Discuss with pixelatedharmony about feet pics, SCP or whatever I don't care

[BurnerPhone]

fun fact: after talking with my brain doctor I can say confidently that both Cimmerian and I had civil rights violations under the 1990 ADA because we were both punished for exhibiting signs of mental illness that could have been avoided by reasonable accommodation.

Fun fact: that's not how the ADA works

 

[Punished “Venom” pH]

Fun fact: that's not how the ADA works

Fun fact: I was wrong. It thought it was for my ADHD, I assumed that you probably assumed it was a trans thing:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/12101

I do have a right to a reasonable accommodation to any public venue, but it’s not worth pursuing in court.

As far as I am concerned, unless I am given a late rationale for my being yanked off the wiki, the SCP Wiki Senior Staff are violating my civil rights, in principle if not to a degree that I would win because courts almost always lean towards the media when sued by limited liability public figures.

Sure the community doesn't really lose anything, but most of them aren't aware of that fact. What I'm saying is that the Staff want to A: Keep everything up, and B: Have the ability to say "well it's what the people want" when criticized over the hypocrisy of their decision.

Bingo

 

[byuu]

Spoiler alert: I have a cooler desk than any of y’all put together

>amiga avatar
>dirty atari user
what a fag

 

[Cow-Chan]

Wow! I’m amazed, and disappointed to see them betray their principles so quickly when it becomes inconvenient to follow them, and I guess they wanted to institutionalize not taking me seriously and they’re doing exactly what I said with weaponizing the Stigma of mental illness. I’m distraught and upset but not surprised. I don’t know if I can go on living a contented life for at least as long as I was there, knowing totems to a ghost still stand, I cannot be happy otherwise. This town hall is a personal guarantee of a decade of misery at best for me. It is a personal attack on my well-being.

The SCP Foundation is really fucking good at hurting people who latch onto it, and as condescending as you think I might be, I truly hope you manage to get away from it mentally. I allowed people on and off of staff to sexually and emotionally abuse me for years and it's taken me around a year and a half to two years just to get to a point where I can even acknowledge that it wasn't my fault. They have a way of making you think they're the good guys until you finally either A) get banned, or B) realize how utterly buttfuckingly unhealthy the social environment and how it'll warp your perception of what is and is not acceptable. It's not a personal attack, this is just what they do. It's a brainwashing cult masquerading as a fiction community and anyone who gets too deep into the water gets caught, chewed up, and spit out when they're no longer needed.

Edit: I realize it looks like I'm trying to take over the conversation with my own problems, I'm not, that's just how I try to relate and make myself accessible.

 

[Punished “Venom” pH]

The SCP Foundation is really fucking good at hurting people who latch onto it, and as condescending as you think I might be, I truly hope you manage to get away from it mentally. I allowed people on and off of staff to sexually and emotionally abuse me for years and it's taken me around a year and a half to two years just to get to a point where I can even acknowledge that it wasn't my fault. They have a way of making you think they're the good guys until you finally either A) get banned, or B) realize how utterly buttfuckingly unhealthy the social environment and how it'll warp your perception of what is and is not acceptable. It's not a personal attack, this is just what they do. It's a brainwashing cult masquerading as a fiction community and anyone who gets too deep into the water gets caught, chewed up, and spit out when they're no longer needed.

Edit: I realize it looks like I'm trying to take over the conversation with my own problems, I'm not, that's just how I try to relate and make myself accessible.

No, continue, you’re spitting the truth in calm terms and I keep hearing that passion is apparently a problem with how I talk so perhaps they’ll listen to someone who seems “reasonable”
I would not call it a cult. This is the natural result of an artifice hierarchy that is sucking power out of an idea which on paper belongs to everyone

>amiga avatar
>dirty atari user
what a fag

Born and bred

If you know anything, anything, of the kiddy-diddlers in staff that we haven’t uncovered already, please know that you are welcome and encouraged to share those stories here should staff fail to meet your demands.

