Trainwreck Pamela Swain / DocHoliday1977 / MsPhoenix1969 / Observer1977 / danishlace2003 / Writer_thriller - Victim of grand #MeToo conspiracy, litigious wannabe starfucker, off her meds and online

[DocHoliday1977]

Hillary Clinton has no right to harass me online. Hillary Clinton has no right to contact me or my university or instructors to harass me. Hillary Clinton has no right tp contact my family.

Hillary Clinton does have the right to take her fat ass to the gym. Hillary Clinton has the right to sit on her fat ass at home. Hillary Clinton has the right to write her own damn books and take her meds.
Hillary Clinton has the right to fuck off.

 

[Whale Spotter]

They apparently do exist Donna cause they're HERE

Donna? Is this a new character? Who is Donna?
I didn't say they don't exist, of course they exist. I said that they don't know YOU exist. And they are not here.

And I'm not posting toned leg pics again.

No one ever asked for them so that's good. Also, toning is for paper not for your legs. You have lowered a little your body fat percentage (maybe), but remember the rule: if it jiggles, it's fat.

She could appeal, not that I think that will be of any help to her, but she does have the right.

Ah so we might see the appeal spergy saga? Lovely!

@Null is Tony Robbins. He did not have his picture in the courtroom scene.

He is not, Null is the one on the left with the red sweater. No amount of your wishful thinking will make Tony Robbins care about you or know you exist.

I know how to appeal and this brief I sent was an opportunity for judges to do the right thing. If they can't, then I'll take other measures.

Yay sperg appeal saga. What other measures, Pam? You got nothing

don't kill anyone please

She won't, she is particularly mad today.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

You can insert Tkny Robbins, Harvey Weinstein. Harvey Weinsteins lawyers and everyone else on that brief.

 

[Burd Turglar]

Hillary Clinton has no right to harass me online. Hillary Clinton has no right to contact me or my university or instructors to harass me. Hillary Clinton has no right tp contact my family.

Hillary Clinton does have the right to take her fat ass to the gym. Hillary Clinton has the right to sit on her fat ass at home. Hillary Clinton has the right to write her own damn books and take her meds.
Hillary Clinton has the right to fuck off.

Better safe than sorry. As of September 28th, 2015 at 5:00pm, Eastern standard time, I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, or posts, both past and future. By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute). NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates. DO NOT SHARE. You MUST copy and paste.

 

[Whale Spotter]

You can insert Tkny Robbins, Harvey Weinstein. Harvey Weinsteins lawyers and everyone else on that brief.

I am sure that will go just as well as your other lolsuit

Better safe than sorry. As of September 28th, 2015 at 5:00pm, Eastern standard time, I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, or posts, both past and future. By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute). NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates. DO NOT SHARE. You MUST copy and paste.

Thank you.

 

[Burd Turglar]

I am sure that will go just as well as your other lolsuit

Thank you.

No problem, just trying to keep us all safe.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

"Of course not, not that this post would be admissible in court."

Indeed, it would not be.

- are you a judge?

No

Cause rape, choking, and death threat are admissible in court.

We have done nothing that constitutes as any of those (I proved it many times), and in general our posts are anonymous (not good faith evidence as per St Amant v. Thompson), and is in general hearsay (which are not admissible (see Rule 802 of Federal rules of Evidence, and Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004) ).

- if you are a judge, are you supposed to be posting here?

There is nothing preventing a judge from shitposting on Kiwifarms.

Cause appeals will include judicial online harassment.

You can't include new evidence in Appeal Courts. From uscourts.gov:
"The appellate courts do not retry cases or hear new evidence. Appellate courts review the procedures and the decisions in the trial court to make sure that the proceedings were fair and that the proper law was applied correctly. "
Note the".gov" bit, this info comes from a governmental website.

@Null is Tony Robbins. He did not have his picture in the courtroom scene.

Lol, that's your proof? Sad.

I know how to appeal

I doubt it.

and this brief I sent was an opportunity for judges to do the right thing. If they can't, then I'll take other measures.

Like I mentioned, your lawsuit violates at least 4 SCOTUS cases. It will not be granted on appeal.

Hillary Clinton has no right to harass me online. Hillary Clinton has no right to contact me or my university or instructors to harass me. Hillary Clinton has no right tp contact my family.

Ignoring the law for a moment, of which your knowledge is minuscule, Hillary did none of those things.

Yay sperg appeal saga.

It's not on the docket yet, but I'll keep an eye on it.

You can insert Tkny Robbins, Harvey Weinstein. Harvey Weinsteins lawyers and everyone else on that brief.

Your brief, you do it, and no you can't introduce new evidence or new people on Appeal.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Indeed, it would not be.

