Sophie Labelle Verville / Guillaume Labelle / Serious Trans Vibes Comics / Assigned Male / Candycore Comics / Pastel Sexy Times / WafflesArt - Obnoxious webcomics and horrific porn by a crazy fat pedo troon

3MMA said:
That adult BABY diaper LOVER, the big eyebrow one from the land down under, he said, “childhood that they stole from us...” as many troons claim.
Stole?
They?
Yeah, who’s snatching childhoods from troons? No one, ya fuckn nut job . Nobody. Bad shit happens to plenty of people, that’s not what the troons are meaning by “stolen childhood” though.

Pretty certain they are feeding their delusions of sex/ gender blah blah blah & use “stolen” to mean “childhood I wished I had.”

Troons often have gross fantasies of how they’d prefer their puberty to be, which we know is nothing like an actual, adolescent girls experience. This is a strong, main, troon fantasy trope.
Nothing was fucking stolen from you assholes.

The above, adult Baby diaper Lover, is using a number one troon delusion to justify LeBoy being a sick, fuck, aBdL, kink, fetishists, on main.
Click to expand...
*slow clap*
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: Allakazam223, blue gopher snakes, From The Uncanny Valley and 7 others
Piga Dgrifm said:
I had to look up what that meant, but here goes. And, I won't repost the art, it's been seen enough in the thread by now that you'll all know which drawings I'm referring to.

1. The average person, applying local community standards, looking at the work in its entirety, must find that it appeals to the prurient interest.

Both the diaper change photo and the pool climbing photo are obviously fetishistic in nature. Particularly the diaper changing one where the character is barely covered and is looking toward the viewer.

2. The work must describe or depict, in an obviously offensive way, sexual conduct, or excretory functions.

In the pool climbing photo, the diaper appears to be full and sagging (which is actually not present in the source it was traced from, I don't think.) In the diaper changing photo and the one of the dog, the characters are posed in sexually suggestive ways.

3. The work as a whole must lack "serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific values".

The drawings do not make a statement about anything, or have a purpose beyond being fap fuel. The intent was clearly fetishistic and nothing more. While art can obviously have meaning beyond what the artist originally intended, I think you'd be hard pressed to find anyone who sees meaning in it beyond the fetishistic one.
Click to expand...
You’re using US law not Canadian law and Canadian law clearly describes what Billy did as illegal. Even loli/shota is illegal.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: WalterPresson96, ExciteDyke, beautiful person and 18 others
Thumb Butler said:
Why do people keep bringing up U.S. laws? They are not relevant in this case. It's like calling for all kiwi farmers to be locked up for British thought crimes.
Click to expand...
oh shit ignore my last thing about Potter Stewart. Canada doesn't have a first amendment and so all shotacon is illegal there - she's fucked if she drew anything racier than the Coppertone ad with the dog. But Yaniv is still a free man so apparently Canada doesn't care who you try to molest as long as you are a troon.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: WalterPresson96, Grog, Vibri and 21 others
Cadaver Corpse said:
"But! But KiwiFarms is just alt-right NAZI FASCISTS so you can't take them seriously!" I crack up whenever I see this.

