Rhys is the kind of "scholar" who you would cite and the rest of your field would be like, "Um, who is that again? I'm not familiar with their work." And then you have to sheepishly admit, "Yeah, 'she's' kind of a fringe researcher into a very narrow subdiscipline... I couldn't find a better citation to be honest."
And then the rest of your colleagues coach you on how to find more mainstream reasearchers to bolster your arguments.
As an aside, Troony McTroonface should be eternally grateful that he didn't go into history. The arguments in that field are fucking BRUTAL, and nobody is given a pass simply because of their identity politics, at least not 15 years ago when I was part of it.
I once saw a troon similar to Rhys reduced to tears because his dissertation's underlying thesis got obliterated by a straight white man who cited a very common piece of fact about persecution in Nazi Germany that was readily available to anyone who cared enough to do their research. As much as I'd like to see him cry, it's probably better for everyone that he picked the softest of the Humanities, i.e. Philosophy, where no substantiation of fact is necessary.
For anyone who's interested, go look at the Goldhagen vs. Browning debate about intentionalism vs. functionalism. Here's a handy link if anyone's interested:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functionalism–intentionalism_debate
That's just one of many examples of History being downright nasty to those who can't hang. And since I know you're reading thism Rhys, why not try and throw your proverbial hat into the ring and teach some of those lazy historians what's what? Since you're a genius at everything and all...