- Joined
- Apr 2, 2019
That 'random Google reference' is a family photo of someone's infant child.You should update the pic. She admitted to “using a random reference on Google” to draw the dog pic
View attachment 1946947
Using random children for art reference is inappropriate and creepy on its own, but the 'dog in diaper' thing is a well-known fetish. He's taking a random baby and reappropriating it for fetish art. Even though it's technically sfw and technically non-pornographic, it still has the inherent sexual undertones that come from making diaper cub 'art'.
Bill is disingenuous and disgusting.