam did
Pam created the absurd story about faked revenge porn nudes to save her ego.

 

[Analog Devolved]

Are you President Joe Biden to say this or are you a member of the department of justice to be saying this?



I'll request it.

@LoverofPi
I'm not talking local county or state, weirdo. They are too corrupt themselves.

I bypassed those avenues of justice to seek relief

The states are corrupt now?

There is no "justice" because there is no crime. You'll never get "relief". No one is out to get you Pamela.

*shrugs*

Maybe.

Also.

There are other DAs looking to prosecute the Trumps and violating rule of law for Harvey Weinstein's accusers is a good place to start.

If the DA's are working on a case against Trump you will never be a part of it. Trump doesn't know who you are.

This means that if corrupt local and state refuses to prosecute, the us prosecutors can press charges.

View attachment 1921580

Federal prosecutors will take one look at your incoherent lolsuit and toss it in the trash.

It's the US Department of Justice.



You dream, Rudy.

I don"t want Christpher Ray to lose his job, Rudy.

Let's negotiate, just me and you.

Just because you are an unemployable basket case doesn't mean you should talk bad about the judge. Based judge Ray is a hard working legal scholar and your accusations get thrown out because they are delusional.

The other post was a mistake and I wasn't posting that case.
View attachment 1921784
View attachment 1921786



Now. Do you want to be added to the suit for witness tampering?

I'm glad you made this trip down memory lane, but you are nowhere fast.


No. I worked for Utlius 3 years after grad work was over to start paying my student loans bacm and you contacted them to get me fired for legally drafting papers, Gerry Butler.... that means you were harassing me from the beginning.
So you were this harassing email.
View attachment 1921818

?????????
View attachment 1921839

You got fired because you chimped out over a spam email and went down for writing papers?

That's not entirely accurate.
View attachment 1921847

????????
View attachment 1921850

2017 kidnapping threat.
View attachment 1921857




Makes no sense.

More scammers and trolls.

View attachment 1921874

None of us are people that trolled you on Facebook.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

And that will wind up with your case dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, among other reasons, but won't get criminal charges filed.

No. And that's wrong to deny someone's day in court.

None of us are people that trolled you on Facebook.

That's not your determination. And these decisions are made in court.

Just because you are an unemployable basket case doesn't mean you should talk bad about the judge. Based judge Ray is a hard working legal scholar and your accusations get thrown out because they are delusional.

You don't know the case. But this statement alone on this site can give me grounds to search for a new judge since it appears this one is corrupt and subject to illegal procedures.

Pam accidentally sent her nudes to the wrong person
Said wrong person was an underaged relative
Said relative told her Mom
Said Mom rightfully raised a stink about what Pam did
Pam created the absurd story about faked revenge porn nudes to save her ego.

No. Not the real testimony. And clearly you didn't read the document.

Ok. I know what to do now.

Since you seem to have everything figured out, see you in court.

None of us are people that trolled you on Facebook.

Tony Robbins on Facebook.




Gerry Butler on Facebook


I now believe that the three men with actual evidence of stalking. Gerry Butler, Tony Robbins, and Harvey Weinstein were online stalkers and Alan Dershowitz, Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump and Donald Trump Jr, were political friends who used government and illegal means to violate my rights and privacy.
They still refuse to cease their stalking activity.

It is now also quite clear that these criminals have repeatedly used corrupt means to avoid civil and criminal charges.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

No.

Yes

And that's wrong to deny someone's day in court.

Not really. If they fail to follow proper rules, caselaw, etc, then it's their own fault. The judge had already informed you of this.

That's not your determination. And these decisions are made in court.

For anything to be done, you'd have to prove it was us, which you haven't done, then sue us.

You don't know the case

We do. We can read after all.

. But this statement alone on this site can give me grounds to search for a new judge since it appears this one is corrupt and subject to illegal procedures.

Ah, the good ol' Mel tactic.
"The judge doesn't give me what I want so he must hate me/is corrupt"
Stop stealing bad tactics from Mel. Just a FYI, all of her attempts to change her judge have been denied.

No. Not the real testimony. And clearly you didn't read the document.

Ok. I know what to do now.

Since you seem to have everything figured out, see you in court.

