SaidTheSpider
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
Very fitting: so is Russell himself.Russel's motion was deficient on its face
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Very fitting: so is Russell himself.Russel's motion was deficient on its face
Are you kidding? The Judge was absolutely right to grant this motion. As mentioned in the document itself Null clearly states he accepts service via that email address. Ergo, he consented to alternate service. It would be biased and improper for the judge to deny this motion purely on the grounds that Russell is an idiot. Doing what you want would be the real "capriciouly[sic]" deciding "wether[sic] or not to follow standard proceedings and laws".
1. That's now how it works in lawYou literally quote in your own retarded post where he consents. But by all means, take my complete exasperation with you as a win.
This should have been a big problem too.The email is for legal notices regarding Kiwi Farms and Lolcow LLC. It is not for Null personally, who Russell is currently sueing. Null has stated multiple times he does not waive his right to be serviced normally.
And you're still wrong, you smug retard. Lolcow LLC may be served via email. Greer tried to serve Null, personally, who is legally distinct from Lolcow LLC.You literally quote in your own retarded post where he consents. But by all means, take my complete exasperation with you as a win.
As an alternative, sure. But since we are arguing the motion was granted improperly, then Lolcow LLC would have to be served under Rule 4 (h) (b). Rule 4 (h) (b) does not allow emailsLolcow LLC may be served via email.
Sounds to me like the judge has given up hope on Greer ever getting it right, and just granted the motion to get this over with. They'll probably dismiss it at the first opportunity.As an alternative, sure. But since we are arguing the motion was granted improperly, then Lolcow LLC would have to be served under Rule 4 (h) (b)
I personally just think that the judge had a very loose understanding on how "consent" works, and also assumed that a "help" page was Null's DM to Russel or something like that.Sounds to me like the judge has given up hope on Greer ever getting it right, and just granted the motion to get this over with. They'll probably dismiss it at the first opportunity.
The court is not ruling for Russ on technical issues so they can dismiss a meritless case (if so, he would have gotten his Taylor cases through). They already had the chance to dismiss because he's filing as a pauper and they chose not to. This is Vic levels of denialism- "We're winning by losing!"Sounds to me like the judge has given up hope on Greer ever getting it right, and just granted the motion to get this over with. They'll probably dismiss it at the first opportunity.
I'm obviously not a lawyer, so this is a genuine question based on a tenuous grasp of due process:The court is not ruling for Russ on technical issues so they can dismiss a meritless case (if so, he would have gotten his Taylor cases through). They already had the chance to do that because of the way he's filing (pauper status). This is Vic levels of denialism- "We're winning by losing!"
The grease on these pictures is his ear juice on the front camera. Thank you penispianoman.
Yes, this is relevant. (2:00 in if you want to skip over the rest.)I have to wonder if his parents know about this, I'm not sure about how conservative they are in their Mormonism. And I am not sure how Mormons view gays and trannies.
But I have to wonder if it's bad, how quickly would they have cut contact with Russ after tolerating how much of a perverted gremlin he is for so long on top of trading handjobs for car rides, ass sex for job opportunity and now bareback gay sex for pleasure.
Attorney Natalya Rose did just such a thing in the first Russ v. Taylor lawsuit- she entered into the case in a limited fashion on behalf of Swift to oppose the default judgement due to improper service. I think that Null's lawyer did something similar in this case to oppose the default but I can't find it in the record so either I'm getting confused by his various lolsuits or it was removed from the public-facing case search.I'm obviously not a lawyer, so this is a genuine question based on a tenuous grasp of due process:
If Null the individual has indeed been serviced improperly, would acknowledging it at all, e.g., objecting in some fashion to the ruling, constitute some kind of receipt of the service?
I could be way off base but I always thought that the practical purpose of service was to ensure that an entity had been adequately notified of a legal action that pertains to them.
I think you might be thinking of Melinda's suit against Null in which Null's lawyer did, indeed, oppose the default, and has as of today got it overturnedI think that Null's lawyer did something similar in this case to oppose the default but I can't find it in the record so either I'm getting confused by his various lolsuits or it was removed from the public-facing case search.
Shit, you're right. And her suits make Russ look like a... well, not a lawyer, but less batshit insane comparitively.I think you might be thinking of Melinda's suit against Null in which Null's lawyer did, indeed, oppose the default, and has as of today got it overturned
has he always looked like a slightly melted wax doll or is this new for him?