It’s a nothing sandwich conspiracy theory, I have less salacious truths but don’t worry they’re only less damning because there’s no pedophile ring. Life pro tip: usually* when you see someone accused of a pedophile ring there’s a “there” there, but *excepting that horrible thing that went down in Belgium it hardly ever actually is pedophilia. Any hierarchy is going to have abuse but that’s just the nature of the beast, not a conspiracy.

 

[Cow-Chan]

No, continue, you’re spitting the truth in calm terms and I keep hearing that passion is apparently a problem with how I talk so perhaps they’ll listen to someone who seems “reasonable”
I would not call it a cult. This is the natural result of an artifice hierarchy that is sucking power out of an idea which on paper belongs to everyone

They're lucky that I chose to "calmly post on KF" as my course of action considering I was first scouted out as a minor by a member of staff that I'm pretty sure I don't even have to name for everyone to know exactly who I'm talking about. It's not why I joined but the attention I got addicted to is absolutely why I stayed, and it very likely has permanently affected how I subconsciously engage with sex.

It’s a nothing sandwich conspiracy theory, I have less salacious truths but don’t worry they’re only less damning because there’s no pedophile ring. Life pro tip: usually* when you see someone accused of a pedophile ring there’s a “there” there, but *excepting that horrible thing that went down in Belgium it hardly ever actually is pedophilia. Any hierarchy is going to have abuse but that’s just the nature of the beast, not a conspiracy.

Now this may seem hypocritical to what I just said, but there really ISN'T a pedo ring. There are pedophiles in SCP, but they're not interconnected. KiwiFarms genuinely does overinflate the issue, and to be blunt it does not help solving the issue. The predators in the community aren't interconnected at all, which actually makes dealing with it more difficult as it is, because I'm relatively sure they aren't even aware of each other, which is why I believe people like Bright have gotten away with it for so long; Because as far as the higher ups can tell, it's not real, it's not connected, and it's too small of an issue for them to bother handling beyond scoffing at. Sorry if my responses seem confused and uncoordinated, this is over half a decade of emotional abuse, self disgust, and rampant attention addiction being squeezed into comparatively small responses.

 

[BurnerPhone]

Fun fact: you’re wrong. It is for my ADHD, you probably assumed it was a trans thing:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/12101

You haven't read that law and I know it because you only linked to the preface. I'll tell you why you're wrong: You're alleging a Title III violation by a private entity for not providing reasonable accommodation to be a member of a website. Let's put aside the fact that there is ZERO case law precedent that supports your claim. So now you have to deal with Sec. 12187 which specifically excludes private clubs as defined under the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Then you have to explain away your decade long involvement with said club and provide tangible evidence of a conspiracy to remove you from the site for your stated mental deficiency. Do you know the last time a Website was the center of an ADA complaint? It was October 2019 when the Supreme Court kicked back a case to the lower courts regarding a blind man's ability to access a Domino's Pizza Website. In essence, he could not physically access the website. Can you prove you cannot get past a spam filter? Can you prove your ADHD physically prevents you from accessing that website? That is the is one of the few legal precedents set regarding websites by the courts and it isn't even a national precedent. So please by all means, hire a lawyer and sue the SCP Foundation for violation of the ADA. You'll make a lawyer a little richer and you'll get to annoy a judge for 5 minutes. Or you could just read the actual text of the law.

 

[Punished “Venom” pH]

You haven't read that law and I know it because you only linked to the preface. I'll tell you why you're wrong: You're alleging a Title III violation by a private entity for not providing reasonable accommodation to be a member of a website. Let's put aside the fact that there is ZERO case law precedent that supports your claim. So now you have to deal with Sec. 12187 which specifically excludes private clubs as defined under the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Then you have to explain away your decade long involvement with said club and provide tangible evidence of a conspiracy to remove you from the site for your stated mental deficiency. Do you know the last time a Website was the center of an ADA complaint? It was October 2019 when the Supreme Court kicked back a case to the lower courts regarding a blind man's ability to access a Domino's Pizza Website. In essence, he could not physically access the website. Can you prove you cannot get past a spam filter? Can you prove your ADHD physically prevents you from accessing that website? That is the is one of the few legal precedents set regarding websites by the courts and it isn't even a national precedent. So please by all means, hire a lawyer and sue the SCP Foundation for violation of the ADA. You'll make a lawyer a little richer and you'll get to annoy a judge for 5 minutes. Or you could just read the actual text of the law.