Feel free to provide that magical document that would solve all of this.
You can't see us in court, because you haven't sued us.

Tony Robbins on Facebook.




Gerry Butler on Facebook

We didn't make those troll accounts.

I now believe that the three men with actual evidence of stalking. Gerry Butler, Tony Robbins, and Harvey Weinstein were online stalkers and Alan Dershowitz, Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump and Donald Trump Jr, were political friends who used government and illegal means to violate my rights and privacy.
They still refuse to cease their stalking activity.

Because they didn't do the thing you are accusing them of.

It is now also quite clear that these criminals have repeatedly used corrupt means to avoid civil and criminal charges.

It's clear that you are wrong

 

[LoverofPi]

No. And that's wrong to deny someone's day in court.

No one is denying you your day in court. Your case is just a laughingstock.

That's not your determination. And these decisions are made in court.

So we are unable to tell if we have contacted you on facebook? Is that what you're saying, Pam?

You don't know the case. But this statement alone on this site can give me grounds to search for a new judge since it appears this one is corrupt and subject to illegal procedures.

We know the case because PACER exists. None of us have a connection to the judge.

No. Not the real testimony. And clearly you didn't read the document.

I never said it was your testimony. I said I think that's what actually happened.

Ok. I know what to do now.

Since you seem to have everything figured out, see you in court.

You have to A: Get your case actually into court and B:Sue us and C: Serve us. Neither A nor C will happen, even if you try and add us to your lolsuit.

Tony Robbins on Facebook.
View attachment 1922515
View attachment 1922516
View attachment 1922517

Gerry Butler on Facebook
View attachment 1922520

No. Those are just random accounts that showed you a picture of and used a picture of those men respectively.

I now believe that the three men with actual evidence of stalking. Gerry Butler, Tony Robbins, and Harvey Weinstein were online stalkers and Alan Dershowitz, Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump and Donald Trump Jr, were political friends who used government and illegal means to violate my rights and privacy.
They still refuse to cease their stalking activity.

Your beliefs and reality are not the same thing, Pam.

It is now also quite clear that these criminals have repeatedly used corrupt means to avoid civil and criminal charges.

What is clear is that you are mentally unwell and delusional.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Yes

Not really. If they fail to follow proper rules, caselaw, etc, then it's their own fault. The judge had already informed you of this.

For anything to be done, you'd have to prove it was us, which you haven't done, then sue us.

We do. We can read after all.

Ah, the good ol' Mel tactic.
"The judge doesn't give me what I want so he must hate me/is corrupt"
Stop stealing bad tactics from Mel. Just a FYI, all of her attempts to change her judge have been denied.

Feel free to provide that magical document that would solve all of this.
You can't see us in court, because you haven't sued us.

We didn't make those troll accounts.

Because they didn't do the thing you are accusing them of.

It's clear that you are wrong

Are you a judicial official encroaching on a possible criminal case where someone has been harmed repeatedly? Then what I'll do is have court subpoena kiwifarms to give up your identity and your contribution to this harassment.

You can speak freely then to anyone.

You have to A: Get your case actually into court and B:Sue us and C: Serve us. Neither A nor C will happen, even if you try and add us to your lolsuit.

Wow, you really are ignorant of federal issues.

 

[LoverofPi]

Are you a judicial official encroaching on a possible criminal case where someone has been harmed repeatedly?

No. Useful Mistake is not a judicial official.

Then what I'll do is have court subpoena kiwifarms to give up your identity and your contribution to this harassment.

Will not happen.

You can speak freely then to anyone.

He can already do that, Pam.

Wow, you really are ignorant of federal issues.

By all means, Pam, enlighten me, since you know so much.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Will not happen

Already has

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Are you a judicial official encroaching on a possible criminal case where someone has been harmed repeatedly? Then what

This is not a criminal case, nor is it a possible one unless US gov decides to investigate.
And, no, I am not an officer of the USA.

I'll do is have court subpoena kiwifarms to give up your identity and your contribution to this harassment.

That'd be funny to watch. We told this to Mel, and we'll tell this to you, Null does not have any of our personal info.
That'd, and I am not harrassing you under the law.

You can speak freely then to anyone.

I can speak freely to anyone whenever I want. That's why the 1st exists.

Wow, you really are ignorant of federal issues.

