Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Pepe is a caricature of French people. Obviously making fun of their self proclamation as the most "passionate" people on Earth. Pepe is a stinking, horny, and disgusting Frenchman. These cartoons were after all originally made for adults. The singular moral take away you could have from these light hearted short comedy is that what he's doing is wrong. Idk how these people can look at Pepe and think its condoning rape, no its obviously just Anglos making fun of French people as they have done for centuries at this point.
 
Last edited:
Some Sen. Kyrsten Sinema sperging. Context: she voted "no" on raising the minimum wage to $15 and Twitter is throwing the world's biggest collective hissy fit.

She was dressed like this:
View attachment 1973427

Which lead to chimpouts about her outfit/appearance.

Her press secretary defended her appearance:

View attachment 1973433

And so it became:

View attachment 1973436
View attachment 1973437

View attachment 1973438

View attachment 1973439
Funnily enough, she was a proponent of the minimum wage hike on Twitter.

The Betrayal EVERYONE Saw Coming 0-12 screenshot.png
 
Pepe Le Pew 'added to rape culture'

Oh FFS - what isn't "rape culture", or "racist", or "misogynist" in this insane freakshow Clown World of Current Year?

I really do miss the days when the cult of "woke" wasn't mainstream. When people usually didn't overthink things to see problems where none exist endlessly.
 
Whites are the best scapegoat because every ethic minority and especially whites with extreme white guilt, will turn out in large numbers to protests and riot.
White's also don't have an active social identity. It's very much a sleeping giant and we pretty much chloroformed it during that whole "Adolf Hitler" kerfuffle. Especially Boomers. I've heard from hardcore conservatives, one of which was the first major female lawyer in her state, that "Whiteness" isn't about "white people". They still think it's just the hippies.
 
It's an old, out of date trope about sleazy French lovers from movies of the era, I believe. But yes, the gag is that he's too stupid to realize that he's unappealing. He's not meant to be a hero, and you're not meant to identify with him. You're meant to laugh at him just like you'd laugh at the hero winning or saving the girl from the sleazy French fucks in the movies he's parodying.

The problem with Cultural Marxists like Charles is that he literally cannot understand that. The idea that you aren't supposed to identify with Pepe, and that he could be a negative role model, is completely incomprehensible to him.

They believe in this stupid discredited bullshit called cultivation theory. The theory is, you watch Wile Coyote and you'll suddenly go around dropping ACME brand Anvils on people, because that's "normalized behavior" in your worldview.
One of the reasons why all strong female characters are Mary Sues now is because according to the woke left, even the VILLAINS have to respect their cultural thinking.

I've seen trans Twitter REEEE because the villains were deadnaming people. That's why hero's can't come from a place of adversity anymore; the SJWs will REEE that they were in a bad situation in the first place. Which violates literally all basic rules of story telling.
 
White's also don't have an active social identity. It's very much a sleeping giant and we pretty much chloroformed it during that whole "Adolf Hitler" kerfuffle. Especially Boomers. I've heard from hardcore conservatives, one of which was the first major female lawyer in her state, that "Whiteness" isn't about "white people". They still think it's just the hippies.
Right. I always told white people that you guys are your own worst enemy at times. How I mean is that white people are the most individualistic people I have ever met in my life and while humans are not of hive mind like ants, I always felt individualism, liberalism and capitalism breeds alienation and despair. Basically a select few families and individuals ever rise to the top to enjoy the spoils. Popular political ideologies or religions have tried to fill the void but failed: They're more akin to a placebo rather than a cure to the problem.

You mentioned how female lawyer saw "whiteness" separate from "white people" but that's what the media has made it all about. In fact that's the very principles Western governments were based on: Liberty, small government, respect for the little man and religious freedom to boot. As such if the far left and SJW have their way, which they very are proving, anyone who agrees with those principals would be become public enemy no. 1. It's not that you're a fan of a controversial cartoon, but when it comes to your very own freedom is threatened you have to stand up for yourself or be trampled by the mob!
 
And yet they also try to insist they're intellectuals. Like this idiot:

we're intellectuals.jpg


Burning and trashing books because they conflict with your ideology is the pinnacle of anti-intellectualism. Also, this sort of shit reinforces my own belief that this is a sad low-level imitation of the Cultural Revolution.
 
And yet they also try to insist they're intellectuals. Like this idiot:

View attachment 1975757

Burning and trashing books because they conflict with your ideology is the pinnacle of anti-intellectualism. Also, this sort of shit reinforces my own belief that this is a sad low-level imitation of the Cultural Revolution.
I actually agree very much with the picture that you've posted. Liberals and Democrats tend to be on the "intellectual" side. I'm not saying that they tend to be particularly smart (or even smarter than their conservative and Republican counterparts), but they do tend to go into academic fields and brine themselves in academic settings. The issue is that the values of those settings are not necessarily all about sound logic and thinking and reason and evidence, rather they're now often about navel gazing, detached theoretical masturbatory practices and self-aggrandizing. The academic setting is increasingly not simply just useful; instead branching out and perverting itself by accommodating and promoting bureaucratic nonsense both within and outside of its institutions.

