Sophie Labelle Verville / Guillaume Labelle / Serious Trans Vibes Comics / Assigned Male / Candycore Comics / Pastel Sexy Times / WafflesArt - Obnoxious webcomics and horrific porn by a crazy fat pedo troon

grimacefetishist said:
I hate the "but you RECOGNIZED IT AS PORNO so youre a perv too!" Argument, because it implies that kiddie porn is some obscure porn niche and not the reality as something that one in nine women are exposed to as children.
Click to expand...
Almost every person I've known who grew up online (including me) have a personal horror story about someone exposing it to them in plain sight on surface web sites like Facebook or 4chan. Literally one of the biggest criticisms of sites like Pornhub is that people have gotten away with posting CP and having it stay there for awhile despite the claims that "every video is reviewed". People act like it's some obscure niche only found on the deepest corners of the darkweb but that really isn't true.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: AssistantWeasel, Vibri, WalterPresson96 and 12 others
grimacefetishist said:
I hate the "but you RECOGNIZED IT AS PORNO so youre a perv too!" Argument, because it implies that kiddie porn is some obscure porn niche and not the reality as something that one in nine women are exposed to as children.
Click to expand...
It’s disingenuous. The Internet is full of creepy people posting their bizarre and disturbing fetishes. It doesn’t take a genius to spot when something’s designed to get a person off.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Vibri, WalterPresson96, The Littlest Shitlord and 15 others
grimacefetishist said:
I hate the "but you RECOGNIZED IT AS PORNO so youre a perv too!" Argument, because it implies that kiddie porn is some obscure porn niche and not the reality as something that one in nine women are exposed to as children.
Click to expand...
Also, out of context porn memes are a thing where you don't have to recognise anything more than that it's a cropped image from porn even if you don't know anything about the people involved.

It's even more disingenuous than @Tragi-Chan says because of how they'll turn right around and complain about things like drawings of women being sexualised. Because they're trying to claim recognising something as sexualised is the same as thinking it's sexy, or is something you can only do if you've seen it in a sexual context before, which blows a shitload of their wokescolding about fictional characters out of the water.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Vibri, WalterPresson96, coolguy69 and 5 others
Tragi-Chan said:
It’s disingenuous. The Internet is full of creepy people posting their bizarre and disturbing fetishes. It doesn’t take a genius to spot when something’s designed to get a person off.
Click to expand...
Porn has been described as (something like) “hard to define but you know it when you see it”. Some USA SC judge, I think. It’s true though, and you absolutely don’t have to be sexually interested in the content to recognise it for what it is. Who else is old enough to remember when “lemon party” and “goatse” were doing the rounds?
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Vibri, WalterPresson96, beautiful person and 11 others
I feel it's unfair to write off everyone defending the pool dog one as creeps.

It isn't pornographic and for a lot of the (presumably) older people, on Facebook especially, I can buy people not realizing it is fetish shit. Babyfurs just aren't something they'd run into and the art could be seen as completely innocent. If someone they look up to is telling them it's clean they'll believe.

What people need to do is spread more of his soiled diapers, and ones with clear provocative poses. Ones that even if you know nothing about the community you'll see as gross and weird.

artilleryfroth said:
Porn has been described as (something like) “hard to define but you know it when you see it”. Some USA SC judge, I think. It’s true though, and you absolutely don’t have to be sexually interested in the content to recognise it for what it is. Who else is old enough to remember when “lemon party” and “goatse” were doing the rounds?
Click to expand...
I don't know, I've always defined it by penetration or genitalia. You can have sexy bikini models on TV, it's titillating to most, but it's not considered porn. Fetish art is the same way to me. It's clearly meant to arouse specific groups of people but unless sex acts are being depicted it's not pornographic, just creepy.
 
  • Dumb
  • Disagree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: rosechupacabra, Vibri, Slime Tube and 19 others
Clorox Cowboy said:
I don't know, I've always defined it by penetration or genitalia. You can have sexy bikini models on TV, it's titillating to most, but it's not considered porn. Fetish art is the same way to me. It's clearly meant to arouse specific groups of people but unless sex acts are being depicted it's not pornographic, just creepy.
Click to expand...
That's "hardcore porn" though, "softcore porn " is still a thing in most people's eyes
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Vibri, Slime Tube, WalterPresson96 and 19 others
Next Task said:
Also, out of context porn memes are a thing where you don't have to recognise anything more than that it's a cropped image from porn even if you don't know anything about the people involved.

It's even more disingenuous than @Tragi-Chan says because of how they'll turn right around and complain about things like drawings of women being sexualised. Because they're trying to claim recognising something as sexualised is the same as thinking it's sexy, or is something you can only do if you've seen it in a sexual context before, which blows a shitload of their wokescolding about fictional characters out of the water.
Click to expand...
And they always scream about "kink shaming" when called out for their utterly disgusting perversions, while simultaneously throwing a tantrum about absolutely normal heterosexuality. We have reached a point where these fucking freaks even complain about women having normal adult breasts.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: rosechupacabra, Vibri, WalterPresson96 and 15 others
AnOminous said:
And they always scream about "kink shaming" when called out for their utterly disgusting perversions, while simultaneously throwing a tantrum about absolutely normal heterosexuality. We have reached a point where these fucking freaks even complain about women having normal adult breasts.
Click to expand...
Breasts are transphobic to transwomen, you bigot.
Seriously though, there’s nothing they won’t chimp out about.
They even complained that there were no “Transwomen” in HBO’s version of The Handmaid’s Tale. Ummm, wut..? Gay men and infertile women were killed before the story even really started. Total narcs.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: rosechupacabra, Vibri, WalterPresson96 and 17 others
artilleryfroth said:
They even complained that there were no “Transwomen” in HBO’s version of The Handmaid’s Tale. Ummm, wut..? Gay men and infertile women were killed before the story even really started. Total narcs.
Click to expand...

Just further instances of these loons wanting to make everything about their fucking lifestyle choices to force it into normalicy.

Ironically, in this specific instance, they want it enforced in a setting that I'm betting is far from normal. Admittedly, I've never read or seen Handmaid's Tale, the most I know is what a classmate years ago said in passing how it treated women as little more than baby factories.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vibri, farmer of pottery, WalterPresson96 and 4 others
Clorox Cowboy said:
I feel it's unfair to write off everyone defending the pool dog one as creeps.

It isn't pornographic and for a lot of the (presumably) older people, on Facebook especially, I can buy people not realizing it is fetish shit. Babyfurs just aren't something they'd run into and the art could be seen as completely innocent. If someone they look up to is telling them it's clean they'll believe.
Click to expand...
This is the truth, I've had to explain to more than one person why the pool dog is porn, precisely because the idea of being turned on by a diaper is so far removed from their notions of sexuality that they struggle to believe fetishists exist who would spaff off to that. After I explained it they were horrified, but without an explanation they truly thought was innocent art.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Vibri, WalterPresson96, kazuhiro and 11 others
Marshal Mannerheim said:
The problem was that the TV show's writers chose to interpret it as euphoric wokery instead of realising that it was an attempt to show Western feminists how badly Muslim fundamentalists treated women.
Click to expand...

The best thing about books is that every reader has their own interpretation.

This is simultaneously the worst thing about books.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Vibri, Lizard Pope, WalterPresson96 and 17 others
Repost
EwNSMEYVEAIoKfQ.jpeg

 
  • Lunacy
  • Optimistic
  • Dumb
Reactions: Vibri, Bixnood, WalterPresson96 and 20 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back