Honestly, I like Stick of Truth better. It had a more coherent story and relied less on memberberries.
Quite literally as Memberberries were a collectable in FBW, lol.
I thought Stick of Truth was funnier and its quicker and faster style with its shorter run time made it an easy breazy play that was a blast. I went through it multiple times before playing FBW because it was easy to knock out fast, but still a ton of fun.
Also, I felt like SoT used up the best jokes and references to the show. FBW had more gold to mine, but most of the very best stuff I would want to see featured in a South Park game was used in the first game, understandably.
I also liked the wide variety of weapons in SoT which you could change and add qualifiers to have different effects and that was fun, whereas FBW just kind of lumped everything together with the artifacts.
That said, I think I preferred the combat in the 2nd game. The game board style allowed for a lot more strategy and it was fun to see all the different attacks of all the different players. Also, having more characters to choose from made it fun and I found myself switching people out as certain characters worked better in certain situations. Also, the DLC for FBW was a ton of fun and really added to the overall experience. I gotta say "Bring the Crunch" made me wish they'd make a Horror game next.
So I'd say I liked Stick of Truth more as the simpler approach made it more fun, the story was more concise, and heck, event the fantasy setting fit the game better than superheroes did. However, both games were great fun and I'm happy I finally got to play them.
