Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Marshal Mannerheim said:
The problem is that you end up sounding very ”how do you do, fellow Republicans”.

I don't know what the way to get right wingers to do activism that isn't on the level of TPUSA members wearing diapers to own the libs is, but we need it soon.
Click to expand...
I think you would need to take a look at the gun rights movement and take several pages from them for a successful Right wing activism movement. There has been major victories in terms of concealed carry, forcing Republicans to be, at the worst, tolerant of guns rights, and have caused them to appoint somewhat pro-2A judges. A lot of this is due to many pro-2A groups filing lawsuits at the drop of a hat, like the GOA or 2AF, as well as large groups of single-issue voters voting in both the primaries and general elections, making them a group impossible for the Republicans to ignore. Recently, NYC was forced to repeal a law strictly limiting handgun usage and California was forced to drop their magazine capacity ban. These organizations are also far less concerned about optics. They've already been slandered as baby-killers, so why would they care what the media says about them?

There are a couple obstacles for applying this to other groups. The first are that gun-owners are typically more well-off and can be heavily invested in gun ownership. It's easier to get a group together to protect your stuff, than some more nebulous like free speech. It is also more likely that the gun-rights organizations will get better funding than 1A groups or other right-wing groups. Another is that 2A groups tend to give their members a lot of benefits. While the NRA can be disappointing on a legal action view, they offer their members a lot of useful services: CCP (concealed carry permit) insurance; training for CCP licenses, hunting, and target shooting; free merch; discounts for a lot of stores; easy ways to looks up candidates positions, etc. Conservatives are more willing to donate to organizations that offer direct benefits.

Take an in-depth look at the Gun-rights movement. Structuring further right-wing movements after it, will probably lead to more success than other methods.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: chickenbutt, Oats12345, Emperor Augustus and 5 others
AnOminous said:
I wouldn't be surprised at all to find that a heavy troon presence drives off real women. They may be supportive of troons at a distance, but once troons actually show up somewhere they are, and start sexually harassing them, they're out of there.

Anyone who actually believes that is so stupid they actually should be re-enslaved.
Click to expand...
That was probably some bullshit poll with grossly incorrect results, like they often are. I've only ever seen the reverse misconception about how late certain countries ended slavery, with Mauritania being the last in 1981. Many people don't know anywhere had it legal after WW2.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Marshal Mannerheim
1613497254902.png
 
  • Lunacy
  • Horrifying
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: Wych Elm, axfaxf, UnsufficentBoobage and 19 others
Duck Duck TUUURN said:
I haven't read R&J since high school, but iirc there isn't any sexual content. Do they even kiss?
Click to expand...
There is a lot of crude humour and they have sex off-stage after their marriage. This is a product of the age of consent being 12 in early modern common law.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: chickenbutt, UnsufficentBoobage, Granola Grenadine and 1 other person
Pointless Pedant said:
Not sure about America but the main controversy over Shakespeare in schools here is that it's gross that Juliet is 13.
Click to expand...

really, the life expectancy of people in those days was about forty so makes sense to marry early.

At 13 you would haved lived more than quarter of your life. Nowadays you would have to be 20.

Also idea of a teenager is a relatively modern invention.

The average 13 yr old male wouldve been working, hell even last century 14 yr olds would be doing full time jobs if not academically minded.

And biologically if you are able to have babies doesnt that mean nature intended you to?

Note not defending pedos (who deserve death penalty) and yes in modern times very much gross.

But times were different 500 years ago.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, Alessonincrippliningdepre and Bibendum
jimsterlingspronoun said:
really, the life expectancy of people in those days was about forty so makes sense to marry early.

At 13 you would haved lived more than quarter of your life. Nowadays you would have to be 20.

Also idea of a teenager is a relatively modern invention.

The average 13 yr old male wouldve been working, hell even last century 14 yr olds would be doing full time jobs if not academically minded.

And biologically if you are able to have babies doesnt that mean nature intended you to?

Note not defending pedos (who deserve death penalty) and yes in modern times very much gross.

But times were different 500 years ago.
Click to expand...
Life expectancy was distorted by infant mortality and was more like 50 for people to lived to 18, but it certainly played a role.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: chickenbutt, UnsufficentBoobage, Granola Grenadine and 7 others
Cryin RN said:
I'm really enjoying this lady's crazy bullshit. It was pretty apparent when she doxed her students that she was nuts, but nuts AND a race faker? Delicious shit.

