Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Dude had his cock flayed & stopped dilating because he regretted it.


He doesn't pass without make up.

And his body is that of a skinny man.
View attachment 1961322
Passing hard. It's nearly impossible for adult men. Even hsts struggle but they know how to manipulate pictures, videos and how to use make up. But they can never pass 100% all the time.
 
HAHA THE SECOND ONE LOOKS LIKE MOOMOO.

1606893734864.png
 
I remember a theory was recently proposed about women and their sexual behavior driving our subsequent evolution into a sapient species, and that is why we are so intelligent compared to our great ape cousins. Women are picky about who they mate with, unlike chimp and gorilla females, who when in ovulation will mate with any available male; the silverback and the alpha chimp try to chase the other males away to get more mating opportunities for themselves, but the females are inherently promiscuous; they don't discriminate.

This approach works when the species is constantly surrounded by an abundance of food that can be found in the rain forests year round, but it's not a workable strategy when food is scarce and the members of the pack need to ration it. Also worth mentioning is that our ape cousins pay a heavy price for their bulk and strength. A silverback gorilla needs 11,000 kcal a day to sustain its bulk, which means he has to spend 5-8 hours everyday eating.

As to your first paragraph: I think it is overwhelmingly likely to be true. Assuming, of course, that women have historically had any sexual agency at all (remember as I said that you only need the slightest of fitness advantages plus enough generations to pass to eventually find "fixation" of that allele in the population).

Chimps may not be "picky" but alpha chimps father many more babies than those slightly lower in the hierarchy let alone the Russell Greer style chimpanzees. See above. The lucky but less-fit chimpanzee who sneaks a fuck and contributes his genes to a new baby will, ten generations down the line, likely have no descendants. But your point about chasing away other males, etc. is well-stated and explains animal sexual dimorphism where males get increasingly scary-looking or powerful. Evidently, the benefits of a powerful Neanderthal-type physique were insufficient to justify the cost in humans.

As to your second paragraph: I may well be mistaken but I genuinely don't see how it follows from the first unless there's an idea missing somewhere. I do agree with what you at least imply, namely that rainforests probably aren't cognitively demanding environments. But why would a more cognitively challenging environment without that readily-available abundance of food move us away from gorilla-like mate-guarding? It's not like they're practicing family planning. Perhaps you're suggesting (and this is an idea I would agree with and in fact has a lot of support) that this type of hardship drives the creation of small families with intense interfamilial bonds: no longer can the village raise a child.

I was not familiar with the gorilla stats! Thank you. But the huge time commitments of the gorilla diet are probably more down to the fact that they are eating extremely low-calorie fibrous plantstuff -- absurdly large amounts of it every day to extract its meagre energy. And they need to walk around with not only huge amounts of rotting shit in their guts but have huge metabolically-expensive intestines. Gorillas, unlike humans, can get energy from cellulose; like humans, however, they only have the enzymes to break down carb's alpha glyosidic linkages and not beta linkages like in cellulose so rely on bacteria to do so which takes a while and involves a very long transit time, a huge long metabolically-expensive intestine that gives every gorilla and absurd beer-belly look, and I imagine lots of farting. I'm sure a gorilla could gorge 11,000 kcal in two short takeaway meals, if offered. Also the gorillas I've seen clips of eating seem to do so in an incredibly languorous, lazy manner, almost meditatively as they stare off into the distance, passing wind. It's not like they have anything else to do.

Thank you for saying "sapient" not "sentient".
 
As to your first paragraph: I think it is overwhelmingly likely to be true. Assuming, of course, that women have historically had any sexual agency at all (remember as I said that you only need the slightest of fitness advantages plus enough generations to pass to eventually find "fixation" of that allele in the population).

Chimps may not be "picky" but alpha chimps father many more babies than those slightly lower in the hierarchy let alone the Russell Greer style chimpanzees. See above. The lucky but less-fit chimpanzee who sneaks a fuck and contributes his genes to a new baby will, ten generations down the line, likely have no descendants. But your point about chasing away other males, etc. is well-stated and explains animal sexual dimorphism where males get increasingly scary-looking or powerful. Evidently, the benefits of a powerful Neanderthal-type physique were insufficient to justify the cost in humans.

