Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

1614864370298.png
 
> Robert Reich

What did you expect?

I'm good friends with a Bernie bro who managed to support Bernie despite being a Britbong. I remember telling him, several times, that Biden would fuck the progressives over, and I remember him saying that Bernie and AOC would magically convince Biden to pass socialist policies.

I've been polite enough to not mention what he said earlier when he rings me up and we start talking politics. [/powerlevel]

The word ”womxn” does not acknowledge the shortcoming [sic] of gender-binary [sic] language; it makes you look afraid of writing the word ”men”.

Does this mean that if you're black and refuse to wear a mask, you instantly get white privilege?
You get beaten up by cops because ACAB.
This is the problem I have with a lot of environmentalist movements. They insist that:
• solar and wind are inherently green and have no bad effects,
• nuclear is always bad because muh Chernobyl, and
• solar and wind will provide enough clean jobs to replace jobs lost by the closure of fossil fuel industries.

I'm an environmentalist. These people make us look ridiculous.
Maybe it's a stealth version of Uncle Ted. Undo the Industrial Revolution by making it nigh-impossible to power it, and once people have to pay $5/kWh and can't buy diesel or gasoline they'll beg to be taught how to live "in harmony with nature" by what remains of the noble savages. Leftist ideology since it was invented by Rousseau has been largely about getting the White Man to adopt the perceived ways of the Noble Savage.
 
Last edited:
Isn't seeing secret codes and messages that aren't really there a sign of serious mental illness like schizophrenia?
It honestly reminds me of the QAnon crowd's insistence that gematria is real and the fact things have the same values as each other in gematria means they're interconnected.
I once got very bored and started putting various historical kings' names into a gematria calculator to see what came up. If you put William the Conqueror's name into a gematria calculator, the names and phrases:
• President Donald John Trump
• Endgame Game of Thrones - season seven
• Call me Q - it works better
• He whom they pierced
• Soros, Antichrist mar MMVI
• Lord God's Vatican, Jesus
• Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
• Richest man in the world
• End times, Judas Iscariot
all come up. (source)
So either the first Norman King of England, Jeff Bezos, Q, AOC, Donald Trump, Judas, George Soros, the Pope and Jesus are all working on an alternate ending to Season 7 of Game of Thrones, or gematria is a load of bullshit. You decide.
And even that's not enough, it's like they despise people with different sexualities.
If they want allies, they should try not to denigrate everyone who would consider working with them.
Now where have I seen that before?
Let me remind you that the same people who think accusing people of anti-Semitism for saying that a person who happens to be a Jew held power behind the scenes is ”playing the antisemitic card” think mentioning George Soros means you want to gas the Jews.
 
Decolonisation did more harm than colonisation (with the exception of Belgian Congo, which was horrible). African infrastructure was built and maintained by the colonial powers and only started to fall apart with their departure.
The strange thing is that after the Belgium government took over control of Belgian Congo (as opposed to it being a personal fief of the Belgian King), the administration was exceedingly benign and that administration remains the only even vaguely functional government that the DRC has ever had.

In any case, most criticisms of colonialism tend not to care about the developmental impact, but tend to just be bizarre moral criticisms. They are A.J. Ayer's "meaningless grunts." Example, this woman extolling the superordinary badness of Australian settlement:
1614876060729.png

What in the fuck does that even mean? What even is a "no spiritual connection?" Why does it even matter? And the second part is just her saying that British settlement of Australia was very, very bad just because it was very, very bad because she feels it is so. But, why should anyone really care about any of this? How could I evaluate the truth of it? What - for example - violence counts? How do I compare the massive reduction in aboriginal mortality due to the disruption of traditional patterns of tribal warfare (violent mortality was 10-40% among men before contact) when cattle drovers moved in against the massacres perpetrated by those very same drovers? How 'unforseeable' is colonization when compared with any other event?

It's always just :optimistic:FEELINGS:optimistic:.

 
The most influential racecraft SJW right now is Ibram X. Kendi. Author of How to Be An Antiracist, and also a coward. The fucker is too scared to debate people with opposing views.
Coleman Hughes thinks he's a twat but doesn't say it outright. I like Hughes but Glenn Loury is more salty, which is my kinda thing.
 

I found about this online channel called Gorm TV that prides itself on "dissecting the societal issues of Irelad's Multicultural Generation" where pretty much all the speakers are black (because that's REAL diversity y'all) and full of imported racial politics pushing for hate crime laws. All these loony race activists never seem to understand that if making something a "hate crime" includes banning views that you don't agree with, you just end up stifling proper political conversations about real concerns people may have.