Also every single 'defense' these people have can easily be refuted, but it also reminds me to stay far far away from Twitter.
  • "It's just fiction!"
    • Normally, I'd agree. A lot of kink - age regression / ABDL included - is fictional fantasizing and not reflective of someone's real-world desires, BDSM and related kinks are often like that. If Labelle wants to shit in diapers and get dressed up in onesies, then as long as those present give the okay for it, then whatever, just keep it in the bedroom where everyone consents. In a roleplay scene, everyone involved is consenting, and it follows the general BDSM rule of SSC. Paraphrasing from Wikipedia...
      • SSC
        • Safe - everything is based on safe activities.
        • Sane - all participants are of sound mind to give consent.
        • Consensual - all participantes give consent.
    • HOWEVER, the moment Labelle referenced an actual baby and directly traced a real toddler to create fetish content, it brought non-consenting real people - a toddler and an infant - into their kink, and broke that line between fictional fantasy roleplay and real-world desires.
    • Labelle seeked out references of real-world BABIES to make fetish content out of, and at no point had any second thoughts about it, and still defends making fetish content from tracing said photos.
    • It is no longer 'just fiction' once real infants are brought in.
    • Sorry, I forgot to mention this is a 32 year-old defending making fetish art from an image of a toddler.
  • "But age regressors like to think about themselves as cubs, not others!"
    • Then it'd make sense for Labelle to have a single self-insert character to represent them, right? Yet they drew sexually-charged diaper art of multiple cub characters, none of which were explicitly meant to depict LaBelle.
  • "But it's not a kink!"
    • Sure, it isn't always, but it absolutely can be, and it certainly is for LaBelle, because they said it themselves and claimed they 'wouldn't be kinkshamed.'
  • "Just because it's a kink doesn't mean it's sexual!"
    • That's the kind of shit I was told by 20-year-olds when I was underage to get me to engage in sexual kink content for them. The only people who ever use that argument are people trying to get unsuspecting others to do shit to arouse them.
    • Just because sex isn't involved, doesn't mean that something isn't sexual. Look at people who like vore or inflation - there's rarely sex in that art, yet it's still sexually arousing masturbation material for those fetishists.
    • Kink has always been used to denote sexualbehaviour that deviates from the norm.
      • " In human sexuality, kinkiness is the use of non-conventional sexual practices, concepts or fantasies. The term derives from the idea of a "bend" in one's sexual behaviour, to contrast such behaviour with "straight" or "vanilla" sexual mores and proclivities. It is thus a colloquial term for non-normative sexual behaviour. The term "kink" has been claimed by some who practice sexual fetishism as a term or synonym for their practices, indicating a range of sexual and sexualistic practices from playful to sexual objectification and certain paraphilias." / src
  • "There's no genitals, so it's not sexual!"
    • Other kinks don't always show genitals. Look at inflation, vore, or hell, even foot kinks, for example. Not all of the art for those things has tits 'n cocks hanging out, but like above, people still jack off to it - it's still sexually arousing to people into those things.
  • "Well asexual people can engage in kink, so it's not inherently sexual!"
    • "Every asexual person is different. Some might be repulsed by sex, some might feel nonchalant about it, and some might enjoy it." / src
    • "[Gray asexuality...] is used to refer to people who experience limited sexual attraction. In other words, they experience sexual attraction very rarely, or with very low intensity." / src
    • "A common reason someone may identify as [gray asexual] is that they experience sexual attraction but very infrequently." / src
    • "Some asexuals may still have a sex drive despite not feeling sexual attraction to anyone. They may still masturbate, watch porn, or participate in sexual activities." / src
    • "Sex-favorable is a term that is most commonly used by asexual and [asexual spectrum] individuals to indicate that they enjoy the act of sex or the concept of sex. Sex-favorable aces do not typically experience sexual attraction, but they may enjoy sex or sexual acts, and/or seek out sexual relationships. " / src
      • These are kinda shit sources so don't get into a slapfight over this, but these are asexual people saying that ace people can have a sex drive, which completely nullifies the "It can't ever be sexual because ace people do it!" argument.
  • "It's just a reference!"
    • A reference of a real-world infant and a tracing of a real-world toddler for sexually charged kink art. Would you feel comfortable with a 32-year-old making fetish art from a photo of your toddler?
  • "But! But KiwiFarms is just full of transphobic gay-hating alt-right nazis!!! This is a transphobic witch hunt trying to kink shame a trans woman for having sexual interests!!!"
    • I'm a trans gay liberal who uses KF, so it's safe to say I'm fairly far from an alt-right trans-hating fascist. I disagree with a lot of shit that's said here, but I agree with the evidence posted here regarding the Labelle-diaper-saga. The fact that Labelle referenced and traced real children for fetish art doesn't suddenly become less true just because you're hearing it from people you hate.
What a hill for these people to die on. Defending the usage of actual children as reference for fetish material because you don't like the people presenting the evidence. I don't miss social media in the slightest.
Click to expand...
This is the best refutation of his bullshit I've seen. He thinks he can Gish Gallop his way out of this, but you have shown it's all fucking bullshit
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: WalterPresson96, Doppio Vinegar, SomeVulgarFujoshi and 14 others
Cadaver Corpse said:
"But age regressors like to think about themselves as cubs, not others!"
  • Then it'd make sense for Labelle to have a single self-insert character to represent them, right? Yet they drew sexually-charged diaper art of multiple cub characters, none of which were explicitly meant to depict LaBelle.
Click to expand...
This just made a bad thought spring into my head, so to play Devil's advocate so it doesn't keep me up tonight:
What if someone say, trace photos of themselves when they were babies? where would that lie?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Islamic Content
  • Horrifying
Reactions: WalterPresson96, Osyth Osyth, Vibri and 7 others
cowisnow said:
Some people just want to live a quiet, uncomplicated life and not be bothered because of who they love or what gender they want to present as.