As to your second paragraph: I may well be mistaken but I genuinely don't see how it follows from the first unless there's an idea missing somewhere. I do agree with what you at least imply, namely that rainforests probably aren't cognitively demanding environments. But why would a more cognitively challenging environment without that readily-available abundance of food move us away from gorilla-like mate-guarding? It's not like they're practicing family planning. Perhaps you're suggesting (and this is an idea I would agree with and in fact has a lot of support) that this type of hardship drives the creation of small families with intense interfamilial bonds: no longer can the village raise a child.

I was not familiar with the gorilla stats! Thank you. But the huge time commitments of the gorilla diet are probably more down to the fact that they are eating extremely low-calorie fibrous plantstuff -- absurdly large amounts of it every day to extract its meagre energy. And they need to walk around with not only huge amounts of rotting shit in their guts but have huge metabolically-expensive intestines. Gorillas, unlike humans, can get energy from cellulose; like humans, however, they only have the enzymes to break down carb's alpha glyosidic linkages and not beta linkages like in cellulose so rely on bacteria to do so which takes a while and involves a very long transit time, a huge long metabolically-expensive intestine that gives every gorilla and absurd beer-belly look, and I imagine lots of farting. I'm sure a gorilla could gorge 11,000 kcal in two short takeaway meals, if offered. Also the gorillas I've seen clips of eating seem to do so in an incredibly languorous, lazy manner, almost meditatively as they stare off into the distance, passing wind. It's not like they have anything else to do.

Thank you for saying "sapient" not "sentient".
Sorry if my reasoning was not clear.

I meant that brute strength, like the type we see in sexually dimorphic male apes, is only selected for (or mainly selected for) when the species exists in an environment that provides enough opportunities for easily acquired food throughout the year, such as bamboo and tropical fruits (but yes, also a variety of less rich plan matter). To maintain this on the savannah, where food is much more scarce, especially for non-ruminants, the gorilla would have to spend practically all its time eating and might still not get enough calories to sustain their bulk long-term. Physical prowess is a marker of reproductive health, yes, but my point is that women who otherwise would have allowed the less-than-clever but very powerful muscle man to rut with them were more or less forced to look out for their own and their offspring's futures by selecting the less physically capable/impressive male who could acquire food by other means than brute strength. Or was simply better at defending the tribe against rivals and/or predators. Either way, the female drives the selection. This could very well be the reason why our ancestors crossed the savannah and other apes did not.

As for women's sexual agency from a historical (and prehistorical) perspective, she might not have needed to consent to the sex act itself, but the women still needed to carry the child, birth it and nurse it for several years, and it's impossible to force someone to commit to that if they absolutely do not want to.

(BTW, for more funny gorilla stats, a mature male eats roughly 40 lbs of plant matter a day! And yes, farts and poops a lot.)
 
Last edited:
I kept getting that video in my recommended despite having watching history turned off.

I know absolutely nothing about Infinity Train apart from the fact this character was supposed to be the MC's mirror self who rebelled or some shit, I don't know. Someone more educated can probably tell you more.
Infinity Train is actually pretty good and I do recommend it, but the existence of that video confirms for me that the fan base has Steven-Universe-itis and can only view things though their social justice-y lens.
Lake's story is about breaking free of one's upbringing and finding yourself. Hell, for most of the story they just call her "MT" and it sounds like "empty". She doesn't know who she really is when she's seperate from her twin.
It could be a metaphor for literal twins, growing apart from family, leaving religion, reformation of identity while traveling...
But no. Sexuality and gender identity. That's all it ever is.
 
Sorry if my reasoning was not clear.