Furthermore, where this person surely thinks it's mostly social (particularly religious Christian, but never Muslim of course) conservatives who value emotion over logic, they are fundamentally correct here regarding the human condition and its propensity to favour emotion. And frankly their (the poster in the picture) mere recognition of this is actually a hell of a lot more than many conservatives have managed to achieve. The whole Ben Shapiro/online-Right autistic gotcha line of "Facts don't care about your feelings" sounds great sitting across from a stoned Joe Rogan who just says "Woooow, that's like, so true though... hey, have you ever tried DMT?" and it's all well and good if you're dunking on retarded 18-25 young adults at a college, but it doesn't really sway people on the liberal/left side of the spectrum and it does virtually nothing to catch the ear of people who aren't terribly engaged in any sort of culture war shit (and believe it or not there are tons of them who just want to watch football/The Bachelor and grill/get their boyfriends to order in Uber Eats). It's little more than a virtue signal to the people who already agree with you just like the progressive do and get deservedly bashed for by people like us here.

If you're talking about guns in the United States it's not enough to spam charts at them showing how gun violence is down over the years or statistics about who is doing most of the killing. You have to cater to emotions even if they do blend in with facts. You have to make it an issue about how your wife or daughter having a gun could be what saves them from a brutal rape or a forced watching of the new Coming to America movie sequel. You can't just give them cold hard breakdowns of why borders need to be enforced and why immigration needs to be heavily vetted with people who will instinctively blurt out "But the kids though, but we're a nation of immigrants though." The writer is definitely correct when they say that people pretty much just search for things that support them, I don't even think that needs to be expanded upon as we all see that play out regularly.

The only real big issues that I have with the poster is that I'm willing to bet that they have too wide of a range for who they're referring to as Christians who stray too far and warp the values of their faith. The other issue being that the poster likely vastly underestimates how fallible they and their side are, and how much like the Christians that they talk about they also don't live up to their ego and commitment of adhering to "Facts and Logic" and supposed intellectualism.
 
A recent issue of Scientific American of all things - everything really is political in Current Year - had the cover read "why social justice movements succeed", and claimed "BLM" is "carrying the torch" of the Civil Rights Movement.

Social "justice" "succeeded" because it was pushed by the elites since Occupy to keep people divided among themselves instead of united against the elites.
If your revolution is being supported by banks who proudly parade how revolutionary they are, it's probably not a revolution.
This is basically this meme:
27f.png

Oh, and abortion is mentioned in the Bible. Exodus 20:13 is a good place to start.
 
it's probably not a revolution

And yet they use cult-like thinking to convince you it is, or else you get excommunicated "cancelled".

basically this meme

"Liberals and Democrats tend to be intellectuals" they say, as they support stuff like removing "problematic" history and getting rid of "problematic" books.

Academia in the West is infested with "woke" and censors "wrongthink", so the only view that really makes it through is "woke". And so they proudly claim that "liberals are more educated".
 
You know recently with cancel culture going after celebs with stupid shit.
I can't wait for SJWs to go after The Rock. Now that guy disappointed me by supporting Biden and Harris. He falsly claims to be a centrist and called Harris "a badass".
I have feeling since cancel culture is going after people over stupid shit they said in the past.

I cant wait for them to go after him for this


"He treated Ben Shapiro like a human being reeeeeeing" . I can't wait for them to start claiming he's a fake liberal.
I just know it's coming. I mean I don't want this guy cancel. But I want him to learn what the group he's pleasing are really like.

I mean Rowling is liberal as fuck and they hate her simply for saying trans are not women.

I
 
Got more stupid Looney Tunes bullshit
View attachment 1975733
Never thought we see the day where a Pepe Le Pew short gets castrated for "rape culture."

If anything, it proves the opposite. Pepe Le Pew is trying to get a woman, but his stench and demeanor makes the woman uncomfortable. That's the joke.
 
Never thought we see the day where a Pepe Le Pew short gets castrated for "rape culture."

If anything, it proves the opposite. Pepe Le Pew is trying to get a woman, but his stench and demeanor makes the woman uncomfortable. That's the joke.
Plus, he NEVER gets the girl. It anything it showed us don't act like a creep.
 
Something I noticed about cancel culture and the people that "prosper" from it.

They have no sense of humor, no resemble of complexity, no subtly, no awareness.

Anything and everything is micro-analyzed, which defeats the purpose of entertainment. They're practically children. Whatever they see can and must be imitated. Rather than take responsibility or relax, they throw a tantrum and blame something else.

How dull does your life have to be to look at everything through a microscope while missing the grand point?

Everything is black and white, good and bad, light and dark. No in between. It's annoying.
 
Back