Here was one of the comments left on the video
comment.JPG
 
Last edited:
The most influential racecraft SJW right now is Ibram X. Kendi. Author of How to Be An Antiracist, and also a coward. The fucker is too scared to debate people with opposing views.
Coleman Hughes thinks he's a twat but doesn't say it outright. I like Hughes but Glenn Loury is more salty, which is my kinda thing.
Of course. He's only tough when he's in an echo chamber or has an advantage. Given the opportunity to debate on fair, even terms, he runs away because he can't shield himself with sychophants and authority figures. To be fair, this happens with any ideologue or fanatic who can't back up their beliefs with facts and logic.
 
All these loony race activists never seem to understand that if making something a "hate crime" includes banning views that you don't agree with, you just end up stifling proper political conversations about real concerns people may have.
I think that they know this. They're well aware that things always move towards their favour, that white people will bend over backwards (often without even being asked) until they break their own backs for them. They (the activists) have no intentions for the most part of having any sort of proper conversations, they only have intentions of grifting and nagging their way into power. As long as Ireland or any of these countries and its people continue to give in to and humour them then they get what they deserve as, edgy as that may sound.
 
The strange thing is that after the Belgium government took over control of Belgian Congo (as opposed to it being a personal fief of the Belgian King), the administration was exceedingly benign and that administration remains the only even vaguely functional government that the DRC has ever had.

In any case, most criticisms of colonialism tend not to care about the developmental impact, but tend to just be bizarre moral criticisms. They are A.J. Ayer's "meaningless grunts." Example, this woman extolling the superordinary badness of Australian settlement:
View attachment 1968648
What in the fuck does that even mean? What even is a "no spiritual connection?" Why does it even matter? And the second part is just her saying that British settlement of Australia was very, very bad just because it was very, very bad because she feels it is so. But, why should anyone really care about any of this? How could I evaluate the truth of it? What - for example - violence counts? How do I compare the massive reduction in aboriginal mortality due to the disruption of traditional patterns of tribal warfare (violent mortality was 10-40% among men before contact) when cattle drovers moved in against the massacres perpetrated by those very same drovers? How 'unforseeable' is colonization when compared with any other event?

It's always just :optimistic:FEELINGS:optimistic:.

View attachment 1968647
No doubt that woman whose tweet you posted has no moral issue with hordes of child-raping Pakis and psychotic, knife-wielding Windrush yardies being granted access to the UK. Because European Caucasian people don’t feel some mystical ‘connection to the land’ (despite being clearly the most environmentally aware cohort in human history), of course.
God save us from the moral pontifications of virtue signalling, privileged, middle class, white women.
 
1614899035240.png

Some people have given up hiding it.

Also imagine literally believing that the KKK & neo-nazis are still relevant . Then again admitting that these extremes are all offshoots of the Borderer and Virginia Cavalier culture (as defined by David Hackett Fischer) and that you desire to eradicate 1/4th to 1/2th of America's culture might turn some people off.
 
View attachment 1969529
Some people have given up hiding it.

Also imagine literally believing that the KKK & neo-nazis are still relevant . Then again admitting that these extremes are all offshoots of the Borderer and Virginia Cavalier culture (as defined by David Hackett Fischer) and that you desire to eradicate 1/4th to 1/2th of America's culture might turn some people off.
The KKK and neo-Nazi groups cannot be racist by today’s definition of the word.
Racism is now apparently ‘power plus prejudice’; as these groups have no power in society, they therefore are just prejudiced, not racist.
 
The KKK and neo-Nazi groups cannot be racist by today’s definition of the word.
Racism is now apparently ‘power plus prejudice’; as these groups have no power in society, they therefore are just prejudiced, not racist.
The workaround is wypipo always have power because of white privilege. Pay attention, as this will be on the test.

I then realized this joke was true and have started weeping.
 
The workaround is wypipo always have power because of white privilege. Pay attention, as this will be on the test.

I then realized this joke was true and have started weeping.
White people have power because of institutionalized white privilege.
White privilege exists because white people have institutionalized power.
The (((leftist solution))) to this chicken and egg problem is to just get rid of white people. Then the US can be a paradise like Haiti, Mozambique or Eritrea, where surely (((they))) won’t take advantage of their disparately high representation within ‘white’ power structures to continue keepin’ de po’ black man down.
I wholeheartedly agree with Brother Malcolm X. Black racial integration in the US is the fever dream of a lunatic. Whites, latinos, SE asians, (dot) Indians and more have managed to cobble together a somewhat functional melting-pot society. The jagged, broken bone bits in that pot’s stew are the race-baiting jews and their rabid, low-IQ, solipsistic, dysfunctional, violent, blame-externalising black attack dogs.
 
Back