Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Hilarity ensues when the nonsensical trans dogma doesn't translate well in other cultures. Hideki is a Japanese VGM composer who shitposts in half-decent English on twitter. He has a lot of Western, often woke followers (spergy video game audience) but he's a normal guy.
firefox_QLD5BxoqvC.png

GUYS HE DOESNT KNOW WHAT IT MEANS NOOOO HES FOREIGN HE CANT THINK FOR HIMSELF
Trannies in the replies cannot take it
firefox_N4G7A3iSUK.pngfirefox_nm1wShJCou.pngfirefox_KGBchXEThm.pngfirefox_yNG7Xe9RsG.pngfirefox_JTyuKsCd8f.pngfirefox_M8n3DVq59Z.pngfirefox_QUBPS3y4Bu.pngfirefox_cgvJcwbtnh.pngfirefox_fbG2xxMbIL.pngfirefox_wXUpedr58p.pngfirefox_0a2uAABnne.png

This is why I love this. It's like a juxtaposition of their utter insanity held directly up to the normality of just being.. straight.

source archive

Edit: 🕔 late!
 
Hilarity ensues when the nonsensical trans dogma doesn't translate well in other cultures. Hideki is a Japanese VGM composer who shitposts in half-decent English on twitter. He has a lot of Western, often woke followers (spergy video game audience) but he's a normal guy.
View attachment 1982064
GUYS HE DOESNT KNOW WHAT IT MEANS NOOOO HES FOREIGN HE CANT THINK FOR HIMSELF
Trannies in the replies cannot take it

This is why I love this. It's like a juxtaposition of their utter insanity held directly up to the normality of just being.. straight.

source archive

Edit: 🕔 late!
Surely, just repeating over and over again that he doesn't know what it means without explaining it beyond super vague "nazi rhetoric" will cause him to take it back, not look up what it means, and definitely means he wants to suck trans pp right
 
Surely, just repeating over and over again that he doesn't know what it means without explaining it beyond super vague "nazi rhetoric" will cause him to take it back, not look up what it means, and definitely means he wants to suck trans pp right
God, if he doubles down and says, "yes I know what it means" the hellfire it will cause, will be of insane proportions.
 
To the people finding this thread from Yahoo News: yes, we know it’s a fake sexuality created to make trans people look bad. It is also a joke, albeit one that is at trans people’s expense. And I recognise can be a very hard pill to swallow - “the idea that laughing at trans people is suddenly okay???” Trust me, I’ve been there.

Back when I was questioning my gender, I used to fucking hate those 'attack helicopter' jokes about non-binary people, because I always thought that the kind of people using them were complete assholes who hated folks like us for simply being ourselves. In reality, there are very few people who truly are like that. And almost anyone can tell the difference between a joke and someone’s actual views. Offensive humour does’t necessarily mean that you hate the groups in question. However, what does make someone hate an entire group is when that group produces such a disproportionate reaction to a harmless piece of humour about them. Like the poor guy who had to take down the Tiktok video because trans folks and their allies made threats on his mother’s life? If he didn’t hate trans people before, he’s probably going to hate them now.

And yes, I know you’ve probably been taught to believe that making fun of marginalised groups is never acceptable, so I can understand why you might still get defensive about this. In a way, I admire that. You are at least trying to do good. Anyway, I don’t expect you to understand immediately why policing people’s humour is not the way to go, but try to at least think about it. I for one have found it very hard to leave that mindset, even after I recognised it as toxic.

But, I hear you say, “humour should be punching up.” Well, let us entertain that notion, shall we? Because not everyone sees trans people as the vulnerable group that you see them as. To others, the rights that you are demanding on trans people’s behalf would give that group a disproportionate amount of power over people that surround them (if that hasn’t happened already), and they can and do abuse this power. I know you struggle to believe that trans people have any power at all, but for many people, the sign that they’ve gone too far is this:

The fact that trans people (and their cis allies) insist - nay, demand - that any given person must be open to the possibility of dating a trans person who they wouldn’t be attracted to, and that many, many people with power and influence support this notion.

This is one of many reasons why folks like these see their offensive humor as punching up against the people imposing rules upon them, rather than punching down against vulnerable people. Yes, there are still problems. I admit that it’s easier to make fun of trans people than cis allies, and that 99.9% of posts on this forum aren’t sympathetic to trans people in the slightest. But the more that people like you write them off as cruel-hearted bigots, the more you are going to fuel their resentment. So think very carefully about how you approach these topics in future. The other side may not always be right, but there is always another side when you’re dealing with other people.

The logic is simple: don’t treat people like assholes and they won’t have to act like one.
 
