US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
View attachment 1988401
View attachment 1988402
View attachment 1988403
That's the same load of garbage from the tweet though. Invasion of Taiwan? Maybe? That seems very unlikely. Where? How? Why? An economic or cultural siege is cheaper and more effective than hardening the old Nationalists and then absorbing that pill into your nation to do untold damage from within.

Nuclear stockpiles? That's more meaningless scaremongering. The nation with ten nukes is no different than the nation with a thousand. It is just arguing over meaningless degrees of devastation.

Hogwash. All of it. I like your posts, but that one was a mediocre contribution and you should fuck a tranny for ten minutes as punishment.
 
That's the same load of garbage from the tweet though. Invasion of Taiwan? Maybe? That seems very unlikely. Where? How? Why? An economic or cultural siege is cheaper and more effective than hardening the old Nationalists and then absorbing that pill into your nation to do untold damage from within.

Nuclear stockpiles? That's more meaningless scaremongering. The nation with ten nukes is no different than the nation with a thousand. It is just arguing over meaningless degrees of devastation.

Hogwash. All of it. I like your posts, but that one was a mediocre contribution and you should fuck a tranny for ten minutes as punishment.
I just post what's said. And no I won't, I'm tomboy only.

1615488917755.png
 
Nuclear stockpiles? That's more meaningless scaremongering. The nation with ten nukes is no different than the nation with a thousand. It is just arguing over meaningless degrees of devastation.
There's a lot of difference.

Ten hits a nation the size of Russia or the US could handle. It would be extremely damaging, kill millions, but still, the nation could fight and possibly win the war anyway.

Plus, they'd need to hold some of those nukes back to handle the war itself, because it would be no holds barred after that.

Then, you have the different levels of nuclear weapons, from Pee-Wee tac-nukes to the big honking ICBM MIRV weapons to wipe out entire cities with multiple nuclear weapon hits. Then you've battlefield level nuclear weapons (like the W series artillery shells in the US arsenal)

A thousand, not so much.

Iran or even China having ten nukes (although LOL at Chinese construction on ICBM's) is something we can not only take on the chin, but strike back from and follow up with massive land, air, and sea attacks. A nuclear parity is FAR FAR more than ICBM's, and the big threat is hypersonic missiles with tactical warheads to offset our Pacific Fleet advantage. The only way to stop 1st and 3rd Armor Divisions would be a tactical nukes if they went full faceroll and China fucking knows it. Then you'd want the high atmosphere detonations over Omaha in the 800W EMP range to disrupt things. Oh, let's not forget you'd need to hit Hawaii, Guam, and the Phillipines too to make sure you knock out ALL of our naval power. Again, tactical weapons for the latter. ICBM for the former, probably with an enhanced jacketing to make sure you can pump the EMP up high enough.

So yeah, the stockpiles DO make a difference.

So, guess you better get behind him for your 10 minutes with that ignorant ass shit.
 
There's a lot of difference.

Ten hits a nation the size of Russia or the US could handle. It would be extremely damaging, kill millions, but still, the nation could fight and possibly win the war anyway.

Plus, they'd need to hold some of those nukes back to handle the war itself, because it would be no holds barred after that.

Then, you have the different levels of nuclear weapons, from Pee-Wee tac-nukes to the big honking ICBM MIRV weapons to wipe out entire cities with multiple nuclear weapon hits. Then you've battlefield level nuclear weapons (like the W series artillery shells in the US arsenal)

A thousand, not so much.

Iran or even China having ten nukes (although LOL at Chinese construction on ICBM's) is something we can not only take on the chin, but strike back from and follow up with massive land, air, and sea attacks. A nuclear parity is FAR FAR more than ICBM's, and the big threat is hypersonic missiles with tactical warheads to offset our Pacific Fleet advantage.

So yeah, the stockpiles DO make a difference.

So, guess you better get behind him for your 10 minutes with that ignorant ass shit.
No fuck you nigger.
 
No fuck you nigger.
Well, on that, there is something that I've noticed that does bother me quite a bit, speaking of nuclear weapons and tactical strikes and all of that.

Anyone else notice how whenever you see Biden, you see Kamala, Pelosi, AND Schumer?

Yeah, it's not unheard of, but it seems like every time the Crapper in Chief is seen in public, you have those three right there.

The conspiracy theory side of me keeps REEEeeeing over how much all four of them are hanging together from a security standpoint.

I get it that Schumer and Pelosi have to control their senile pants shitting puppet and Kamala's ego won't let her be away from any decision at all, but having those four people constantly together seems like a huge fucking security risk and headache for the security detail.,

Eh, it's probably nothing, just confirmation bias and me being paranoid again.
 
