Are they hoping most of the audience sees skinny arms on a black person and goes, 'OH! WOMAN!' or something?? I'd somehow never seen that before, but it reminds me of that one infamous scene from the club in Shameless (followed by the even more infamous lunch scene, presumably).
Everyone can become a scientist nowadays without studying.
Dude is a repulsive, perverted pig. He just wants to jerk off to this specific fantasy aka lesbian women who refuse to believe troonbians are women getting converted to lust after dick. It's not a deep question, it's part of a fetish fantasy.
not even media, academic researchers and writers themselves do their best to obfuscate and mask any such outcome, from the usual attempts at explaining it away by blaming bias/discrimination all the way to specifically altering test designs and removing questions/tasks from tests entirely if they're known to yield undesirable results
Having a bigger brain (relative to what your body ‘should’) have, is actually bad. It’s called Megalencephaly, and it’s strongly linked with autism!
Agreed. seems like in this thread we spend alot of time trying to disprove tranny takes, we dont need any more evidence that these people are unhinged other than that they genuinely believe they are female.
Here's his AO3 profile if any of y'all wanna comb through his shitty furry fanfiction.
education is learned skills
Have you actually ever taken iq test in your life, and by this I don't mean some online test? You think that iq tests don't ask questions that person can perform better in if they have had enough practise in that area?
Wrong on so many levels.
An unfortunate reality is that the longer a thread goes the higher probability that it goes off-topic is, radical feminism, autism, iqs... are examples from this thread.
"OMG science is as biased as the media, academic researchers lie, like, all the time, and IQ rating is obviously a perfectly accurate measurement of objective intelligence, which is, like, well-defined as a scientific concept and well-understood as rooted in brain mere biology !§!§§! #UnpopularOpinion"
Yes indeed... Same exact shit as Troonery 101's "I haz a fUhMAle BreAN in muh male body". And even with studying, we have that troons-in-STEM Twitter thread posted a few pages back here, adequately demonstrating that you can deny every basics of evolutionary and reproductive biology, while performing research in those precise fields. Though these troons were mostly studying birds and insects, which could come as an explanation, sex in birds and insects being not exactly like in hoomans. But I must be too optimistic here.
I dunno, I'm not bothered by men having a wider statistical bound on IQ. Most measures of IQ prominently feature the shit where male autists excel. Socialization (including the basic shit like nutrition/stress as children) impacts it greatly besides. I'm poisoned by Cordelia Fine's books and, additionally continue to intentionally poison my brain by reading sites like this while drinking.
assuming we're talking about the wais-iv/waic or whatever, you can absolutely teach basic test-taking skills to raise scores by at least one standard deviation, and very possibly beyond that if you keep tutoring people like they aren't idiots. IQ tests don't necessarily measure memorized skills, but you absolutely can teach people 'how to think correctly' to score better. The Flynn Effect is basically this writ large as western standards of education spread, but you can affect it in more localized communities within the west as well. It'd take me a bit to dig up studies because I'm out of the ed game but it's 'a thing' if you'll believe some random idiot on kiwifarms of all places.
Oh boy. Underage lesbo Ducktales fic. Someone summon Webby's Boyfriend out of purgatory.
education performance isnt identical with iq, how hard is that to understand?