I stand corrected, thank you for the informative post! This is probably a good example for why psychiatrists and lawyers are selective professions. So, yay, “only” my rights as an author are under fire. Cool.

also to be clear I wasn’t citing my civil rights for a lawsuit, I was expressing the principle the law represents which is why I linked the part describing it at the beginning. Media law was the hardest college course I ever took and I’m not exactly eager to ensnare myself in it again but for realsies

 

[Cow-Chan]

I stand corrected, thank you for the informative post! This is probably a good example for why psychiatrists and lawyers are selective professions. So, yay, “only” my rights as an author are under fire. Cool.

Only your rights as an author that you had while with SCP. Give them the finger by turning around, walking away, and letting them keep your stuff. If you really want to be an author, then keep writing on your own and make something better than anything you've written on their site in the past, and if possible, make some fucking bank on it. The best insult you can give to them is to make something of your life despite the damage they've tried to do to you.

TL;DR - They can keep your work. So what? Fuck them and fuck your old work. Make something better than all of it.

 

[Punished “Venom” pH]

TL;DR - They can keep your work. So what? Fuck them and fuck your old work. Make something better than all of it.

I’ve already deleted my old account. It’s over for me. That’s my intent but I am not able to find happiness without resolving the damage I did by leaving those hollow pieces up. I am taking responsibility for my own actions and I cannot walk away from my obligations because I did it to them, ultimately. I let my pain infect them, and if I don’t change it nobody will. Remember, we got “there is no canon” from Fish and that was 30 articles. How important is that principle to how the Wiki operates to this day? If I back down now, I’ll leave them in ruins that cannot be rebuilt. If it burns, the writers can built on my ashes.

I told them I wanted a clean break. They’re the ones who chose to make me hold them accountable.



These are my phillipics, senior staff: every platitude-ridden message sent to “see how I am doing” will be met with the same continued hostility that you are showing to me. Your unilateral decision to censor any mention of my mental state while also allowing yourselves to mention it, while also blocking me from posting in the thread at all, has already shown me what little my input matters to you when I am not bending your arm behind your back to go with the request to do the right and moral thing to do. Delete my stuff already.

more importantly, don’t anyone ever let djkaktus forget how he ran head over heels into the lap of the nearest authority figure capable of defending his personal interests when those interests (upvote djkaktus, anyone?) were threatened.

He’s the only person more complicit than me in fostering the toxic upvote culture that reduces your value to an upvote.

So why does djkaktus want you to pledge your upvote to him? Why would it be in-character for the morally bankrupt manchild who acts too cool for school on Twitter(@scp_djkaktus go peep his dated tweets)why does he Need your upvote to the point that it’s his brand?

That’s all he thinks about you.

That is all the good you are in his eyes, to be one in the world’s largest chorus singing to him, the only person allowed to be an individual.

djkaktus gives and takes crit only with designs to tailor you to upvote his material

why do you think he keeps citing legal over moral concerns?

Why do you, Ben, think an authors’ emotional bond to their work must be a ruse and that this is an overreaction?

he is just like I was, empty inside and needing others to tel him he is good to Pretend like he can feel good

Pay no attention to the little man behind the cactus.

in fact we can do better than that

I see that djkaktus is already trying to appropriate my material with one hand while he plays at trying to “save it” with the other.

Maybe he means, save it all for him?

I forbid djkaktus or his alts or any agent acting on his behalf from using my material unless they first join me in deleting all of their original work.

This is not a legal requirement, but a moral one, and it is up to you reading this to fulfill that moral obligation.

do not let my sacrifices be for nothing. Let this be the final reckoning of the upvote obsession.

(Senior staff, djkaktus has a number of alts he uses to post articles under an account without his name attached to “see what it feels like to be one of the little people” so take that one to the bank if you want it. I’m sure someone who analyzes style could find them, I’d point them out but I’ve forgotten the #’s)
#rogetbox is an IRC channel I used to own that is his now, if it isn’t already abandoned it should be. Do the right thing.

