The Abortion Debate Containment Thread - Put abortion sperging here.

Expurgate Contradictions said:
This coming from the same person who misconstrued my stance on state-funded voluntary sterilization is pretty rich. Tell me more about what my "definitions" are, incel.
Click to expand...
The fact that you even said it is retarded enough sorry.

Tell me why only women should have "voluntary" eugenics programs to prevent unwanted offspring when historically it's men fucking everything that moved that caused a surplus of bastard children in the world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Android raptor and Freya
Android raptor said:
Unless it has some horrible condition that causes it constant suffering that's incompatible with life. Then it has to stay plugged in to life support as long as possible and those evil doctors better not even think about letting the precious miracle finally have peace.

Seriously I swear on the rare occasion I see prolifers giving a shit about actual born kids it's always terminally ill completely hopeless cases like Tinslee or Alfie or Jaxon.
Click to expand...

I’m wondering where this constant assumption comes from. Apparently you can only care about a child before it is born or after? Not both? Doesn’t make sense to me - let’s be straight. These people don’t give a shit about religion. They don’t give a shit about God or what his will actually is. They’re all narcissists who use their children for clout and hide behind religion so people can’t come at them.

If a child is born and is in for a constant life of suffering and misery due to a medical mutation, Christians understand that at that point it’s probably best to let the child go. They don’t ignore context. Keeping them alive via man made machines doesn’t fit in with Gods will - it goes against it as others on this thread have said. That’s entirely different from wanting to not abort healthy babies that WON’T be born with such afflictions. And the majority ARE aborted out of convenience rather than any of those potential diseases. Stop confusing the two. These parents are sad stuck up people that want support from any community that is willing to agree with them. The pro life community is the best place to find that - I’m not going to act like there AREN’T pro life people that don’t support them by the way. But a baby being born with butterfly skin is an entirely different thing than a baby being born perfectly healthy and capable of having a happy life.

These tard baby parents will almost always be pro life but how many pro lifers actually think it’s God will to keep a baby alive that has 60 seizures a day? You get smacked in the face with the narcissistic attitude they have whenever they post 10 pictures a day of their potato baby in the incubator with ten tubes stuck in them. They constantly will not shut up about it. That’s when you know religion has nothing to do with this shit - using the Miracle word to cover up their sick game is classic Christian grifting.
 
  • Like
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Agree
Reactions: Puff, Exigent Circumcisions, Marchesa of the Vast and 16 others
CheezzyMach said:
The fact that you even said it is retarded enough sorry.

Tell me why only women should have "voluntary" eugenics programs to prevent unwanted offspring when historically it's men fucking everything that moved that caused a surplus of bastard children in the world.
Click to expand...
Well, if the men don't want to have children they can also volunteer to be sterilized, but since all men wouldn't volunteer the best way for a woman to guarantee she didn't get pregnant would be to have herself sterilized.

As far as it being eugenics (it's not but damn you're simple so let's pretend it is), what about your bodily autonomy stance? If women want to be sterilized who are you to say otherwise? A rapist incel, that's who.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: secret watcher and FEETLOAF
CheezzyMach said:
The fact that you even said it is retarded enough sorry.

Tell me why only women should have "voluntary" eugenics programs to prevent unwanted offspring when historically it's men fucking everything that moved that caused a surplus of bastard children in the world.
Click to expand...
I like how the instant your point gets questioned you just start whining about how everything in the world is men's faults and that no women are ever to blame for anything ever.
 
  • Feels
  • Dislike
  • Agree
Reactions: Lemmingwise, Muh Vagina, secret watcher and 2 others
Expurgate Contradictions said:
Well, if the men don't want to have children they can also volunteer to be sterilized, but since all men wouldn't volunteer the best way for a woman to guarantee she didn't get pregnant would be to have herself sterilized.

As far as it being eugenics (it's not but damn you're simple so let's pretend it is), what about your bodily autonomy stance? If women want to be sterilized who are you to say otherwise? A rapist incel, that's who.
Click to expand...
Nom Carver said:
I like how the instant your point gets questioned you just start whining about how everything in the world is men's faults and that no women are ever to blame for anything ever.
Click to expand...
I'm glad you both won't be having kids because they'd be retards.