She's losing her mind at her haters over on her blog, where she's blogposting like crazy (archive) about the discrimination she's currently enduring and also that her dad had a dream that she's a real Injun and that makes her NOT WHITE:

View attachment 1919112View attachment 1919113View attachment 1919114

The "Leroux" person she's responding to is a poor random Twitter user that retweeted this Twitter thread, the one that initially cast doubt on her Indigenous authenticity. In Canada to be seen as First Nations, you need an actual registered First Nations band to claim ownership of you. If they don't know you, you're not First Nations. Seems like nobody's heard of her, and she's not taking it well lollll
Click to expand...

Amie has pledged to hunt down and kill those who doubt that she's a native


1613507838296.png


This dude seems quite interesting

Darryl Leroux | Saint Mary's University (Canada) - Academia.edu

Academia.edu is a place to share and follow research.
smu-ca.academia.edu smu-ca.academia.edu

Basically he has written books and papers on how white people dig up a long (400 years) dead native ancestor, and then gibs me dat native bucks.

Distorted Descent examines a social phenomenon that has taken off in the twenty-first century: otherwise white, French descendant settlers in Canada shifting into a self-defined “Indigenous” identity. This study is not about individuals who have been dispossessed by colonial policies, or the multi-generational efforts to reconnect that occur in response. Rather, it is about white, French-descendant people discovering an Indigenous ancestor born 300 to 375 years ago through genealogy and using that ancestor as the sole basis for an eventual shift into an “Indigenous” identity today.

After setting out the most common genealogical practices that facilitate race shifting, Leroux examines two of the most prominent self-identified “Indigenous” organizations currently operating in Quebec. Both organizations have their origins in committed opposition to Indigenous land and territorial negotiations, and both encourage the use of suspect genealogical practices. Distorted Descent brings to light to how these claims to an “Indigenous” identity are then used politically to oppose actual, living Indigenous peoples, exposing along the way the shifting politics of whiteness, white settler colonialism, and white supremacy.
Click to expand...

He has been writing about lying white people pretending not to be white people for YEARS.



The obvious conclusion is that none of these people deserve any special privileges, but I doubt that will happen.


She specifically wants to hunt him down and kill him because essentially any vague claim she might have to being an injun is that almost EVERYONE in Canada has such a claim. So he's not a random Twitter user at all, but someone who has spent years battling against grifters like her,
 
  • Informative
  • Lunacy
  • Winner
Reactions: Wych Elm, chickenbutt, UnsufficentBoobage and 11 others
John Stoehr says the opinions of respectable white people must be kept on tab to protect democracy from fascism. From the gist of it, based on John's kind of vague description, so-called respectable white people must feel white guilt and grovel to minorities. Like many others on the left, he pushes the narrative that white people are inherently bad because reasons.
 
  • Lunacy
Reactions: chickenbutt, UnsufficentBoobage, TerribleIdeas™ and 2 others
trannyfucker said:
Amie has pledged to hunt down and kill those who doubt that she's a native


View attachment 1925379

This dude seems quite interesting

Darryl Leroux | Saint Mary's University (Canada) - Academia.edu

Academia.edu is a place to share and follow research.
smu-ca.academia.edu smu-ca.academia.edu

Basically he has written books and papers on how white people dig up a long (400 years) dead native ancestor, and then gibs me dat native bucks.



He has been writing about lying white people pretending not to be white people for YEARS.



The obvious conclusion is that none of these people deserve any special privileges, but I doubt that will happen.


She specifically wants to hunt him down and kill him because essentially any vague claim she might have to being an injun is that almost EVERYONE in Canada has such a claim. So he's not a random Twitter user at all, but someone who has spent years battling against grifters like her,
Click to expand...
Ironically it was the nutter progressives that were whitewashing and colonizing? I'm shocked.

I think he may have been beaten to the punch in the blatantly obvious department. SP seems to do that alot.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: chickenbutt, UnsufficentBoobage, albert chan and 4 others
TerribleIdeas™ said:
View attachment 1924171

What the fuck is this trying to say, other than "I have too much time and money, and should be robbed!"?
Click to expand...
I think its trying to say "I'm jealous that these women havent been such frigid abrasive cunts that theyve managed to find a man and live in the suburbs, so I must place myself above them and hope that when the revolution comes I can have their head on my spear."
 
  • Agree
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, Hog On Ice and LurkNoMore
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back