Superstraight Containment Station - No superphobes allowed!

From page 4 onwards theres barely memes and a sole repeat article, does this really need to turn into "troons bad" discussion when it should be "troons mad" and mocking their reaction? Post content not essays.
Why do people need to sperg about 1% again? Just laugh at mentally Ill people and have fun.
IMG_20210309_082125.jpg
Wow you are right this is definitly high quality content that needs to be on at least three threads no wonder you are so proud of being Kiwi Farm's best poster who contributes so, so much.
Crazy how it's been 5 pages since and you still haven't post shit, yet bitched at me for actually contributing on topic.
Seethe harder, at least I contribute instead of being a salty bitch like you.
 
What should we do line them up and shoot them? Or can we just discredit them using common sense and wit. I do not give a fuck what some assclown does with their body. There are simply put trans people who want to exist and not push insane politics. The people on twitter and other social media that say the insane shit are the ones to criticize, I do not personally like to make blanket statements on millions of people like they all think the same way.
Sounds good to me! You're not going to discredit people with full control of the media. You're incredibly naive if you think some twitter hashtag will make a difference. Gamergate tried the same thing and you can read the wikipedia article on that autismfest.

They put on a dress and say they're women. They're insane and no amount of white knighting from you will change that. There are no good transexuals being lead astray by bad ones. They are all mentally ill and they all need proper psychology help. Either men are men and women are women or neither statement is true. It's a black and white situation. You can't disown people from being transexual because you don't like them. They're you're freaks and you're responsible for every last one of them.

Yeah, it's right out of Rules for Radicals, "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules."
Rules for radicals is how you subvert things from a left wing perspective. That rule only works on people with a firm moral compass and ideals. You need some tradition and conservative values to make your enemy stick to if you want to use that tactic, which does not work on progressive ideologies.
 
Lol "I posted le funny reddit meme on three threads that is called contributing why do you sleep Winchester?"

he has contributed more to this thread than you have, and he is at least trying to have fun and post funny reactions to this shit, unlike you who is just seething and being unfun for no reason.

image tax

1615298535831.png
1615298809288.png



1615298615487.png
 
You are incredibly naive if you think we can just line them up and shoot them edge lord.
That's where the conflict between ideology always ends. Our society isn't the first to deal with transexuals grooming children and it won't be the last. Either the super straights or the transexuals are going to turn violent and start shooting.
 
That's where the conflict between ideology always ends. Our society isn't the first to deal with transexuals grooming children and it won't be the last. Either the super straights or the transexuals are going to turn violent and start shooting.
Who the fuck is talking about grooming children we are just laughing at the trans people who can't catch a date and are crying about the Super Straight movement, take that dark shit somewhere else.
 
Their logic is that trans women are women, and therefore straight men are by default attracted to them (extrapolate that to lesbians, gay men, etc). Take that to its natural conclusion, and you get the super straight argument of "well then anyone not attracted to trans people must be a non-normative sexual orientation" and using all their own rhetorical tools against them.

It incenses the trans rights activists, but at the same time it's 100% consistent with everything they've been advocating for.

Yeah, I get that, and I get the appeal of "It incenses the trans rights activists". But, even in shitposting meme-ideologies like this, it's still ceding ground to the pro-trans narrative, which still changes how people (both opponents and supporters) see these issues.

Same as a few years ago, when the troons were trying to push away from having people seeing the world in terms of "sex", trying to re-define things in terms of "gender"; The Sargonites and Kekistani-types responded by obsessively shit-posting about "only two genders"; That "only two genders" thing was largely just been a meme to "trigger' the SJWs"- But even today we see the fall-out of that; Today everyone, from shitposters on Reddit and the chans, right up to mainstream conservative media and senior politicians, discusses these issues in terms of "gender", "how many genders?", "what gender are they?'" etc. And virtually no-one discusses this stuff in terms of "sex" anymore.

"Only two genders" was mostly just shit-posting. But it still ended up ceding the ground, which got us to where, today even opponents of trans activists see these issues through the murky, subjective lens of "gender", rather than the fixed, objective terminology of "sex"- which was basically the overt, stated goal of the trans activists from the start... A goal which the "only two genders" shitposters helped the trans activists achieve.

Shitposting or not, letting your enemy define your terms like this, is a really bad idea. (Especially in an issue which is ABOUT the definition of terms, like the "trans" stuff) People may not START OFF taking these terms/definitions seriously, but eventually it just becomes 'what these words mean', once people start using them that way.
 
Who the fuck is talking about grooming children we are just laughing at the trans people who can't catch a date and are crying about the Super Straight movement, take that dark shit somewhere else.
Hello fellow normal people. Don't you think super straights are just as bad as trannies? Trannies are so bigoted but super straights are even more bigoted against trannies! Am I rite or am I rite?
 
I think the most illuminating thing that came from this is how the twitter trans people act when they are being pressed. The aggressive things they say, the violence inferred and the visceral way it is said like for example
2123123312.PNG

No wonder lesbians and men alike avoid these people. Even tomboys and dykes do not act this repulsive yet they are "Women", this is what you would expect in a call of duty match with shitty mics. This is disgusting.
 
Paying my context tax, because @Arm Pit Cream is being a retard, again. And there's an civil war brewing on Reddit.
Anytime people on Reddit have fun at the expense of the Reddit hivemind they get shut down pretty quickly. Sadly I don't see this subreddit surviving the weekend. As soon as one piece of bad press comes out about it they'll ban it.

Reddit doesn't actually give a shit about values or opinions, they just worry about negative press that causes them to look bad to the public and to potential advertising customers. That's why the original banwave happened (the one that banned /r/jailbait, /r/picsofdeadkids, and a few others). And I'd bet that's why places like /r/the_donald and /r/chapotraphouse got banned as well.

If you make Reddit look less friendly to advertisers, you're on borrowed time.
 
Last edited:
Back