Also lol, "women should get sterilized to prevent themselves from getting knocked up because not enough men would do it" Yeah I totally believe you aren't an incel when you unironically post shit like this.
 
  • Dislike
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Android raptor, Muh Vagina, secret watcher and 2 others
Expurgate Contradictions said:
Explain why that statement is wrong, then. You seem pretty smart, so try an argument.
Click to expand...
Explain why you think only women should be sterilized to prevent babycide but not men.

Also lol if you know men won't "volunteer" to get sterilized to "save the babies" why does your autistic brain think women would?
 
  • Like
  • Dislike
Reactions: Android raptor, Muh Vagina, secret watcher and 1 other person
CheezzyMach said:
"Also lol if you know men won't "volunteer" to get sterilized to "save the babies" why does your autistic brain think women would?"
Click to expand...
Scare quotes aren't an argument, they're just something SJW incels do when they're trying to REEEE people out of their safe space. Go to an abortion clinic if you want to feel at home amongst equals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: secret watcher and FEETLOAF
Expurgate Contradictions said:
Scare quotes aren't an argument, they're just something SJW incels do when they're trying to REEEE people out of their safe space. Go to an abortion clinic if you want to feel at home amongst equals.
Click to expand...
Lol I'm just repeating your exact words you fucking mong.

You're the one screeching libtard at me because you can't defend your retarded stance.
FEETLOAF said:
This is what I get a kick from. He said "could never become a child." You read "Isn't currently a child."
Basic rhetorical distinctions are just totally beyond you.
Click to expand...
Do you retards think women just reproduce asexually or something?

What do you think fertilizes the egg that becomes a fetus moron?
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: secret watcher
CheezzyMach said:
Lol I'm just repeating your exact words you fucking mong.

You're the one screeching libtard at me because you can't defend your retarded stance.

Do you retards think women just reproduce asexually or something?

What do you think fertilizes the egg that becomes a fetus moron?
Click to expand...
Taking action to end a fetus that would develop into a fully fledged human being on it's own should the parents not take action to end it, is totally different than sperm waiting in a dude's testicles waiting for them to take action to use said sperm to fertilize an egg.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: FEETLOAF, Megatardingo, secret watcher and 1 other person
SpumbleSplabloo said:
The Church is only accepting of abortions if they're fourth trimester or later.
Click to expand...
Touché.

In my opinion there's a wealth of difference between allowing a baby to pass away in comfort and tearing that baby apart in the womb. The more pro-abortion of you on this thread are welcome to disagree, but this isn't the thread for sperging about abortion in any case.
Android raptor said:
Then it has to stay plugged in to life support
Click to expand...
Not really. Keeping an ancephalic baby on life support when that would obviously be futile is extraordinary care; extraordinary care isn't obligatory.
 
  • Dumb
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Puff, Marchesa of the Vast, Bad Take Crucifier and 10 others
Nom Carver said:
Taking action to end a fetus that would develop into a fully fledged human being on it's own should the parents not take action to end it, is totally different than sperm waiting in a dude's testicles waiting for them to take action to use said sperm to fertilize an egg.
Click to expand...
What are you, some kind of book-reading faggot?
 
  • Like
Reactions: FEETLOAF
Nom Carver said:
Taking action to end a fetus that would develop into a fully fledged human being on it's own should the parents not take action to end it, is totally different than sperm waiting in a dude's testicles waiting for them to take action to use said sperm to fertilize an egg.
Click to expand...
A week old embryo is literally just a clump of cells that may develop into a fetus which then develops into a baby.

When this was pointed out to you by a couple of female Kiwis you all screeched about baby murder like retards and proved feminists have a point when they tell men to shut up about women's bodies.

Then one of you took it a step futher and started posting straight up incel shit as a "plan" to save the spermcells.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Android raptor and Muh Vagina
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back