So according to Phil, Anony told Phil that all of this stuff is an attempt to get him in trouble and that it isn't true. Given his current silence, Anony may have sobered up and regretted his contact with us and is already crawling back, Swaggy-style.
Phil isn't sure what anyone wants him to do with info that Anony was here.
There is no clandestine, secret, conversations with the mods. There are conversation, but it's all mundane. Nothing interesting! Seriously! The word 'mundane' is repeated three times! Why does anyone care!
It's when people don't have access to something, people get curious, according to Phil. If someone went to get chat logs and dumped them on the internet, there is nothing even in there. There is no point to any of this, it's fake drama.
Phil refers to the dumped chat logs! They don't prove anything! They could be faked! He could fake them! He'd have to download a program but he could make them!
If a mod of Phil's turns out to be someone dishonest and wants to hurt him (he can't fathom why), it'd be disheartening.
It happened before... he goes into his victim story about Marle playing him.
He then proceeds to get deliberately distracted by a stream chat poll after his victim rant and never really finishes this line of thought.
He of course didn't mention how he talks to the mods, or where these chat logs are. That information alone could be a smoking gun, neglecting that he has lied for years about using Discord, and it could be linked to Champions.
My thought is when we found that he deleted his Discord account previously, it was in case this happened so now he has a different Discord account from the first one connected to Champions. Even if Anony leaks something, if it's recent, then Phil may have already covered his tracks on that one. At best, we might get him calling OiC autistic like Sidella.
He is also building in that any leaks could be fake, and that they must be fake because nothing real could actually be harmful in there. I also like that he implies the previous leaks were fake, but doesn't actually say it. Creating himself a little semantic loophole there.
EDIT: Our conspiracies are getting shit on again.
A court would not give a bankruptcy to someone who blew the money on mobile games.
They would if you lied and told them it was a business expense.
But if there is another reason for the tens of thousands of dollars that has disappeared at this point, by all means... let us know, Phil.
And feel free to explain what the microtransactions are.
EDIT 2: Phil is happy that nothing stupid or controversial has happened for the last year and a half.
The bankruptcy that exposed his finances and that he makes over $100k annually after lying about it... that... wasn't anything?
EDIT 3: Phil got baited into talking about the mobile game issue. We claim he is 'crazy addict' (hi Phil!) and that was why he had to declare bankruptcy.
Phil says he doesn't know who this is - an impersonator trying to get him in trouble, some bad luck coincidence... it's suspect that it was his Twitter handle because they should have used his real full name from various accounts, not his Twitter handle. Phil again defends NotDSP as being a poor innocent victim. How fucking suspect.
He has nothing he can show us that would prove or disprove anything.
IF he were trying to show anything about mobile games from the past, we would move the goal posts and use it to try to hurt him further (again confirming he has blown a fortune elsewhere).
He never once mentions showing us his Champions account...
We're trying to paint him as a liar and 'an addictive guy' who blew all his money. He openly admitted that he used to spend money on mobile games. He confirms he played WWE Supercard. He neglects to mention that he admitted he also plays Champions. He hasn't played since Kat moved in - something he has also admitted is not the case, and he played on the plane to CT. Again, he got his bankruptcy, so this disproves everything. Yet we keep looking for 'a smoking gun'.