>amiga avatar
>dirty atari user
what a fag

Let me be aspirational

 

[Furret]

It’s a nothing sandwich conspiracy theory, I have less salacious truths but don’t worry they’re only less damning because there’s no pedophile ring. Life pro tip: usually* when you see someone accused of a pedophile ring there’s a “there” there, but *excepting that horrible thing that went down in Belgium it hardly ever actually is pedophilia. Any hierarchy is going to have abuse but that’s just the nature of the beast, not a conspiracy.

I kinda figured that it wasn't a full-blown pedophile ring, but thanks for confirming it. I hope I haven't accidentally said otherwise.

more importantly, don’t anyone ever let djkaktus forget how he ran head over heels into the lap of the nearest authority figure capable of defending his personal interests when those interests (upvote djkaktus, anyone?) were threatened.

He’s the only person more complicit than me in fostering the toxic upvote culture that reduces your value to an upvote.

So why does djkaktus want you to pledge your upvote to him? Why would it be in-character for the morally bankrupt manchild who acts too cool for school on Twitter(@scp_djkaktus go peep his dated tweets)why does he Need your upvote to the point that it’s his brand?

That’s all he thinks about you.

That is all the good you are in his eyes, to be one in the world’s largest chorus singing to him, the only person allowed to be an individual.

djkaktus gives and takes crit only with designs to tailor you to upvote his material

why do you think he keeps citing legal over moral concerns?

Why do you, Ben, think an authors’ emotional bond to their work must be a ruse and that this is an overreaction?

he is just like I was, empty inside and needing others to tel him he is good to Pretend like he can feel good

Pay no attention to the little man behind the cactus.

in fact we can do better than that

I see that djkaktus is already trying to appropriate my material with one hand while he plays at trying to “save it” with the other.

Maybe he means, save it all for him?

I forbid djkaktus or his alts or any agent acting on his behalf from using my material unless they first join me in deleting all of their original work.

This is not a legal requirement, but a moral one, and it is up to you reading this to fulfill that moral obligation.

do not let my sacrifices be for nothing. Let this be the final reckoning of the upvote obsession.

(Senior staff, djkaktus has a number of alts he uses to post articles under an account without his name attached to “see what it feels like to be one of the little people” so take that one to the bank if you want it. I’m sure someone who analyzes style could find them, I’d point them out but I’ve forgotten the #’s)
#rogetbox is an IRC channel I used to own that is his now, if it isn’t already abandoned it should be. Do the right thing.

You seem to have struck a nerve, because Kaktus is now calling for staff to just ignore community input and keep your works as a middle finger. Somehow, I'm not surprised.

Also, since I know you're reading this Ben, I hate to be the bringer of bad news, but your dox has been publicly available in the SCP thread for months, and I'm not just talking about your name. It's pretty pathetic for you to act like Roget/Harmony doxxed you when the most she's done in this thread is call you by your first name, especially since you haven't hidden your name very well. I knew your full name before I knew about the existence of Kiwi Farms.

 

[ToS]

Hey Roggie, what do you think about this? http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-14007108/town-hall-meeting:mass-deletion-request#

It also foists responsibility (and blame) into the hands of the community, who are more than likely always going to want the content to stay no matter the circumstances.

What I'm saying is that the Staff want to A: Keep everything up, and B: Have the ability to say "well it's what the people want" when criticized over the hypocrisy of their decision.

Amazing, they ask the community for their thoughts on this, but didn’t think to with the pride logo.

They want very badly to deny the deletion request, but want to avoid pulling the trigger too. Making that decision would end the Wiki as a true collaboration and solidify it as a paraSite, at their order. They want something that will be unpopular but want to save face too by deflecting the responsibility... something good, strong leaders shouldn’t need to do. All the privileges they’ve had from being in their position, and when the time comes, they have zero strength or leadership to show for it.

It’s a rock and a hard place; the Wiki is guaranteed to have a deep tissue injury either way. So they are putting the gun in their hands. True cowards.

