Jesus those feet look like baby feet and legs. I get it's his art style that makes everything look pudgy and kiddie, but you'd think he could mix it up when drawing adults. He never used to draw adults in Assigned Male like that, those look like how he draws kids.
The tiger fleshlight story and all its comments are another example of this whole kink issue only turning into an problem when it's public, and people wilfully conflating that with any and all masturbation. "I bet this woman would hate it if her daughter had a dildo!" Yeah, if said daughter was bringing the dildo with her to the public water park around kids and waving it at her, she probably would hate it! If it stayed in her bedroom drawer and in private, she wouldn't even know about it or care. Like someone said earlier in the thread, if Guillaume had just kept this in private with other consenting adults, there would be no problem and nobody would even have known, or if someone leaked it (poor choice of words, sorry), people would think it was gross or make fun of it but they'd move on pretty fast and forget about it. The problem is he traced a real child's photo, and let his fetish colour so much of his public life, his public, child-centred art career, his public interactions with people, and that's why it's wrong. It's not about all sex or all masturbation being wrong, it's about it being the wrong time and place and children seeing it or being involved.