And this fat prick, he "represents" them as a notable and fairly public member of this certain bunch of people.

And he's expressing thoughts towards vulnerable children, and drawing erotic art catering to these base instincts.

And he (ok, she) deserves to be cast out into the darkness of hell, where you shall hear the wailing and gnashing of teeth.

Or something like that.

So fucking denounce it. Do not condone this behavior and may the culture of shame and modesty prevail.

🧐
Click to expand...
The problem is that he was already making a comic strip about an 11-year-old kid identifying as a female, bitching about it, and using terms like "girldick" and all done without self-awareness or "it's just fantasy bro", and this was not only accepted but celebrated.

To suddenly start caring and calling out Labelle NOW is either hypocritical or admitting you missed the obvious red flags.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: WalterPresson96, Grog, Allakazam223 and 10 others
Oglooger said:
This just made a bad thought spring into my head, so to play Devil's advocate so it doesn't keep me up tonight:
What if someone say, trace photos of themselves when they were babies? where would that lie?
Click to expand...
I personally think it would depend what they did with the resultant drawings. If it’s used to create something for people to fap to, I don’t think it matters what child the pic is based on. Unless of course it was one of my sons, in which case I’d definitely kick them into a ravine in Minecraft without a second thought.

Also, for whoever the earlier poster was who said something like “being explicit is the definition of porn”, I have heard of pedos creating/trading pictures of actual babies in lacy lingerie and high heels, claiming that bc it’s not “explicit” it’s not illegal. I bet it still is in most countries, because it’s fucking sickening.
 
  • Horrifying
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: WalterPresson96, Death Grip, Osyth Osyth and 15 others
Oglooger said:
This just made a bad thought spring into my head, so to play Devil's advocate so it doesn't keep me up tonight:
What if someone say, trace photos of themselves when they were babies? where would that lie?
Click to expand...
roflbot (5).jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: WalterPresson96, repentance, Allakazam223 and 17 others
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: WalterPresson96, ExciteDyke, Allakazam223 and 18 others
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: FramerGirl420, WalterPresson96, Struggle Cakes and 25 others
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: FramerGirl420, WalterPresson96, Grog and 62 others
artilleryfroth said:
Oh man I would be furious if I was LGB in Cheltenham.
Click to expand...

Cash Pope said:
What a fucktarded thing to share in light of recent events
Click to expand...

JY's Tampon said:
This group just posted this for LGBT+ History Month. Let's see what happens.
View attachment 1956956

It doesn't look like an official group but it has over 1200 followers.
View attachment 1956957
Click to expand...
Thread already deleted.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: WalterPresson96, Allakazam223, Trombonista and 9 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back