My belief is that they’ve already made up their mind. They think this is the easy way out and that it minimizes the most superficial damage, but are only tunnel visioned on the immediate out of stress and fear right now.

Keeping the articles will do more damage long term than taking them down will.

 

[Valstrax]

Damn, 8 pages already?

 

[MDforever]

Go Croatia!

i hate croatia

 

[Punished “Venom” pH]

Amazing, they ask the community for their thoughts on this, but didn’t think to with the pride logo.

They want very badly to deny the deletion request, but want to avoid pulling the trigger too. Making that decision would end the Wiki as a true collaboration and solidify it as a paraSite, at their order. They want something that will be unpopular but want to save face too by deflecting the responsibility... something good, strong leaders shouldn’t need to do. All the privileges they’ve had from being in their position, and when the time comes, they have zero strength or leadership to show for it.

It’s a rock and a hard place; the Wiki is guaranteed to have a deep tissue injury either way. So they are putting the gun in their hands. True cowards.

My belief is that they’ve already made up their mind. They think this is the easy way out and that it minimizes the most superficial damage, but are only tunnel visioned on the immediate out of stress and fear right now.

Keeping the articles will do more damage long term than taking them down will.

Bingo. I tried to warn them! Emphatically! Repeatedly! Am I wrong?

This action by staff is more transphobic than anything KiwiFarms has ever done to me, personally I have been practically welcomed, at least as long as I am useful. But I know that up front because you didn’t discriminate or make exceptions. You were trying to be mean, but at least that’s being open and you’re honest and up front with your intentions and feelings. That was not my experience with the SCP Foundation Wiki. They saw a hurting trans woman; looked directly at their stated commitment to protect my well-being and decided on equivocation and splitting hairs instead of doing the right thing and they are going to pay more for it the longer it takes them to get there.

 

[Bad Gateway]

That's too much stubble for a shemale, bro.

 

[ToS]

Bingo. I tried to warn them! Emphatically! Repeatedly! Am I wrong?

You’re wrong in thinking that demanding the articles be taken down is a just means of atonement, but besides that first step in a wrong direction, you have been taking correct turns imo, yes. You’ve checkmated the staff, bravo, but in a game that will inevitably & needlessly injure what you (say you) love. You’re holding the site and the people who had nothing to do with them in it hostage. But yeah, feel good about that.

You don’t discriminate or make exceptions and you’re honest and up front with your intentions and feelings.

That’s a mighty fine red pill if I’ve ever seen one.

 

[Furret]

You’re wrong in thinking that demanding the articles be taken down is a just means of atonement, but besides that first step in a wrong direction, you have been taking correct turns imo, yes. You’ve checkmated the staff, bravo, but in a game that will inevitably & needlessly injure what you (say you) love. You’re holding the site and the people who had nothing to do with them in it hostage. But yeah, feel good about that.

Yeah, while this is certainly going to hurt staff, this is a bit like nuking a city to kill one guy you don't like.

 

[No Exit]

That's too much stubble for a shemale, bro.

Lol like any tranny even tries to pass nowadays.

 

[Punished “Venom” pH]

You’re wrong in thinking that demanding the articles be taken down is a just means of atonement, but besides that first step in a wrong direction, you have been taking correct turns imo, yes. You’ve checkmated the staff, bravo, but in a game that will inevitably & needlessly injure what you (say you) love. You’re holding the site and the people who had nothing to do with them in it hostage. But yeah, feel good about that.


That’s a mighty fine red pill if I’ve ever seen one.

Oh no, I’m under no illusions here, I only take my own pills. I do not make value judgements or distinctions between people, everybody is a good and valid person in my eyes.

As long as its principles are not abrogated, SCP will rise again. If it is stained with corruption of its core values it is doomed to irrelevance and terminal decline. Everybody is in pain today, but they don’t have to be forever.

Lol like any tranny even tries to pass nowadays.

I know I need to shave I am gratified it took 8 pages for people to notice tho

That's too much stubble for a shemale, bro.

I’ll be better sir