If you know so much about federal issues, why did you fail to counter any of my legal points?

Already has

Did you just subpeona Null, lol?

 

[DocHoliday1977]

This is not a criminal case, nor is it a possible one unless US gov decides to investigate.
And, no, I am not an officer of the USA.

That'd be funny to watch. We told this to Mel, and we'll tell this to you, Null does not have any of our personal info.
That'd, and I am not harrassing you under the law.

I can speak freely to anyone whenever I want. That's why the 1st exists.

If you know so much about federal issues, why did you fail to counter any of my legal points?

Did you just subpeona Null, lol?

*shrugs*

Don't know.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

*shrugs*

Don't know.

Pam: I will subpeona you!
LoverofPi: No.
Pam: I did!
Me: Clarification, did you actually do it
Pam:....I changed my mind and no longer know.

Amazing. Simply amazing

 

[LoverofPi]

Already has

Clearly it hasn't, because you were just talking about doing it. And even if you do try and subpoena the farms, Null ain't got nothing on us save generic IP addresses.

*shrugs*

Don't know.

The most honest and correct thing you've said in days. You don't know anything about anything.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Pam: I will subpeona you!
LoverofPi: No.
Pam: I did!
Me: Clarification, did you actually do it
Pam:....I changed my mind and no longer know.

Amazing. Simply amazing

It is. Ok

What is clear is that you are mentally unwell and delusional.

If I'm mentally unwell, then you all out of control, deranged, career corrupt politicians and judges.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

If I'm mentally unwell, then you all out of control, deranged, career corrupt politicians and judges.

Yes you are mentally unwell and cannot write well

 

[LoverofPi]

It is. Ok

Your inability to keep consistent from one minute to the next truly is amazing.

If I'm mentally unwell, then you all out of control, deranged, career corrupt politicians and judges.

That does not logically follow at all. You can be unwell even if none of us are politicians and judges. In fact, you ARE delusional, and part of that is believing we're politicians and judges when we are not.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Yes you are mentally unwell and cannot write well

That is a personal opinion and not admissible in court.
Have a great day.

Yes you are mentally unwell and cannot write well

However, you and the other defendants have used this form of communication as means to harass, intimidate, and slander the accuser.

 

[LoverofPi]

That is a personal opinion and not admissible in court.
Have a great day.

Both are objectively true in that you are objectively delusional and suffer from erotomania, and you consistently fail to write coherent sentences and/ or contradict yourself from one moment to the next, an objective measurement of bad writing.

However, you and the other defendants have used this form of communication as means to harass, intimidate, and slander the accuser.

Meanwhile, that IS your personal opinion and will never hold up in court. I mean, it'll never make it TO court, but you get my meaning.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Both are objectively true in that you are objectively delusional and suffer from erotomania, and you consistently fail to write coherent sentences and/ or contradict yourself from one moment to the next, an objective measurement of bad writing.



Meanwhile, that IS your personal opinion and will never hold up in court. I mean, it'll never make it TO court, but you get my meaning.

My grammar is not determined by a hate troll site.

It's already in court. The fact that you cant figure it out which form or court is your problem.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

That is a personal opinion and not admissible in court.

I am neither suing you, nor defending against you, so the admitability of my statements has no value upon the discussion we are having.

However, you and the other defendants have used this form of communication as means to harass, intimidate, and slander the accuser.

Nope. All of these have legal definitions. We did not do any of those things.
All of which is irrelavant, of course, because we are not being sued.

It's already in court. The fact that you cant figure it out which form or court is your problem.

The one sentence you have against Kiwifarms as a whole in your suit is conclusory, and therefore need not be considered - Ashcroft v. Iqbal.
Then again, the entirety of your suit is like that, so....tough luck, it's gonna get thrown out.

 

[LoverofPi]

My grammar is not determined by a hate troll site.

Your grammar is 'determined' by the rules of written English. And you are just terrible at following them, Pam.

It's already in court.

No, you've filed, but it's not in court yet. It will be thrown out before it makes it to an actual courtroom.

The fact that you cant figure it out which form or court is your problem.

By all means, Pam, tell us the court, then. I mean, you think you're suing us, shouldn't we know where we're being sued? If we literally don't know where we're being sued we cannot respond and service will not be proper.