No

We have done nothing that constitutes as any of those (I proved it many times), and in general our posts are anonymous (not good faith evidence as per St Amant v. Thompson), and is in general hearsay (which are not admissible (see Rule 802 of Federal rules of Evidence, and Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004) ).

There is nothing preventing a judge from shitposting on Kiwifarms.

You can't include new evidence in Appeal Courts. From uscourts.gov:
"The appellate courts do not retry cases or hear new evidence. Appellate courts review the procedures and the decisions in the trial court to make sure that the proceedings were fair and that the proper law was applied correctly. "
Note the".gov" bit, this info comes from a governmental website.

Lol, that's your proof? Sad.

I doubt it.

Like I mentioned, your lawsuit violates at least 4 SCOTUS cases. It will not be granted on appeal.

Ignoring the law for a moment, of which your knowledge is minuscule, Hillary did none of those things.


It's not on the docket yet, but I'll keep an eye on it.


Your brief, you do it, and no you can't introduce new evidence or new people on Appeal.

This thread is admissible.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

This thread is admissible.

It's telling that you ignored the "no new evidence at appeal" thing.

I disagree. Even if it was, none of the things we have written here are illegal (as I have shown you many times)

 

[Burd Turglar]

This thread is admissible.

I know it was more than a couple hours ago so you probably forgot but all this thread shows is you threatening the lives and well being of others as well as wishing them to kill themselves. I don't think you have a gross leg in a fat girl pose to stand on.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

It's telling that you ignored the "no new evidence at appeal" thing.

I disagree. Even if it was, none of the things we have written here are illegal (as I have shown you many times)

Thread created July 2018.

 

[LoverofPi]

@LoverofPi won't get doxed. You know why?

Because he hasn't gone around the Internet making a damn fool of himself using his real name and picture, or powerlevelled all over the place thinking that it's somehow 'owning' randoms on a forum.

It's really very simple. Like you.

I also have self control, unlike Pam.

Blah blah blah.

"Of course not, not that this post would be admissible in court."
- are you a judge? Cause rape, choking, and death threat are admissible in court.
- if you are a judge, are you supposed to be posting here? Cause appeals will include judicial online harassment.

Even if he was a judge, if he wasn't a judge related to your case, it wouldn't be relevant.

Hillary Clinton has no right to contact me

She does, actually. Just as you would have the right to contact her if you knew how.

Hillary Clinton has no right tp contact my family.

Again, she does, just as you have that right to do the same in reverse. It would be rude of her to do, but she has the right.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Thread created July 2018.

I don't know why you think this matters, but it really does not. Regardless, you can't submit new evidence to appeals courts, as I have shown you here

You can't include new evidence in Appeal Courts. From uscourts.gov:
"The appellate courts do not retry cases or hear new evidence. Appellate courts review the procedures and the decisions in the trial court to make sure that the proceedings were fair and that the proper law was applied correctly. "
Note the".gov" bit, this info comes from a governmental website.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

I know it was more than a couple hours ago so you probably forgot but all this thread shows is you threatening the lives and well being of others as well as wishing them to kill themselves. I don't think you have a gross leg in a fat girl pose to stand on.

This thread shows unwanted rape, choking and domestic abuse. Shut the fuck up.

 

[Narr Then]

I don't know why you think this matters, but it really does not. Regardless, you can't submit new evidence to appeals courts, as I have shown you here

She doesn't understand the term new evidence, clearly.

 

[LoverofPi]

This thread shows unwanted rape, choking and domestic abuse. Shut the fuck up.

Where? No, seriously, how did I miss all that?

 

[Burd Turglar]

This thread shows unwanted rape, choking and domestic abuse. Shut the fuck up.

As opposed to wanted rape, choking and domestic abuse?

We all know you're into some fucked up shit sexually but golly!

 

[Useful_Mistake]

This thread shows unwanted rape, choking and domestic abuse. Shut the fuck up.

No one here has even touched you, nor are we in any relationship. That means none of the things you just said are true.

She doesn't understand the term new evidence, clearly.

You figure she'll accuse us of bribing the appeal court judge when he/she tell her the same thing?

 

[Whale Spotter]

Thread created July 2018.

Just because it was created in 2018 it doesn't mean it is not new evidence. Did you add it to your original insane lolsuit as evidence? No? Then it is considered "new evidence". This is why you constantly fail.

This thread shows unwanted rape, choking and domestic abuse. Shut the fuck up.

Wow you are really mad today.
There are no credible threats. At most someone talking a lot of shit to get you riled up. By the way, some of those threats were made by you.

You figure she'll accuse us of bribing the appeal court judge when he/she tell her the same thing?

Very likely.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

NEW DOC @Whale Spotter @Viridian @LoverofPi

Spoiler: That's not how you appeal, Pam.

Instead of appealing, she submitted yet another amended complaint. Needless to say, this is moot because her suit is still dismissed.

Updated Courtlistener link