I meant that brute strength, like the type we see in sexually dimorphic male apes, is only selected for (or mainly selected for) when the species exists in an environment that provides enough opportunities for easily acquired food throughout the year, such as bamboo and tropical fruits (but yes, also a variety of less rich plan matter). To maintain this on the savannah, where food is much more scarce, especially for non-ruminants, the gorilla would have to spend practically all its time eating and might still not get enough calories to sustain their bulk long-term. Physical prowess is a marker of reproductive health, yes, but my point is that women who otherwise would have allowed the less-than-clever but very powerful muscle man to rut with them were more or less forced to look out for their own and their offspring's futures by selecting the less physically capable/impressive male who could acquire food by other means than brute strength. Or was simply better at defending the tribe against rivals and/or predators. Either way, the female drives the selection. This could very well be the reason why our descendants crossed the savannah and other apes did not.

As for women's sexual agency from a historical (and prehistorical) perspective, she might not have needed to consent to the sex act itself, but the women still needed to carry the child, birth it and nurse it for several years, and it's impossible to force someone to commit to that if they absolutely do not want to.

(BTW, for more funny gorilla stats, a mature male eats roughly 40 lbs of plant matter a day! And yes, farts and poops a lot.)

Thanks for responding. Good point about the infanticide. I wonder if most women find it difficult to bond with their "rape babies" or if the hormones sort of overwhelm everything.

As for your elaboration -- you made some interesting points. And I'm being careful here as I don't want to embarrass myself by claiming expertise I do not have! I am very interested in the subject but my university studies involved very little on evolution and zero on anything even related to evo-psych. Anyway, this particular claim is not one I have heard before (although it seems like a reasonable extrapolation from what I do know and from the facts you mention) and wonder if it is your own. If you would change "enough opportunities for easily acquired food" as you wrote it to instead "not a cognitively demanding environment" then as I understand it your view would be fairly mainstream among the evo-psych community.

Yes, I think our stereotypical SJW would struggle immensely against the idea that evolution in humans arises in large part from women getting what they like. Maybe my favourite example here is the baculum, or penis bone. I guessed women either wanted a more a honest signal of health (impotence not being correlated with anything good) or were turned off by erect but unengorged cocks. And of course the absurd size of the human penis in comparison with other primates is itself an indication that women were very fussy about their mates. In Africa, especially.
 
FTM feels the wall approaching and wants to troon out, husband and kid get in the way. The comment section says unanimously: "He's abusive, leave him, your kid will thank you for destroying your marriage!!"




Some highlights:
View attachment 1961422

He knows you are an airhead and this is just another stunt for attention, like so many others youve likely pulled in the past. So he just ignores it.
Tbh this is a symptom that he shouldnt ignore.

View attachment 1961423

Re the dehodorants: why would he oppose you using mens dehodorants? They dont smell that different from womens and no one is going to notice you are using mens dehodorants. Maybe your husband isnt as hetero as you like to think he is.

Re gym: he has more sense than you do but ofc you are too lazy for that, so youd rather just take hormones and cut your tits off so you can get the approval and validation without working for it like you think men get just for being men. In your bubble this is probably true, but the real world doesnt work that way and men from those kinds of circles tend to do really badly out in the real world.

View attachment 1961426
As if this mysogynistic twat gives a shit about her daughter.
Re financial dependence, maybe the problem here is the very unhealthy relationship you have with what you think femininity is? Just a thought.
The fiancé got engaged to a woman. Most people aren't cool with their spouse just up and changing genders. So if your fiancé is a straight man and you randomly one day say "From now on I identify as a gay man and want to be on hormones" he's probably going to tell you to hit the bricks sooner than later. Or some variation of "that's nice, but I'm not gay so this is probably not going to work."

It reminds of that FtM who complained they weren't being invited to Girls' Night anymore and the friends basically said, "You told us you were a dude now, so yeah, why would we invite you?"
 
The fiancé got engaged to a woman. Most people aren't cool with their spouse just up and changing genders. So if your fiancé is a straight man and you randomly one day say "From now on I identify as a gay man and want to be on hormones" he's probably going to tell you to hit the bricks sooner than later. Or some variation of "that's nice, but I'm not gay so this is probably not going to work."