I have no idea what possessed Joe's admin to make trooning out America their first priority. Maybe the pharma lobby's been buying the most favors? Or it could lend credence to the theory that he's a Chinese puppet, maybe China thinks this is the best way to debilitate the country. In any case, you'd think they would wait at least a few months and try to do something crowd-pleasing first.
"Tell Joe he needs to put trannies in women's sports."
Xi-Jinping-presides.jpg
 
To the people finding this thread from Yahoo News: yes, we know it’s a fake sexuality created to make trans people look bad. It is also a joke, albeit one that is at trans people’s expense. And I recognise can be a very hard pill to swallow - “the idea that laughing at trans people is suddenly okay???” Trust me, I’ve been there.

Back when I was questioning my gender, I used to fucking hate those 'attack helicopter' jokes about non-binary people, because I always thought that the kind of people using them were complete assholes who hated folks like us for simply being ourselves. In reality, there are very few people who truly are like that. And almost anyone can tell the difference between a joke and someone’s actual views. Offensive humour does’t necessarily mean that you hate the groups in question. However, what does make someone hate an entire group is when that group produces such a disproportionate reaction to a harmless piece of humour about them. Like the poor guy who had to take down the Tiktok video because trans folks and their allies made threats on his mother’s life? If he didn’t hate trans people before, he’s probably going to hate them now.

And yes, I know you’ve probably been taught to believe that making fun of marginalised groups is never acceptable, so I can understand why you might still get defensive about this. In a way, I admire that. You are at least trying to do good. Anyway, I don’t expect you to understand immediately why policing people’s humour is not the way to go, but try to at least think about it. I for one have found it very hard to leave that mindset, even after I recognised it as toxic.

But, I hear you say, “humour should be punching up.” Well, let us entertain that notion, shall we? Because not everyone sees trans people as the vulnerable group that you see them as. To others, the rights that you are demanding on trans people’s behalf would give that group a disproportionate amount of power over people that surround them (if that hasn’t happened already), and they can and do abuse this power. I know you struggle to believe that trans people have any power at all, but for many people, the sign that they’ve gone too far is this:

The fact that trans people (and their cis allies) insist - nay, demand - that any given person must be open to the possibility of dating a trans person who they wouldn’t be attracted to, and that many, many people with power and influence support this notion.

This is one of many reasons why folks like these see their offensive humor as punching up against the people imposing rules upon them, rather than punching down against vulnerable people. Yes, there are still problems. I admit that it’s easier to make fun of trans people than cis allies, and that 99.9% of posts on this forum aren’t sympathetic to trans people in the slightest. But the more that people like you write them off as cruel-hearted bigots, the more you are going to fuel their resentment. So think very carefully about how you approach these topics in future. The other side may not always be right, but there is always another side when you’re dealing with other people.

The logic is simple: don’t treat people like assholes and they won’t have to act like one.
fanook
 
So we're quick to believe some random person on the internet who may well be making it up, but the moment sexual assault allegations come out against people we're politically/socially/culturally aligned with, we assume they're all false?
Yeah, that's exactly what I was thinking... that story could very well be false, so it's important not to get too invested in what's inevitably a case of he-said-she-said. Some sexual harassment allegations are more believable than others though, especially when the person in question (specifically I'm thinking of Andrew Cuomo here) actually backtracks from saying "no, I never did it" to "I was just playing around" or "I was lonely". If the person in question isn't guilty on some level, there would be absolutely no reason to start backpedaling from an outright denial. But, since in this case it's impossible for the accused to make any kind of response, or to prove that any of this ever even happened, it's important to take the allegation with a grain of salt.
 
One rule I've always lived by when judging people:

NEVER trust people who can't take a joke or laugh at themselves. If you can't take the slightest bit of ball busting or ribbing, then that tells me you have an ego that is as big as a mountain and as fragile as glass, and that does not make for a fun person to be around.

If a simple hastag on twitter is enough to send you into a tizzy, then you need help. Plain and simple.
 
I have no idea what possessed Joe's admin to make trooning out America their first priority. Maybe the pharma lobby's been buying the most favors? Or it could lend credence to the theory that he's a Chinese puppet, maybe China thinks this is the best way to debilitate the country. In any case, you'd think they would wait at least a few months and try to do something crowd-pleasing first.

In other news, this was posted on r/SuperStraight:
View attachment 1981477
Dunno if it's authentic, but it's certainly believable.

God damn, this makes me furious. Shows how much power the cancel cartel has and that people are fully aware of how they operate.
 
PenisNews is funded by Google? Fuck, I hate to sound like one of those assholes whining about Big Tech, but... fuck. That website is a cancer.
It appears it was a one-time grant in 2018, and I don't really like the way he phrased it. It's not completely bogus, but it reminds me of when I see anticapitalist radfems trying to draw financial links between stuff and fail, like the claim going around that the makers of Lupron "owned" netflix because a hedge fund owned shares in both companies.

Not that Google giving them a grant isn't garbage.
 
Back