No fuck you nigger.
Too late, you already promised. Freshen up, bend over and unclench.
China can't do shit. We'd bomb them back to the stone-age and they know it. It's easier to just slowly take over the economy and media.
If America fucks up, China would collapse. They're gaining plenty of ground and trying to fix themselves somewhat successfully, but they're still a paper tiger.
 
That's the same load of garbage from the tweet though. Invasion of Taiwan? Maybe? That seems very unlikely. Where? How? Why? An economic or cultural siege is cheaper and more effective than hardening the old Nationalists and then absorbing that pill into your nation to do untold damage from within.

Nuclear stockpiles? That's more meaningless scaremongering. The nation with ten nukes is no different than the nation with a thousand. It is just arguing over meaningless degrees of devastation.

Hogwash. All of it. I like your posts, but that one was a mediocre contribution and you should fuck a tranny for ten minutes as punishment.

The main concern is allowing China to have a blue water navy which leads to them controlling the South China Sea.

This causes a problem with all of our diplomatic influence over the pacific. Many countries do not want China to have naval control over that region.

Combined with China's belt/road initative: Hypothetically, China could have a stranglehold over trade infustracture with a navy to back it up.

They're not even close to this right now, but military spending is built on projections. So, the military has to start to increase naval projection now. They have to filter funding to meet the potential threat in the future.

Granted, its all convient to keep the military industrial complex going. But, is it rooted in some sort of reality? Potentially.

I do think China should be viewed as an adversary...
 
Well, on that, there is something that I've noticed that does bother me quite a bit, speaking of nuclear weapons and tactical strikes and all of that.

Anyone else notice how whenever you see Biden, you see Kamala, Pelosi, AND Schumer?

Yeah, it's not unheard of, but it seems like every time the Crapper in Chief is seen in public, you have those three right there.

The conspiracy theory side of me keeps REEEeeeing over how much all four of them are hanging together from a security standpoint.

I get it that Schumer and Pelosi have to control their senile pants shitting puppet and Kamala's ego won't let her be away from any decision at all, but having those four people constantly together seems like a huge fucking security risk and headache for the security detail.,

Eh, it's probably nothing, just confirmation bias and me being paranoid again.
Pelosi and Kamala have already asked for them to get the nuclear codes, so you aren't.
 
What is it they have such a hard on over finding? I'm outta coffee and super foggy, so
You're not considering a key aspect, which is ORANGE MAN BAD.

They are still seething over things like Pelosi asking Trump to delay the State of the Union address back in 2019, due to the shutdown. In response, Trump fired back and cancelled Pelosi's trip overseas the next day, an hour before they were set to leave, allegedly they were already on a bus to the airport lol.

unnamed.jpg

They are going to stop at no lengths to get revenge because there are plenty of other instances, both known and unknown, where he treated them like they deserved to be treated.
 
Well, on that, there is something that I've noticed that does bother me quite a bit, speaking of nuclear weapons and tactical strikes and all of that.

Anyone else notice how whenever you see Biden, you see Kamala, Pelosi, AND Schumer?

Yeah, it's not unheard of, but it seems like every time the Crapper in Chief is seen in public, you have those three right there.

The conspiracy theory side of me keeps REEEeeeing over how much all four of them are hanging together from a security standpoint.

I get it that Schumer and Pelosi have to control their senile pants shitting puppet and Kamala's ego won't let her be away from any decision at all, but having those four people constantly together seems like a huge fucking security risk and headache for the security detail.,

Eh, it's probably nothing, just confirmation bias and me being paranoid again.
Tim Kaine Introduced a bill to strip Biden of his war powers last week. So no, you're not paranoid.

(Or maybe you are, but that's the beauty of paranoia; you only have to be right once).
What is it they have such a hard on over finding?
Still looking for that elusive, white whale line item of "to Vladimir Putin to steal elections (which cannot be rigged or stolen)".
 
Y'know, out of all the things that piss me off about the Biden administration, this is the one that pisses me off the most.

A very close family member of mine is suffering from Alzheimer's (not for much longer, thankfully - she's in hospice right now), and let me tell you - Alzheimer's is NOT PRETTY. Talking to people who aren't there, spontaneously crying for no reason, staying up all night and sleeping all day, urinating on the floor - shit sucked, hard. She's actually older than Creepy Joe, too, by about 2 years. Not 20 years ago, she was a perfectly normal, if a bit feisty, old lady. Seeing her decline like that was pretty devastating for us, my grandmother especially. The fact that the LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD not only clearly exhibits some of the same symptoms, but is paraded around as if nothing were wrong with him at all, sickens me to my very core, and I hope his puppet masters rot in the deepest bowels of Hell when they kick the bucket.

TL;DR: Alzheimer's ain't no joke, and the MSM are acting like it is. FUCK. THEM.
Normally I'd feel bad but Biden carved this hell out for himself over his half century in the swamp.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back