It reminds of that FtM who complained they weren't being invited to Girls' Night anymore and the friends basically said, "You told us you were a dude now, so yeah, why would we invite you?"
a lot of troons want to have it both ways; they know what their biology is and where they used to belong and what challenges they still face on that basis since most of them don't pass, so they think they can dip back into it if they really need to, but according to their own logic, they shouldn't be doing that anymore. a lot of trans people feel genuine fear and strife trying to fit in as the group that they simply aren't and were never socialized into as well, leaving them between a rock and a hard place, no matter how hard they try. it causes a lot of cognitive dissonance that sometimes leads to identifying as nonbinary or bigender or something on top to retain that aspect and signal to their friends that they can still do the things they used to do, when the whole thing could have been completely avoided in the first place. it's just fucking confusing for everyone involved.
 
FTM feels the wall approaching and wants to troon out, husband and kid get in the way. The comment section says unanimously: "He's abusive, leave him, your kid will thank you for destroying your marriage!!"

Re the dehodorants: why would he oppose you using mens dehodorants? They dont smell that different from womens and no one is going to notice you are using mens dehodorants. Maybe your husband isnt as hetero as you like to think he is.
Let's not be obtuse, men's deodorants do smell different from women's because men smell different from women. Men's deodorants also smell stronger than women's.

People on cross sex hormones uniformly smell like a burst sewer pipe. The fact that this troon even thinks of using deodorant at all is admirable.

It is also, sadly a self own because women have more sensitive smell receptors compared to men, and that is why she is raising such a stink (lol) over it.
Thanks for responding. Good point about the infanticide. I wonder if most women find it difficult to bond with their "rape babies" or if the hormones sort of overwhelm everything.
Rape is a strictly human construct, and a lot of animal mating behaviour can be seen as rape in a human lens (eg chickens). I believe there are theories that neolithic humans abandoned rape offspring.

Another thing that is a strictly human construct is abandonment of young. The majority of mammalia straight up eat their rejected offspring.

I wouldn't claim to know about the stats for these things, but general consesus seems to be that the chemicals responsible for "bonding" fire off close to due dates, and there is a high margin of error, enough that we can categorise all the different ways it can go wrong.
 
Let's not be obtuse, men's deodorants do smell different from women's because men smell different from women. Men's deodorants also smell stronger than women's.

People on cross sex hormones uniformly smell like a burst sewer pipe. The fact that this troon even thinks of using deodorant at all is admirable.

It is also, sadly a self own because women have more sensitive smell receptors compared to men, and that is why she is raising such a stink (lol) over it.

Rape is a strictly human construct, and a lot of animal mating behaviour can be seen as rape in a human lens (eg chickens). I believe there are theories that neolithic humans abandoned rape offspring.

Another thing that is a strictly human construct is abandonment of young. The majority of mammalia straight up eat their rejected offspring.

I wouldn't claim to know about the stats for these things, but general consesus seems to be that the chemicals responsible for "bonding" fire off close to due dates, and there is a high margin of error, enough that we can categorise all the different ways it can go wrong.
Other animals can also spontaneously abort their offspring if they're under stress. Humans have really fucked-up reproduction (look into how our placenta works for some nightmare fuel) and one theory for why that is is that our ancestors DID abort and abandon rape-babies.
 
What an evil man. These drugs make you DISABLED because it fucks your bones and teeth up. Also it's a drug that sterilizes children! This crazy sick fuck is calling for mass sterilization and child abuse.
In addition to the issue of sterilization, puberty blockers can cause life-long sexual dysfunction (inability to become aroused or experience orgasm).

Imagine being so fucked in the head that you think a child/teenager capable of truly comprehending what it means to give up your ability to ever have a family or a healthy sex life as an adult.

Not to mention that by troons’ own logic, the outcomes are poor. Puberty blockers result in micro penises, leaving insufficient tissue for what would be considered “the gold standard” (fuckin lol) of SRS.
 
The fact humans still rape means that somewhere along the line it became evolutionarily beneficial to do so. Men who raped passed their genetic material on. If all or most women abandoned or didn't bond with rape-babies, then rape would not have been beneficial and the behavior would have died out. I would hazard a guess that in long ago times it really wasn't seen as a problem, it was just how (some) men were. The same way as people used to kill each other on the regular. Humans were a violent species from the start
 
Back