🐱 Cartoon Network Releases New PSA Telling Audience To “See Color” In Order To Be “Anti-Racist”

CatParty

In a new public service announcement, Cartoon Network has informed its viewers that they must “see color” and view individuals through a skin-color based lens in order to be “Anti-Racist.”

The latest in a series of similar racism-related cartoons rooted heavily in critical race theory and featuring the cast of Steven Universe, “See Color” finds Amethyst taking issue with the goal of ‘color blindness’ in race relations, criticizing the directors of her PSA-within-the-PSA for a song featuring the lyrics “Color blindness is our game / Because everyone’s the same / Everybody join our circle / It doesn’t matter if you’re white / Or Black / Or Purple.”

“Adding purple people into a lesson about human racism makes no sense,” declares Amethyst to which one of her PSA co-stars, a young white girl, responds by suggesting that “people like the ‘Black, White or purple’ thing because adding a fantasy race in there helps distract from the actual racism Black people have to deal with.”


“Right, my experience with anti-Black racism is really specific. Other people of color experience other forms of racism too,” adds the PSA’s third co-star, a young black girl, before telling audiences that they “won’t see any of that if you don’t see color.”

Speculating that the original script for the ‘PSA-within-the-PSA’ could have been “a ploy to avoid talking about racism altogether,” Amethyst concludes the short by asking for “a rewrite where we appreciate each other without erasing what makes each of us different?”, with the PSA’s final shot featuring a large graphic reading “See Color, Be Anti-Racist!”

“When you see color and the history that comes with it,” wrote Cartoon Network in a tweet accompanying See Color’s premiere on Twitter, “You can recognize the role racism plays in our culture AND appreciate everyone’s diversity.”

Related: Cartoon Network’s Toonami Runs New Bumper Supporting Black Lives Matter

As noted above, See Color is but the latest “anti-racism” PSA produced by Cartoon Network for their The Crystal Gems Say BE ANTI-RACIST campaign, undertaken by the network “as part of our commitment to fostering inclusion and equity.”

In the series’ first entry, Don’t Deny It – Defy It, after a young boy criticizes the ‘cheesiness’ of another boy’s taunt that “black people can’t marry white people!”, Garnett informs the young man that “just because it doesn’t happen to you doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen” before stating that viewers must “acknowledge racism to work against it.”

This was followed by Tell the Whole Story, in which Pearl criticizes education curriculums for omitting “black roman warriors, black medieval knights, black classical musicians, black cowboys, [and] black fighter pilots,” asking audiences to “ask yourself as you’re learning history: Who’s telling the story? Was this modified to make white readers comfortable? Are major details being left out that would credit people of color and center their point of view?”

 
So in order to end judgements based on skin color, I have to judge people based on the color of their skin? View them as race first, and individuals second? Doesn't that defeat the "people-first" language that terms like "People of color" were trying to accomplish? How does this argument make sense in any rational way?

Well, if you want it that way: 13, 52. Thank you, Steven Universe. I'm anti-racist now.
 
Just what the fuck is going on?
It's just so anti-logic. If a white guy was looking to marry a black girl twenty years ago, and they talked to their parents about it, the general school of thought was: You two love each other? You have common interests? Focus on those and build a life together.

Now, if the same thing happens, it's expected to make their races a center issue, to constantly pick apart how Whitey gets the bigger piece of the pie, and how he should not only feel bad, but make sure his African American Princess is getting the bigger piece because BLACK AND FEMALE. For hundreds of years people married other races, and sometimes people were lousy, but largely no one really cared. America had its own weird thing with race segregation, but we fixed that, and this is no less weird and unnatural than segregation.
 
Did they forget that nobody learns about individual Roman warriors outside of notable commanders? Sure, there's new archaeological evidence of black Roman citizens travelling to as far as Britain, but that is a very specific aspect of Roman society that no highschool curriculum is going to obsess over. It'd be folded in with immigration and citizenship, if anything.

Black Roman commanders simply didn't reach the significance of people such as Pompey, Crassus, or even Scipio. It's not like the Romans were exclusively racist towards them, either, there was pushback against inducting people of the surrounding regions of Italy as Roman citizens, not to mention the rest of the empire!

Why's it just about blacks? It's erasing the experiences of Asian American classical musicians, cowboys, and military figures. Or even Native Americans, for that matter? Hyper-focusing on presenting America as just blacks and whites isn't helpful for representation.
becky don't care, she's a jew
 
Man, this sure would mean something if it wasn't for the fact that kids don't watch TV when they've got a tablet and youtube videos. For fucks sake, in 2008, when I was a kid; I barely watched cartoons cause I liked video game commentary let's play shit. I'd only watch that stuff if I had no other choice. It's only gotten easier since then to do so, so I have no doubt kids aren't the ones seeing this shit. Hell, my 12 year old Nephew and 10 year old Cousin KNEW that the George Floyd shit had nothing to do with race, so this shit clearly doesn't work.
 
I love it when CN treats black people as these victims of everyday hate...

Yo CN, it's not 1954. Segregation Laws have been abolished for over 30 years now. More Black/African Americans are living in suburbs with other races and earning decent wages now than ever. Not every single Black child is getting called a nigger today. Most of them have Nintendo Switches and Playstation 5s. Ya, there are still poor black people but that's not the point right now.

I dunno if the California smog has rotted your brains but don't tell kids to judge people based on their skin. They're CHILDREN and don't know anything! Kids aren't even taught the word racism until around 5th grade. This whole PSA could've simply been, "Don't be mean to others! It's a terrible thing to judge someone based on their race and background!" but no they had to appeal to the 20-year-olds who put autism in their profile bio.

I still cannot get over how fucking awful this whole Anti Racism "PSA" series is.
 
Man, this sure would mean something if it wasn't for the fact that kids don't watch TV when they've got a tablet and youtube videos. For fucks sake, in 2008, when I was a kid; I barely watched cartoons cause I liked video game commentary let's play shit. I'd only watch that stuff if I had no other choice. It's only gotten easier since then to do so, so I have no doubt kids aren't the ones seeing this shit. Hell, my 12 year old Nephew and 10 year old Cousin KNEW that the George Floyd shit had nothing to do with race, so this shit clearly doesn't work.

Cartoon Network is for alleged adults now.
 
The black girl in the cartoon reminds of certain insufferable black people who want special treatment and when people get annoyed with their attitude, they say, "It's because I'm black, isn't it?! Racist!". No, it's not your race, it's because you're annoying and make being a victim your whole identity. People acting like fragile victims isn't endearing and it doesn't make others want to deal with you.
 
This shit's been floating around academia for a while, it's now just forcing its way into mainstream culture. The 'colorblind equality' approach is viewed as quaint at best and literally just the thinly veiled evolution of Jim Crow at worst. The new astroturfing of 'equity' over 'equality' is just the woke leftist version of race realism.
 
Equality is no longer equality. People will only be equal now when everyone else is better off than whites.
"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

So in order to end judgements based on skin color, I have to judge people based on the color of their skin? View them as race first, and individuals second? Doesn't that defeat the "people-first" language that terms like "People of color" were trying to accomplish? How does this argument make sense in any rational way?

Well, if you want it that way: 13, 52. Thank you, Steven Universe. I'm anti-racist now.
These are the same people who will say "black and brown bodies" instead of "people," too.

And by the way, "people of color" was intended to divide the world into white and non-white. You'd be a fool to use it.
 
Last edited:
Back